# Conservation, Inertia, and Spacetime Geometry

**Authors:** James Owen Weatherall

arXiv: 1702.01642 · 2017-08-17

## TL;DR

This paper explores the relationship between spacetime geometry, conservation laws, and inertial motion in general relativity, emphasizing the theorem-like nature of inertial motion and the role of the conservation condition as a consequence of dynamical equations.

## Contribution

It clarifies the status of the conservation condition in general relativity, framing it as a consequence of matter evolution equations rather than a fundamental postulate.

## Key findings

- Conservation condition follows from matter evolution equations.
- Inertial motion is best understood as a theorem in general relativity.
- Spacetime geometry's meaning relates to matter dynamics.

## Abstract

As Harvey Brown emphasizes in his book Physical Relativity, inertial motion in general relativity is best understood as a theorem, and not a postulate. Here I discuss the status of the "conservation condition", which states that the energy-momentum tensor associated with non-interacting matter is covariantly divergence-free, in connection with such theorems. I argue that the conservation condition is best understood as a consequence of the differential equations governing the evolution of matter in general relativity and many other theories. I conclude by discussing what it means to posit a certain spacetime geometry and the relationship between that geometry and the dynamical properties of matter.

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1702.01642/full.md

## References

87 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1702.01642/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1702.01642