A set of 12 numbers is not determined by its set of 4-sums
J. E. Isomurodov, K. P. Kokhas

TL;DR
This paper shows that a set of 12 integers is not uniquely determined by its 4-sums, providing counterexamples and correcting a long-standing mathematical misconception from 50 years ago.
Contribution
It presents explicit counterexamples of two different 12-integer sets sharing the same 4-sums, refuting a previous proof claiming uniqueness.
Findings
Two distinct 12-integer sets with identical 4-sums
Refutation of a 50-year-old proof of uniqueness
Correction of an incorrect calculation in prior work
Abstract
We present two sets of 12 integers that have the same sets of 4-sums. The proof of the fact that a set of 12 numbers is uniquely determined by the set of its 4-sums published 50 years ago is wrong, and we demonstrate an incorrect calculation in it.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsHistory and Theory of Mathematics
