Peano dimension of fundamental groups
Gregory Conner, Curtis Kent

TL;DR
This paper introduces the Peano dimension for fundamental groups, generalizes geometric dimension, and proves the conjecture relating it to homotopy dimension for certain continua, addressing a longstanding question.
Contribution
It defines the Peano dimension for fundamental groups and proves its equality with homotopy dimension for one-dimensional or planar Peano continua.
Findings
Peano dimension generalizes geometric dimension for groups.
Conjecture confirmed for one-dimensional and planar cases.
Addresses Cannon and Conner's 2007 question.
Abstract
We define the Peano dimension for groups arising as fundamental groups, which generalizes the classical definition of geometric dimension of finitely presented groups. We conjecture that the Peano dimension of the fundamental group of a aspherical Peano continuum is equal to the homotopy dimension of . We prove the conjecture for one-dimensional or planar Peano continua. This answers a question posed by Cannon and Conner in 2007 concerning the homotopy dimension of planar sets.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Peano dimension of fundamental groups
Gregory R Conner1
and
Curtis Kent2
Abstract.
We define the Peano dimension for groups arising as fundamental groups, which generalizes the classical definition of geometric dimension of finitely presented groups. We conjecture that the Peano dimension of the fundamental group of a aspherical Peano continuum is equal to the homotopy dimension of . We prove the conjecture for one-dimensional or planar Peano continua. This answers a question posed by Cannon and Conner in 2007 concerning the homotopy dimension of planar sets.
1Supported by Simons Foundation Collaboration Grant 646221.
2Supported by Simons Foundation Collaboration Grant 587001.
1. Introduction
The geometric group theory concerns itself with the relationships between algebraic properties of groups and topological and geometric properties of spaces on which they act. The geometric dimension and cohomological dimension of a group form a classical and well-used pair of notions relating them. These two dimensions coincide for finitely presented groups (except in dimension 2 where their equality is the Eilenberg-Ganea conjecture) and form a basis for many standard constructions and arguments in the area. The reason for their utility is that cohomological dimension has a purely algebraic definition while geometric dimension is entirely topological. This allows one to move back and forth between the worlds of algebra and topology – with the standard Galois correspondence from covering space theory as a major tool.
Unfortunately for fundamental groups of non-locally contractible spaces and other uncountable groups both of these notions are very difficult to compute. In [3], Cannon and Conner consider the notion of homotopy dimension and discern which subspaces of the plane can be homotoped to be one-dimensional. Their constructions are topological in nature. The key advantages of homotopy dimension are that it is defined in a much broader context and it agrees with geometric dimension for finitely presented groups.
The geometric dimension of a finitely presented group is the minimal dimension of a space with fundamental group and contractible universal cover. Such spaces for fundamental groups of locally complicated spaces are unwieldy. Alternatively, one could replace the requirement of having a contractible universal cover with the property that all higher homotopy groups are trivial. This property is equivalent when considering CW-complexes but allows for potentially nicer spaces for many uncountable groups, e.g. fundamental groups of spaces with arbitrarily small essential loops. Thus we will define a dimension for groups arising as fundamental groups of spaces with nontrivial local algebraic topology as follows.
Definition 1.1**.**
The Peano dimension of a group is the minimum covering dimension among aspherical Peano continua with fundamental group , if any such Peano continua exist. The Peano dimension of is undefined if there does not exits an aspherical Peano continuum with fundamental group .
The geometric dimension of a finitely presented group is equal to its cohomological dimension whenever the cohomological dimension is not 2 [9, 16, 17]. Thus the fundamental group of the Hawaiian earring has geometric dimension at least 2, cohomological dimension at least 2, Peano dimension 1, and homotopy dimension 1. Thus homotopy dimension and the Peano dimension create a better matching of spaces to fundamental groups than cohomological dimension and geometric dimension for many locally complicated spaces.
The homotopy dimension of a space is the minimum covering dimension among all Hausdorff spaces homotopy equivalent to it. The classical notion of homotopy dimension is a natural mixture of homotopy and topology and has been studied by several authors, see [3, 15, 19]. It is an exercise to show that the geometric dimension of a finitely presented group is the homotopy dimension of any space.
We make the following conjecture relating the Peano dimension of fundamental groups to the homotopy dimension of an aspherical Peano continua with the prescribed fundamental group, which we prove for planar and one-dimensional Peano continua.
Conjecture 1**.**
If is an aspherical Peano continuum with fundamental group , then the Peano dimension of is the homotopy dimension of .
Note the conjecture simply states that any two aspherical Peano continua with isomorphic fundamental groups have the same homotopy dimension. Thus the homotopy dimension would be an invariant of the fundamental group in this setting.
Both planar spaces and one-dimensional spaces are aspherical [4]. Thus to prove Conjecture 1 for planar or one-dimensional Peano continua, we need only prove the following:
Theorem 1.2**.**
- (1)
A planar Peano continuum with homotopy dimension one is homotopy equivalent to a one-dimensional planar Peano continuum. 2. (2)
In the class comprised of the union of one-dimensional Peano continua and planar Peano continua, the fundamental group determines the homotopy dimension.
Every contractible space has homotopy dimension zero, and every planar continuum has homotopy dimension at most two. The space obtained by filling one removed square of the Sierpinski carpet gives an example of a planar continuum with homotopy dimension exactly two [4]. In fact, there exist uncountably many non-homotopy equivalent planar continua with homotopy dimension exactly two [14]. Theorem 1.2 gives us the following corollary, which answers Question 1.6 of [3].
Corollary 1.3**.**
Let be a planar Peano continuum. Then has homotopy dimension one if and only if the fundamental group of is isomorphic to the fundamental group of a non-contractible one-dimensional Peano continuum.
We will also show that the properties of being homotopically a Peano continuum, homotopically one-dimensional, or homotopically planar are rigid in the following sense.
Theorem 1.4**.**
Let be a topological space. If is homotopy equivalent to spaces and where is one-dimensional and is a Peano continuum, then is homotopy equivalent to a one-dimensional Peano continuum. If, in addition, is homotopy equivalent to a planar set, then is isomorphic to the fundamental group of a one-dimensional planar Peano continuum.
Cannon and Conner showed that the fundamental group of a planar Peano continuum always embeds into the fundamental group of a one-dimensional Peano continuum [3]. Theorem 1.2 shows that Cannon and Conner’s embedding can never be surjective, if the planar continuum has homotopy dimension two. Thus there exists a planar continuum with homotopy dimension two whose fundamental group embeds into the fundamental group of a one-dimensional space.
While the fundamental group determines the topology of the set of points at which a planar or one-dimensional Peano continuum is not locally simply connected [6, 7], Theorem 1.2 shows that there exist planar Peano continua with non-isomorphic fundamental groups, and the set of points at which they are not locally simply connected are homeomorphic (see Proposition 6.1).
In a subsequent paper [13] by the second author, it is proved that in the union of the set of planar Peano continua and the set of one-dimensional Peano continua the fundamental group is a perfect invariant of the homotopy type. Note that this subsequent result, while related, does not imply Theorem 1.2, since Theorem 1.2 requires one to consider the situation when a planar Peano continuum has the fundamental group of an arbitrarily one-dimensional Hausdorff space, which is not covered in [13]. The work in [13] depends on an extensive and technical study of homotopies of planar sets. Here, on the other hand, we give a shorter and independent proof of Theorem 1.2 that illustrates how the classical Phragmén-Brouwer properties, [20, p. 47], can be used to reduce many questions about planar continua to the appropriate questions for one-dimensional continua. Theorem 1.2 also holds when is allowed to be the complement of a discrete set in (see Theorem 4.1), which does not follow from the results in [13].
2. Codiscrete subsets of
Cannon and Conner showed that every planar Peano continuum is homotopy equivalent to a nice subset of the -sphere which can be easier to manipulate than a general planar continuum. A subset of the -sphere, , is codiscrete if it is the complement of a discrete set.
Theorem 2.1** ([3, Theorem 1.2]).**
Every Peano continuum in the 2-sphere is homotopy equivalent to a codiscrete subset of . Conversely, every codiscrete subset of is homotopy equivalent to a Peano continuum in .
We will use Theorem 2.1 and Theorem 4.1 to prove Theorem 1.2.
Definition 2.2**.**
If is a codiscrete subset of , let be the discrete complement of in and be the set of accumulation points of . It is immediate that is the set of points at which is not semilocally simply connected. For any space , we will use to denote the set of points at which is not semilocally simply connected.
Cannon and Conner were able to prove the following topological characterization of codiscrete subsets of with homotopy dimension at most one [3].
Theorem 2.3** (Cannon & Conner).**
Suppose that is a codiscrete subset of the two-sphere . Then is homotopically at most one-dimensional if and only if the following two conditions are satisfied.
- (i)
Every component of contains a point of . 2. (ii)
If is any closed disk in the two-sphere , then the components of that do not contain any point of form a null sequence.
When the codiscrete space satisfies the two conditions of Theorem 2.3, Cannon and Conner actually build a deformation retraction of onto a one-dimensional subset of (see [3, p. 60]), which implies the following corollary.
Corollary 2.4** (Cannon & Conner).**
Suppose that is a codiscrete subset of the two-sphere satisfying both conditions of Theorem 2.3, then is homotopy equivalent to a one-dimensional planar continuum.
The idea for the proof of Theorem 2.3 is to use the holes arising from to push the two-dimensional components of onto some nice one-dimensional core. The problem is that puncturing the Warsaw disc (the closure of the bounded component of complement of the Warsaw circle in the plane) at any finite set of points is insufficient to be able to retract it onto any one-dimensional subset. Thus condition (ii) must be used to guarantee sufficient punctures to build nice retracts.
To prove Theorem 1.2, we will use Theorem 3.10 to find a continuous function between the corresponding codiscrete subsets of the two-sphere which induces an isomorphism of the fundamental groups. The key step in the proof that is new here is the ability to recognize conditions (i) and (ii) from the fundamental group. Section 4 is dedicated to showing that if a continuous function between a codiscrete sets induces an isomorphism on the fundamental group and factors through a map into a one-dimensional space then the conditions of Theorem 2.3 must be satisfied.
3. Studying codiscrete subsets of
The following are standard definitions that we present here to fix notation.
Definition 3.1**.**
Let and . When no confusion will arise from suppressing the superscript in our notations for balls and spheres, we will do so. If is a planar set then and . For non-degenerate sets , we will use to denote the -neighborhood of in .
If , we will use to denote the topological closure of in . When is understood, the closure will be denoted simply by . We will denote the unit circle in the plane by and the unit sphere in by .
Let \alpha:\bigl{(}[0,a],0,a\bigr{)}\to\bigl{(}X,x_{0},x_{1}\bigr{)} be a path. Then \overline{\alpha}:\bigl{(}[0,a],0,a\bigr{)}\to\bigl{(}X,x_{1},x_{0}\bigr{)} is the path defined by . A path \alpha:\bigl{(}[0,a],0,a\bigr{)}\to\bigl{(}X,x_{0},x_{1}\bigr{)} induces a change of base point isomorphism defined by .
A space is locally simply connected at if every neighborhood of contains a simply connected neighborhood of . A space is semilocally simply connected at if there exists a neighborhood of such that the inclusion induced homomorphism is trivial. A space is locally simply connected (or semilocally simply connected) if it is at each its points.
Definition 3.2**.**
Let be subsets of a topological space . A closed subset of separates and , if there exists disjoint open subsets of such that , , and .
Theorem 3.3**.**
[18, Corollary 4.5.12]** Let be a non-empty topological space. Then the covering dimension of is at most if and only if for every pair of disjoint closed subsets of there exists a closed 0-dimensional subset of that separates from .
Lemma 3.4** ([7, Lemma 5.5]).**
Suppose that is a topological space and has a planar or one-dimensional open neighborhood. Then every open neighborhood of contains an open neighborhood of such that no essential loop in can be freely homotoped out of .
This also proves the following well-known fact.
Corollary 3.5**.**
A planar or one-dimensional set is semilocally simply connected if and only if it is locally simply connected.
Lemma 3.6**.**
Let be a closed connected subset of . Then each component of is simply connected.
Sketch of proof..
Let be a component of and suppose that is a loop in . Since and are disjoint compact sets, is homotopic in by a straight line homotopy to a polygonal path . Suppose that is a simple closed subpath of . Since is connected exactly one of the components of can intersect and the component not intersecting must be contained in which implies that is nullhomotopic in .
Since is a polygonal path it can be reduced to the constant path by a finite process of replacing simply closed subpaths by constant paths. By the previous argument, this process preserves the homotopy class and thus is nullhomotopic in . ∎
When we say separates in , we mean that and is not contained in a single connected component of .
Lemma 3.7**.**
Let be a codiscrete subset of and such that . Then and if separates in then separates in .
Proof.
Since and , we have .
Since separates in there exists a continuous function which is non-constant on . For each there exists such that \bigl{\{}B^{\mathbb{S}^{2}}_{\epsilon_{d}}(d)\mid d\in D(X)\bigr{\}} is a cover of by disjoint open balls each of which intersects at a unique point and is disjoint from . Thus is constant on . Then we can define by on and making constant on each ball . It is immediate that is continuous. Since was non-constant on so is . Then and are disjoint open sets and both intersect which implies they both intersect . Hence is non-constant on . ∎
Lemma 3.8**.**
Let be a codiscrete subset of and an open subset of whose closure is a proper subset of . Fix and . For every there exists a simply closed curve in which is essential in .
Proof.
Fix and and . Let be a component of which separates . Let be the component of which contains . By Lemma 3.7, is simply connected. After possible passing to a subset of which still separates and , we may assume that . By the Riemann Mapping Theorem there exists a homeomorphism . We may assume that and .
Then is a compact set which contains , hence is also compact. We can find an such that f(C)\subset B_{M}\bigl{(}(0,0)\bigr{)}=B.
Then is a simple closed curve which separates and . Notice that might intersect . However after perturbing near its intersections with , we may also assume that it is contained in both and . (However, can not necessarily be homotoped off of .)
∎
We will require the following technical lemma concerning separating components of point preimages.
Lemma 3.9**.**
Suppose that is a continuous map where is a codiscrete subset of . Fix such that separates in . Then either \operatorname{cl}_{\mathbb{S}^{2}}\bigl{(}A\bigr{)}\cap D(X)\neq\emptyset for every component of which separates in and is disjoint from or the induced map on fundamental groups is not injective.
Proof.
Fix such that separates in . Suppose that is a component of which separates in , is disjoint from , and \operatorname{cl}_{\mathbb{S}^{2}}\bigl{(}A\bigr{)}\cap D(X)=\emptyset.
Notice that \operatorname{cl}_{\mathbb{S}^{2}}\bigl{(}A\bigr{)}\cap D(X)=\emptyset implies that \operatorname{cl}_{\mathbb{S}^{2}}\bigl{(}A\bigr{)}=\operatorname{cl}_{X}(A). Since is a component of , it is a maximal connected subset of the closed set which implies that . Hence is a connected closed subset of .
Since , there exists such that . Let be a component of such that and \bigl{(}\mathbb{S}^{2}\backslash\operatorname{cl}_{\mathbb{S}^{2}}(U)\bigr{)}\cap D(X)\neq\emptyset. Let and d\in\bigl{(}\mathbb{S}^{2}\backslash\operatorname{cl}_{\mathbb{S}^{2}}(U\bigr{)}\cap D(X). This is possible since separates in .
By Lemma 3.8, there exists a simple closed curve which is homotopically essential in . Hence is also homotopically essential in .
Let be the disc in with boundary parameterized by that does not contain . By construction, the components of are either contained in or have boundary contained in . Hence the map extends to a map by sending each of the components bounded by to and letting agree with on the components contained in . Thus extends to a map of the disc and has a nontrivial kernel.
∎
We will use the following theorem that arbitrary homomorphisms of the fundamental groups of planar and one-dimensional Peano continua are induced by continuous maps.
Theorem 3.10** ([8], [7],[14]).**
Let and be one-dimensional or planar Peano continua and a homomorphism of their fundamental groups. Then there exists a continuous function and a path such that where is the change of base-point isomorphism induced by .
When and are one-dimensional this was proved by Eda. When is one-dimensional and is planar this was done by Conner and Kent. When is planar and is one-dimensional or planar this was proved by Kent.
The following lemma is an easy exercise which will be left to the reader.
Lemma 3.11**.**
Suppose that is a continuous function and is a continuous map such that d\bigl{(}\alpha(t),f\circ\alpha(t)\bigr{)}<d\bigl{(}\alpha(t),\{c,d\}\bigr{)} where the metric on the 2-sphere is the standard CAT(1) metric. If is nullhomotopic, then is nullhomotopic in .
Lemma 3.12** ([7, Lemma 2.10]).**
Let be a one-dimensional or planar topological space. Suppose that and are two null sequences of essential loops based at and respectively. If is freely homotopic to for all , then . If is also a Peano continuum and there exists a loop such that is homotopic rel endpoints to for all , then is a nullhomotopic loop.
Proposition 3.13**.**
Let be a one-dimensional or planar Peano continuum and fix . If is a nontrivial inner automorphism, then is not induced by a continuous function.
Proof.
Suppose that there exists a continuous function such that is an inner automorphism. Then there exists a loop at such that f_{*}([s])=\hat{\gamma}\bigl{(}[s]\bigr{)}=[\overline{\gamma}*s*\gamma] for all loops based at . Since , there exists a null sequence of essential loops at . Then and are null sequences of loops which are conjugate by ; hence Lemma 3.12 implies that is nullhomotopic. Thus is the identity homomorphism.
∎
Lemma 3.14**.**
Let be a one-dimensional or planar Peano continuum and a planar or one-dimensional topological space. Suppose that is a homotopy equivalence with homotopy inverse . Then and, for every , (k\circ h)_{*}=id_{\pi_{1}\bigl{(}\bar{X},k(x)\bigr{)}}. Similarly and, for every , (h\circ k)_{*}=id_{\pi_{1}\bigl{(}X,x\bigr{)}}.
Proof.
Let be any planar or one-dimensional space and . Suppose that is a continuous map such that is the identity on . Then for all by Lemma 3.12. Thus and .
Then [12, Lemma 1.19] together with Lemma 3.12 imply that and are the identity automorphisms on \pi_{1}\bigl{(}\bar{X},k(x)\bigr{)} and \pi_{1}\bigl{(}X,x\bigr{)}, respectively. (In the notation of [12], the change of basepoint isomorphism of Lemma 1.19 must be the constant path by Lemma 3.12.) ∎
Lemma 3.15**.**
Let be a one-dimensional or planar Peano continuum and a planar or one-dimensional topological space. Suppose that and are homotopy equivalences. If and is an inner automorphism, then is an inner automorphism of \pi_{1}\bigr{(}\bar{X},k(x)\bigl{)}. If, in addition, is the identity on \pi_{1}\bigl{(}\bar{X},k(x)\bigr{)}, then is the identity homomorphism on .
Proof.
If is an inner automorphism, then there exists such that \phi([s])=\hat{\gamma}\bigl{(}[s]\bigr{)}=[\overline{\gamma}*s*\gamma] for all loops based at . For any loop based at , we have that is homotopic rel endpoints to and k_{*}\circ\phi\circ h_{*}\bigl{(}[\alpha]\bigr{)}=k_{*}\circ\phi\bigl{(}[h\circ\alpha]\bigr{)}=k_{*}\bigl{(}[\overline{\gamma}*(h\circ\alpha)*\gamma]=\bigl{[}(k\circ\overline{\gamma})*(k\circ h\circ\alpha)*(k\circ\gamma)\bigr{]}=\bigl{[}(\overline{k\circ\gamma})*\alpha*(k\circ\gamma)\bigr{]}. Thus is an inner automorphism.
Suppose that, in addition to being an inner automorphism, is the identity on \pi_{1}\bigl{(}\bar{X},k(x)\bigr{)}. Then for any loop based at , we have that [\alpha]=k_{*}\circ\phi\circ h_{*}\bigl{(}[\alpha]\bigr{)}=\bigl{[}(\overline{k\circ\gamma})*\alpha*(k\circ\gamma)\bigr{]}. Lemma 3.12 implies that is nullhomotopic. Since is a homotopy equivalence, is injective and must by nullhomotopic. Thus is the identity homomorphism. ∎
Lemma 3.16**.**
If are planar or one-dimensional Peano continua with isomorphic fundamental groups then there exit continuous maps and such that for some and .
Proof.
A planar or one-dimensional Peano continua is locally simply connected if and only if it has countable fundamental group, see [5, Theorem 3.1] in the planar case and [2, Theorem 5.9] in the one-dimensional case. Thus if , then and both and are homotopy equivalent to a finite wedge of circles in which case the lemma is standard.
Thus we need only concern ourselves with the case that . Fix . By Theorem 3.10 there exists a continuous function such that is an isomorphism. We can apply Theorem 3.10 again to find continuous maps and such that . Then is a change of basepoint isomorphism. Hence defines an isomorphism from to for all .
Let be a null sequence of essential loops based at . Notice that is homotopic to and freely homotopic to . Applying Lemma 3.12 to and gives that . Thus is a loop based at and is an inner automorphism. Lemma 3.13 implies that is the identity on as desired.
∎
The following is a technical lemma from Cannon and Conner’s proof of Theorem 2.3 that is a slight strengthening of condition (ii), see [3, Lemma 4.3].
Lemma 3.17** (Annulus Lemma).**
Suppose that is a codiscrete subset of the 2-sphere for which condition (ii) of Theorem 2.3 fails. Then there exists a closed annulus in and infinitely many components of such that intersect both boundary components of and for all .
4. Proof of Theorem 4.1
Theorem 4.1**.**
Let be a codiscrete subset of the 2-sphere, . Then is homotopy equivalent to a one-dimensional Peano continuum if and only if is isomorphic to the fundamental group of a one-dimensional planar Peano continuum.
This section will be dedicated to the proof of Theorem 4.1. If is homotopy equivalent to a one-dimensional Peano continuum, then any homotopy equivalence induces an isomorphism of fundamental groups. Thus we need only prove that if the fundamental group of a codiscrete set is isomorphic to the fundamental group of a one-dimensional Peano continuum then is homotopy equivalent to a one-dimensional Peano continuum.
For the remainder of the section, we will fix a codiscrete subset of and a one-dimensional Peano continuum such that is isomorphic to . Note that if is locally simply connected, then is a finitely punctured sphere and is homotopy equivalent to a bouquet of finitely many circles. Thus the theorem is trivial if is locally simply connected. Thus we may assume that is not locally simply connected and fix .
Lemma 4.2**.**
There exists continuous maps and such that and .
Proof.
By Theorem 2.1 exists a planar Peano continuum and homotopy equivalences and . Since , by Lemma 3.14.
By Lemma 3.16, there exists maps and such that g_{1}\circ f_{1}\bigl{(}k(x_{0})\bigr{)}=k(x_{0}) and (g_{1}\circ f_{1})_{*}=id_{\pi_{1}\bigl{(}\bar{X},k(x_{0})\bigr{)}}.
Then and . By Lemma 3.14 . So and are the desired maps. ∎
Using the notation from Lemma 4.2, we will now fix and such that and where and are homotopy equivalences of with a planar Peano continuum.
Lemma 4.3**.**
If , then , any path is homotopic rel endpoints to , and induces the identity homomorphism on .
Proof.
Fix and a path . By Lemma 3.12, we have that . Let be an essential loop based at . Since is the identity on we have is homotopic rel endpoints to . Hence is homotopic rel endpoints to . Thus defines an inner automorphism of , which by Lemma 3.15 implies that is an inner automorphism. Since is induced by a continuous function, it is the identity on \pi_{1}\bigl{(}\bar{X},k(x)\bigr{)} by Lemma 3.15. By Lemma 3.13, induces the identity homomorphism on . Hence is nullhomotopic and is homotopic rel endpoints to .
∎
Lemma 4.4**.**
The codiscrete space satisfies condition (i) of Theorem 2.3.
Proof.
Suppose there exists a component of such that . Notice that this implies that is compact.
Case 1: is not simply connected. Then has at least two distinct boundary components. Let where are disjoint nonempty closed sets and intersects both sets.
Then are disjoint closed subsets of a one-dimensional Peano continuum. Hence there exists a [math]-dimensional subspace of which separates . Let be a boundary component of contained in for .
Since is connected any set which separates boundary components of must intersect . Since is disjoint from any component of which intersects must be contained in . Therefore there exists a component of which separates and is contained in .
By hypothesis and which implies that . Then Lemma 3.7 implies that separates in .
Since is [math]-dimensional and is connected, is constant on and Lemma 3.9 implies that is not injective which is a contradiction.
Case 2: is simply connected. Fix and \epsilon=d\bigl{(}x_{1},B(X)\bigr{)}>0. Since and , we have that separates and any point of . Thus d\bigl{(}x_{1},D(X)\bigr{)}\geq d\bigl{(}x_{1},B(X)\bigr{)}. Choose such that d\bigl{(}g\circ f(x),g\circ f(y)\bigr{)}<\epsilon/4 for every with .
By Lemma 3.8, there exists a simply closed curve which is homotopically essential in for any fixed .
For every there exists a such that and we have
[TABLE]
Since bounds a disc in , must factor through a dendrite and hence so does . Thus is nullhomotopic in . However is homotopically essential in which contradicts Lemma 3.11.
∎
Lemma 4.5**.**
Suppose that is a simply closed curve in and is a sequence of open subsets of such that is contained in a connected component of . Then converges to [math].
Proof.
Let be a homeomorphism. Fix a sequence of open subsets of such that is contained in a connected component of . Let be the connected component of J\backslash\bigcup\limits_{i\neq n}\operatorname{cl}\bigl{(}W_{i}\bigr{)} containing .
Since is compact, it can only contain finitely many disjoint open intervals of diameter greater than any fixed . Thus for all but finitely many , which implies that for all but finitely many . ∎
Lemma 4.6**.**
* satisfies condition (ii) of Theorem 2.3.*
Proof.
By way of contradiction, suppose that does not satisfy (ii) of Theorem 2.3.
By Lemma 3.17, there exists a closed annulus in and components of such that interests both boundary components of and for all . Let and be the boundary components of .
Since and is a component of , we have that . This implies that and hence \operatorname{cl}_{X}\bigl{(}\bigcup\limits_{n}U_{n}\bigr{)} is compact. (This follows since \operatorname{cl}_{X}\bigl{(}\bigcup\limits_{n}U_{n}\bigr{)}\backslash\bigl{(}\bigcup\limits_{n}U_{n}\bigr{)}\subset B(X).)
The boundary of has two types of points.
- Type (1)
Points that are contained in . When restricted to these points, the map is a homeomorphism and is the identity. 2. Type (2)
Points which are on . A priori we have not control over what or does on these types of points. So we have to insure that for sufficiently large the diameter of the set of points in of this type is sufficiently small.
Since each is open and has closure intersecting both and , there exists an and a sequence of points such that d\bigl{(}x_{n},J_{1}\cup J_{2}\bigr{)}\geq 4\epsilon_{1} for some . We may also fix such that d\bigl{(}c,U_{n}\bigr{)}>4\epsilon_{1} for all (by possible passing to a cofinal subsequence of and choosing a smaller ).
Fix such that d\bigl{(}g\circ f(x),g\circ f(y)\bigr{)}<\epsilon_{1} for all x,y\in\operatorname{cl}_{X}\Bigl{(}\bigcup\limits_{n}U_{n}\Bigr{)} with .
Fix such that d\bigl{(}g\circ f(x),g\circ f(y)\bigr{)}<\delta_{1} for all x,y\in\operatorname{cl}_{X}\Bigl{(}\bigcup\limits_{n}U_{n}\Bigr{)} with .
Since each is open and connected in and intersects both boundary components of A, is contained in a connected component of for . The by Lemma 4.5 and both converge to [math], i.e. the set of points of of Type (2) can be partitioned into two subsets each of which has small diameter. Hence we can fix an such that \max\bigl{\{}\operatorname{diam}(U_{n_{0}}\cap J_{1}),\operatorname{diam}(U_{n_{0}}\cap J_{2})\bigr{\}}<\delta_{2}. Let be the component of U_{n_{0}}\backslash\operatorname{cl}_{X}\bigl{(}\mathcal{N}_{2\delta_{1}}(\partial A)\bigr{)} containing .
Case 1: is not simply connected. Then has a boundary component such d\bigl{(}C_{1},x\bigr{)}\geq 2\delta_{1} for all points of Type 2. Let be the component of which intersects both and . Since \max\bigl{\{}\operatorname{diam}(U_{n_{0}}\cap J_{1}),\operatorname{diam}(U_{n_{0}}\cap J_{2})\bigr{\}}<\delta_{2} and restricts to a homeomorphism on , we see that and are disjoint closed sets.
Then f\bigl{(}\partial U_{n_{0}}\bigr{)} has at least two distinct components. Let where are disjoint nonempty closed sets with for and .
Hence there exists a [math]-dimensional subspace of which separates . Then separates which implies that a single component of separates . Since is disjoint from , is a subset and . By hypothesis and which implies that .
By construction, separates so Lemma 3.7 implies that separates in . Since is [math]-dimensional and is connected, is constant on and Lemma 3.9 implies that is not injective which is a contradiction.
Case 2: is simply connected.
Let 4\epsilon_{2}=\min\bigl{\{}d(x_{n_{0}},\partial U_{n_{0}}),4\epsilon_{1}\bigr{\}}. We can choose such that 4d\bigl{(}g\circ f(x),g\circ f(y)\bigr{)}<\epsilon_{2} for all with .
By Lemma 3.8, there exists a simply closed curve which is homotopically essential in . Since and we have that d\bigl{(}\operatorname{Im}(\alpha),c\bigr{)}\geq 4\epsilon_{1}. Points on are on or at least from . We now need to show that d\bigl{(}x,g\circ f(x)\bigr{)}<d\bigl{(}x,\{x_{n_{0}},c\}\bigr{)} for every . This breaks down into two case corresponding to whether is close to or far from (at least ).
Subcase 1: d\bigl{(}x,\partial U_{n_{0}}\bigr{)}\leq\delta_{3}. Then d\bigl{(}x,x_{n_{0}}\bigr{)}>4\epsilon_{2}-\delta_{3} and such that . Thus
[TABLE]
Subcase 2: d\bigl{(}\alpha(t),\partial U_{n_{0}}\bigr{)}>\delta_{3}. Then there exists such that and . This implies that . Since has diameter at most for , there exists such that . Thus
[TABLE]
Since bounds a disc in , must factor through a dendrite and hence so does . However is homotopically essential in which contradicts Corollary 3.11.
∎
Thus by Theorem 2.3 and Corollary 2.4, is homotopy equivalent to a one-dimensional planar Peano continuum, which completes the proof of Theorem 4.1.
5. Proof of Theorem 1.2
Lemma 5.1**.**
Let be a one-dimensional path-connected Hausdorff space and a path-connected subset of such that the inclusion map induces an isomorphism. Then any path with p\bigl{(}(0,1)\bigr{)}\subset X\backslash A and is a nullhomotopic loop.
Proof.
Fix a path with p\bigl{(}(0,1\bigr{)}\subset X\backslash A. Let be the reduced representative of . If is a non-degenerate loop, we may assume that \tilde{p}\bigl{(}(0,1)\bigr{)}\subset X\backslash A. Let be any reduced path in from to . Then is a reduced path, since \tilde{p}\bigl{(}(0,1)\bigr{)}\cap q\bigl{(}[0,1]\bigr{)}=\emptyset or is a degenerate loop. Since the inclusion map induces an isomorphism on fundamental groups, every essential reduced loop is contained in . Thus must be a degenerate loop and is a nullhomotopic loop. ∎
Corollary 5.2**.**
Let be a one-dimensional path-connected Hausdorff space and a path-connected closed subset of such that the inclusion map induces an isomorphism. Then every reduced path starting and ending in is contained in .
Proposition 5.3**.**
Let be a Peano continuum and a one-dimensional Hausdorff space. Suppose that is a homotopy equivalence. Then is homotopy equivalent to the one-dimensional Peano continuum .
Proof.
Let be a homotopy equivalence with homotopy inverse . Then there exists maps and such that and . Since is a homotopy equivalence, gives an isomorphism for any choice of base points. Define by for all . Then where is the inclusion map. Thus i_{*}:\pi_{1}\bigl{(}f(X),f(x_{0})\bigr{)}\to\pi_{1}\bigl{(}Y,f(x_{0})\bigr{)} is surjective, since is surjective. By [2, Corollary 3.3], the inclusion induced homomorphism from \pi_{1}\bigl{(}f(X),f(x_{0})\bigr{)} to \pi_{1}\bigl{(}Y,f(x_{0})\bigr{)} is injective. Thus is an isomorphism and \pi_{1}\bigl{(}Y,f(x_{0})\bigr{)} is isomorphic to \pi_{1}\bigr{(}f(X),f(x_{0})\bigl{)}. Thus every reduced path starting and ending in is contained in . Then for every , the path has reduced representative contained in . By the Hahn-Mazurkiewicz Theorem, the continuous image of a Peano continuum in Hausdorff space is a Peano continuum. Thus is a Peano continuum and by [4, Theorem 3.9] there exists a parametrization of such that given by is continuous. Thus are homotopy inverses and is homotopy equivalent to .
∎
For convenience, we will restate Theorem 1.2 and Theorem 1.4 before proving them.
Theorem 1.2.
- (1)
A planar Peano continuum with homotopy dimension one is homotopy equivalent to a one-dimensional planar Peano continuum. 2. (2)
In the class comprised of the union of one-dimensional Peano continua and planar Peano continua, the fundamental group determines the homotopy dimension.
Proof of Theorem 1.2.
Statement (1): Let be a planar Peano continuum and suppose that has homotopy dimension one. Then is homotopy equivalent to a codiscrete subset of the two-sphere which satisfies both conditions of Theorem 2.1. By Corollary 2.4, we have that is homotopy equivalent to a one-dimensional planar continuum. Thus Proposition 5.3 implies that is homotopy equivalent to a planar one-dimensional Peano continuum contained in .
Statement (2): A simply connected one-dimensional Peano continuum is a dendrite, which implies contractible. Thus we need only consider planar Peano continua. Suppose that is a planar Peano continuum and that there exists a one-dimensional Peano continuum such that is isomorphic to . By Theorem 2.1, is homotopy equivalent to a codiscrete subset of , which by Theorem 4.1 is homotopy equivalent to some one-dimensional Peano continuum. Thus is homotopy equivalent to a one-dimensional Peano continuum. If the one-dimensional Peano continuum is simply connected, then it is contractible, which would imply that is also contractible.
∎
Corollary 5.4**.**
Let be a planar Peano continuum. Then has homotopy dimension one if and only if the fundamental group of is isomorphic to the fundamental group of a non-contractible one-dimensional Peano continuum.
Theorem 1.4.
Let be a topological space. If is homotopy equivalent to spaces and where is one-dimensional and is a Peano continuum, then is homotopy equivalent to a one-dimensional Peano continuum. If, in addition, is homotopy equivalent to a planar set, then is isomorphic to the fundamental group of a one-dimensional planar Peano continuum.
Proof of Theorem 1.4.
Let be a topological space and suppose that is homotopy equivalent to spaces and where is one-dimensional and is a Peano continuum. By Proposition 5.3, we have that is homotopy equivalent to a one-dimensional Peano continuum contained in and hence so is .
Suppose, in addition, that is homotopy equivalent to a planar set . Let be a homotopy equivalence with homotopy inverse . Then f_{2*}\bigl{(}\pi_{1}\bigl{(}g_{2}(Y_{2}),g_{2}(y_{2})\bigr{)}\bigr{)} is isomorphic to by Proposition 5.3. Since is an isomorphism, we have that \pi_{1}\bigl{(}g_{2}(Y_{2}),g_{2}(y_{2})\bigr{)} is isomorphic to . By Theorem 1.2, we have that is homotopy equivalent to a one-dimensional planar Peano continuum. ∎
6. Example
Proposition 6.1**.**
The set of points at which a planar Peano continuum is not locally simply connected is not a perfect invariant of the homotopy type or of the fundamental group.
Proof.
In [4] Cannon, Conner, and Zastrow proved that a filled Sierpinski carpet is not homotopy equivalent to the standard Sierpinski carpet. Specifically they showed that the filled Sierpinksi carpet has homotopy dimension two while the Sierpinski carpet has homotopy dimension one while the set of points at which they are not locally simply connected is the same for both. By applying Theorem 1.2 to this example, we can see that the Sierpinksi carpet and the filled Sierpinksi carpet cannot have isomorphic fundamental groups. ∎
The fundamental group determines the set with its topology, as well as the homotopy dimension for a planar Peano continuum . Thus a natural question is what other topologically defined properties of a planar continuum are determined by the fundamental group.
The following is an example of two planar Peano continua with the same homotopy dimensions for which it is unknown if they have isomorphic fundamental groups or if they are homotopy equivalent.
Example 6.2**.**
A Warsaw circle is a space homeomorphic to
[TABLE]
Notice that every Warsaw circle is tamely embedded into , i.e. the complement has exactly two simply connected components. Let be a Warsaw circle in with complementary components . Let be a null sequence of open discs in with limit set . Let and .
Since there is no continuous map fixing which interchanges the complementary components of in , it is not clear if and should be homotopy equivalent or not.
Question 2**.**
Are and homotopy equivalent? Or possible weaker, do they have isomorphic fundamental groups?
Question 3**.**
If and are not homotopy equivalent, is there an invariant that can be used to distinguish between these two spaces?
The reference list from the paper itself. Each links out to its DOI / PubMed record.
- 1[1] Jeremy Brazas. Semicoverings: a generalization of covering space theory. Homology Homotopy Appl. , 14(1):33–63, 2012.
- 2[2] J. W. Cannon and G. R. Conner. On the fundamental groups of one-dimensional spaces. Topology Appl. , 153(14):2648–2672, 2006.
- 3[3] J. W. Cannon and G. R. Conner. The homotopy dimension of codiscrete subsets of the 2-sphere 𝕊 2 superscript 𝕊 2 \mathbb{S}^{2} . Fund. Math. , 197:35–66, 2007.
- 4[4] J. W. Cannon, G. R. Conner, and A. Zastrow. One-dimensional sets and planar sets are aspherical. Topology Appl. , 120(1-2):23–45, 2002. In memory of T. Benny Rushing.
- 5[5] G. R. Conner and J. W. Lamoreaux. On the existence of universal covering spaces for metric spaces and subsets of the Euclidean plane. Fund. Math. , 187(2):95–110, 2005.
- 6[6] G.R. Conner and K. Eda. Fundamental groups having the whole information of spaces. Topology Appl. , 146/147:317–328, 2005.
- 7[7] Gregory Conner and Curtis Kent. Fundamental groups of locally connected subsets of the plane. Adv. Math. , 347:384–407, 2019.
- 8[8] K. Eda. The fundamental groups of one-dimensional spaces and spatial homomorphisms. Topology Appl. , 123(3):479–505, 2002.
