# Split Active Asteroid P/2016 J1 (PANSTARRS)

**Authors:** Man-To Hui, David Jewitt, and Xinnan Du

arXiv: 1702.02766 · 2017-03-15

## TL;DR

This study investigates the physical properties, activity history, and possible breakup mechanisms of the split active asteroid P/2016 J1 (PANSTARRS), revealing its recent activity, composition, and potential for future disintegration.

## Contribution

It provides detailed photometric and astrometric analysis of P/2016 J1's components, estimating their sizes, activity duration, and proposing a sublimation-driven breakup mechanism.

## Key findings

- Components separated 1500-2300 days ago with low velocity.
- Both fragments have similar primitive asteroid-like colors.
- Active dust ejection persisted for 3-6 months at low speeds.

## Abstract

We present a photometric and astrometric study of the split active asteroid P/2016 J1 (PANSTARRS). The two components (hereafter J1-A and J1-B) separated either $\sim$1500 days (2012 May to June) or 2300 days (2010 April) prior to the current epoch, with a separation speed $V_{\mathrm{sep}} = 0.70 \pm 0.02$ m s$^{-1}$ for the former scenario, or $0.83 \pm 0.06$ m s$^{-1}$ for the latter. Keck photometry reveals that the two fragments have similar, Sun-like colors which are comparable to the colors of primitive C- and G-type asteroids. With a nominal comet-like albedo, $p_{R} = 0.04$, the effective, dust-contaminated cross sections are estimated to be 2.4 km$^{2}$ for J1-A, and 0.5 km$^{2}$ for J1-B. We estimate that the nucleus radii lie in the range $140 \lesssim R_{\mathrm{N}} \lesssim 900$ m for J1-A and $40 \lesssim R_{\mathrm{N}} \lesssim 400$ m, for J1-B. A syndyne-synchrone simulation shows that both components have been active for 3 to 6 months, by ejecting dust grains at speeds $\sim$0.5 m s$^{-1}$ with rates $\sim$1 kg s$^{-1}$ for J1-A and 0.1 kg s$^{-1}$ for J1-B. In its present orbit, the rotational spin-up and devolatilization times of 2016 J1 are very small compared to the age of the solar system, raising the question of why this object still exists. We suggest that ice that was formerly buried within this asteroid became exposed at the surface, perhaps via a small impact, and that sublimation torques then rapidly drove it to break-up. Further disintegration events are anticipated due to the rotational instability.

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1702.02766/full.md

## Figures

7 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1702.02766/full.md

## References

36 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1702.02766/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1702.02766