PHIBSS: Unified Scaling Relations of Gas Depletion Time and Molecular Gas Fractions
L. J. Tacconi, R. Genzel, A. Saintonge, F. Combes, S., Garc\'ia-Burillo, R. Neri, A. Bolatto, T. Contini, N. M. F\"orster Schreiber,, S. Lilly, D. Lutz, S. Wuyts, G. Accurso, J. Boissier, F. Boone, N. Bouch\'e,, F. Bournaud, A. Burkert, M. Carollo, M. Cooper, P. Cox, C. Feruglio

TL;DR
This study updates the scaling relations between molecular gas, stellar mass, and star formation rates in galaxies across redshifts 0 to 4, revealing consistent trends across different measurement methods and providing insights into galaxy evolution.
Contribution
It presents a unified analysis of molecular gas scaling relations using multiple independent methods, confirming their consistency and detailing their evolution with redshift and star formation activity.
Findings
Molecular gas depletion time scales as (1+z)^{-0.6} and weakly depends on stellar mass.
Molecular-to-stellar mass ratio increases with redshift as (1+z)^{2.5}.
Scaling relations are consistent across different measurement techniques.
Abstract
This paper provides an update of our previous scaling relations (Genzel et al.2015) between galaxy integrated molecular gas masses, stellar masses and star formation rates, in the framework of the star formation main-sequence (MS), with the main goal to test for possible systematic effects. For this purpose our new study combines three independent methods of determining molecular gas masses from CO line fluxes, far-infrared dust spectral energy distributions, and ~1mm dust photometry, in a large sample of 1444 star forming galaxies (SFGs) between z=0 and 4. The sample covers the stellar mass range log(M*/M_solar)=9.0-11.8, and star formation rates relative to that on the MS, delta_MS=SFR/SFR(MS), from 10^{-1.3} to 10^{2.2}. Our most important finding is that all data sets, despite the different techniques and analysis methods used, follow the same scaling trends, once method-to-method…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
