# Classical novae vs cataclysmic variables

**Authors:** C. Tappert, I. Fuentes-Morales, E. Puebla, A. Ederoclite, L., Schmidtobreick, N. Vogt

arXiv: 1702.02415 · 2017-02-09

## TL;DR

This paper compares post-nova systems with general cataclysmic variables, focusing on mass-transfer rates and their relation to nova eruptions, revealing that post-novae are mainly high mass-transfer CVs and suggesting possible effects of eruptions on system properties.

## Contribution

It provides the first comparative analysis of post-novae and CVs, highlighting the role of mass-transfer rates and potential eruption effects on binary system characteristics.

## Key findings

- Post-novae are predominantly high mass-transfer CVs.
- Shorter recurrence times explain the prevalence of high mass-transfer post-novae.
- Evidence suggests eruptions may influence mass-transfer rates in specific cases.

## Abstract

We present a preliminary comparison of the post-nova population with that of general cataclysmic variables (CVs). We particularly focus on the mass-transfer rate and its potential relation to the nova eruption. We find that the known post-nova sample exclusively consists of high mass-transfer CVs, but that this is more likely to be due to the shorter recurrent time for those systems, rather than the mass-transfer rate being affected by the eruption. Nevertheless, we find evidence for such an effect for specific post-novae, and that it is potentially related to the binary separation and to presence or absence of an accretion disc.

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1702.02415/full.md

## Figures

10 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1702.02415/full.md

## References

37 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1702.02415/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1702.02415