An estimate for the average number of common zeros of Laplacian eigenfunctions
Dmitri Akhiezer, Boris Kazarnovskii

TL;DR
This paper provides an upper bound estimate for the average number of common zeros of Laplacian eigenfunctions on homogeneous compact Riemannian manifolds, with an explicit constant and conditions for equality.
Contribution
It introduces a new estimate for common zeros of eigenfunctions on homogeneous manifolds, utilizing Crofton's formula, and specifies conditions for exactness.
Findings
Upper bound matches Weyl's law expression
Equality holds when isotropy representation is irreducible
Explicit constant c(n) is provided
Abstract
On a compact Riemannian manifold of dimension , we consider eigenfunctions of the Laplace operator with eigenvalue . If is homogeneous under a compact Lie group preserving the metric then we prove that the average number of common zeros of eigenfunctions does not exceed , the expression known from the celebrated Weyl's law. Moreover, if the isotropy representation is irreducible, then the estimate turns into equality. The constant is explicitly given. The method of proof is based on the application of Crofton's formula for the sphere.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
An Estimate for the Average Number of Common Zeros of Laplacian Eigenfunctions
Dmitri Akhiezer and Boris Kazarnovskii
To Ernest Borisovich Vinberg on the occasion of his 80th birthday
Institute for Information Transmission Problems
19 B.Karetny per.,127994, Moscow, Russia,
D.A.: [email protected], B.K.: [email protected].
Abstract.
On a compact Riemannian manifold of dimension , we consider eigenfunctions of the Laplace operator with eigenvalue . If is homogeneous under a compact Lie group preserving the metric then we prove that the average number of common zeros of eigenfunctions does not exceed , the expression known from the celebrated Weyl’s law. Moreover, if the isotropy representation is irreducible, then the estimate turns into the equality. The constant is explicitly given. The method of proof is based on the application of Crofton’s formula for the sphere.
Key words and phrases:
Homogeneous Riemannian manifold, Laplace operator, Crofton formula
MSC 2010: 53C30, 58J05; UDC: 514.765, 517.956.2
The research was carried out at the Institute for Information Transmission Problems under support by the Russian Foundation of Sciences, grant No. 14-50-00150
1. Introduction
Let be a compact Riemannian manifold without boundary, , and the Riemannian measure on . For an eigenvalue of the Laplace operator on let denote the corresponding eigenspace, i.e.,
[TABLE]
Then is a finite dimensional real vector subspace of , considered with the induced scalar product. We note that the space and the scalar product are invariant under any isometry of . Our goal is to define and, under certain assumptions, to evaluate the average number of zeros of the system of equations
[TABLE]
where are linearly independent. The linear envelope of is a subspace of dimension . We define to be the set of common zeros of . For any set we denote by the number of its points if is finite or if is infinite. We now let vary within a subspace of some dimension , which does not necessarily coincide with . Then we have the function
[TABLE]
The average number of zeros or, more precisely, is defined as the integral of over the Grassmanian with respect to the measure induced by the (normalized) Haar measure of acting on . We keep in mind that the averaging process depends on , but do not stress this in notation.
Theorem 1.1**.**
Let be a homogeneous space of a compact connected Lie group with a -invariant Riemannian metric and let be a -invariant subspace. Then
[TABLE]
where
[TABLE]
and is the volume of the -dimensional sphere of radius 1. Furthermore, if points of are not locally separated by then
[TABLE]
Recall that is called isotropy irreducible if the representation of the isotropy subgroup in the tangent space at the origin is irreducible. We refer the reader to [6] for the properties of isotropy irreducible homogeneous spaces. Their minimal immersions into spheres are for the first time considered in [13]. We also note that a symmetric space of a simple group, e.g., the sphere with the special orthogonal group, is isotropy irreducible. Under a stronger assumption, namely, if the connected component acts irreducibly in the tangent space at , all isotropy irreducible homogeneous spaces are listed, see [11, 14].
Theorem 1.2**.**
If is isotropy irreducible then for any -invariant subspace one has the equality
[TABLE]
This is proved in [1], but our proof here is slightly different. Namely, Theorem 1.2 appears below as a corollary of Theorem 1.1. It should be noted that the inequality in Theorem 1.1 is in general strict even if locally separates points of , see an example in Sect.5.
As in [1], our arguments are based on Crofton’s formula for the sphere [12], which we recall in Sect.2. In integral geometry, formulae of Crofton type are regarded as the simplest kinematic formulae, see [9, 12]. We refer the reader to [7, 2] for another approach, namely, for the relationship of Crofton’s formula with Radon transform.
Finally, we want to mention two circumstances which partly motivated our research. We recall that the zero set of an eigenfunction of the Laplace operator is called a nodal set. Connected components of its complement are called nodal domains. The classical Courant’s theorem [5] says that the number of nodal domains defined by the -th eigenfunction does not exceed , see also [4]. Consider now the set of common zeros of eigenfunctions. As a rule, its complement for is connected. In order to carry over Courant’s theorem to this case, V.Arnold suggested to study the topology of the analytic set and to find the dependence of suitable topological invariants of on the number of the corresponding eigenvalue of the Laplacian, see [3], Problem 2003-10, p.174. We follow Arnold’s suggestion for under certain additional assumptions of group-theoretic character. On the other hand, we remark that the right hand side of the inequality in Theorem 1.1, up to a coefficient, coincides with the first term of asymptotics in the celebrated Weyl’s law, see [10]. Thus we get an estimate of the average number of common zeros of Laplacian eigenfunctions in terms of the asymptotic expression for the eigenvalue number. There is no doubt that one has to give a meaning to this fact.
2. Crofton’s formula for the sphere
Let be the unit sphere considered with the metric induced from the ambient Euclidean space. Suppose we are given two submanifolds and of dimensions and respectively, such that . Let denote the volume of the -dimensional sphere of radius 1. Moving the second submanifold by a rotation , take the number of intersection points . Then the Crofton (or kinematic) formula is the expression for the average number of such points, i.e., the integral of over with respect to the Haar measure . Namely,
[TABLE]
We refer the reader to the book of L.A.Santaló [12], see Sections 15.2 and 18.6. Another proof is given by R.Howard, see [9], Sect. 3.12. We will use the Crofton formula for being a plane section through the origin of complementary dimension . Then the formula reads
[TABLE]
It will be convenient to have this formula for coverings. For this we recall the definition of -density on a manifold , see, e.g., [2]. Let be the cone of decomposable -vectors at . Then -density on is a function , depending smoothly on and such that . A -density can be integrated along any, not necessarily orientable, submanifold of dimension . If is a Riemannian manifold then for any there is a -density attaching to a -vector the volume of a -dimensional parallelotope with edges . For any differentiable mapping and for a -density on we have the inverse image , a -density on .
Proposition 2.1**.**
Let be a compact manifold of dimension and let be a covering over . Assume that is not contained in a proper linear subspace of . The pull-back of the dual space is some -dimensional subspace , which comes equipped with the metric of . Then, in the notation of Sect.1, for an -dimensional subspace one has
[TABLE]
where is the Riemannian -density on .
Proof. We have
[TABLE]
for some plane section of of codimension . Let be the degree of the covering . Then
[TABLE]
by Crofton’s formula and by the definition of .
3. Equivariant mappings into the sphere
Let be a compact connected Lie group , a closed subgroup, and the homogeneous space considered with the transitive -action. Introduce a -invariant Riemannian metric on . Let be a -invariant finite dimensional subspace in considered with the scalar product
[TABLE]
where is the Riemannian measure on . For let denote the linear functional from attaching to a function its value . Take an orthonormal basis of , denote by the dual basis of , and identify with via
[TABLE]
Then
[TABLE]
and so we obtain the coordinate form of the map , namely,
[TABLE]
The map is equivariant with respect to the given action of on and the linear representation of in identified with . In fact, the image of is contained in a sphere, and we now compute its radius. The following lemma for spherical harmonics is known in quantum mechanics as Unsöld’s identity (1927). The general case is found in [6], Exercise 5.25 c),i), p.261 and p.303, see also [1].
Lemma 3.1**.**
The image is contained in the sphere of radius , i.e.,
[TABLE]
Proof. Write
[TABLE]
Then is an orthogonal matrix, hence
[TABLE]
Since acts transitively on , we have
[TABLE]
where is some constant. Integrating the last equality over , we get .
The following lemma is quite general and elementary. For two quadratic forms and on a real vector space and positive definite, let denote the trace of the matrix of in any orthonormal basis with respect to . We use the same notation for a quadratic and the associate symmetric bilinear form. We denote by the Eucledian metric on , i.e., relative to Cartesian coordinates.
Lemma 3.2**.**
Let be a Riemannian manifold,
[TABLE]
a differential mapping, and the pull-back of the Euclidean metric onto . Then
[TABLE]
where the norm of a tangent vector is taken with respect to .
Proof. Let be an orthonormal basis at some point . Then
[TABLE]
are the coordinates of relative to the chosen basis. At the point we have
[TABLE]
hence
[TABLE]
as we asserted.
We now return to the Lie group setting. Let , where is a compact connected Lie group and a closed subgroup. Fix a -invariant Riemannian metric on , consider the corresponding Laplace operator and take a -invariant subspace . Recall that we have the mapping and the quadratic form on induced by the Euclidean metric on . The first and the last assertions in the following lemma are known, see [13].
Lemma 3.3**.**
(1)* The form is -invariant.
(2) One has*
[TABLE]
(3)* If is isotropy irreducible then , where is a constant.*
Proof. (1) follows from the fact that is a -equivariant mapping. To prove (3), it suffices to remark that an irreducible -module has only one, up to a multiple, -invariant quadratic form. To prove (2), write
[TABLE]
sum up the equalities for all and integrate over . This gives
[TABLE]
On the other hand, is constant, and so we obtain
[TABLE]
by Lemma 3.2. Therefore .
Remark. If is isotropy irreducible then is a minimal immersion of into the sphere, see [13].
4. Proof of main results
Proof of Theorem 1.1.
Case 1: * locally separates the points of .* The equivariant mapping defined in Sect.3 gives rise to a fibering . By Lemma 3.1 the image is contained in the sphere of radius . Therefore is a covering over a submanifold . By Proposition 2.1
[TABLE]
Now, can be obtained by pulling the Riemannian metric back to by and then taking the volume form. Suppose has eigenvalues with respect to an orthogonal basis of on at some point . Then . By (1) of Lemma 3.3 the form is -invariant, and so the set of eigenvalues (with multiplicities) is the same for all . Thus
[TABLE]
From (2) of Lemma 3.3 it follows that . Since
[TABLE]
we obtain the estimate
[TABLE]
as required.
Case 2: The points of are not locally separated by . The equivariant mapping has positive dimensional fiber, i.e.,
[TABLE]
Recall that , , and . Consider the mapping of
[TABLE]
to defined by . It is easily seen that is a manifold. Namely, is the space of a fiber bundle over whose fiber is the set of points of the Grassmanian , such that the corresponding subspace contains a given point . Thus the dimension of is easily computed, namely,
[TABLE]
where is the quotient space of of dimension . Hence
[TABLE]
Therefore the image of in has measure 0 (for example, by Sards’s lemma), and our assertion follows by the definition of .
Proof of Theorem 1.2. Since is isotropy irreducible, is not contained in a proper subgroup of of greater dimension. Thus the mapping is a covering, so that we are in Case 1 of Theorem 1.1. Also, (3) of Lemma 3.3 shows that all are equal. Thus the inequality in the proof of Theorem 1.1, Case 1, becomes an equality.
5. Concluding remarks
1. Example: the inequality in Theorem 1.1 can be strict. Let be an orthonormal basis in , the Cartesian coordinates relative to , and the lattice generated by and , where is some fixed non-zero number. The metric defines a flat metric on the torus . Let be the associate Laplace operator. Then the minimal positive eigenvalue of equals , the space has dimension 4, and one finds easily an orthonormal basis in . Namely,
[TABLE]
[TABLE]
Then
[TABLE]
by a direct computation. The mapping from the proof of Theorem 1.1 has the form
[TABLE]
Using the notation inroduced in the course of the proof, we get , so the inequality is strict if .
- Crofton’s formula is local. In Proposition 2.1, one can replace by any domain and get the average number of common zeros of in . Namely,
[TABLE]
For this reduces to
[TABLE]
see the proof of Theorem 1.1. Finally, if is isotropy irreducible, then
[TABLE]
- The case of equations, . We keep the notations and assumptions of Theorem 1.2, but consider a smaller number of functions . Let the functions be linearly independent so that their linear envelope has dimension . We keep the same notation for the set of common zeros of . If is a smooth -dimensional submanifold of then we denote by its -dimensional volume. Otherwise we put . The subset of consisting of all , such that is not a smooth submanifold of dimension has measure 0. This follows from Sard’s lemma applied to the projection
[TABLE]
Therefore the average volume of is correctly defined as the integral of over the Grassmanian . For isotropy irreducible we have
[TABLE]
The proof follows the above scheme for functions if one takes into account the following fact. Let be an -dimensional submanifold of the sphere and let be a vector subspace of codimension . Then it follows from Crofton’s formula that the integral of over the Grassmanian of all such subspaces equals .
Note. V.M.Gichev informed the authors that Theorem 1.2 follows from the results of [8].
The reference list from the paper itself. Each links out to its DOI / PubMed record.
- 1[1] D.Akhiezer, B.Kazarnovskii, On common zeros of eigenfunctions of the Laplace operator , Abh. Math. Sem. Univ. Hamburg 87, no.1 (2017), 105–111, DOI:10.1007/s 12188-016-0138-1.
- 2[2] J.- C.Álvarez Paiva, E.Fernandes, Gelfand transforms and Crofton formulas , Selecta Math., vol. 13, no.3 (2008), pp.369 – 390.
- 3[3] V.I.Arnold(ed.), Arnold’s Problems , Springer, 2005.
- 4[4] S.Y.Cheng, Eigenfunctions and nodal sets , Comment. Math. Helvetici 51 (1976), pp. 43–55.
- 5[5] R.Courant & \& D.Hilbert, Methods of Mathematical Physics, I , Interscience Publishers, New York, 1953.
- 6[6] S.Gallot, D.Hulin, J.Lafontaine, Riemannian Geometry , Third Edition, Springer, 2004.
- 7[7] I.M.Gelfand, M.M.Smirnov, Lagrangians satisfying Crofton formulas, Radon transforms, and nonlocal differentials , Advances in Math. 109, no.2 (1994), pp. 188–227.
- 8[8] V.M.Gichev, Metric properties in the mean of polynomials on compact isotropy irreducible homogeneous spaces , Anal. Math. Phys. 3, no.2 (2013), pp. 119–144.
