On h-Fibrations
Mehdi Tajik, Behrooz Mashayekhy, Ali Pakdaman

TL;DR
This paper introduces and studies h-fibrations, a weak homotopical variant of fibrations, exploring their properties, categorical constructions, and homotopical analogues to deepen understanding of their structure.
Contribution
It defines h-fibrations, characterizes them via homotopical analogues, and constructs new categories with results on products and coproducts involving h-fibrations.
Findings
h-fibrations have a weak covering homotopy property
Categories with h-fibrations support products and coproducts
Homotopical analogues of fibrations are established
Abstract
In this paper, we study h-fibrations, a weak homotopical version of fibrations which have weak covering homotopy property. We present some homotopical analogue of the notions related to fibrations and characterize h-fibrations using them. Then we construct some new categories by h-fibrations and deduce some results in these categories such as the existence of products and coproducts.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsHomotopy and Cohomology in Algebraic Topology · Fuzzy and Soft Set Theory · Advanced Topology and Set Theory
On h-Fibrations
Mehdi Tajik1
Behrooz Mashayekhy1,
Ali Pakdaman2
1Department of Pure Mathematics, Center of Excellence in Analysis on Algebraic Structures,
Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, P.O.Box 1159-91775, Mashhad, Iran.
2Department of Mathematics, Faculty of Science, University of Golestan,
P.O.Box 155, Gorgan, Iran.
Abstract
In this paper, we study h-fibrations, a weak homotopical version of fibrations which have weak covering homotopy property. We present some homotopical analogue of the notions related to fibrations and characterize h-fibrations using them. Then we construct some new categories by h-fibrations and deduce some results in these categories such as the existence of products and coproducts.
keywords:
fiber homotopy, weak covering homotopy property, h-fibration, homotopically path lifting.
MSC:
[2010]55R65, 55R05, 55R35, 57M12.
††journal:
1 Introduction
1.1 Motivation
A map is said to be a fibration (Hurewicz fibration) if it has covering homotopy property with respect to every space, that is, for every space , every map and every homotopy with , there exists a homtopy such that and , where is .
Covering homotopy property is not invariant under fiber homotopy equivalence and hence any fiber homotopic map to a fibration is not necessarily a fibration. E. Fadell [2] introduced a new type of fibrations which do not have this defect. Also, Dold [1] considered a weak version of covering homotopy property introduced by Fuchs [3] which enjoys useful property of covering homotopy property such as exact homotopy sequence and spectral sequence and also, it is invariant under fiber homotopy equivalence.
A fiber homotopy is a kind of homotopy which preserves points in their fibers during the homotopy ([4, 8]) and weak covering homotopy property is obtained by replacing by in the definition of covering homotopy property, (see [1, 3, 5, 6]). Dold proved that under a weak local contractibility condition for a space , a map has weak covering homotopy property if and only if it is locally fiber homotopically trivial [1, Theorem 6.4]. A map is called h-fibration or Dold fibration if it has weak covering homotopy property with respect to every space. A good characterization of fibrations and h-fibrations can be found in [1, 6, 8].
A map is said to have unique path lifting property (upl) if for given paths and in such that and , we have (see [8]). Unique path lifting property has an important role for fibrations, because make them very close to covering projections and also implies lifting theorem [8, Theorem 2.4.5]. In [7], the authors presented a homotopical version of unique path lifting property and studied it’s properties for fibrations.
Here, after rehabilitating the definition of fiber homotopic maps with respect to arbitrary maps (instead of fibrations), we study h-fibrations with weakly unique path homotopically lifting property and give a sufficient condition which makes an h-fibration to be a fibration. We prove that an h-fibration has the homotopically path lifting property, which is a homotopical version of path lifting property. Also, we show that an h-fibration has homotopically lifting function. In Section 3, by proving that the composition of h-fibrations is an h-fibration, we introduce some new categories by h-fibrations , and . Then we compare them by the categories constructed by fibrations , and (see [7, 8]). Moreover, we show that these new categories have products and coproducts by introducing them.
1.2 Preliminaries
Throughout this paper, all spaces are path connected, unless otherwise stated. A map means a continuous function. A map is called a path from to and it’s inverse is defined by . For two paths with , denotes the usual concatenation of the two paths. Also, all homotopies between paths are assumed to be relative to end points.
For given maps and , a map is called a lift of if . When is a map, we say that is a homotopy from to and write , where is , for . The constant map from to which sends all the points to is denoted by .
For a toplological space , is the space of paths in and for a given map , is the mapping path space, that is, . Also, by is a fibration which is called the mapping path fibration (see [8]).
2 h-Fibrations
For the definition of fiber homotopic maps with respect to a fibration and the definition of fiber homotopy equivalent fibrations, see [8]. We give here similar definitions for an arbitrary map and a few basic results that we need in sequel.
Definition 2.1**.**
Let be a map. Two maps are said to be fiber homotopic with respect to , denoted by if there is a homotopy such that for every and any .
We recall that for given maps and , a map is called fiber-preserving if .
Definition 2.2**.**
Two maps and are said to be fiber homotopy equivalent, if there exist fiber preserving maps and such that and . Each of the maps and is called a fiber homotopy equivalence.
We have the following proposition for the fiber homotopy property.
Proposition 2.3**.**
*Let be a map.
(i) If and are maps such that , then .
(ii) The fiber homotopy with respect to is an equivalence relation on the set of maps from to .
(iii) If and are maps such that , then .
(iv) If and are maps such that , then .*
Proof.
(i) Let . Since we have
[TABLE]
which implies that .
(ii) It is similar to the proof of ordinary homotopy relation.
(iii) Let be a fiber homotopy from to with respect to . Define by . Then is a homotopy from to and
[TABLE]
(iv) Let be the fiber homotopy and define by . Then and so . ∎
A map has weak covering homotopy property, abbreviated by wchp, if for every space X and any maps , with , there exists a homotopy such taht and . In Fact, Dold’s definition was a bit different [1]. A map is called an h-fibration if it has wchp [6]. By [1, Proposition 5.2], if a map is fiber homotopy equivalent to a fibration, it has wchp and so is an h-fibration. Also, in [5] it is mentioned that every h-fibration is fiber homotopy equivalent to a fibration (see [6, Proposition 1.15]). Since one can not find a detailed proof for this fact, we are going to give a proof for it. First, for , let be the mapping path space, be the mapping path fibration and be the map . Then is a section of , moreover, and are homotopy inverse ([8, Theorem 2.8.9]).
Theorem 2.4**.**
A map is an h-fibration if and only if it is fiber homotopy equivalent to a fibration.
Proof.
Let be fiber homotopy equivalent to a fibration . There exist two maps and such that , , and . If and are maps such that , then . Therefore by assumption, there is a homotopy such that and . Let . Then
[TABLE]
and by Proposition 2.3
[TABLE]
Hence is an h-fibration.
Conversely, let be an h-fibration. Define a map by which is a fibration (see [8, Theorem 2.8.9]). We show that and are fiber homotopy equivalent. Let be defined by . Note that
[TABLE]
where is the map . Since is an h-fibration, there exist homotopies and such that and . Let be defined by . It is sufficient to show that and . We have that and also , because . Let be the map . Since and
[TABLE]
[TABLE]
[TABLE]
[TABLE]
we have .
Define by . Then since
[TABLE]
[TABLE]
[TABLE]
[TABLE]
Hence, transitivity of fiber homotopy implies that .
For the second fiber homotopy, define by , for in which is the path , for every . Clearly, . Moreover,
[TABLE]
[TABLE]
[TABLE]
and hence On the other hand,
[TABLE]
[TABLE]
Thus and so . Now, define by . Note that is well-define because
[TABLE]
Moreover, since
[TABLE]
[TABLE]
[TABLE]
[TABLE]
[TABLE]
Therefore, using and , we have . ∎
For fibrations with path connected base space, any two fibers have the same homotopy type. Since, every h-fibration is fiber homotopy equivalent to a fibration, and a fiber homotopy equivalence can be thought as a family of homotopy equivalences between corresponding fibers ([4, Page 406]), hence we have another proof for the following proposition.
Proposition 2.5**.**
([6, Proposition 1.12]). The fibers of an h-fibration have the same homotopy type.
Corollary 2.6**.**
If an h-fibration has the path connected base space with a path connected fiber, then its total space is also path connected.
Proof.
Let be an h-fibration with a path connected fiber. Then by Proposition 2.5, every fiber of is path connected. Let be a fibration which is fiber homotopy equivalent to . Then the fibers of are path connected and so by [8, Exercise 2.8.E.2], is path connected. By definition, there exist fiber preserving maps and . If , then there exists a path in from to . Since , we have , also . Let be a path in from to and be a path in from to . Therefore is a path in from to . ∎
By definitions, every fibration is an h-fibration. But an h-fibration is not necessarily a fibration (for an example see [1]). In order to find a sufficient condition which makes an h-fibration a fibration, first consider the following lemma.
Lemma 2.7**.**
If a map has upl and are fiber homotopic with respect to , then .
Proof.
Let . Then for every and every , . For a fix , is a path in the fiber and so . Since , and has upl, we have . Hence , as desired. ∎
Theorem 2.8**.**
Every h-fibration with upl is a fibration.
Proof.
Let be an h-fibration. Also let be a topological space, and be maps such that . Then, there exists a homotopy such that and . By Lemma 2.7, which implies that is a fibration. ∎
Unique path lifting property is important in the study of fibrations because make them a covering map, when the base space is locally nice, i.e, locally path connected and semi-locally simply connected [8]. The authors introduced a homotopical version of upl in [7] and studied its role in fibrations. Since here we are working with a weak homotopical version of fibrations, we are going to study h-fibrations with the homotopical version of upl.
A map is said to have weakly unique path homotopically lifting property abbreviated by wuphl, if by given two paths and in with and , then it follows that (see [7]).
The unique path lifting property for fibrations is equivalent to the fact that every path in any fiber is constant [8, Theorem 2.2.5]. Also, the weakly unique path homotopically lifting property for fibrations is equivalent to the fact that every loop in any fiber is nullhomotopic [7, Theorem 3.4]. In the following, we show that these facts hold for h-fibrations.
Proposition 2.9**.**
An h-fibration has upl if and only if every path in any fiber is constant.
Proof.
If has upl, then it is easy to see that every path in any fiber is constant. For the converse, let be two lifts of a path in started from the same point . Let and consider the path in from to by
[TABLE]
By assumption , then there exists a homotopy , rel . Since has wchp, there exist homotopies with and . Thus
[TABLE]
[TABLE]
and
[TABLE]
Therefore, is a path in the fiber . So by assumption it is constant, which implies that . Now, note that is a path from to in the fiber , and also is a path from to in the fiber . Then, since and
[TABLE]
there exists a path in this fiber from to , which by assumption it must be constant. Then, and since is arbitrary we will have . ∎
Proposition 2.10**.**
An h-fibration has wuphl if and only if every loop in any fiber is nullhomotopic.
Proof.
Necessity is trivial. For the sufficiency, let be two paths with , and , rel . Let which is a loop at . Put and , then we have
[TABLE]
Let , rel . Since is an h-fibration, there exist homotopies such that and . Let and which are paths in with , and , so we can define and . Note that is a closed path because
[TABLE]
[TABLE]
Also, since
[TABLE]
we have . Hence belongs to the fiber and so by assumption, is null. On the other hand, by definitions of and , rel , which implies , rel and so , rel . ∎
Obviously, if every loop in fibers of an h-fibration is constant, then has wuphl, but the converse is not necessarily true. For example, the h-fibration , when is any non-singleton simply connected space, has wuphl and also has nonconstant paths in its fibers. Since the fibers of two fiber homotopy equivalence fibrations (h-fibrations) have the same homotopy type, by Proposition 2.10 we have the following result.
Corollary 2.11**.**
*(i) If two h-fibrations are fiber homotoy equivalent and one of them has wuphl, then so has the other one.
(ii) If an h-fibration is fiber homotoy equivalent to a fibration and one of them has wuphl, then so has the other one.*
A map has path lifting property if for a given path with and every there exists a path in started at , such that . We know that every fibration has the path lifting property and the following example shows that an h-fibration does not necessarily have the path lifting property.
Example 2.12**.**
Let , and be the projection on the first component. Then is an h-fibration because for given maps and with it suffices to define by . But, there is no lift for the path , started from .
In the following we give a homotopical analogue of path lifting property and show that h-fibrations enjoy this property.
Definition 2.13**.**
A map has homotopically path lifting property if for a given , and a path in beginning at , there exists a path in such that and , rel .
Theorem 2.14**.**
An h-fibration has homotopically path lifting property.
Proof.
Let be an h-fibration, be a path in and . Also, let be the homotopy and be the map . Then and since is an h-fibration, there is a homotopy and a fiber homotopy such that and . Let be the path in defined by . Then , and
[TABLE]
Let which is a path in the fiber from to . Then is a homotopical lift of started from , because
[TABLE]
∎
We know that restriction of a fibration on each of whose path components is a fibration and for maps with locally path connected total space, we have the converse (see, [8, Lemma 2.3.1 and Theorem 2.3.2]). These results are satisfied for h-fibrations with a simulated proof which is left to the readers.
Proposition 2.15**.**
Let be a map. If is locally path connected, then is an h-fibration if and only if for each path component of , is a path component of and is an h-fibration.
Let be a map and define a subspace as follows:
[TABLE]
Recall that, a lifting function for is a map which assigns to each point and any path in starting at a path in starting at that is a lift of . Existence of a lifting function for a map is equivalent to is a fibration (see [8, Theorem 2.7.8]). For h-fibrations we introduce a homotopical version of lifting function and show that every h-fibration has one of them.
Definition 2.16**.**
A homotopically lifting function for is a map which assigns to each point and any path in starting at a path in starting at that is a homotopical lift of .
Theorem 2.17**.**
Every h-fibration has a homotopically lifting function.
Proof.
Let be an h-fibration. Define two maps and by and , respectively. Since and is an h-fibration, there exist homotopies such that and . Define by which is continuous. Let . Then because . Similar to the proof of Proposition 2.14, there is a path in the fiber from to . Define by . Then and
[TABLE]
[TABLE]
Therefore is a homotopically lifting function for . ∎
Remark 2.18**.**
The converse of Theorem 2.17 is not true. As an example, let , and be the projection on the first component. Since the fibers of do not have the same homotopy, is not an h-fibration. However, has a homotopically lifting function. For, let and be a path in starting at . Also define two paths in by and , where . Define such that . Then is a path starting at . Moreover, since
[TABLE]
[TABLE]
and is simply connected, , as desired.
3 Category of h-Fibrations
In this section, and are the category of fibrations and fibrations over , and have the categories and (with the extra assumption unique path lifting) as subcategory, respectively (see [8]). When we deal with fibrations with wuphl instead of upl, we have the categories and [7], for which
[TABLE]
To construct new categories by h-fibrations, we need to the following essential proposition.
Proposition 3.1**.**
Composition of two h-fibrations is an h-fibration.
Proof.
Let and be two h-fibrations, and be two maps such that . Since is an h-fibration, there exist homotopies such that and . Since and is an h-fibration, there exist homotopies such that and . Let be the map . Since and is an h-fibration, there exist homotopies such that and . Since, , is the desired homotopy. Also, by Proposition 2.3, and . Moreover,
,
, which imply that . Since fiber homotopy is an equivalence relation, and so the result holds. ∎
It is straightforward that composition of two maps with wuphl is a map with wuphl [7, Proposition 4.1] and so we have the following proposition.
Proposition 3.2**.**
Composition of h-fibrations with wuphl is an h-fibration with wuphl.
Now, we can define category of h-fibrations, and its subcategory, category of h-fibrations with wuphl, in which the objects are topological spaces and morphisms are h-fibrations and h-fibrations with wuphl, respectively. Moreover, for a given space , we can consider other categories, and , whose objects are h-fibrations and h-fibrations with wuphl over and morphisms are the commutative triangles.
By Theorem 2.8, since every fibration is an h-fibration, we have the following diagram of inclusion relations between categories.
FibuFibwuFibhFibuhFibwuhFib .
It is notable that we have a similar diagram for the categories constructed over the base space . Also, note that in the above diagram, the inclusions are proper. The first row is proper [7, Example 3.3] and the second row is proper, since a fibration is an h-fibration. Moreover, Example 2.12 shows that the second and the third column are proper.
Now, we study the existence of products and coproducts for these categories.
Proposition 3.3**.**
Product of two h-fibrations is an h-fibration.
Proof.
Let and be two h-fibrations, and be maps such that . Since , and and are h-fibration, there exist and such that , , and . Define by . Then
[TABLE]
and
[TABLE]
∎
It is easy to see that product of two maps with wuphl is a map with wuphl. Hence we have the following result.
Proposition 3.4**.**
The categories and have the product.
To present products for and , consider the Whitney sum of h-fibrations (with wuphl). If is an indexed collection of h-fibrations (with wuphl ) over the space , define
[TABLE]
and also define
[TABLE]
[TABLE]
Proposition 3.5**.**
Let be an indexed collection of h-fibrations (with wuphl) on the space . Then is an h-fibration (with wuphl).
Proof.
Let and . Also, let and be two maps such that . Then , where is the projection of over the j-th component. By definition of , and since is an h-fibration, there exist homotopies and such that and . Since , we can define by . Hence,
[TABLE]
Also, since , and so we can define by . Now since
[TABLE]
Therefore is an h-fibration. Moreover, if every has wuphl, since the fibers of are the product of the fibers of ’s, then by Proposition 2.10, has wuphl. ∎
The following result is a consequence of the above proposition.
Theorem 3.6**.**
The categories and have products.
Suppose is an indexed collection of morphisms in (or ), and are disjoint union of ’s and ’s, respectively. Define by . Then is an h-fibration (with wuphl). Because let and be the maps such that . If , then there exists one and only one such that and . Since ’s and ’s are disjoint, continuity of and yields that for every and every , , and which imply that . By assumption, there exist homotopies and such that and . Define by and , if . Therefore . Also, because if , then
[TABLE]
Hence is an h-fibration. Moreover, if every has wuphl, since a fiber of is a fiber of one of , Proposition 2.10 follows that has wuphl.
Similarly, if is an indexed collection of objects in (or ), defined by is also an h-fibration (with wuphl), because it is sufficient that for every , let . Therefore, we have the following result.
Theorem 3.7**.**
The categories , , and have coproducts.
References
The reference list from the paper itself. Each links out to its DOI / PubMed record.
- 1[1] A. Dold , Partitions of unity in the theory of fibrations, Annal of Math. 78 (1963), 223-255.
- 2[2] E. Fadell , On fibre spaces. Trans. Amer. Math. Soc, 90(1959), 1-14.
- 3[3] K. Fuchs, Homotopiefaserungen. Dissertation, Universitat Saarbrucken.
- 4[4] A. Hatcher , Algebraic topology, Cambridge University Press, 2001.
- 5[5] P. Pave s ˇ ˇ 𝑠 \check{s} i c ´ ´ 𝑐 \acute{c} , A note on trivial fibrations, Glasnik Matematicki, 46(2011), 513 - 519.
- 6[6] P. Pave s ˇ ˇ 𝑠 \check{s} i c ´ ´ 𝑐 \acute{c} , R.A. Piccinini , Fibrations and their classification, Heldermann, 2013.
- 7[7] M. Tajik, B. Mashayekhy, A. Pakdaman , Unique path lifting from homotopy point of view, ar Xiv:1601.03494.
- 8[8] E.H. Spanier , Algebraic Topology, Mc Graw-Hill, New York, 1966.
