# IoT Localization for Bistatic Passive UHF RFID Systems with 3D Radiation   Pattern

**Authors:** Bekir Sait Ciftler, Abdullah Kadri, and Ismail Guvenc

arXiv: 1702.04398 · 2017-05-01

## TL;DR

This paper analyzes the accuracy of 3D radiation pattern-based localization in passive UHF RFID systems, highlighting the impact of antenna configuration and orientation on IoT positioning performance.

## Contribution

It derives the CRLB for RFID localization accuracy considering 3D antenna patterns and compares it with maximum likelihood estimators for different configurations.

## Key findings

- Bistatic configuration improves localization accuracy.
- Localization accuracy degrades at blind spots outside main beam.
- Optimizing antenna elevation enhances coverage.

## Abstract

Passive Radio-Frequency IDentification (RFID) systems carry critical importance for Internet of Things (IoT) applications due to their energy harvesting capabilities. RFID based position estimation, in particular, is expected to facilitate a wide array of location based services for IoT applications with low-power requirements. In this paper, considering monostatic and bistatic configurations and 3D antenna radiation pattern, we investigate the accuracy of received signal strength based wireless localization using passive ultra high frequency (UHF) RFID systems. The Cramer-Rao Lower Bound (CRLB) for the localization accuracy is derived, and is compared with the accuracy of maximum likelihood estimators for various RFID antenna configurations. Numerical results show that due to RFID tag/antenna sensitivity, and the directional antenna pattern, the localization accuracy can degrade at blind locations that remain outside of the RFID reader antennas' main beam patterns. In such cases optimizing elevation angle of antennas are shown to improve localization coverage, while using bistatic configuration improves localization accuracy significantly.

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1702.04398/full.md

## Figures

17 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1702.04398/full.md

## References

42 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1702.04398/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1702.04398