Asymptotic Properties of the p-Adic Fractional Integration Operator
Anatoly N. Kochubei, Daniel S. Soskin

TL;DR
This paper investigates the long-term behavior of a p-adic fractional integration operator, extending previous work on non-Archimedean pseudo-differential equations to understand its asymptotic properties.
Contribution
It provides a detailed analysis of the asymptotic properties of the p-adic fractional integration operator, a novel extension of Kochubei's earlier work.
Findings
Characterization of the asymptotic behavior of the operator
Identification of conditions for specific asymptotic regimes
Extension of classical fractional integration results to p-adic context
Abstract
We study asymptotic properties of the p-adic version of a fractional integration operator introduced in the paper by A. N. Kochubei, Radial solutions of non-Archimedean pseudo-differential equations, Pacif. J. Math. 269 (2014), 355-369.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
Topicsadvanced mathematical theories
Asymptotic Properties of the -Adic Fractional Integration Operator
**Anatoly N. Kochubei
**Institute of Mathematics,
National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine,
Tereshchenkivska 3, Kyiv, 01004 Ukraine,
E-mail: [email protected]
**Daniel S. Soskin
**Faculty of Mathematics and Mechanics,
Taras Shevchenko Kyiv National University,
Volodymyrska 64, Kyiv, 01033 Ukraine,
E-mail: [email protected]
(To the blessed memory of M. L. Gorbachuk)
Abstract
We study asymptotic properties of the -adic version of a fractional integration operator introduced in the paper by A. N. Kochubei, Radial solutions of non-Archimedean pseudo-differential equations, Pacif. J. Math. 269 (2014), 355–369.
**Key words: ** -adic numbers; Vladimirov’s -adic fractional differentiation operator; -adic fractional integration operator; asymptotic expansion
MSC 2010. Primary: 11S80. Secondary: 26A33.
1 Introduction
1.1. In analysis of complex-valued functions on the field of -adic numbers (or, more generally, on a non-Archimedean local field), the basic operator is Vladimirov’s fractional differentiation operator , , defined via the Fourier transform or, for wider classes of functions, as a hypersingular integral operator [1, 5]. Properties of this -adic pseudo-differential operator were studied by Vladimirov (see [5]) and found to be more complicated than those of its classical counterparts. For example, as an operator on , it has a point spectrum of infinite multiplicity. However, it was shown in [2] to behave much simpler on radial functions .
In particular, in [2] the first author introduced a right inverse to the operator on radial functions, which can be seen as a -adic analog of the Riemann-Liouville fractional integral of real analysis (including the case of the usual antiderivative). Just as the Riemann-Liouville fractional integral is a source of many problems of analysis, that must be true for the operator .
In this paper we study asymptotic properties of the function for a given asymptotic expansion of ; for the asymptotic properties of Riemann-Liouville fractional integral see [3, 4, 7].
1.2. Let us recall the main definitions and notation used below.
Let be a prime number. The field of -adic numbers is the completion of the field of rational numbers, with respect to the absolute value defined by setting ,
[TABLE]
where , and are prime to . It is well known that is a locally compact topological field with the topology determined by the metric , and that there are no absolute values on , which are not equivalent to the “Euclidean” one, or one of . We will denote by the Haar measure on the additive group of normalized by the condition .
The absolute value , , has the following properties:
[TABLE]
The latter property called the ultrametric inequality (or the non-Archimedean property) implies the total disconnectedness of and unusual geometric properties. Note also the following consequence of the ultrametric inequality:
[TABLE]
We will often use the integration formulas (see [1, 5, 6]):
[TABLE]
in particular,
[TABLE]
[TABLE]
[TABLE]
See [1, 5] for further details of analysis of complex-valued functions on .
From now on, we consider the case . The integral operator introduced in [2] has the form
[TABLE]
where is a locally integrable function on . See [2] for its connection to the Vladimirov operator and applications to non-Archimedean counterparts of ordinary differential equations. Note that our results can be generalized easily to the case of general non-Archimedean local fields.
2 Asymptotics at the origin
Let , . Then the sequence is an asymptotic scale for (see, for example, §16 of [4] for the main notions regarding asymptotic expansions).
Theorem 1**.**
Suppose that a function admits an asymptotic series expansion
[TABLE]
Then
[TABLE]
where
[TABLE]
Proof. We have
[TABLE]
Then ,
[TABLE]
[TABLE]
After the change of variables we get
[TABLE]
where
[TABLE]
[TABLE]
On the other hand, since , we find that for some constant ,
[TABLE]
The above calculations result in the asymptotic relation (2).
3 Asymptotics at infinity
For positive functions , we write , , if , for large values of , , for some positive constants .
Theorem 2**.**
Suppose that () for , , , , for . Then
[TABLE]
Proof. Let us rewrite (1) with in the form where
[TABLE]
[TABLE]
Then
[TABLE]
Next, if , , then
[TABLE]
Calculating the integral as above and finding the sums of geometric progressions we see that , which proves (3).
4 Logarithmic asymptotics
If a function decays slower than it did under the assumptions of Theorem 2, then a richer asymptotic behavior is possible. Let us consider the case where ,
[TABLE]
where , , .
First we need some auxiliary results.
Lemma 1**.**
Let , , where . Then
[TABLE]
Proof. Let . Then . It is known (see Section 1) that
[TABLE]
so that
[TABLE]
By our assumption, for any , there exists such that for . Then we can write
[TABLE]
where
[TABLE]
It follows from (6) that , so that
[TABLE]
where is arbitrary. Therefore
[TABLE]
which gives, together with (7), the required asymptotic relation (5).
Lemma 2**.**
Let , . For any , such that ,
[TABLE]
Proof. Assuming that , we have , so that , and we find that
[TABLE]
if is large enough, and the relation (8) follows from the integration formula (6).
Now we are ready to consider the asymptotics of for a function satisfying (4). Below we use the notation
[TABLE]
for any real positive number and .
Theorem 3**.**
If a function satisfies the asymptotic relation (4), then
[TABLE]
where
[TABLE]
[TABLE]
Proof. Let us write for as the sum of two integrals and , with the integration over and respectively.
Denote . Considering , for , we have
[TABLE]
Indeed, if , then , , and we get (10). If , , then .
It follows from (10) that
[TABLE]
and by (4) and Lemma 1, for any small ,
[TABLE]
Considering we write
[TABLE]
Denote
[TABLE]
where on the domain of integration,
[TABLE]
and we may write, for a non-integer , the convergent binomial series
[TABLE]
Note that we can use the Taylor formula with the integral form of the remainder
[TABLE]
where
[TABLE]
If , , then . Therefore
[TABLE]
[TABLE]
and this asymptotics is uniform with respect to .
Substituting and using Lemma 2 we obtain the expansion
[TABLE]
We have
[TABLE]
where
[TABLE]
The last estimate is a consequence of (12).
Now the asymptotic relations (11) and (12) imply the required relation (9).
In our final result, we give a modification of Theorem 3 for the case where .
Theorem 4**.**
Suppose that is nonnegative,
[TABLE]
Then
[TABLE]
where
[TABLE]
[TABLE]
Proof. Let us write where
[TABLE]
[TABLE]
[TABLE]
Choosing , such that , we see that , . By Lemma 1,
[TABLE]
For the kernel of the above integral operator we get, considering various cases, the estimate
[TABLE]
It follows from Lemma 1 that
[TABLE]
By our assumption,
[TABLE]
Let us consider the expression
[TABLE]
It follows from the first integration formula from Section 1 that
[TABLE]
This implies (just as in the proof of Theorem 3) the expansion
[TABLE]
Taking into account (14), we come to (13).
Acknowledgments
The work of the first author was supported in part by Grant 23/16-18 “Statistical dynamics, generalized Fokker-Planck equations, and their applications in the theory of complex systems” of the Ministry of Education and Science of Ukraine.
The reference list from the paper itself. Each links out to its DOI / PubMed record.
- 1[1] A. N. Kochubei, Pseudo-Differential Equations and Stochastics over Non-Archimedean Fields , Marcel Dekker, New York, 2001.
- 2[2] A. N. Kochubei, Radial solutions of non-Archimedean pseudo-differential equations, Pacif. J. Math. 269 (2014), 355–369.
- 3[3] E. Riekstiṇs̆, Asymptotic representation of certain types of the convolution integral, Latviiski Matem. Ezhegodnik 8 (1970), 223–239 (Russian).
- 4[4] S. G. Samko, A. A. Kilbas, and O. I. Marichev, Fractional Integrals and Derivatives: Theory and Applications , Gordon and Breach, New York, 1993.
- 5[5] V. S. Vladimirov, I. V. Volovich and E. I. Zelenov, p 𝑝 p -Adic Analysis and Mathematical Physics , World Scientific, Singapore, 1994.
- 6[6] V. S. Vladimirov, Tables of Integrals of Complex-Valued Functions of p 𝑝 p -Adic Arguments , Steklov Mathematical Institute, Moscow, 2003 (Russian). English version, Ar Xiv: math-ph/9911027.
- 7[7] R. Wong, Asymptotic expansions of fractional integrals involving logarithms, SIAM J. Math. Anal. 9 (1978), 835–842.
