Vanishing of $\ell^2$-Betti numbers of locally compact groups as an invariant of coarse equivalence
Roman Sauer, Michael Schr\"odl

TL;DR
This paper proves that the property of having zero $ ext{l}^2$-Betti numbers for unimodular locally compact second countable groups remains unchanged under coarse equivalence, establishing it as a coarse invariant.
Contribution
It demonstrates that the vanishing of $ ext{l}^2$-Betti numbers is preserved under coarse equivalence for a broad class of groups, extending previous invariance results.
Findings
Vanishing of $ ext{l}^2$-Betti numbers is a coarse invariant.
The result applies to unimodular locally compact second countable groups.
Provides a new tool for classifying groups via coarse geometry.
Abstract
We provide a proof that the vanishing of -Betti numbers of unimodular locally compact second countable groups is an invariant of coarse equivalence.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Vanishing of -Betti numbers of locally compact groups as an invariant of coarse equivalence
Roman Sauer
Institute for Algebra and Geometry
Karlsruhe Institute of Technology
Englerstr. 2
76128 Karlsruhe, Germany
and
Michael Schrödl
Institute for Algebra and Geometry
Karlsruhe Institute of Technology
Englerstr. 2
76128 Karlsruhe, Germany
Abstract.
We provide a proof that the vanishing of -Betti numbers of unimodular locally compact second countable groups is an invariant of coarse equivalence. To this end, we define coarse -cohomology for locally compact groups and show that it is isomorphic to continuous cohomology for unimodular groups and invariant under coarse equivalence.
Key words and phrases:
Coarse geometry, locally compact groups, -Betti numbers
2010 Mathematics Subject Classification:
Primary 20F65; Secondary 22D99
1. Introduction
The insight that the vanishing of -Betti numbers provides a quasi-isometry invariant is due to Gromov (see [12]*Chapter 8 for a statement without proof), and positive results around this insight have a long history. The most important contribution is by Pansu [18] whose work on asymptotic -cohomology includes a proof that the vanishing of -Betti numbers of discrete groups of type , is a quasi-isometry invariant.
There is a growing interest in the metric geometry of locally compact groups [3, 2]. We thus think it is important to have the quasi-isometry and coarse invariance of the vanishing of -Betti numbers available in the greatest generality. Following Pansu’s ideas and relying on more recent advances in the theory of -Betti numbers, we provide a proof of the following result.
Theorem 1**.**
Let and be unimodular locally compact second countable groups. If and are coarsely equivalent then the -th -Betti number of vanishes if and only the -th -Betti number of vanishes.
The coarse invariance for discrete groups was proven earlier in a paper of Mimura-Ozawa-Sako-Suzuki [16]*Corollary 6.3.
Every locally compact, second countable group (hereafter abbreviated by lcsc) has a left-invariant proper continuous metric by a theorem of Struble [26]. As any two left-invariant proper continuous metrics on are coarsely equivalent, every lcsc group has a well defined coarse geometry. Further, any coarse equivalence between compactly generated lcsc groups is a quasi-isometry with respect to word metrics of compact symmetric generating sets and vice versa. In particular, a coarse equivalence between finitely generated discrete groups is a quasi-isometry. See [3]*Chapter 4 for a systematic discussion of these notions.
To even state Theorem 1 in that generality, recent advances in the theory of -Betti numbers were necessary. -Betti numbers of discrete groups enjoy a long history but it was not until recently that -Betti numbers were defined for arbitrary unimodular lcsc groups by Petersen [19], and a systematic theory analogous to the discrete case emerged \citelist[19][13][20]. Earlier studies of -Betti numbers of locally compact groups in specific cases can be found in [10, 6, 4].
Previous results on coarse invariance
Pansu [18] introduced asymptotic -cohomology of discrete groups and proved its invariance under quasi-isometries. If a group is of type , then the -cohomology of coincides with its asymptotic -cohomology [18]*Théorème 1. The geometric explanation for the appearance of the type condition is that the finite-dimensional skeleta of the universal covering of a classifying space of finite type are uniformly contractible. As an immediate consequence of Pansu’s result, the vanishing of -Betti numbers is a quasi-isometry invariant among discrete groups of type . The same arguments work for totally disconnected groups admitting a topological model of finite type [23].
Elek [7] investigated the relation between -cohomology of discrete groups and Roe’s coarse cohomology and proved similar results. Another independent treatment is due to Fan [8]. Genton [11] elaborated upon Pansu’s methods in the case of metric measure spaces.
Oguni [17] generalised the quasi-isometry invariance of the vanishing of -Betti numbers from discrete groups of type to discrete groups whose cohomology with coefficients in the group von Neumann algebra satisfies a certain technical condition. A similar technical condition appears in the proof of quasi-isometry invariance of Novikov-Shubin invariants of amenable groups [25]*, and it is unclear how much this condition differs from the type -condition. Oguni’s groupoid approach is inspired by [9, 25] and quite different from the approaches by Elek, Fan, and Pansu.
The coarse invariance of vanishing of -Betti numbers for discrete groups was shown by Mimura-Ozawa-Sako-Suzuki [16]*Corollary 6.3. Li [14] recently reproved this using groupoid techniques as a consequence of more general cohomological coarse invariance results.
Structure of the paper
We review the necessary basics of -Betti numbers and continuous cohomology in Section 2. In Section 3 we define coarse -cohomology for lcsc groups and show that it is isomorphic to continuous cohomology. In Section 4 we conclude the proof of Theorem 1 and discuss what fails for non-unimodular groups.
2. Continuous cohomology and -Betti numbers of lcsc groups
Let be a unimodular lcsc group with Haar measure . Let be a locally compact second countable space with Radon measure . Let be a Fréchet space.
The space of continuous functions from to becomes a Fréchet space when endowed with the topology of compact convergence. Let be the space of equivalence classes of measurable maps up to -null sets such that is square-integrable for every compact subset . The -norm of the function defines a semi-norm on . The family of semi-norms , , turns into a Fréchet space.
We call a Fréchet space with a continuous (i.e. , , is continuous for every ) linear -action a -module. A continuous linear -equivariant map between -modules is a homomorphism of -modules. If is a -module and acts continuously and -preserving on then and become -modules via for and [1]*Proposition 3.1.1. The usual homogeneous coboundary map
[TABLE]
defines cochain complexes and of -modules (cf. [1]*Proposition 3.2.1). Here we take the diagonal -action on . We recall the following definition.
Definition 2**.**
The (continuous) cohomology of with coefficients in is the cohomology
[TABLE]
of the -invariants of . The reduced (continuous) cohomology is a quotient of obtained by taking the quotient with the closure of instead of .
We have an obvious inclusion
[TABLE]
The maps form a cochain map of -modules. Taking a positive function there is a cochain map of -modules
[TABLE]
such that and are homotopic (as cochain maps of -modules) to the identity [1, Proposition 4.8]. So we have the following useful fact:
Theorem 3**.**
The cochain map in (2) induces isomorphisms in cohomology and in reduced cohomology.
Next we turn to the case where the coefficient module is the regular representation, relevant for the definition of -Betti numbers.
Let be the von Neumann algebra of ; the Haar measure defines a semifinite trace on . There are a natural left -action and a natural right -action on , and the two actions commute. Hence also the -actions on and considered previously and the -actions induced from the right -action on commute. So the (reduced and non-reduced) continuous cohomology of with coefficients in is naturally a -module111When talking about -modules we mean the algebraic module structure and ignore topologies.. Obviously, the cochain map above is compatible with the -module structures. The groups are called the (continuous) -cohomology of . Similarly for the reduced cohomology.
Petersen [19] extended Lück’s dimension function from finite von Neumann algebras to semifinite von Neumann algebras. The dimension function with respect to is a non-trivial dimension for (algebraic) right -modules that is additive for short exact sequences of -modules. It scales as for . The fact that a -module has dimension zero can be expressed without referring to the trace: it is an algebraic fact. The following criterion was shown by the first author for finite von Neumann algebras [24]*Theorem 2.4; it was extended to the semifinite case by Petersen [19]*Lemma B.27.
Theorem 4**.**
An -module satisfies if and only if for every there is an increasing sequence of projections in with such that for every .
Definition 5**.**
The -th -Betti number of is the -dimension of its reduced continuous cohomology with coefficients in , i.e.
[TABLE]
Remark 6*.*
Equivalently, the -th -Betti number can be defined as the -dimension of the non-reduced cohomology . This is a non-trivial fact (see [13]*Theorem A). For discrete , our definition coincides with Lück’s definition in [15]. Again, this is non-trivial and shown in [21]*Theorem 2.2.
The following lemma was observed in [19]*Proposition 3.8. Since it is a direct consequence of Theorem 4 we present the argument.
Lemma 7**.**
Proof.
Let . Let be a cocycle representing a cohomology class in . By Theorem 4 there is an increasing sequence of projections whose supremum is such that each is a coboundary . It is clear that converges to in the topology of , thus . ∎
3. Coarse equivalence and coarse -cohomology
Let be a lcsc group. We fix a left-invariant proper continuous metric on . Let be a Haar measure on . Let be the -fold product measure of on .
For every and we consider the closed subset
[TABLE]
and a family of semi-norms for measurable maps defined by
[TABLE]
Let be the space of equivalence classes (up to -null sets) of measurable maps such that for every . The semi-norms , , turn into a Fréchet space. It is straightforward to verify that the homogeneous differential (1) yields a well-defined, continuous homomorphism (cf. [11]*Proposition 2.3.3). Thus we obtain a cochain complex of Fréchet spaces.
Definition 8**.**
The coarse -cohomology of is defined as
[TABLE]
By taking the quotients by the closure of the differentials, one defines similarly the reduced coarse -cohomology .
Remark 9*.*
The previous definition is the continuous analog of Elek’s definition [7]*Definition 1.3 in the discrete case (Elek gives credits to Roe [22]). It is very much related to Pansu’s asymptotic -cohomology [18], which was considered in the generality of metric measure spaces by Genton [11]. The difference of our definition to the one in Genton [11] is as follows: is an inverse limit of spaces . Unlike us, Genton takes first the cohomology of and then the inverse limit. Under some uniform contractibility assumptions the two definitions coincide but likely not in general.
Theorem 10**.**
Let be a unimodular lcsc group. For every , the -th continuous cohomology of with coefficients in the left regular representation is isomorphic to the -th coarse -cohomology of , and likewise for reduced cohomology.
Proof.
We have the obvious embedding
[TABLE]
and the exponential law (see [1]*Lemme 1.4 for a proof but beware of the typo in the statement)
[TABLE]
Thus an element in is represented by a measurable complex function in -variables. For we define -almost everywhere
[TABLE]
The measurable function is invariant by translation in the -th variable. By Fubini’s theorem we may regard as a measurable function in the first -variables. We may think of as an evaluation of at . Let denote the -ball around . Next we show that for every , thus .
Since we have
[TABLE]
The map
[TABLE]
is measure preserving since it is the composition of taking inverses in the last coordinate, left multiplication by , conjugation by and taking inverses in the last coordinate. Note that this requires unimodularity. Further, we have
[TABLE]
This implies the first inequality below. The first equality follows from the fact that is a measure preserving measurable automorphism of .
[TABLE]
Hence is finite for every . That
[TABLE]
defines a cochain map is obvious. The above computation also implies that is continuous with respect to the Fréchet topologies.
Given we define
[TABLE]
for -almost every . The function defines an element in . The -invariance of is obvious. We have to show that is square-integrable for every . This follows from the following computations which is based on the arguments above in reversed order.
[TABLE]
Obviously, is a chain map. Continuity follows from the previous computation. It is clear that and are mutual inverses. Using Theorem 3, this concludes the proof. ∎
4. Coarse invariance
We recall the notion of coarse equivalence. A map between metric spaces is coarse Lipschitz if there is a non-decreasing function with such that
[TABLE]
for all . We say that two such maps are close if
[TABLE]
A coarse Lipschitz map is a coarse equivalence if there is a coarse Lipschitz map such that and are close to the identity. We say is a coarse inverse of .
Lemma 11**.**
Coarsely equivalent lcsc groups are measurably coarse equivalent, i.e. if and are coarse equivalent lcsc groups then there are measurable coarse Lipschitz maps and such that and are close to the identity.
Proof.
We choose left-invariant continuous proper metrics and on and , respectively. Let be a coarse Lipschitz map with . Let . We pick a countable measurable partition of whose elements have diameter and choose an element for every .
By setting for we obtain a coarse Lipschitz map which satisfies and is close to with . Analogously, we construct a measurable coarse Lipschitz map , constructed from a coarse Lipschitz map which is a coarse inverse to . It is obvious that is a coarse inverse to . ∎
Theorem 12**.**
Coarsely equivalent lcsc groups have isomorphic reduced and non-reduced coarse -cohomology groups.
Proof.
Let and lcsc groups with Haar measures and , respectively. Let be a coarse equivalence with coarse inverse . Because of lemma 11 we can further assume that and are measurable. We define a map by
[TABLE]
where we choose such that . Then is a measurable function with and . We use the following notation:
[TABLE]
Analogously, we define with some radius . Now we can define the maps and as follows where we use for elements in and for elements of :
[TABLE]
The idea of averaging over a function like goes back to Pansu; it is necessary in our context since the maps and do not preserve the measure classes, in general.
First of all, we check that these are well-defined continuous cochain maps.
[TABLE]
It is a direct computation that .
It remains to show that there is a cochain homotopy such that . We define by
[TABLE]
and set
[TABLE]
That is well-defined is a similar consideration as to show that and are well-defined. Now let us denote the i-th term of the coboundary map by , i.e. . It is straightforward to verify that we have the following relations:
[TABLE]
We get . The same construction applies to which completes the proof. ∎
Proof of Theorem 1.
Let and be unimodular lcsc groups. Let and be coarsely equivalent. Then we have the following equivalences:
[TABLE]
Going the same steps backwards for the group finishes the proof. ∎
Remark 13*.*
Since the Borel subgroup of upper triangular matrices is cocompact, the solvable Lie groups and are quasi-isometric. So belongs to the class of amenable hyperbolic lcsc groups of which a systematic study was undertaken in [2].
The group is not unimodular and thus its -Betti number are not defined. Nevertheless, one may ask what exactly breaks down in the proof above which can be formulated to a large part without the notion of -Betti numbers. By a result of Delorme [5]*Corollaire V.3, we have . Since Theorem 12 does not require unimodularity, we have since . So it is Theorem 10 that fails for the non-unimodular group .
Acknowledgements
We acknowledge support by the German Science Foundation via the Research Training Group 2229.
The reference list from the paper itself. Each links out to its DOI / PubMed record.
- 1[1]
- 2[1] P. Blanc, Sur la cohomologie continue des groupes localement compacts , Ann. Sci. École Norm. Sup. (4) 12 (1979), 137–168.
- 3[2] P.-E. Caprace et al., Amenable hyperbolic groups , J. Eur. Math. Soc. (JEMS) 17 (2015), 2903–2947.
- 4[3] Y. Cornulier and P. de la Harpe, Metric geometry of locally compact groups , EMS Tracts in Mathematics, 25, European Mathematical Society (EMS), Zürich, 2016.
- 5[4] M. W. Davis et al., Weighted L 2 superscript 𝐿 2 L^{2} -cohomology of Coxeter groups , Geom. Topol. 11 (2007), 47–138.
- 6[5] P. Delorme, 1 1 1 -cohomologie des représentations unitaires des groupes de Lie semi-simples et résolubles. Produits tensoriels continus de représentations , Bull. Soc. Math. France 105 (1977), 281–336.
- 7[6] J. Dymara, Thin buildings , Geom. Topol. 10 (2006), 667–694.
- 8[7] G. Elek, Coarse cohomology and l p subscript 𝑙 𝑝 l_{p} -cohomology , K 𝐾 K -Theory 13 (1998), 1–22.
