The curl operator on odd-dimensional manifolds
Christian Baer

TL;DR
This paper investigates the spectral characteristics of the curl operator on odd-dimensional manifolds, revealing its eigenvalue structure, asymptotics, and specific spectra for notable geometries like spheres and tori.
Contribution
It provides a comprehensive analysis of the curl operator's spectrum on odd-dimensional manifolds, including asymptotics, bounds, and explicit spectra for key geometries.
Findings
Eigenvalues include zero with infinite multiplicity and finite discrete eigenvalues.
Weyl asymptotics for the spectrum are established.
Explicit spectra are computed for flat tori, spheres, and spherical space forms.
Abstract
We study the spectral properties of curl, a linear differential operator of first order acting on differential forms of appropriate degree on an odd-dimensional closed oriented Riemannian manifold. In three dimensions its eigenvalues are the electromagnetic oscillation frequencies in vacuum without external sources. In general, the spectrum consists of the eigenvalue 0 with infinite multiplicity and further real discrete eigenvalues of finite multiplicity. We compute the Weyl asymptotics and study the zeta-function. We give a sharp lower eigenvalue bound for positively curved manifolds and analyze the equality case. Finally, we compute the spectrum for flat tori, round spheres and 3-dimensional spherical space forms.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
The curl operator on odd-dimensional manifolds
Christian Bär
Institut für Mathematik, Universität Potsdam, Karl-Liebknecht-Str. 24-25, 14476 Potsdam, Germany
Abstract.
We study the spectral properties of , a linear differential operator of first order acting on differential forms of appropriate degree on an odd-dimensional closed oriented Riemannian manifold. In three dimensions its eigenvalues are the electromagnetic oscillation frequencies in vacuum without external sources. In general, the spectrum consists of the eigenvalue [math] with infinite multiplicity and further real discrete eigenvalues of finite multiplicity. We compute the Weyl asymptotics and study the -function. We give a sharp lower eigenvalue bound for positively curved manifolds and analyze the equality case. Finally, we compute the spectrum for flat tori, round spheres and -dimensional spherical space forms.
Key words and phrases:
Maxwell equations, curl, Weyl asymptotics, -function, eigenvalue estimate, flat tori, spherical space forms
2010 Mathematics Subject Classification:
58J50,78A40
I. Introduction
Let be a domain. The Maxwell equations in vacuum in absence of external sources are
[TABLE]
Here and are time-dependent vector fields on , the electric and magnetic fields, respectively. The equations have to be complemented with suitable boundary conditions. The ansatz
[TABLE]
yields a solution to the first two equations if and only if
[TABLE]
Thus the eigenvalues of the “stationary Maxwell operator” on divergence free vector fields are regarded as the electromagnetic oscillation frequencies of . This spectrum has been studied by Weyl [Weyl] on bounded domains with smooth boundary. Weyl showed the asymptotic law
[TABLE]
as . Here denotes the number of eigenvalues whose modulus is bounded from above by . Safarov [Saf] improved this to
[TABLE]
and, under an additional assumption on the billards of the domain, even to
[TABLE]
The case when the boundary of has only Lipschitz regularity has also been investigated, see e.g. [BirSol1087, Fil, Ven2010]. Additional complications arise for nonsmooth dielectric permittivity and magnetic permiability. We will, however, consider only the case when they are constant and can be normalized to be by a suitable choice of physical units.
Maxwell’s equations (1)–(4) make sense on any oriented Riemannian -manifold . If the manifold is compact and without boundary we need not worry about boundary conditions. Then turns out to be a selfadjoint operator and is an eigenvalue of if and only if and are eigenvalues of the stationary Maxwell operator.
We will study the spectrum of on closed oriented Riemannian manifolds. In order to generalize it to higher dimensions it is convenient to reformulate it in terms of differential forms rather than vector fields. In three dimensions, can be equivalently defined acting on -forms by where denotes the exterior differential and the Hodge-star operator.
More generally, if the dimension of is odd the operator acts on -forms. It turns out that is formally selfadjoint if mod and formally skewadjoint if mod . To obtain a selfadjoint operator in all odd dimensions we define in the latter case. Similar generalizations to higher dimensions using differential forms have been considered in the literature [Weyl52, Mill, Weck, DF2008, Fil]. In [JS, Thm 1.3] the connection between classical and quantum ergodicity of has been studied. We hope that our investigation of the curl operator in higher dimensions may prove useful for the understanding of extensions of electromagnetism to compactified extra dimensions as well as the the -brane scenario.
The present paper is structured as follows. In Sec. II. Differential forms, we fix notations and recall the Hodge decomposition theorem. In Sec. III. The curl operator, we introduce the -operator on odd-dimensional oriented Riemannian manifolds and show essential selfadjointness if the manifold is closed. The operator is not elliptic, indeed it has an infinite-dimensional kernel. But the rest of the spectrum is discrete, i.e., consists of eigenvalues of finite multiplicity, and the corresponding eigenforms are smooth. In dimension , restricting to the complement of the kernel is equivalent to imposing equations (3) and (4).
The structure of the spectrum is investigated in Sec. IV. The spectrum. If mod the spectrum turns out to be symmetric about [math] but for mod this is in general not the case. We give an explicit example for . Denoting the number of positive eigenvalues below by and that of negative eigenvalues above by we prove the Weyl asymptotics
[TABLE]
as . Then, we introduce the -function of and prove its basic properties. In particular, the value at the origin turns out to be an integer-valued topological invariant of the underlying manifold. When taken modulo two gives Kervaire’s semi-characteristic of .
Interestingly, the -invariant of has been studied long ago by Millson. In [Mill] he shows that it coincides with the -invariant of the signature operator acting on forms of even degree. This -invariant occurs as a boundary contribution in the signature formula for manifolds with boundary due to Atiyah, Singer, and Patodi [APS, Thm. 4.14].
In Sec. V. Eigenvalue estimates, we prove a sharp lower eigenvalue estimate if the curvature operator of is positive. In three dimensions this can be relaxed to a lower Ricci curvature bound. The equality case is also analyzed.
In Sec. VI. Examples, we compute the -spectrum for flat tori and round spheres. In these cases the spectrum is always symmetric about [math]. In dimension we also treat spherical space forms and obtain a convenient criterion for the symmetry of the spectrum. Suitable lens spaces then provide simple examples for nonsymmetric -spectrum.
II. Differential forms
We start by fixing some notations. Throughout this text will denote an -dimensional Riemannian manifold. For , we denote by , , and the space of complex-valued -forms on which are smooth, square-integrable, and distributional, respectively. On we have the scalar product
[TABLE]
turning into a Hilbert space. Here, denotes the scalar product on forms induced by the Riemannian metric and the Riemannian volume measure.
The exterior differential is denoted by . Now assume that carries an orientation. Then, the Hodge-star operator is defined and characterized on by
[TABLE]
The operator formally adjoint to is given by
[TABLE]
see e.g. [Rosenberg, p. 21]. Moreover, we have on
[TABLE]
see e.g. [Besse, p. 33]. The Hodge-Laplacian is defined by
[TABLE]
It commutes with , and . If is closed, i.e., compact and without boundary, then there is the Hodge decomposition [Warner, Ch. 6]
[TABLE]
Since the Hodge-Laplacian is elliptic its kernel is finite-dimensional and contained in . Moreover, (9) and elliptic regularity theory imply
[TABLE]
III. The curl operator
From now on, will always be oriented and of odd dimension . We consider the operator . Equivalently, it would also be possible to consider but we fix the other convention.
A. Formal selfadjointness
Lemma 2.1**.**
Let be an oriented Riemannian manifold of odd dimension . Then, is formally selfadjoint if mod and formally skewadjoint if mod .
Proof.
By (5)–(7) and the fact that is odd we have
[TABLE]
In order to always have a formally selfadjoint operator we propose the following:
Definition 2.2**.**
The operator
[TABLE]
acting on is called the curl operator.
For we locally have and the curl operator is noting but acting on functions. Therefore we will assume . Then, is not elliptic; in fact its kernel contains the infinite-dimensional space . In particular, eigenforms for the eigenvalue [math] can have low regularity.
Lemma 2.3**.**
Let be an oriented closed Riemannian manifold of odd dimension . Let and . Then, the following are equivalent:
- (i)
* where and ;* 2. (ii)
* and is of the form for some .*
Proof.
To prove the implication (i) (ii) it suffices to consider . Then, for or , we have . Thus does the job. Moreover,
[TABLE]
Conversely, let satisfy . Then, the same computation shows . Since commutes with it leaves its eigenspace for the eigenvalue invariant. By (5) it also maps to itself. Thus restricts to an endomorphism on the finite-dimensional space whose square is . This selfadjoint endomorphism can only have the eigenvalues and and (i) follows. ∎
For the eigenspace of any linear operator to the eigenvalue we write . For the multiplicity we write .
Corollary 2.4**.**
Let be an oriented closed Riemannian manifold of odd dimension . Then, eigenforms of to nonzero eigenvalues are smooth and the multiplicity of any nonzero eigenvalue is finite.
Proof.
We may rewrite the statement of Lemma 2.3 as
[TABLE]
Since is finite-dimensional and consists of smooth forms by elliptic theory the assertion follows. ∎
Remark 2.5**.**
The proof of the implication (i) (ii) in Lemma 2.3 did not use the assumption that is closed. Here might even be incomplete. Thus smoothness of eigenforms of to nonzero eigenvalues is also true in this general case.
B. Selfadjointness
By Lemma 2.1 we know that defines a symmetric unbounded operator in the Hilbert space with domain .
Lemma 2.6**.**
Let be an oriented closed Riemannian manifold of odd dimension . Then, with domain is essentially selfadjoint in the Hilbert space .
Proof.
It suffices to show that the adjoint operator (in the sense of functional analysis) of with domain in does not have nontrivial solutions of . Then, is a distributional eigenform of to the eigenvalue . By Lemma 2.3 is then an eigenform of to the eigenvalue and is, in particular, smooth. Since is nonnegative . ∎
On on can define a vector cross product and a corresponding curl operator based on the algebra of the octonions [PY]. Since this curl operator acts on vector fields while our curl in this case acts on -forms which have fiber dimension , there seems to be no relation.
IV. The spectrum
When we now speak of the spectrum of we mean the spectrum of its unique selfadjoint extension in .
A. Structure of the spectrum
Theorem 3.1**.**
Let be an oriented closed Riemannian manifold of odd dimension . Then, the continuous spectrum of is empty. The point spectrum consists of the eigenvalue [math] which has infinite multiplicity and the discrete spectrum.
Proof.
By (10) the kernel of is given by
[TABLE]
where the second summand is obviously infinite-dimensional. For the orthogonal complement Lemma 2.3 provides us with the spectral resolution
[TABLE]
Here denotes the spectrum of the selfadjoint extension of and the sum is a sum of Hilbert spaces in . Recall that is left invariant by . ∎
B. Symmetry of the spectrum
Since has positive and negative eigenvalues the question arises whether the spectrum is symmetric about [math].
Theorem 3.2**.**
Let be an oriented closed Riemannian manifold of odd dimension with mod . Then, the spectrum of is symmetric about [math].
Proof.
If mod then restricts to a real skewsymmetric endomorphism on . Thus on this subspace has the eigenvalues and with equal multiplicity. Hence, itself has the eigenvalues and with equal multiplicity. ∎
In the last section we will exhibit a -dimensional example with nonsymmetric spectrum. But even when mod there are situations where the spectrum is necessarily symmetric.
Theorem 3.3**.**
Let be an oriented closed Riemannian manifold of odd dimension . Assume there exists an orientation reversing isometry .
Then, the spectrum of is symmetric about [math].
Proof.
The map acts by pull-back on and commutes with . Since it is an orientation reversing isometry it anticommutes with the Hodge-star operator. Hence, it anticommutes with . Thus restricts to an isomorphism . ∎
Corollary 3.4**.**
Let be an oriented closed Riemannian symmetric space of odd dimension . Then, the spectrum of is symmetric about [math].
Proof.
Let be the geodesic reflection about a point in . Since is symmetric this is an isometry and since is odd is orientation reversing. ∎
Examples for such symmetric spaces are flat tori, round spheres, compact Lie groups with biinvariant metrics etc.
C. Weyl asymptotics
To examine the asymptotic behavior of large eigenvalues we introduce the eigenvalue counting functions and set for
[TABLE]
and
[TABLE]
Hence, is the total number of positive eigenvalues below and is the total number of negative eigenvalues above . Similarly, we have the counting functions for the Hodge-Laplacians
[TABLE]
Lemma 3.5**.**
Let be an oriented closed Riemannian manifold of odd dimension . Then,
[TABLE]
Proof.
The commutative diagram
[TABLE]
shows that for fixed
[TABLE]
Proceeding inductively we get
[TABLE]
and hence, by (12),
[TABLE]
Summation over proves the assertion. ∎
Theorem 3.6**.**
Let be an oriented closed Riemannian manifold of odd dimension . Then, as ,
[TABLE]
Proof.
We apply [Ivrii, Thm. 0.1] to and the subspace of . In other words, is the -orthogonal complement of the kernel of . Then, we get where
[TABLE]
Here is the orthoprojection onto the orthogonal complement of in and as well as where is the spectral resolution of the principal symbol of . Since is a differential operator of first order its principal symbol depends linearly on and hence . This implies
[TABLE]
and therefore .
It remains to determine this coefficient. It is known (see e.g. [BGV, Cor. 2.43]) that has the following asymptotics as :
[TABLE]
Inserting this into Lemma 3.5 yields
[TABLE]
Here we employed the formula
[TABLE]
with . Using Legendre’s duplication formula for the -function
[TABLE]
we obtain for the dimension-dependent coefficient
[TABLE]
This shows
[TABLE]
and concludes the proof. ∎
Remark 3.7**.**
For low dimensions one can compute the coefficient of the leading term in the Weyl expansion directly from (14). For we have and the principal symbol of at is multiplication with where the sign depends on the orientation of . Thus if and is correctly oriented and otherwise. Hence, for fixed the integral over gives . Therefore which coincides with the coefficient in Theorem 3.6.
For , is the orthoprojection onto the orthogonal complement of in . The principal symbol of is times a rotation in the plane and hence has the eigenvalues and . Thus if and vanishes otherwise. Therefore the integral over coincides with the volume of the unit ball. Hence
[TABLE]
again in accordance with Theorem 3.6. This is also consistent with the formulas obtained in [Weyl, Saf] for domains in .
D. The -function
We define the -function of by
[TABLE]
Theorem 3.8**.**
The -function converges and is holomorphic for and has a meromorphic continuation to . The poles are simple and can occur only at . Moreover,
[TABLE]
where denotes the Betti number of .
Proof.
The -function of relates to the -functions of the Hodge-Laplacians
[TABLE]
Namely, by (13) we find
[TABLE]
The assertions about convergence, meromorphic continuation and the poles now follow directly from the corresponding statements for , see e.g. [Rosenberg, Thm. 5.2]. Moreover, again by [Rosenberg, Thm. 5.2] and by Hodge theory, we find
[TABLE]
In particular, the value is a topological invariant of . When taken modulo it is known as the semi-characteristic of [Ker].
E. The -invariant
An interesting modification of the -function is the -function given by
[TABLE]
Millson showed in [Mill] that the -invariant coincides with the -invariant of the signature operator acting on forms of even degree. This -invariant occurs as a boundary contribution in the signature formula for manifolds with boundary due to Atiyah, Singer, and Patodi [APS, Thm. 4.14].
V. Eigenvalue estimates
In section VI. Examples we will compute the spectrum of on some particularly nice spaces. In general, an explicit computation is not possible. But often one can at least give bounds on the spectrum.
To formulate an estimate which is valid in all odd dimensions consider the curvature operator , a field of symmetric endomorphisms of . It is characterized by
[TABLE]
for all and all . The manifold has constant sectional curvature if and only if .
Theorem 4.1**.**
Let be an oriented closed Riemannian manifold of odd dimension . Let be a positive constant and assume . Then, all nonzero eigenvalues of satisfy
[TABLE]
Proof.
By [GaMe, Thm. 6.13] all eigenvalues of the Hodge-Laplacian on coexact -forms satisfy
[TABLE]
Lemma 2.3 yields the claim. ∎
The estimate is sharp because equality holds for the standard sphere, see Theorem 5.2 below. Unfortunately, positivity of the curvature operator is a very strong assumption. In dimension we now replace it by a weaker Ricci curvature bound. The conclusion remains the same.
Theorem 4.2**.**
Let be an oriented closed -dimensional Riemannian manifold. Let be a positive constant and assume . Then, all nonzero eigenvalues of satisfy
[TABLE]
Again, the estimate is optimal because equality is attained on the round .
Proof.
We introduce an auxiliary connection on by
[TABLE]
Here denotes the covector corresponding to under the “musical isomorphism”, i.e., for all vectors . This defines a metric connection because the term we have added is skewsymmetric in .
We compute the connection-Laplacian for . We fix a point in and choose a local orthonormal tangent frame near which is synchronous at , i.e., at . Then, we find at :
[TABLE]
Inserting the Bochner formula
[TABLE]
yields
[TABLE]
Now let be an eigenvalue of with corresponding eigenform . Inserting into (16) and taking the -scalar product with yields
[TABLE]
Hence, and, since , we conclude .
For a negative eigenvalue we can obtain the estimate using the connection or, alternatively, we reduce to the case of positive by reversing the orientiation. ∎
Remark 4.3**.**
It is possible to deduce Theorem 4.1 in a similar fashion using the modified connection
[TABLE]
where the optimal value of
[TABLE]
depends on the dimension.
It is interesting to compare the estimate in Theorem 4.2 to Lichnerowicz’ lower bound (see e.g. [Chavel, p. 82]) for the first eigenvalue of the Laplacian acting on functions (under the same Ricci curvature assumption):
[TABLE]
If equality holds in (17) then Obata’s theorem tells us that is isometric to a round sphere. We have a similar rigidity statement for Theorem 4.2 as well. On the round -sphere the multiplicity of the eigenvalue is . Conversely, we can now show:
Theorem 4.4**.**
Let be an oriented closed and connected -dimensional Riemannian manifold. Let be a positive constant and assume . Assume that or is an eigenvalue of of multiplicity at least .
Then, has constant sectional curvature and is hence a spherical spaceform. Moreover, if both and are -eigenvalues of multiplicity at least, then is isometric to or to equipped with a metric of constant sectional curvature .
Proof.
By reversing the orientation if necessary we can assume that is positive. By rescaling the metric we may furthermore assume that .
Thus let be an eigenvalue of of multiplicity at least . Every eigenform of to the eigenvalue must be parallel with respect to the connection , see the proof of Theorem 4.2. Since the connection is metric we can choose the such that they are perpendicular and of length at each point. One easily checks that is also -parallel and complements and to an orthonormal basis at each point. Thus the cotangent bundle is trivialized by the -parallel forms , and .
Let be the corresponding vector fields. Without loss of generality we assume that is positively oriented. Since the are -parallel we have
[TABLE]
This implies
[TABLE]
Hence, if are pairwise disjoint we get
[TABLE]
If the permutation is even we find
[TABLE]
and the same result also holds if is odd. This determines the full curvature tensor which must then be given by
[TABLE]
Thus has constant sectional curvature .
Now assume that both and are -eigenvalues of multiplicity at least. Then, as we have seen above, they actually have multiplicity . The assertion will be shown right after Corollary 5.7 below. ∎
Remark 4.5**.**
Theorems 4.2 and the first part of 4.4 can also be derived from Theorem 7.6 in [CT94]. Namely, by this result eigen-1-forms to the eigenvalues are dual to Killing vector fields which are pointwise eigenvectors of the Ricci curvature tensor.
VI. Examples
We now consider a few examples of manifolds on which the spectrum of can be computed explicitly. The equivariant -invariant of for these spaces has been computed with representation theoretic methods by Millson in [Mill].
A. Flat tori
Let be a lattice and its dual lattice,
[TABLE]
We determine the eigenvalues of on the flat torus . By Theorem 3.3 . Hence, (13) yields
[TABLE]
On a flat torus we have . Inserting this into (18) yields
[TABLE]
The spectrum of the Laplace-Beltrami operator on a flat torus can be computed using Fourier series and is well known to be
[TABLE]
see [BGM, Prop. B.I.2]. We summarize:
Theorem 5.1**.**
On the flat torus a number is an eigenvalue of the operator if and only if there exists a such that . The multiplicity of then is
[TABLE]
B. Round spheres
Now let be the round sphere with constant sectional curvature . Again by Theorem 3.3 the spectrum of is symmetric about [math]. Theorem 6 in [IK] tells us that is an eigenvalue of the Hodge-Laplacian on if and only if it is of the form for . By (12) and [IK, Thm. 6] the multiplicity is then given by
[TABLE]
We summarize:
Theorem 5.2**.**
On the round sphere with sectional curvature a number is an eigenvalue of the operator if and only if it is of the form
[TABLE]
for some . The multiplicity of then is
[TABLE]
Remark 5.3**.**
It is interesting to compare the spectrum of on to that of the Dirac operator acting on spinor fields. By [B1, Thm. 1] the Dirac eigenvalues are the numbers given by
[TABLE]
There now seems to be a contradiction for because then reduces to the Dirac operator. The point is here that carries two different spin structures. While (19) gives the Dirac spectrum for the “nontrivial” spin structure, the formula in Theorem 5.2 provides it for the “trivial” spin structure.
C. Spherical space forms
We now study spherical space forms in dimensions, in other words, quotients of the round -sphere . The group of orientation preserving isometries of is acting by matrix multiplication from the left. Oriented compact connected -manifolds of constant sectional curvature are of the form where is a finite fixed point free subgroup. One-forms on correspond to -invariant one-forms on via pull-back along the projection map . Hence, has the same -eigenvalues as , only the multiplicities on will in general be smaller than on (including the possibility [math]). We encode this information in the following Poincaré series:
[TABLE]
where the multiplicities are those of on . Knowing the -spectrum on is equivalent to knowing the power series and .
Lemma 5.4**.**
The power series and converge absolutely for .
Proof.
By Theorem 5.2 with both and can be majorized by
[TABLE]
That power series has convergence radius because
[TABLE]
The -module of -forms decomposes into those of selfdual and antiselfdual -forms, . Let be the corresponding characters.
Theorem 5.5**.**
Let be a finite fixed point free subgroup. Then, the -spectrum of is given by
[TABLE]
Example 5.6**.**
We determine the -spectrum of real projective -space . In this case and both and act trivially on -forms. Hence, . Therefore
[TABLE]
This shows that on the number is a -eigenvalue if and only if is even and in this case it has the same multiplicity as on .
For the smallest positive and the largest negative -eigenvalue of a spherical space form we get
Corollary 5.7**.**
The multiplicity of the smallest positive -eigenvalue of is given by
[TABLE]
The maximal value is attained if and only if acts trivially on . Similarly, the multiplicity of the largest negative -eigenvalue is given by
[TABLE]
The maximal value is attained if and only if acts trivially on .
Proof.
The multiplicity is given by
[TABLE]
Now for any we have with equality if and only if acts trivially on . The assertion follows. ∎
We can now finish the proof of Theorem 4.4.
Completion of the proof of Theorem 4.4..
If then must act trivially on and on . The only elements of doing that are and . Hence, either is trivial and or and . ∎
Corollary 5.8**.**
The -spectrum on is symmetric about [math] if and only if
[TABLE]
Proof.
This follows directly from
[TABLE]
and . ∎
Example 5.9**.**
Put
[TABLE]
We choose . Then, is called a lens space. If is a positively oriented orthonormal basis of then is a basis of . A straighforward computation shows that w.r.t. this basis the action of on is given by the matrix
[TABLE]
and hence
[TABLE]
Similarly one sees
[TABLE]
In order to apply the criterion in Corollary 5.8 we compute
[TABLE]
Thus for we get
[TABLE]
Similarly, for we get
[TABLE]
as well. Corollary 5.8 now shows that the -spectrum of the lens space is not symmetric about [math]. Specifically, from (20), (21), the corresponding values for , and Corollary 5.7 we see that while .
It remains to prove Theorem 5.5. We denote the eigenspace of an operator on to the eigenvalue by . Let be the inclusion map. We regard the elements of as constant (parallel) -forms on .
Lemma 5.10**.**
The map yields -equivariant isomorphisms and .
Proof.
Denote the exterior unit normal vector field of by and the Levi-Civita connection of by . For vector fields on the Gauss equation says
[TABLE]
This implies for -forms on (assuming without loss of generality at the point under consideration):
[TABLE]
In particular, if is parallel then
[TABLE]
Denote the Hodge-star operator on by and that on by . Let , , be a local positively oriented orthonormal frame on . Then, , , , forms a positively oriented orthonormal frame on . Using (22) we compute for parallel :
[TABLE]
Since the direction of can be chosen arbitrarily we find
[TABLE]
Now let . Then, is -parallel and satisfies . Thus satisfies
[TABLE]
hence is -parallel. Since the space of -parallel -forms on coincides with the map restricts to a linear map . The elements act by orientation-preserving isometries, hence they commute with and . Thus the map is -equivariant. Furthermore, the map is nontrivial, is an irreducible -module and and both have dimension . Thus by Schur’s lemma the map is an isomorphism.
The statement about is analogous. ∎
Proof of Theorem 5.5..
Since the cotangent bundle is trivialized by -parallel -forms, the Hilbert space is spanned by products where and is -parallel. It is well known that where is the space of harmonic homogeneous polynomials of degree on , restricted to , see e.g. [BGM, Sec. C.I.C]. Denote the character of the representation of on by . Then, by Lemma 5.10, the character of the -module is given by . Since the Hodge decomposition reads
[TABLE]
Now is -equivariant and has kernel . Thus the character of the -module is given by .
On the connection-Laplacian acts as and hence has the same eigenvalue as the Laplacian on , namely , see [BGM, Prop. III.C.I.1]. We encode the multiplicities of the eigenvalues of on , restricted to coexact forms, in the Poincaré series
[TABLE]
Similarly, we consider
[TABLE]
Ikeda has shown [Ike, p. 81] that
[TABLE]
Thus
[TABLE]
From (16) we get on (using , and ):
[TABLE]
and hence
[TABLE]
Now we observe
[TABLE]
For our Poincaré series this means
[TABLE]
Similarly, we get
[TABLE]
Solving for we find
[TABLE]
and similarly for . ∎
Acknowledgments
I would like to thank Dmitri Vassiliev for directing my attention to the -operator on manifolds and Nikolai Saveliev for pointing out interesting references.
References
