False negatives for remote life detection on ocean-bearing planets: Lessons from the early Earth
C.T. Reinhard, S.L. Olson, E.W. Schwieterman, T.W. Lyons

TL;DR
This paper discusses the challenges of detecting biosignatures on ocean-bearing planets, highlighting how Earth's long history shows that key gases like oxygen and methane can be cryptic and difficult to observe remotely, especially in early planetary stages.
Contribution
It provides a comprehensive review of Earth's geochemical record and models to illustrate how atmospheric biosignatures can be hidden, emphasizing the limitations of current remote detection methods for ocean worlds.
Findings
Oxygen and methane biosignatures have been difficult to detect for most of Earth's history.
Atmospheric O2/O3 levels are poor proxies for biosphere presence until recent geological times.
Oceanic recycling can obscure surface biosignatures, complicating remote life detection.
Abstract
Ocean-atmosphere chemistry on Earth has undergone dramatic evolutionary changes through its long history, with potentially significant ramifications for the emergence and long-term stability of atmospheric biosignatures. Though a great deal of work has centered on refining our understanding of false positives for remote life detection, much less attention has been paid to the possibility of false negatives, that is, cryptical biospheres that are widespread and active on a planet's surface but are ultimately undetectable or difficult to detect in the composition of a planet's atmosphere. Here, we summarize recent developments from geochemical proxy records and Earth system models that provide insight into the long-term evolution of the most readily detectable potential biosignature gases on Earth - oxygen (O2), ozone (O3), and methane (CH4). We suggest that the canonical O2-CH4…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
