# Estimate of Joule Heating in a Flat Dechirper

**Authors:** Karl Bane, Gennady Stupakov, Erion Gjonaj

arXiv: 1702.01809 · 2017-06-07

## TL;DR

This paper calculates Joule heating losses in a flat dechirper using a surface impedance model, validated by simulations, with estimates relevant for LCLS-II parameters.

## Contribution

It provides analytical and numerical estimates of Joule power losses in a flat dechirper, considering different configurations and validating formulas with simulations.

## Key findings

- Most wake power is radiated to the sides of the plates.
- Joule power loss is estimated at 21 W/m for two plates and 24 W/m for a single plate.
- Analytical formulas are confirmed by numerical simulations.

## Abstract

We have performed Joule power loss calculations for a flat dechirper. We have considered the configurations of the beam on-axis between the two plates---for chirp control---and for the beam especially close to one plate---for use as a fast kicker. Our calculations use a surface impedance approach, one that is valid when corrugation parameters are small compared to aperture (the perturbative parameter regime). In our model we ignore effects of field reflections at the sides of the dechirper plates, and thus expect the results to underestimate the Joule losses. The analytical results were also tested by numerical, time-domain simulations. We find that most of the wake power lost by the beam is radiated out to the sides of the plates. For the case of the beam passing by a single plate, we derive an analytical expression for the broad-band impedance, and---in Appendix B---numerically confirm recently developed, analytical formulas for the short-range wakes. While our theory can be applied to the LCLS-II dechirper with large gaps, for the nominal apertures we are not in the perturbative regime and the reflection contribution to Joule losses is not negligible. With input from computer simulations, we estimate the Joule power loss (assuming bunch charge of 300 pC, repetition rate of 100 kHz) is 21~W/m for the case of two plates, and 24 W/m for the case of a single plate.

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1702.01809/full.md

## Figures

23 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1702.01809/full.md

## References

16 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1702.01809/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1702.01809