# Comparison Study between NOMA and SCMA

## TL;DR

This paper compares NOMA and SCMA multiple access techniques in cellular systems, analyzing their performance and complexity through resource allocation problems solved with convex approximation methods.

## Contribution

It provides a comparative analysis of NOMA and SCMA, including resource allocation formulations and solution approaches for HetNet scenarios.

## Key findings

- SCMA outperforms NOMA in system performance
- SCMA has higher system complexity
- Resource allocation problems are effectively solved using SCA

## Abstract

In this paper, the performance and system complexity of the candidate multiple access (MA) techniques for the next generation of cellular systems, namely, non-orthogonal multiple access (NOMA) (in this paper, we consider power domain MA as NOMA) and sparse code multiple access (SCMA), are investigated. To this end, for each MA technique, a resource allocation problem considering heterogeneous cellular networks (HetNet) is formulated. We apply successive convex approximation (SCA) method to each problem and obtain their solutions. The simulation results show that SCMA-based system achieves better performance than NOMA-based one at the cost of more complexity.