Temperature induced phase transition from cycloidal to collinear antiferromagnetism in multiferroic Bi$_{0.9}$Sm$_{0.1}$FeO$_3$ driven by $f$-$d$ induced magnetic anisotropy
R. D. Johnson, P. A. McClarty, D. D. Khalyavin, P. Manuel, P., Svedlindh, and C. S. Knee

TL;DR
This study reveals that substituting samarium into BiFeO$_3$ induces a temperature-driven transition from cycloidal to collinear antiferromagnetic order, driven by $f$-$d$ exchange-induced magnetic anisotropy, impacting multiferroic device stability.
Contribution
It demonstrates how $f$-$d$ exchange coupling from samarium substitution causes a phase transition in BiFeO$_3$, revealing the role of magnetic anisotropy in non-collinear magnetic structures.
Findings
Cycloidal order increases in periodicity with Sm substitution.
Below ~15 K, magnetic structure transitions to G-type antiferromagnet.
Transition driven by $f$-$d$ exchange coupling inducing local anisotropy.
Abstract
In multiferroic BiFeO a cycloidal antiferromagnetic structure is coupled to a large electric polarization at room temperature, giving rise to magnetoelectric functionality that may be exploited in novel multiferroic-based devices. In this paper, we demonstrate that by substituting samarium for 10% of the bismuth ions the periodicity of the room temperature cycloid is increased, and by cooling below K the magnetic structure tends towards a simple G-type antiferromagnet, which is fully established at 1.5 K. We show that this transition results from exchange coupling, which induces a local anisotropy on the iron magnetic moments that destroys the cycloidal order - a result of general significance regarding the stability of non-collinear magnetic structures in the presence of multiple magnetic sublattices.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Temperature induced phase transition from cycloidal to collinear antiferromagnetism in multiferroic Bi0.9Sm0.1FeO3 driven by - induced magnetic anisotropy
R. D. Johnson
ISIS facility, Rutherford Appleton Laboratory-STFC, Chilton, Didcot, OX11 0QX, United Kingdom
Clarendon Laboratory, Department of Physics, University of Oxford, Oxford, OX1 3PU, United Kingdom
P. A. McClarty
D. D. Khalyavin
P. Manuel
ISIS facility, Rutherford Appleton Laboratory-STFC, Chilton, Didcot, OX11 0QX, United Kingdom
P. Svedlindh
Department of Engineering Sciences, Uppsala University, Box 534, SE-751 21 Uppsala, Sweden
C. S. Knee
Department of Chemical and Biological Engineering, Chalmers University of Technology, Gothenburg SE 412 96, Sweden
Current address: ESAB AB, Lindholmsallén 9, SE-402 77 Gothenburg, Sweden.
Abstract
In multiferroic BiFeO3 a cycloidal antiferromagnetic structure is coupled to a large electric polarization at room temperature, giving rise to magnetoelectric functionality that may be exploited in novel multiferroic-based devices. In this paper, we demonstrate that by substituting samarium for 10% of the bismuth ions the periodicity of the room temperature cycloid is increased, and by cooling below K the magnetic structure tends towards a simple G-type antiferromagnet, which is fully established at 1.5 K. We show that this transition results from exchange coupling, which induces a local anisotropy on the iron magnetic moments that destroys the cycloidal order - a result of general significance regarding the stability of non-collinear magnetic structures in the presence of multiple magnetic sublattices.
I Introduction
In multiferroic materials spontaneous magnetic order is coupled to ferroelectricity such that the magnetic state may be tuned by an electric field, and vice versa Cheong and Mostovoy (2007); Johnson and Radaelli (2014). In these technologically important materials, a polar magnetic structure must be uniquely stabilised by the absence of inversion symmetry in an already ferroelectric phase, or itself break inversion symmetry and induce a coupled electric polarization. Such magnetic structures typically arise through a complex interplay between frustrated magnetic exchange interactions and anisotropies. Of all multiferroic materials, BiFeO3 is arguably the most studied owing to its large electric polarization (over [3]), which is coupled to antiferromagnetism at room temperature - a key requirement for technological application.
BiFeO3 has a rhombohedrally-distorted perovskite crystal structure with polar space group Michel et al. (1969); Moreau et al. (1971). The Fe3+ magnetic sublattice is ordered at room temperature (), with a predominantly antiparallel alignment of nearest neighbor (NN) spins (G-type) resulting from dominant antiferromagnetic NN Heisenberg exchange of the form . This energy is independent of the global direction of the magnetic moments, and in the absence of a significant Fe3+ single ion anisotropy Jeong et al. (2012, 2014) the magnetic structure of BiFeO3 is stabilized by the antisymmetric Dzyaloshinskii-Moriya (DM) interaction of the form Dzyaloshinsky (1958); Moriya (1960); Katsura et al. (2005); Mostovoy (2006). Two distinct components of the DM vector, , are present in BiFeO3. One is allowed by global inversion-symmetry breaking of the ferroelectric order parameter. Here the component of lies in the hexagonal basal plane and gains energy through a long-period cycloidal modulation of spins ( 62 nm) within the plane containing the magnetic propagation vector and , as observed () Sosnowska et al. (1982); Sosnowska and Zvezdin (1995); Kadomtseva et al. (2004); Lebeugle et al. (2008); Lee et al. (2008). The second component is allowed through antiphase FeO6 octahedral rotations that are represented by an axial vector parallel to the hexagonal -axis, which exactly describes the relevant component of Khalyavin et al. (2014). If this interaction is finite but weaker than the first, the cycloid adopts a small orthogonal spin component whose magnitude is modulated with the same periodicity as the cycloid. If the second interaction is stronger than the first, the cycloidal state is destabilized in favour of a G-type structure with a net ferromagnetic component induced by spin canting in the basal plane Ederer and Spaldin (2005).
The crystal and magnetic structure of BiFeO3 may be tuned by doping rare-earth ions onto the bismuth site. In general, lanthanide substitution reduces the average polarizability of the A-site cation, with greatest depolarization achieved with rare-earth ions of small radii Shannon (1976). Increasing lanthanide content therefore destabilizes the polar phase, and drives the crystal structure from polar, to antipolar (reported for = La–Sm, and generally PbZrO3-related superstructure except for Bi1-xLaxFeO3, where the PbZrO3-related structure is stable only in a narrow compositional range and is replaced by an incommensurate phase with symmetry Rusakov et al. (2011)) and finally to nonpolar GdFeO3-type superstructure, with each morphotropic phase transition having a profound effect on the ferroelectric and piezoelectric response of the material Troyanchuk et al. (2011). For example, holmium substitution gives rise to an enhancement in the remnant ferroelectric polarization at low switching fields Jeon et al. (2011), suppression of the spin cycloid towards a canted G-type antiferromagnetic structure was found in Bi1-xDyxFeO3 Uniyal and Yadav (2009), and a temperature induced 90∘ spin flop occurs upon doping neodymium Levin et al. (2011). Importantly, it has been suggested that in certain compositions ferromagnetism may coexist with ferroelectricity Khomchenko et al. (2008) - critical progress towards device engineering.
At room temperature Bi1-xSmxFeO3 maintains a single polar phase up to a samarium content of . The system then transitions to a mixed /PbZrO3-related phase for compositions in the range , and finally a single non-polar GdFeO3-type phase is stabilized for Troyanchuk et al. (2011). Weak ferromagnetism is now well established in the non-polar phase, consistent with a symmetry allowed canting of the G-type antiferromagnetism Khomchenko et al. (2010, 2011a). Remarkably, weak ferromagnetism with a softened hysteresis has been reported in the polar phase of Bi1-xSmxFeO3 ()(Bielecki et al., 2012; Khomchenko et al., 2010). As in undoped BiFeO3, ferromagnetism is incompatible with the cycloidal magnetic structure, and despite numerous studies the exact nature of this phenomenon remains unclear Nalwa and Garg (2008); Maurya et al. (2009); Khomchenko et al. (2010, 2011b); Dai et al. (2012); Bielecki et al. (2012).
In this paper we demonstrate that the room temperature magnetic structure of Bi0.9Sm0.1FeO3 is indeed cycloidal, albeit with a lengthened periodicity compared to BiFeO3 in accordance with a reduction in the polarization of the A-site cation sublattice. Furthermore, we show that at low temperatures the magnetic structure transitions from a spin cycloid to a simple G-type antiferromagnet, which is fully established at 1.5 K. This magnetic phase transition can be explained as a result of exchange coupling that induces an easy-axis magnetic anisotropy upon the Fe3+ sublattice. This observation opens new routes for manipulating the cycloidal magnetic structure within the ferroelectric phase of BiFeO3.
II Experiment
The polycrystalline Bi0.9Sm0.1FeO3 sample was synthesised via a solid state reaction route as detailed in reference 33. Field cooled magnetization versus temperature measurement were performed between 150 and 2 K using an applied field of 5000 Oe in a Quantum Design MPMS. Neutron powder diffraction measurements were performed using the time-of-flight diffractometer WISHChapon et al. (2011) at ISIS, the UK pulsed Neutron and Muon Spallation Source. 1 g of powder Bi0.9Sm0.1FeO3 was placed in a thin 3 mm vanadium can to minimise the effects of samarium absorption. The can was mounted inside a standard helium-4 cryostat, providing sample temperature control in the range 1.5 K to 300 K. Heat capacity data were collected from polycrystalline samples of BiFeO3 and Bi0.9Sm0.1FeO3 as a function of temperature (cooling from 150 K to 3 K) using a Quantum Design Physical Properties Measurement System. Both samples had a mass of mg, and were prepared by cold pressing and sintering at 750∘C for 5 hours.
III Results and Discussion
III.1 Crystal structure
As Bi0.9Sm0.1FeO3, lies close to the morphotropic phase boundaryKubota et al. (2011), and also because inhomogeneous samarium doping may lead to phase coexistence, we carried out a neutron powder diffraction study of the crystal structure of our sample. Figure 1a shows data measured at 1.5 K. These data were found to be representative of all data collected in the temperature range 1.5 to 300 K, with the exception of the magnetic diffraction peaks (discussed in detail later), and small changes in the nuclear peak positions in accordance with thermal expansion of the lattice. All nuclear diffraction peaks could be reliably fit by Rietveld refinement of the Michel et al. (1969); Moreau et al. (1971) crystal structure using fullprofRodríguez-Carvajal (1993) (, , ). Also shown in Figure 1a, the calculated diffraction patterns for both PbZrO3-related and GdFeO3-type structures do not reproduce the data, and there is no qualitative evidence for phase coexistence. Hence, Bi0.9Sm0.1FeO3 unambiguously adopts the polar crystal structure at all measured temperatures (n.b. we neglect the true monoclinic symmetry of the magnetically ordered system as magneto-elastic coupling is weak). The temperature dependencies of the and lattice parameters ( in hexagonal setting) are shown in figures 1b and 1c, respectively. The lattice was found to smoothly contract on decreasing temperature, with the largest change observed in the direction.
III.2 Magnetic structure
The strongest magnetic diffraction peaks, labelled with an asterix in Figure 1a, were measured in high resolution at 300 K, 30 K, and 1.5 K (Figure 2). At 300 K four reflections were observed - pairs of the six {1,0,1} satellites have common -spacing forming three peaks in the powder data, and the fourth peak is a superposition of the (0,0,3) reflections. For the BiFeO3 cycloidal magnetic structure with a circular spin rotation envelope propagating along (, , 0), the intensities of the (1,0,1) and (0,-1,1) peaks (green and pink dashed lines in Figure 2) are predicted to be exactly 75% of the (-1,1,1) intensity (brown dashed line), as observed. An elliptical distortion of the rotation envelope would lead to a small, almost immeasurable deviation in the relative intensities of these three peaks. The (0,0,3) peak intensity is dependent only on the magnitude of the -plane component of the magnetic moments, and is therefore highly sensitive to the ellipticity of the cycloid (or the degree of out-of-plane spin canting in a collinear G-type AFM phase) when measured relative to the {1,0,1} reflections.
The 300 K data in Figure 2a was fit by Rietveld analysis using fullprofRodríguez-Carvajal (1993). The propagation vector was determined by the separation of the magnetic peaks, and refined to , . The magnetic diffraction intensity was scaled to the full nuclear diffraction pattern observed at shorter -spacing, giving moment magnitudes of and , which corresponds to an average Fe3+ magnetic moment of 3.4(2) and an ellipticity of 0.8 (defined as ). The maximum moment, , is consistent with that found for undoped BiFeO3, in which Sosnowska et al. (2002). The propagation vector has shortened with respect to BiFeO3Sosnowska et al. (1982) to a value similar to that observed in Bi0.9La0.1FeO3 ()Knee et al. (2014). This lengthening of the cycloidal periodicity upon doping is consistent with a depolarization of the A-site cation sublattice as the canting angle of neighboring magnetic moments is proportional to the crystal polarization. An ellipticity value is also consistent with a reduced polarization, as the competing DM interaction associated with octahedral rotations favors in-plane magnetic moments.
Refinement of the cycloidal model against data measured at 30 K (Figure 2b) showed little change in the propagation vector, , but gave moment magnitudes of - a circular spin rotation envelope. At higher temperatures a reduction of the Fe moments when the spin lies against magnetic anisotropy may be stabilized through entropy, however, at low temperature the system will tend towards a fully saturated moment on every Fe ion.
The data measured at 1.5 K is in stark contrast to that at 30 K and 300 K. Only two peaks were observed, which index with the same families of reflections as at higher temperatures but with (i.e. the six {1,0,1} reflections become equivalent), and corresponds to the collinear G-type antiferromagnetic structure. The G-type model was refined against the full 1.5 K data set (nuclear + magnetic) with reliability factors , , , and . The iron moments were found to be of magnitude 3.82(3) and inclined 32(2)∘ from the -axis. The direction of the moment projected onto the -plane exactly determines the ground state symmetry, however, this could not be determined by powder diffraction. The magnetic space group of the cycloidal phase is , in which threefold symmetry and two -glides are broken with respect to the parent symmetry, . The incommensurate cycloid breaks translational symmetry in the hexagonal basal plane, and propagates orthogonal to the remaining glide plane. In the commensurate tilted G-type structure the threefold symmetry is also broken, as well as at least two of the three glides, but translational symmetry within the basal plane is restored. If the antiferromagnetic component of the magnetic moments lies parallel to a glide plane (i.e in a plane orthogonal to the cycloidal rotation plane) then that glide remains and the magnetic spacegroup is , which also allows a ferromagnetic component orthogonal to the glide plane that may couple to the axial octahedral rotations via the second DM interaction discussed in the introduction. If the antiferromagnetic component of the moments is not parallel to the glide plane the ground state symmetry is reduced to triclinic , and any moment configuration is allowed by symmetry. Whilst we cannot empirically differentiate between and scenarios, we continue on the assumption that the higher symmetry structure is stablized, as drawn in Figure 3.
A phase transition from cycloidal to collinear antiferromagnetism can be observed in the temperature dependence of the magnetic propagation vector (Figure 4b), which shows a trend similar to that observed for other incommensurate to commensurate magnetic phase transitionsKobayashi et al. (2004). The transition was found to be concomitant with an increase in the sample magnetisation, consistent with symmetry-allowed spin canting of the G-type magnetic structure (Figure 4a). The average magnetic moment (Figure 4d) was found to be invariant within error throughout the measured temperature range, whereas the ellipticity of the spin rotation envelope (Figure 4c) monotonically increased on cooling below K in favour of a larger magnetic moment component parallel to the hexagonal -axis.
III.3 Magnetic anisotropy and f-d coupling
The origin of the temperature dependent ellipticity and the low-temperature transition to a collinear antiferromagnetic structure can be explained by the presence of a uniaxial Fe3+ magnetic anisotropy parallel to the c-axis. If, at low temperature, the DM energy associated with octahedral rotations became larger than that of the ferroelectric polarization, a collinear magnetic structure would be favored. However, this anisotropy strictly aligns magnetic moments within the basal plane, which is incompatible with the observed change in ellipticity and the direction of the magnetic moment in the collinear phase (a structure with in-plane magnetic moments was modelled and shown as a blue line in Figure 2c). In a different Fe3+ -based multiferroic also containing rare-earth ions, NdFe3(BO3)4, it was demonstrated that hybridization between and magnetism leads to the anisotropy local to the Nd3+ ions being inherited by the essentially isotropic Fe3+ ions.
In orthoferrite SmFeO3 (the end member of the Bi1-xSmxFeO3 series), only the weak ferromagnetic component of the canted AFM iron magnetic structure couples to the rare-earth sublattice, by symmetry. However, in the rhombohedral phase of Bi1-xSmxFeO3, the point symmetry of the Fe3+ site (3) allows the full AFM component of the iron magnetic moments to interact with their nearest neighbor samarium ions. With this in mind, let us consider a plausible microscopic mechanism that may lead to the observed low temperature transition. A Sm3+ dopant ion replaces a Bi3+ ion with a single nearest neighbor Fe3+ separated from it by with . We consider the dominant - exchange contribution between these neighboring sites. If we assume that the site symmetry of the ions is as in pure BiFeO3 - namely point group - then the symmetry allowed exchange, regardless of origin, must take the form , and where are the operators acting within the Sm3+ multiplet and act within the high spin () state space of the Fe3+. The three couplings are, respectively, , and , and isotropic exchange corresponds to the case and .
At temperatures below the scale of the ground to first excited crystal field energy gap (applicable to the current study), one must consider the effective exchange, which is the “bare” exchange described above projected onto the Sm3+ crystal field ground state. It is therefore important to consider the possible single ion anisotropy of samarium. The site symmetry constrains the crystal field Hamiltonian to the form with potentially nonvanishing parameters: , , , , , . We have written the Hamiltonian using Stevens operator equivalents which brings out a dependence on the ion-specific Stevens factors and the radial expectation values of the ions, both of which have been tabulated. For Sm3+, , so there are four crystal field parameters for this system.
From a purely theoretical standpoint, the presence of a finite parameter means that uniaxial samarium single ion anisotropy parallel to the -axis is allowed, as observed by experiment. Furthermore, if and [40], the phase space spanned by the four non-zero amplitudes is dominated by an Ising-like, uniaxial state. It is therefore plausible that uniaxial anisotropy arising from the samarium crystal field forces the nearest neighbor Fe-Sm exchange to be Ising-like at low energies, giving rise to the observed low temperature transition Bi0.9Sm0.1FeO3 (the typical scale of - exchange is of the order K, which coincides well with the transition temperature observed experimentally). We note that the above case would result in iron magnetic moments preferentially aligning parallel to the c-axis. However, the moments were found to tilt towards the ab-plane. The tilts naturally result from the in-plane DM anisotropy acting on a collinear magnetic structure.
This result is valid in general when considering the stability of long-range-ordered cycloidal or helical magnetic structures in the presence of point like uniaxial anisotropy. For example, the spin cycloid in BiFeO3 can also be destroyed by doping cobalt into the iron sites, directly introducing local magnetic anisotropy onto the transition-metal sublattice Sosnowska et al. (2013). The competition between single-ion anisotropy and spin cycloids stabilized by the DM interaction in non-centrosymmetric crystals was previously discussed theoretically for isostructural PbVO3 and BiCoO3 Solovyev (2012). Here V4+ has a 3d1 spin configuration that forms an isotropic Kramers doublet. On the other hand, Co3+ has a non-Kramers, anisotropic 3d6 electronic configuration. As in BiFeO3, ab-initio calculations predict a spin cycloid in PbVO3. In contrast, single-ion anisotropy in BiCoO3 partially destroys the cycloid and induces a magnetic structure of predominantly collinear AFM domains accompanied by cycloidal domain walls of width unit cells. This description is qualitatively consistent with our data measured on Bi0.9Sm0.1FeO3 in the G-type AFM ground state, where the magnetic diffraction peaks with a Q component parallel to the magnetic propagation vector were found to be approximately 2% broader than those measured in the cycloidal phase, which is indicative of finite size effects in the collinear AFM ground state.
In addition to Bi0.9Sm0.1FeO3, we have investigated the rhombohedral phases Bi0.9Eu0.1FeO3 and Bi0.9Tb0.1FeO3 finding that, unlike the samarium substituted case, they exhibit no low temperature transition in the magnetic structure. These results are consistent with our understanding of the mechanism driving the low temperature transition in Bi0.9Sm0.1FeO3: Eu3+ is nonmagnetic (), and Tb3+ () is magnetic yet it is nonKramers in a low symmetry environment so the crystal field ground state may, in principle, be a nonmagnetic singlet - both scenarios being consistent with the absence of a low temperature transition.
III.4 Specific heat
Figure 5 shows the specific heat capacity measured from both BiFeO3 and Bi0.9Sm0.1FeO3 samples (in the lower panes is plotted in order to accentuate the variation at lower temperatures). The red line shows a Debye-Einstein model simultaneously fit to both BiFeO3 and Bi0.9Sm0.1FeO3 data sets. Here, it was assumed that phonon excitations form the dominant contribution to the specific heat of BiFeO3, as concluded by ab-initio studies Wang et al. (2011) (n.b. the magnon contribution to the specific heat for a collinear AFM and cycloidal magnetic structure would be expected to exhibit the same temperature dependence as the phonon contribution, except for a small magnon gap). The fitted model is in excellent quantitative agreement with the BiFeO3 data. Furthermore, the number of atoms in the sample refined to of the theoretical value, and the average frequency of the Einstein modes refined to 2.7(2) THz, which is in good agreement with the frequency of the first optical phonon mode measured by Raman scattering ( THz)Rovillain et al. (2009) and found through ab-initio calculations ( THz)Wang et al. (2011).
In Bi0.9Sm0.1FeO3 the specific heat was found to deviate from the Debye-Einstein model at low temperature (see Figure 5 lower-right pane and Figure 6), indicating an additional contribution to the sample’s entropy at low temperature due to the samarium substitution. In the rare-earth substituted system Nd2-xCexCuO4, a Schottky anomaly was observed at low temperature due to a splitting of the Nd ground state doublet in the presence of f-d exchange between Nd and Cu Brugger et al. (1993). Furthermore, at certain doping levels the low temperature side of the Schottky peak was found to exhibit a linear temperature dependence which was later found to originate in a degree of disorder within the system inherent to the doping, which effectively broadens the Nd doublet splitting Henggeler et al. (1998). These exact features were observed in our heat capacity data on Bi0.9Sm0.1FeO3.
The inset to Figure 6 shows the anomalous contribution to the heat capacity divided by temperature, having subtracted the Debye-Einstein model. Two key parameters may be directly extracted from the data. Firstly, the onset temperature of the anomaly was found to be K (labelled in Figure 6), which provides an indication of the f-d exchange energy. This is in excellent agreement with the neutron diffraction results. Secondly, the integrated anomaly in provides a measure of the change in entropy, . For a two level system , where is the number of contributing atoms in the sample. Here, was found to be equal to 0.08 atoms per formula unit - in good agreement with the nominal substitution level of 0.1. Together, both quantities provide strong evidence for f-d exchange coupling between samarium and iron magnetic moments at low temperature.
IV Conclusions
In summary, we have shown that Bi0.9Sm0.1FeO3 is isostructural with BiFeO3, and shares the same room temperature cycloidal magnetic structure. The real space periodicity of the cycloid was found to lengthen upon samarium substitution - consistent with the depolarization of the nominally bismuth sublattice. Furthermore, we show that at low temperatures the magnetic structure transitions from a spin cycloid to a simple G-type antiferromagnet. The G-type structure is fully established at 1.5 K, and results from an easy-axis magnetic anisotropy induced upon the Fe3+ sublattice through exchange coupling. This result opens new routes for modifying the cycloidal magnetic structure of BiFeO3 and, more generally, it is relevant to understanding the stability of non-collinear magnetic structures in the presence of local anisotropy that may be inherited through interactions between multiple magnetic sublattices. In future studies it would be useful to experimentally determine the crystal electric field spectrum on the samarium site using inelastic neutron scattering, in order to elucidate the fine details of the magnetic anisotropy present in this system.
Acknowledgements.
RDJ acknowledges support from a Royal Society University Research Fellowship, and assistance with the heat capacity measurements from D. Prabhakaran. PAM acknowledges support from STFC through a Keeley-Rutherford fellowship. CSK acknowledges support from the Swedish research council (Vetenskapsrådet) Grant No. 621-2011-3851 and the authors thank the Science and Technology Facilities Council for provision of neutron beam time at the ISIS neutron and muon facility. DDK and PM acknowledge support from the TUMOCS project, which has received funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under the Marie Skłodowska-Curie grant agreement No. 645660. In accordance with the UK policy framework on research data, access to the data will be made available from Ref. 47
The reference list from the paper itself. Each links out to its DOI / PubMed record.
- 1Cheong and Mostovoy (2007) S.-W. Cheong and M. Mostovoy, Nature Materials 6 , 13 (2007) . · doi ↗
- 2Johnson and Radaelli (2014) R. D. Johnson and P. G. Radaelli, Annual Review of Materials Research 44 , 269 (2014) . · doi ↗
- 3Yun et al. (2004) K. Y. Yun, D. Ricinschi, T. Kanashima, M. Noda, and M. Okuyama, Japanese Journal of Applied Physics 43 , L 647 (2004) .
- 4Michel et al. (1969) C. Michel, J.-M. Moreau, G. D. Achenbach, R. Gerson, and W. James, Solid State Communications 7 , 701 (1969) . · doi ↗
- 5Moreau et al. (1971) J. Moreau, C. Michel, R. Gerson, and W. James, Journal of Physics and Chemistry of Solids 32 , 1315 (1971) . · doi ↗
- 6Jeong et al. (2012) J. Jeong, E. A. Goremychkin, T. Guidi, K. Nakajima, G. S. Jeon, S.-A. Kim, S. Furukawa, Y. B. Kim, S. Lee, V. Kiryukhin, S.-W. Cheong, and J.-G. Park, Phys. Rev. Lett. 108 , 077202 (2012) . · doi ↗
- 7Jeong et al. (2014) J. Jeong, M. D. Le, P. Bourges, S. Petit, S. Furukawa, S.-A. Kim, S. Lee, S.-W. Cheong, and J.-G. Park, Phys. Rev. Lett. 113 , 107202 (2014) . · doi ↗
- 8Dzyaloshinsky (1958) I. Dzyaloshinsky, Journal of Physics and Chemistry of Solids 4 , 241 (1958) . · doi ↗
