Substrate engineering for high quality emission of free and localized excitons from atomic monolayers in hybrid architectures
Oliver Iff, Yu-Ming He, Nils Lundt, Sebastian Stoll, Vasilij Baumann,, Sven H\"ofling, Christian Schneider

TL;DR
This study demonstrates how substrate engineering, particularly using hybrid architectures with III-V materials, significantly enhances the emission quality of excitons in atomic monolayers like MoSe2 and WSe2, reducing spectral diffusion and enabling high-quality optoelectronic applications.
Contribution
It reveals the impact of different substrates on exciton emission in monolayers and shows that hybrid architectures can produce high-quality, stable emission lines suitable for device integration.
Findings
MoSe2 emission dominated by trions on InGaP substrates
Localized excitons in WSe2 with linewidths down to 70 μeV
Reduced inhomogeneous broadening and spectral diffusion on hybrid substrates
Abstract
Atomic monolayers represent a novel class of materials to study localized and free excitons in two dimensions and to engineer optoelectronic devices based on their significant optical response. Here, we investigate the role of the substrate on the photoluminescense response of MoSe and WSe monolayers exfoliated either on SiO or epitaxially grown InGaP substrates. In the case of MoSe, we observe a significant qualitative modification of the emission spectrum, which is widely dominated by the trion resonance on InGaP substrates. However, the effects of inhomogeneous broadening of the emission features are strongly reduced. Even more strikingly, in sheets of WSe, we could routinely observe emission lines from localized excitons with linewidths down to the resolution limit of 70\, eV. This is in stark contrast to reference samples featuring WSe monolayers on…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Substrate engineering for high quality emission of free and localized excitons from atomic monolayers in hybrid architectures
Oliver Iff1+, Yu-Ming He1+, Nils Lundt1, Sebastian Stoll1,
Vasilij Baumann1, Sven Höfling1,2, Christian Schneider1
Abstract
Atomic monolayers represent a novel class of materials to study localized and free excitons in two dimensions and to engineer optoelectronic devices based on their significant optical response. Here, we investigate the role of the substrate on the photoluminescense response of MoSe2 and WSe2 monolayers exfoliated either on SiO2 or epitaxially grown InGaP substrates. In the case of MoSe2, we observe a significant qualitative modification of the emission spectrum, which is widely dominated by the trion resonance on InGaP substrates. However, the effects of inhomogeneous broadening of the emission features are strongly reduced. Even more strikingly, in sheets of WSe2, we could routinely observe emission lines from localized excitons with linewidths down to the resolution limit of 70 eV. This is in stark contrast to reference samples featuring WSe2 monolayers on SiO2 surfaces, where the emission spectra from localized defects are widely dominated by spectral diffusion and blinking behaviour. Our experiment outlines the enormous potential of III-V-monolayer hybrid architectures to obtain high quality emission signals from atomic monolayers, which are straight forward to integrate into nanophotonic and integrated optoelectronic devices.
1.Technische Physik and Wilhelm Conrad Röntgen Research Center for Complex Material Systems, Physikalisches Institut Universität Würzburg, Am Hubland, D-97074 Würzburg, Germany
- SUPA, School of Physics and Astronomy, University of St Andrews, St Andrews, KY16 9SS, United Kingdom
+ These authors contributed equally
corresponding author:
Christian Schneider ([email protected])
1 Introduction
Monolayers of transition metal dichalcogenides have moved into the focus of solid state spectroscopy, since these new materials feature a variety of unique optical properties. Monolayers composed of the transition metal Mo or W and the Chalcogene Se, S and Te crystallize in a honeycomb lattice which lacks an inversion center. This yields a characteristic bandstructure, where the direct bandgap transitions are located at the K and K’ points of the hexagonal Brillouine zone. These points can be distinctly addressed by the polarization of an injection laser, which leads to novel spinor effects in these systems [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6]. In addition, so called valley excitons are formed, which feature an extraordinarily high binding energy exceeding 300 meV [7]. This is a consequence of reduced dimensions, reduced dielectric screening and flat bands leading to a heavy exciton mass. In most of these materials, even up to ambient conditions, the absorption and luminescence spectrum is dominated by excitonic effects, rather than by direct interband transitions. While the general properties, such as the exciton frequency, and the trion binding energy are primarily determined by the monolayer itself, the surrounding environment still has a major influence on the optical properties. For instance, it has been shown that excitons in monolayers of MoS2 sensibly react on absorbed molecules on the surface [8], and energy shifts resulting from capping have been reported [9]. Similarly, the choice of the substrate can have a significant effect on the luminescence properties of the free monolayer excitons, as well as the emission features from localized excitons which were recently identified as novel sources of single photon streams [10, 11, 12, 13, 14]. Here, we study the excitonic properties of exfoliated monolayers of MoSe2 and WSe2 at cryogenic temperatures, which were transferred onto SiO2/Si as well as InGaP/GaAs heterostructures. For the case of MoSe2, we observe a strong reduction of the inhomogeneous broadening of the dominant trion feature as epitaxial substrates are utilized. In monolayers of WSe2, we focus on the emission of localized excitons. This quantum dot like features are strongly broadened and disturbed by their environment on the insulating glass substrates. In stark contrast, the semiconducting InGaP/GaAs substrates facilitate dramatically reduced charge fluctuations, yielding stable and robust emitters of single photons on an epitaxial platform.
2 Sample structure and setup
The investigated monolayers were produced by mechanical exfoliation from a MoSe2 or a WSe2 bulk crystal with scotch tape. After confirming their monolayer nature via their distinct photoluminescence and the color contrast in an optical microscope, they have been transferred onto the designated target substrate via a dry-stamp method [15]. Using this technique, flake sizes of around 30 m * 50 m have been fabricated. Two different sample types have been implemented which are sketched in fig. 1 (a). The monolayers were transferred onto substrates composed of a 90 nm SiO2 layer ontop of a Si substrate. The other substrate is made of a 250 nm thick In0.49Ga0.51P layer which has been grown lattice-matched onto a semi-insulating GaAs by means of gas-source molecular beam epitaxy. In order to get an impression of the samples’ surface quality we performed atomic force microscope (AFM) measurements, which can be seen in fig. 1 (b). The root-mean-squared roughness of both samples is of the same magnitude. Specifically, the SiO2 surface characterized by a roughness of 0.15 nm, while the InGaP surface features a comparable value of 0.29 nm. Optical characterization was carried out in a standard microphotoluminescence setup (PL). The samples were attached to the cold-finger of a liquid helium flow cryostat and the luminescence from the flake was collected by a 50x objective (NA=0.42) in a confocal microscope system. The structures were excited by a continuous-wave(cw) 532 nm laser. Photoluminescence measurements were performed using a Princeton-Instrument SP2750i spectrometer equipped with a liquid nitrogen cooled charge coupled detector and a grating (\Delta E_{\textnormal{Res}}\approx 70\leavevmode\nobreak\$$\mueV) for the high resolution images or a grating for overview spectra. The PL could also be collected into a fiber coupled Hanbury Brown and Twiss setup (HBT) with a timing resolution of approximately 570 ps to measure the second order field correlation of the emission, after passing through a pair of band-pass filters (1 nm bandwidth).
3 Experimental Results and Discussion
First, we investigate the impact of the two aforementioned substrates on the emission characteristics of MoSe2 monolayers. Fig. 2 depicts a series of photoluminescence spectra of the Si/SiO2-MoSe2 structure which were recorded subsequently under nominally the same conditions and without blanking the laser. The spectra were taken in a time span of 10 minutes at a constant laser power of 50 W. We observe the common spectral signatures of MoSe2 monolayers: At 1.657 eV, the free exciton (X) is clearly visible. On the low energy side, the negatively charged trion (X-) emerges at 1.625 meV, yielding a trion binding energy of 32 meV. Noteworthily, during the series, the initial exciton intensity decreases and the trion intensity increases until both signals converge to a constant intensity ratio after roughly 5 minutes. This behaviour can be explained by a photo induced doping effect which introduces new free carriers into the system, enhancing the formation of trions [16, 17] at the expense of free neutral excitons. On the contrary, on the GaAs/InGaP-MoSe2 heterostructures, the free exciton is not visible while only the trion-attributed resonance can be clearly observed at an energy of 1.632 eV at 50 W laser power. The spectral energy shift of approx meV compared to the SiO2-MoSe2 stack occurs reproducibly in different flakes, and is most likely a consequence of the modified dielectric environment. Remarkably, the overall intensity of this trion resonance does not change with time, indicating that the system natively has access to a great amount of free carriers. We note, that both monolayers originate from the same bulk crystal and therefore we can rule out inherent doping of the flake itself as a reason of this behavior.
In fig. 3 we depict the result of a power series from both samples. The non-resonant excitation power was ramped from 50 W up to 5 mW, and we plot the trions’ integrated intensity and the linewidth. With increasing power, the intensity of the observed resonances rises approximately linearly as shown in fig. 3(a). Fitting the data (red lines) to a straight line gives a slope of 0.96 for SiO2 respectively 0.92 for InGaP, in good agreement with the expected slope of 1 for charged excitons. At higher output power (> 1 mW) the emissions start to show a saturation behaviour, independent from the used substrate caused by exciton annihilation [18]. Another important parameter is the corresponding full width at half maximum (FWHM) of the studied signal, which is plotted in fig. 3 (b). On the glass substrate the linewidth of the trion reaches a value around 13 meV for small laser power. Increasing the power yields a progressive broadening of the emission line, reaching approximately 16 meV at 6 mW pump power. We assume, that this power induced broadening of the trion resonance is a consequence of local heating from the pump laser, but it could be also induced by additional charges which accumulate in the monolayer and at random positions at the heterointerface [17]. This charge puddling effect is known to occur on SiO2 surfaces [19], which induce a randomly varying inhomogeneity on the photoluminescence response. Contrary to this, the linewidth on the InGaP sample is as small as 6.5 meV, surpassing its SiO2 counter part by a factor of 2. Even more remarkably, the linewidth stays nearly constant with increasing power and reaches just 7 meV at 6 mW laser output. This is due to a higher thermal conductivity of InGaP compared to SiO2 [20] leading to lower local heating at the laser spot. Overall, these results already outline the reduction of charge induced fluctuations in monolayer-InGaP devices, and illustrate the impact the right substrate can have on the excitonic properties of MoSe2.
While monolayers of MoSe2 are specificly suitable to study effects of free excitons and trions, the observation of single photon emission from localized excitons have set monolayers of WSe2 in the focus of solid state quantum photonics. Figure 4 shows a typical photoluminescence spectrum from such a localized exciton in a WSe2 monolayer ontop of a SiO2/Si substrate, which was excited by a continuous-wave(CW) 532 nm laser at an excitation power of 30 W and a nominal sample temperature of 4.2 K. The photoluminescence spectrum consists of several sharp peaks with linewidths of 2 meV, centered at 1.52 eV. Such a spectral feature, which is red-shifted 180 meV from the WSe2 free valley exciton(1.7eV), is comparable to previously reported localized emission signals in WSe2 monolayers [21]. Compared to the weak, broad PL spectrum from the localized exciton in the WSe2 monolayer exfoliated on the SiO2/Si substrate, several bright, spectral resolution limited (70 eV) PL peaks were observed from WSe2 sheets transferred onto the InGaP/GaAs substrate (temperature of 4.5 K). It is worth noting, that the extracted linewidth is more than 30 times smaller compared to the WSe2-SiO2 structure. Here, the PL excitation power for fig. 4 (b) is around 70 nW, which is almost three order of magnitude smaller than the nominal 30 W for fig. 4 (a). Additionally, the right inset of fig. 4 (b) shows the cw-pumped autocorrelation histogram from the marked peak in fig. 4 (b). The emission is spectrally filtered by a pair of band-pass filters and then coupled into a fiber-based HBT-setup to measure the second order autocorrelation. The clear antibunching is observed around \tau\approx 0\leavevmode\nobreak\ns which reaches down well below and therefore proves the single photon emission.
In order to account for the finite time resolution of our setup, we fit the measured data with a two sided exponential decay convolved with a Gaussian distribution :
[TABLE]
Following this, we extract a deconvoluted -value of .
To assess the influence of the spectral wandering on the macroscopic time scale on the emission features depicted in fig. 4 (a) and 4 (b), we record various spectra every second and combine them in the contour graph in fig. 5 (a) and 5 (b). In fig.5 (a), clear spectral wandering and jumps on the timescale of seconds are observed. Each frame is then fitted with a Lorentzian function and the statistics of the peak energies are plotted in fig. 5 (c). We find a direct contribution as large as (957\pm 58)$$\mueV of the long term spectral diffusion. This characteristic slow spectral jitter on such a large magnitude is commonly observed for self-assembled quantum emitters close to surfaces or interfaces which yield the capability of trapping and releasing charges. Thus, and in principle agreement with the studies presented in fig. 3 for the MoSe2 case, we conclude that the spectral jumps are induced by carriers trapped via dangling bonds on the SiO2 surface. Compared to the WSe2 monolayer on SiO2 substrate, no obvious spectral wandering is observed in fig. 5 (b), where the WSe2 monolayer is transferred on the InGaP substrate. The corresponding statistics of the spectral wandering in fig. 5 (d) yields a value around 5.5$$\mueV, which is within the linewidth fitting uncertainty. The narrowing could be attributed to fewer charge fluctuation for semiconducting environment which allows transferring trapped charges, which leads to a suppression of the long scale spectral jitter.
Lastly, we performed a statistical study of the influence of the different substrate on the spectral linewidth of the localized excitons in the WSe2 monolayers . A statistical histogram for 37 randomly localized emitters from 10 different monolayers on SiO2/Si substrate is presented in fig.6 (a). The extracted linewidths randomly fluctuate between 147 eV to 3.3 meV. Similarly, the statistical histogram for 259 randomly localized emitters from 10 different monolayers on InGaP/GaAs is depicted in fig. 6 (b). Here the extracted average linewidth is almost restricted by the spectrometer resolution (70 eV). Therefore, the resolution limited, jitter free PL strongly indicates that the InGaP substrate could greatly enhance the emission properties of the localized excitons in the WSe2 monolayer.
4 Summary
In conclusion, we have studied the influence of the substrate on the emission properties of monolayers of MoSe2 and WSe2 at cryogenic temperatures. On our reference SiO2 substrate, the luminescence of the free exciton and trion in MoSe2 is notably inhomogeneously broadened, and sensitive to power broadening. The investigated localized defects occuring in WSe2 monolayers are subject to a long term spectral diffusion induced by a slowly varying charge environment. In stark contrast, InGaP substrates show a notable effect on the charge environment, which directly leads to a reduced broadening of the trionic emission in MoSe2 and in many cases eliminates the slow spectral diffusion acting on localized emission centers in WSe2. Together with the highly developed photonic processing technology of InGaP/GaAs structures, this makes WSe2-InGaP heterostacks very interesting for novel nanophotonic and integrated monolayer based quantum photonic architectures. Furthermore, we have observed a significantly enhanced formation of free trions in MoSe2 monolayers on InGaP, which make such a platform highly suitable to study interactions of monolayer excitations with electron gases, and can likely represent a new approach towards trion polaritons in a straight forward manner and without the necessity for electrostatic gating.
Acknowledgments
We acknowledge financial support by the State of Bavaria and the European Research Council (Project Unlimit-2D).
Figures
The reference list from the paper itself. Each links out to its DOI / PubMed record.
- 1[1] X. Xu, W. Yao, D. Xiao and T. F. Heinz, “Spin and pseudospins in layered transition metal dichalcogenides,” Nature Phys. 10 (5), 343–350 (2014).
- 2[2] A. M. Jones, H. Yu, N. J. Ghimire, S. Wu, G. Aivazian, J. S. Ross, B. Zhao, J. Yan, D. G. Mandrus, D. Xiao, W. Yao and X. Xu, “Optical generation of excitonic valley coherence in monolayer W S e 2 𝑊 𝑆 subscript 𝑒 2 W Se_{2} ,” Nature Nanotech. 8 (9), 634–638 (2013).
- 3[3] D. Xiao, G. B. Liu, W. Feng, X. Xu, and W. Yao, “Coupled spin and valley physics in monolayers of M o S 2 𝑀 𝑜 subscript 𝑆 2 Mo S_{2} and other Group-VI dichalcogenides,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 108 (19), 196802 (2012).
- 4[4] K. F. Mak, K. He, J. Shan and T. F. Heinz, “Control of valley polarization in monolayer M o S 2 𝑀 𝑜 subscript 𝑆 2 Mo S_{2} by optical helicity,” Nature Nanotech. 7 (8), 494–498 (2012).
- 5[5] T. Cao, G. Wang, W. Han, H. Ye, C. Zhu, J. Shi, Q. Niu, P. Tan, E. Wang, B. Liu and J. Feng, “Valley-selective circular dichroism of monolayer molybdenum disulphide,” Nat. Commun. 3 (6), 887 (2012).
- 6[6] H. Zeng, J. Dai, W. Yao, D. Xiao and X. Cui, “Valley polarization in M o S 2 𝑀 𝑜 subscript 𝑆 2 Mo S_{2} monolayers by optical pumping,” Nature Nanotech. 7 (8), 490–493 (2012).
- 7[7] A. Ramasubramaniam, “Large excitonic effects in monolayers of molybdenum and tungsten dichalcogenides,” Phys. Rev. B 86 (11), 1–6 (2012).
- 8[8] J. He, K. Wu, R. Sa, Q Li, Y Wei,“Magnetic properties of nonmetal atoms absorbed Mo S 2 monolayers,” App. Phys. Lett., 96 (8), 2014–2017 (2010).
