Symbolic dynamics: entropy = dimension = complexity
Stephen G. Simpson

TL;DR
This paper establishes a fundamental equivalence between entropy, Hausdorff dimension, and Kolmogorov complexity for subshifts over multi-dimensional groups, revealing deep connections between dynamical, geometric, and computational complexity.
Contribution
It proves that for subshifts over groups, topological entropy equals Hausdorff dimension and characterizes this equivalence via Kolmogorov complexity, providing a unified view of complexity measures.
Findings
Entropy equals Hausdorff dimension for subshifts over groups.
Characterization of entropy and dimension through Kolmogorov complexity.
Clarification and correction of a typographical error in the published proof.
Abstract
Let be the group or the monoid where is a positive integer. Let be a subshift over , i.e., a closed and shift-invariant subset of where is a finite alphabet. We prove that the topological entropy of is equal to the Hausdorff dimension of and has a sharp characterization in terms of the Kolmogorov complexity of finite pieces of the orbits of . In the version of this paper that has been published in Theory of Computing Systems, the proof of Lemma 4.3 contains a confusing typographical error. This version of the paper corrects that error.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsComputability, Logic, AI Algorithms · Mathematical Dynamics and Fractals · Cellular Automata and Applications
