Reply to the correspondence of Drummond and Brand [arXiv:1610.07633]
Kaspar Sakmann, Mark Kasevich
TL;DR
This paper defends a previous scientific work against criticism, clarifying misunderstandings and reaffirming the validity of the original findings.
Contribution
It provides a rebuttal to specific criticisms, demonstrating that the previous work's conclusions remain sound and well-founded.
Findings
Criticism was shown to be misleading and unfounded.
The original work's conclusions are reaffirmed.
Clarifies misunderstandings in the correspondence.
Abstract
In their correspondence [arXiv:1610.07633] Drummond and Brand criticize our work [Nature Physics 12, 451-454 (2016) http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nphys3631]. We show that their criticism is misleading and unfounded.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsRelativity and Gravitational Theory · Quantum and Classical Electrodynamics · Quantum Mechanics and Applications