This paper improves bounds on the size of k-caps in projective geometries over finite fields with even q, specifically refining the second largest complete k-cap size in PG(3, q) and deriving new bounds for higher dimensions.
Contribution
It provides improved upper bounds for the second largest complete k-cap in PG(3, q) and new bounds for maximum k-cap sizes in higher-dimensional projective spaces over even q.
Findings
01
Improved upper bound for m'_2(3, q) when q ≥ 8 and q even.
02
Derived new bounds for m_2(n, q) for n ≥ 4 and q even.
03
Identified gaps in previous proofs by Cao and Ou.
Abstract
Let m_2(n, q) be the maximum size of k for which there exists a k-cap in PG(n, q), and let m'_2(n, q) be the second largest value of k for which there exists a complete k-cap in PG(n, q). In this paper Chao's upper bound q^2 - q + 5 for m'_2(3, q), q even and q \geq 8, will be improved. As a corollary new bounds for m_2(n, q), q even, q\geq 8 and n \geq 4, are obtained. Cao and Ou published a better bound but there seems to be a gap in their proof.
Equations160
m2′(3,q)≤q2−q+5,qeven,q≥8.
m2′(3,q)≤q2−q+5,qeven,q≥8.
t(t−1)≥q(q+2−x)x.
t(t−1)≥q(q+2−x)x.
m2′(3,q)<q2−(5−1)q+5,qeven,q≥8.
m2′(3,q)<q2−(5−1)q+5,qeven,q≥8.
m2′(3,q)<q2−2q+3q+2,qeven,q≥2048.
m2′(3,q)<q2−2q+3q+2,qeven,q≥2048.
m2′(3,q)≤q2−q+3,qeven,q≥8.
m2′(3,q)≤q2−q+3,qeven,q≥8.
t(t−1)≥f(4)=f(q−2)=4q(q−2),
t(t−1)≥f(4)=f(q−2)=4q(q−2),
t≥21+1+16q(q−2)≥2q−47forq≥8.
t≥21+1+16q(q−2)≥2q−47forq≥8.
k−1≤2.2+(q−1)q=q2−q+4.
k−1≤2.2+(q−1)q=q2−q+4.
s(q−1)+uq+3=q2−q+4,s+u=q.
s(q−1)+uq+3=q2−q+4,s+u=q.
s(q−1)+uq+q−2+3=q2−q+4,s+u=q−1.
s(q−1)+uq+q−2+3=q2−q+4,s+u=q−1.
r(q−2)+s(q−1)+uq+1=q2−q+5,r+s+u=q+1,withr≥2.
r(q−2)+s(q−1)+uq+1=q2−q+5,r+s+u=q+1,withr≥2.
r(q−2)+uq+q−1+1=q2−q+4,r+u+1=q+1.
r(q−2)+uq+q−1+1=q2−q+4,r+u+1=q+1.
r(q−2)+s(q−1)+uq+1=q2−q+4,r+s+u=q+1,r≥1,s≥1.
r(q−2)+s(q−1)+uq+1=q2−q+4,r+s+u=q+1,r≥1,s≥1.
m2′(3,q)<q2−(5−1)q+5,qeven,q≥8.
m2′(3,q)<q2−(5−1)q+5,qeven,q≥8.
m2′(3,4)=14.
m2′(3,4)=14.
5≤∣Π∩K∣≤q−3.
5≤∣Π∩K∣≤q−3.
t(t−1)≥f(5)=f(q−3)=5q(q−3).
t(t−1)≥f(5)=f(q−3)=5q(q−3).
t≥21+1+20q(q−3).
t≥21+1+20q(q−3).
1+20q(q−3)≥25q−2α−1.
1+20q(q−3)≥25q−2α−1.
1+20q(q−3)≥20q2+4α2+1−8α5q−45q+4α,
1+20q(q−3)≥20q2+4α2+1−8α5q−45q+4α,
0≥4α2+α(−85q+4)+60q−45q,
0≥4α2+α(−85q+4)+60q−45q,
0≥α2+α(−25q+1)+15q−5q.
0≥α2+α(−25q+1)+15q−5q.
k≤q2+q+2−5q+3,
k≤q2+q+2−5q+3,
k≤q2+(1−5)q+5.
k≤q2+(1−5)q+5.
q2+(1−α)q+2+2α>q2+(1−5)q+5,
q2+(1−α)q+2+2α>q2+(1−5)q+5,
(5−α)q+2α−3>0
(5−α)q+2α−3>0
2q2−q+2.(q−1)/2q+2.
2q2−q+2.(q−1)/2q+2.
2q2−q+2.(q−1)/2q+2.
2q2−q+2.(q−1)/2q+2.
r(q−2)+sq+2(q−3)+1,withr+s=q−1.
r(q−2)+sq+2(q−3)+1,withr+s=q−1.
r(q−2)+(q−1−r)q+2(q−3)+1≤q2−q+3,
r(q−2)+(q−1−r)q+2(q−3)+1≤q2−q+3,
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsFinite Group Theory Research · Limits and Structures in Graph Theory · Analytic Number Theory Research
Full text
On k-caps in PG(n,q), with q even and n≥3
J. A. THAS
Ghent University
Ghent University, Department of Mathematics, Krijgslaan 281, S22, B-9000 Ghent, Belgium
Let m2(n,q) be the maximum size of k for which there exists a k-cap in PG(n,q), and let m2′(n,q) be the second largest value of k for which there exists a complete k-cap in PG(n,q). In this paper Chao’s upper bound q2−q+5 for m2′(3,q), q even and q≥8, will be improved. As a corollary new bounds for m2(n,q), q even, q≥8 and n≥4, are obtained. Cao and Ou published a better bound but there seems to be a gap in their proof.
Keywords: projective space, finite field, k-cap
1. Introduction
A *k-arc * of PG(2,q) is a set of k points, no three of which are collinear; a k-cap of PG(n,q), n≥3, is a set of k points, no three of which are collinear. A k-arc or k-cap is complete if it is not contained in a (k+1)-arc or (k+1)-cap. The largest value of k for which a k-arc of PG(2,q), or a k-cap of PG(n,q) with n≥3, exists is denoted by m2(n,q). The size of the second largest complete k-arc of PG(2,q) or k-cap of PG(n,q), n≥3, is denoted by m2′(n,q).
Let K be a k-arc of PG(2,q), q even and q>2, with q−q+1<k≤q+1. Then K can be uniquely extended to a (q+2)-arc of PG(2,q).
For any k-arc K in PG(2,q) or k-cap K in PG(n,q), n≥3, a tangent of K is a line which has exactly one point in common with K. Let t be the number of tangents of K through a point P of K and let σ1(Q) be the number of tangents of K through a point Q∈K. Then for a k-arc Kt+k=q+2 and for a k-cap Kt+k=qn−1+qn−2+⋯+q+2.
Let K be a complete k-cap in PG(3,q) with q even. If Π is a plane such that ∣Π∩K∣=x, then
[TABLE]
In the underlying paper the following improvement of Chao’s result will be obtained.
Theorem 1.6** (Main Theorem).**
[TABLE]
As a corollary new bounds for m2(n,q), q even, q≥8 and n≥4, are obtained.
Combining the main theorem of [12] with Theorem 1.6, there is an immediate improvement of the upper bound for m2′(3,q), q≥2048. We thank T. Szőnyi for bringing reference [12] to our attention.
Theorem 1.7**.**
[TABLE]
2. A first improvement of Chao’s bound
Theorem 2.1**.**
[TABLE]
Proof. Let K be a complete k-cap in PG(3,q), q even, q≥8 and k<q2+1.
Let Π be a plane of PG(3,q) for which 4≤∣Π∩K∣≤q−2.
Let f(X)=q(q+2−X)X. Then
[TABLE]
by Lemma 1.5. So
[TABLE]
Hence k≤q2+q+2−2q+47=q2−q+415, and consequently k≤q2−q+3.
So we may assume that either ∣Π∩K∣≤3, or ∣Π∩K∣≥q−1, for any plane Π of PG(3,q). Let l1,l2,...,lt be the t tangents of K through the point P∈K. We consider three cases depending on the number of planes containing \li and intersecting K in at most 3 points.
(A) There exists exactly one plane Πli containing li such that ∣Πli∩K∣≤3,i=1,2,...,t. We will show that in this case k≤q2−q+3.
Assume there is exactly one plane Π through P with ∣Π∩K∣≤3. Then for i=1,2,...,t, Πli=Π. Hence all tangents of K containing P are in Π. So t≤q+1, a contradiction. Hence there are at least two planes Π1,Π2 through P such that ∣Πi∩K∣≤3,i=1,2. Then ∣Π1∩Π2∩K∣=2. Consequently t≥2(q−1), and so k≤q2+q+2−2q+2=q2−q+4.
Assume, by way of contradiction, that k=q2−q+4. So t=2(q−1). Then ∣Π1∩K∣=∣Π2∩K∣=3. All tangent lines at P are contained in Π1 and Π2. Let l be a tangent of K at P in Π1, and consider the q+1 planes containing l. The plane Π1 is the only of these planes which intersects K in 3 points, exactly q−1 planes through l contain 2 tangent lines at P and so intersect K in a q-arc and the remaining plane through l contains exactly one tangent line at P and so intersects K in a (q+1)-arc.
Let Π be the unique plane containing l which intersects K in a (q+1)-arc, let Π∩K=O, and let N be the kernel of O, that is, N is the unique point of Π which extends O to a (q+2)-arc of Π. Clearly N∈l.
If K′ is a k′-arc of a plane PG(2,q) and P′∈PG(2,q)∖K′, then the parity of the number of tangents of K′ through P′ is the parity of k′, see Chapter 1 of [7]. Hence, by considering O and the q−1q-arcs whose planes contain l, we see that the number of tangents of K through N is at least q+1+q−1=2q. As K is complete we have 2q≤t, so k≤q2+q+2−2q=q2−q+2, a contradiction.
Consequently k≤q2−q+3.
(B) Some tangent li,1≤i≤t, is contained in at least two planes having at most three points in common with K.
First we will prove that k≤q2−q+5. For k=q2−q+5 and k=q2−q+4 a contradiction will be obtained; the case k=q2−q+4 will be subdivided in two cases. Hence it follows that also in Case (B) we have k≤q2−q+3.
Counting the points of K on the q+1 planes containing li gives
[TABLE]
So k≤q2−q+5.
(B.1) First, assume k=q2−q+5. Then two planes Π1,Π2 containing li intersect K in 3 points, while the remaining planes Π3,Π4,...,Πq+1 containing li intersect K in q+1 points. Let l be a tangent of K at P in Π1, distinct from li. Any plane ζ containing l, with ζ=Π1, intersects each (q+1)-arc Πi∩K,i=3,4,...,q+1, in exactly two points. Hence ∣ζ∩K∣≥q. Considering the lines ζ∩Π2, we see that exactly two of the planes ζ, say ζ1 and ζ2, intersect K in (q+1)-arcs O1 and O2, while the q−2 other planes ζ, say ζ3,ζ4,...,ζq, intersect K in a q-arc.
Let N1 be the kernel of O1; then N1∈l. The number of tangents of K containing N1 is at least q+1+q−2=2q−1. As K is complete we have 2q−1≤t, so k≤q2+q+2−2q+1=q2−q+3, a contradiction.
(B.2) Next, assume k=q2−q+4. Then, considering all planes containing li, there are two cases to consider.
(B.2.1) Two planes Π1,Π2 containing li intersect K in three points, the plane Π3 containing li intersects K in q points, and the remaining planes Π4,Π5,...,Πq+1 containing li intersect K in q+1 points.
Let l be a tangent of K at P in Π1, distinct from li. Any plane ζ containing l, distinct from Π1, intersects each (q+1)-arc Πi∩K,i=4,5,...,q+1, in exactly two points; q−1 of these planes ζ intersect Π3∩K in exactly two points. So for at least q−1 of these planes ζ we have ∣ζ∩K∣≥q, and for all planes ζ we have ∣ζ∩K∣≥q−1.
Assume that for all q planes ζ we have ∣ζ∩K∣≥q. Let s be the number of planes ζ for which ∣ζ∩K∣=q and let u be the number of planes ζ for which ∣ζ∩K∣=q+1. Then
[TABLE]
So s(q−1)+(q−s)q+3=q2−q+4, hence s=q−1 and u=1. Let ζ be the plane which intersects K in a (q+1)-arc O, and let N∈l be the nucleus of O. The number of tangents of K containing N is at least q+1+q−1=2q, so k≤q2+q+2−2q=q2−q+2, a contradiction.
So we may assume that for exactly q−1 planes ζ we have ∣ζ∩K∣≥q and that for exactly one plane ζ we have ∣ζ∩K∣=q−1. Assume that for s planes ζ we have ∣ζ∩K∣=q, and that for u planes ζ we have ∣ζ∩K∣=q+1. Then
[TABLE]
So s(q−1)+(q−1−s)q+q+1=q2−q+4, hence s=q−3 and u=2. Let ζ1,ζ2 be the planes containing l which intersect K in (q+1)-arcs O1,O2, let N1,N2 be the nuclei of O1,O2, and let Π1∩K={P,P1,P2}. Assume first that N1∈P1P2. Then the number of tangents of K containing N1 is at least q+1+q−3+2=2q, so k≤q2−q+2 a contradiction. Similarly if N2∈P1P2. Hence we may assume that N1=N2=P1P2∩l. Then the number of tangents of K through N1 is at least q+1+q+q−3=3q−2, so k≤q2+q+2−3q+2=q2−2q+4, again a contradiction.
(B.2.2) One plane Π1 containing li intersects K in three points, and one plane Π2 containing li intersects K in two points.
Consequently the other q−1 planes Π3,Π4,...,Πq+1 containing li intersect K in q+1 points. Let l be a tangent of K at P in Π1, distinct from li. Any plane ζ containing l, distinct from Π1, intersects each (q+1)-arc Πi∩K, with i=3,4,...,q+1, in exactly two points. As k=q2−q+4 it easily follows that for q−1 of these planes ζ we have ∣ζ∩K∣=q, while for the remaining plane ζ we have ∣ζ∩K∣=q+1.
Let ζ be the plane containing l which intersects K in a (q+1)-arc O, and let N be the nucleus of O. The number of tangents of K containing N is at least q+1+q−1=2q, so k≤q2−q+2, again a contradiction.
(C) Some tangent li, with 1≤i≤t, is contained in no plane having at most three points in common with K.
First we will prove that k≤q2−q+5. A contradiction will be obtained for k∈{q2−q+5,q2−q+4}; for k=q2−q+4 two cases have to be considered. Hence again k≤q2−q+3.
Then ∣Πj∩K∣≥q−1 for each plane Πj containing li, with j=1,2,...,q+1. The arc Πj∩K of Πj can be completed to a (q+2)-arc of Πj; see Theorem 1.2. This (q+2)-arc meets li in points P,Pj. As there are q+1 points Pj and ∣li∖{P}∣=q, two of the points Pj coincide, say P1=P2. The number of tangents of K containing P1 is at least 2(q−2)+1=2q−3, so k≤q2−q+5.
Now we make some observations on (q−1)-arcs of PG(2,q), q even. Let K be any (q−1)-arc of PG(2,q), q even, and let l be a tangent of K at P∈K. Let C be the unique (q+2)-arc which contains K; see Theorem 1.2. Put C∩l={P,N}. Then it is easy to see that exactly q−2 points of l∖{P,N} are on exactly three tangents of K, and that exactly one point R of l∖{P,N} is on exactly one tangent of K; also, R=l∩N′N′′, with {N,N′,N′′}∪K=C.
(C.1) First, assume k=q2−q+5. Then Π1∩K and Π2∩K are (q−1)-arcs of Π1 and Π2. Let r be the number of (q−1)-arcs Πj∩K, let s be the number of q-arcs Πj∩K and let u be the number of (q+1)-arcs Πj∩K. Then
[TABLE]
So r(q−2)+s(q−1)+(q+1−r−s)q+1=q2−q+5, hence 2r+s=2q−4, with r≥2. If s≥1, then we have an extra tangent of K containing P1, so k≤q2−q+4, a contradiction. Hence s=0,r=q−2,u=3.
As the number of tangents of K containing P1 is exactly 2q−3, the nuclei of the three (q+1)-arcs Πj∩K are distinct from P1. Let N be one of these nuclei. Also, P1 is on exactly one tangent of each of the q−4(q−1)-arcs Πj∩K, distinct from the (q−1)-arcs Π1∩K,Π2∩K. So N is on at least three tangents of each of these q−4(q−1)-arcs Πj∩K. Hence the number of tangents of K containing N is at least 2(q−4)+q+1=3q−7>2q−3, a contradiction.
(C.2) Finally, assume that k=q2−q+4. We have to consider two cases depending of the sizes of Π1∩K and Π2∩K.
(C.2.1) First, assume that Π1∩K and Π2∩K are (q−1)-arcs. The tangents of K containing P1 are the tangents of Π1∩K and Π2∩K containing P1, and one extra tangent l. Assume that l is a tangent of Π3∩K. If Π3∩K is a (q+1)-arc O, then P1 is the nucleus of O, so there arise q extra tangents, a contradiction; if Π3∩K is a (q−1)-arc K′, then P1 is contained in at least three tangents of K′, again a contradiction. Hence Π3∩K is a q-arc. Also, Πj∩K, with j=4,5,...,q+1, cannot be a q-arc. Let r be the number of (q−1)-arcs Πj∩K, and let u be the number of (q+1)-arcs Πj∩K. Then
[TABLE]
So r(q−2)+(q−r)q+q=q2−q+4, hence r=q−2 and u=2. Let O1,O2 be the (q+1)-arcs Πj∩K, and let N1,N2 be the nuclei of O1,O2. Then Ni=P1,i=1,2. Also P1 is contained in exactly one tangent of each of the q−4(q−1)-arcs Πj∩K, with j=1,2. Hence the number of tangents of K containing N1 is at least 2(q−4)+q+1=3q−7>2q−2, clearly a contradiction.
(C.2.2) Consequently, we may assume that Π1∩K is a (q−1)-arc and that Π2∩K is a q-arc
. Let r be the number of (q−1)-arcs Πj∩K, let s be the number of q-arcs Πj∩K and let u be the number of (q+1)-arcs Πj∩K. Then
[TABLE]
So 2r+s=2q−3,r≥1,s≥1. Clearly, s=1, as otherwise we have an extra tangent containing P1, and then k<q2−q+4. Hence r=q−2,s=1,u=2. The nuclei of the two (q+1)-arcs Πj∩K are distinct from P1. Let N be one of these nuclei. Also, P1 is on exactly one tangent of each of the q−3(q−1)-arcs Πj∩K distinct from Π1∩K. So N is on at least three tangents of each of these q−3(q−1)-arcs Πj∩K. Consequently the number of tangents of K containing N is at least 2(q−3)+q+1=3q−5>2q−2, a final contradiction. ■
3. Main Theorem
Theorem 3.1**.**
[TABLE]
[TABLE]
Proof By [8] we have m2′(3,4)=14, and by Theorem 2.1 we have m2′(3,8)≤59, which proves Theorem 3.1 for q=8. So from now on we assume q>8.
Let K be a complete k-cap in PG(3,q), q even, q>8, and k<q2+1. Let Π be a plane of PG(3,q) for which
[TABLE]
Let f(X)=q(q+2−X)X. Then by Lemma 1.5 of Chao
[TABLE]
So
[TABLE]
Put 21+1+20q(q−3)≥5q−α, that is,
[TABLE]
For α≤5q−(1/2) this is equivalent to
[TABLE]
or
[TABLE]
or
[TABLE]
Put α=3. Then there arises 0≥9+3(−25q+1)+15q−5q, that is, 0≥12+15q−75q. This inequality is satisfied for q>16.
Hence for q>16 we have t≥5q−3, and so,
[TABLE]
that is,
[TABLE]
For q=16 it follows from (18) that t>32 and so k≤241, which is equivalent to k≤q2+(1−5)q+5 with q=16.
**From now on suppose that either ∣Π∩K∣≤4 or ∣Π∩K∣≥q−2 for any plane Π of PG(3,q). Let l1,l2,...,lt be the t tangents of K containing the point P∈K. Assume, by way of contradiction, that k>q2+(1−5)q+5. We consider three cases depending on the number of planes containing li and intersecting K in at most 4 points. In each case a contradiction will be obtained **.
(A) Assume, by way of contradiction, that each li is contained in exactly one plane Πli for which ∣Πli∩K∣≤4, with i=1,2,...,t.
(A.1) Assume that there is exactly one plane Π through P with ∣Π∩K∣≤4. Then for i=1,2,...,t we have Πli=Π. So t≤q+1, hence k≥q2+1, a contradiction.
(A.2) There are at least two planes Π1,Π2 through P such that ∣Πi∩K∣≤4,i=1,2. Then ∣Π1∩Π2∩K∣=2. Consequently t≥2(q−2), and so k≤q2+q+2−2q+4=q2−q+6.
The plane Π1 intersects K in a m-arc, m≤4, and contains at least q−2 tangents of K at P. Let P1∈(K∩Π1)∖P and assume that PP1 is contained in α planes Π with ∣Π∩K∣≤4. Then t≥α(q−2), so k≤q2+(1−α)q+2+2α. Consequently
[TABLE]
or
[TABLE]
This gives a contradiction for α>2 with q>8. So PP1 is contained in at most two planes intersecting K in at most four points.
Assume, by way of contradiction, that for some plane Π of PG(3,q) we have Π∩K={P}. As there are at least two planes Π,Π′ through P intersecting K in at most four points, we have ∣Π∩Π′∩K∣=2 and so ∣Π∩K∣≥2, a contradiction.
Let PG(2,q) be a plane of PG(3,q) not containing P and let σ be the projection of PG(3,q)∖{P} from P onto PG(2,q). Further, let P be the set of all images under σ of all points of K∖{P} contained in planes Π, with P∈Π, for which ∣Π∩K∣≤4, and let B be the set of all images under σ of the sets Π∖{P}. Then there arises an incidence structure (P,B) of points and lines for which
(1)
∣B∣≥2,
(2)
any two distinct lines in B have exactly one point in common,
(3)
each point is contained in at most two lines,
(4)
each line contains at most three points and at least one point.
It follows easily that 2≤∣B∣≤4. For each value of ∣β∣ we will find a contradiction.
(α) ∣B∣=4
Then t=4(q−2), so k=q2+q+2−4q+8=q2−3q+10. Hence q2−3q+10>q2+(1−5)q+5, or 5>(4−5)q, a contradiction as q>8.
(β) ∣B∣=3
If ∣P∣=3, then t=3(q−1), so k=q2−2q+5. Hence q2−2q+5>q2+(1−5)q+5, or (3−5)q<0, a contradiction.
If ∣P∣=4, then t=2(q−1)+q−2, so k=q2−2q+6. Hence q2+(1−5)q+5<q2−2q+6, or (3−5)q−1<0, a contradiction.
If ∣P∣=5, then t=q−1+2(q−2), so k=q2−2q+7. Hence q2+(1−5)q+5<q2−2q+7, or (3−5)q<2, a contradiction.
If ∣P∣=6, then t=3(q−2), so k=q2−2q+8. Hence q2+(1−5)q+5<q2−2q+8, or (3−5)q<3, a contradiction.
(γ) ∣B∣=2
By Theorem 2.1 we may assume that k≤q2−q+3.
If ∣P∣=1, then t=2q, so k=q2−q+2.
If ∣P∣=2, then t=2q−1, so k=q2−q+3.
If ∣P∣=3, then t=2q−2, so k=q2−q+4, a contradiction.
If ∣P∣=4, then t=2q−3, so k=q2−q+5, a contradiction.
If ∣P∣=5, then t=2q−4, so k=q2−q+6, a contradiction.
Hence the cases k=q2−q+2 and k=q2−q+3 have still to be considered.
(γ.1) k=q2−q+2
On K there are two points P,P1 such that PP1 is contained in two planes Π1,Π2 intersecting K in just {P,P1}, and in q−1 planes Π3,Π4,...,Πq+1 intersecting K in a (q+2)-arc.
Let P′∈(Π3∩K)∖{P,P1} and let l be a tangent of K at P′. Assume, by way of contradiction, that each plane containing l intersects K in a m-arc with m>4, so m≥q−2. These m-arcs Ki′, with i=1,2,...,q+1, are extendable to (q+2)-arcs Ci. Let Ci∩l={Ni,P′},i=1,2,...,q+1. At least two of the points N1,N2,...,Nq+1 coincide, say N1=N2. A plane Π′ containing l, but not containing P nor P1, intersects each of the (q+2)-arcs Πi∩K, with i=3,4,...,q+1, in either 0 or 2 points; so ∣Π′∩K∣ is even. A plane Π′ containing l and either P or P1 intersects K in q points. Hence each plane containing l intersects K in a m-arc, with m even. Counting tangents of K containing N1, we obtain at least 2(q−3)+1+q−1=3q−6 tangents. So k≤q2+q+2−3q+6=q2−2q+8, a contradiction for q>8. We conclude that there is a plane Π′ containing l with ∣Π′∩K∣≤4.
Assume, by way of contradiction, that l is contained in at least two planes Π′,Π′′ with ∣Π′∩K∣≤4,∣Π′′∩K∣≤4. Then, by a previous argument, these intersections have an even number of points and so ∣Π′∩K∣∈{2,4} and ∣Π′′∩K∣∈{2,4}. Now we count the points of K in planes containing l, and obtain k≤(q−1)(q−1)+7=q2−2q+8, a contradiction for q>8.
Hence l is contained in exactly one plane Π′ for which ∣Π′∩K∣≤4. It follows that the roles of P and P′ may be interchanged.
Let l′ be a second tangent of K containing P′, with l′⊂Π′. Let K~=K∩Π3,Π′∩K~={P′,P1′}. If P1′∈{P,P1}, then ∣Π′∩K∣=q, a contradiction. Hence P1′∈{P,P1}. With P′ there corresponds an incidence structure (P′,B′) of points and lines. As k=q2−q+2, we necessarily have ∣P′∣=1 and ∣B′∣=2. Hence Π′∩K={P′,P1′}. If Π~′ is the unique plane containing l′ and intersecting K in at most 4 points, then Π~′∩K={P′,P1′}. Also, the roles of P and P1′, P′ and P1′, P and P1 can be interchanged.
Interchanging Π3 and Πi, i∈{3,4,....,q+1}, and interchanging P′ with any point of (Πi∩K)∖{P,P1}, we see that K is partitioned into (q2−q+2)/2 pairs, where each pair is contained in two planes intersecting K in that pair and in q−1 planes intersecting K in a (q+2)-arc. Any other plane contains either 0 or q points of K. Each point Q of K is contained in 2q tangents; the two planes on Q intersecting K in two points each contain q of these tangents.
Now we count the planes intersecting K in a (q+2)-arc, and obtain
[TABLE]
Hence q+2∣(q2−q+2)(q−1), so q+2∣24, that is q∈{2,4}, a contradiction.
(γ.2) k=q2−q+3
Then on K there are points P,P1 such that PP1 is contained in two planes Π1,Π2 with Π1∩K={P,P1},Π2∩K={P,P1,P2}, and in q−1 planes Π3,Π4,...,Πq+1 intersecting K in a (q+2)-arc.
Let P′∈(Π3∩K)∖{P,P1} and let l be a tangent of K at P′. Assume, by way of contradiction, that each plane containing l intersects K in a m-arc with m>4, so m≥q−2. These m-arcs Ki′, with i=1,2,...,q+1, are extendable to (q+2)-arcs Ci. Let Ci∩l={Ni,P′},i=1,2,...,q+1. At least two of the points N1,N2,...,Nq+1 coincide, say N1=N2. A plane Π′ containing l, but not containing P nor P1, intersects each of the (q+2)-arcs Πi∩K, with i=3,4,...,q+1, in either 0 or 2 points. So if P2∈Π′, then ∣Π′∩K∣ is even. A plane Π′ containing l and either P or P1, but not P2, intersects K in q points. Hence q planes containing l intersect K in a m-arc, with m even. Counting tangents of K containing N1, we obtain at least 2(q−3)+1+q−2=3q−7 tangents. So k≤q2+q+2−3q+7=q2−2q+9, a contradiction for q>8. We conclude that there is a plane Π′ containing l with ∣Π′∩K∣≤4.
Assume, by way of contradiction, that l is contained in at least two planes Π′,Π′′ with ∣Π′∩K∣≤4,∣Π′′∩K∣≤4. Now we count the points of K in planes containing l, and obtain k≤q2−2q+9, a contradiction for q>8.
Hence l is contained in exactly one plane Π′ for which ∣Π′∩K∣≤4. As all tangents of K at P1 are contained in Π1∪Π2, it follows that each tangent of K at P1 is contained in exactly one plane intersecting K in at most 4 points. Hence all points of K∖{P2} play the same role.
Let l′ be a second tangent of K containing P′, with l′⊂Π′. Let K∩Π3=K~,Π′∩K~={P′,P1′}. If P1′∈{P,P1}, then ∣Π′∩K∣≥q, a contradiction. Hence P1′∈{P,P1}. With P′ there corresponds an incidence structure (P′,B′) of points and lines (see first part of (A)).
As k=q2−q+3, we necessarily have ∣P′∣=2 and ∣B′∣=2. Hence ∣Π′∩K∣∈{2,3} and Π′∩K⊃{P′,P1′}. Let Π′ be the unique plane containing l′ and intersecting K in at most 4 points, and let Π′∩K={P′,P1′}. If P1′=P1′, then by the structure of (P′,B′) we have {P1′,P1′}⊂Π′, clearly a contradiction. Hence P1′=P1′, and so {P′,P1′}⊂Π′∩K.
Without loss of generality we may assume that Π′∩K={P′,P1′,P2′} and Π′∩K={P′,P1′}. As ∣Π′∩K∣ is odd, the set Π′∩K has to contain the point P2. Consequently P2=P2′.
Interchanging Π3 and Πi, i∈{3,4,⋯,q+1}, and interchanging P′ with any point of (Πi∩K)∖{P,P1}, we see that K∖{P2} is partitioned into (q2−q+2)/2 pairs, where each pair is contained in one plane intersecting K in that pair, in one plane intersecting K in that pair together with P2, and in q−1 planes intersecting K in a (q+2)-arc. Any other plane contains 0, 1, q or q+1 points of K.
Now we count the planes intersecting K in a (q+2)-arc and obtain
[TABLE]
Hence q+2∣(q2−q+2)(q−1), so q+2∣24, that is q∈{2,4}, a final contradiction.
We conclude that there is some tangent li containing P, with i∈{1,2,...,t}, which is contained in exactly θ>1 planes having at most 4 points in common with K.
(B) Assume, by way of contradiction, that some tangent l of K is contained in no plane intersecting K in at most 4 points.
Hence each plane Πi containing l satisfies ∣Πi∩K∣≥q−2, with i=1,2,...,q+1. By Theorem 1.2 the arc Πi∩K can be extended to a (q+2)-arc Ci; let Ci∩l={Ni,P} with l∩K={P}. For at least two planes Πi, say Π1 and Π2, we have N1=N2.
(B.1) First we prove that N1 is on a tangent of K not in Π1∪Π2; clearly N1 is on at least 2q−5 tangents of K contained in Π1∪Π2. Assume the contrary. Then for any plane Πi∈{Π1,Π2}, the arc Πi∩K must have an odd number of points. So Πi∩K either is a (q−1)-arc or a (q+1)-arc, i∈{3,4,...,q+1}. Also, Ni=N1 for i=3,4,...,q−1. If Πi∩K is a (q−1)-arc and Ci∖(Πi∩K)={Ni,Ni′,Ni′′},i∈{3,4,...,q+1}, then N1∈Ni′Ni′′, as otherwise N1Ni′ and N1Ni′′ are tangents of Πi∩K.
Let r be the number of planes Πi, with i=1,2, for which Πi∩K is a (q−1)-arc, and let s be the number of planes Πi, with i=1,2, for which Πi∩K is a (q+1)-arc. The number of points of K is at least
[TABLE]
As K is complete, by Theorem 2.1
[TABLE]
so
[TABLE]
We may assume that Π3∩K is a (q−1)-arc. The number of tangents of K containing N3 is at least
[TABLE]
Hence
[TABLE]
So
[TABLE]
a contradiction for q>8.
Consequently N1 is on a tangent l′ of K not in Π1∪Π2.
(B.2) **Now we consider all planes Πi′ containing the tangent l′, with i=1,2,...,q+1. We will show that:
(a) For each plane Πi′ such that ∣Πi′∩K∣≥q−2 the point N1 does not extend the arc Πi′∩K.
(b) For each i we have ∣Πi′∩K∣≥q−2**.
(a) Let ∣Π1∩K∣=α,q−2≤α≤q+1,∣Π2∩K∣=β,q−2≤β≤q+1. Then N1 is contained in at least α+β tangents of K. Now we consider all planes Πi′ containing the tangent l′, with i=1,2,...,q+1. Assume, by way of contradiction, that m=∣Πi′∩K∣≥q−2 and that the (q+2)-arc Ci′ extending Πi′∩K intersects l′ in {N1,P′}, with l′∩K={P′},i∈{1,2,...,q+1}. Then the number of tangents of K containing N1 is at least
[TABLE]
Hence
[TABLE]
So q2−2q+11>q2+(1−5)q+5, a contradiction. Consequently for ∣Πi′∩K∣≥q−2 we have N1∈Ci′,i∈{1,2,...,q+1}.
(b) Next, assume by way of contradiction that for at least one plane Πi′ containing l′, say Π1′, we have ∣Π1′∩K∣≤4. Let Π2′ be the plane ll′. Now we count the points of K in the planes Πi′, with i=1,2,...,q+1. Let
θ1 be the number of planes Πi′,i∈{3,4,...,q+1}, containing a tangent of Π1∩K through N1 and a tangent of Π2∩K through N1,
θ2 be the number of planes Πi′,i∈{3,4,...,q+1}, containing a tangent of Π1∩K through N1, but no tangent of Π2∩K through N1,
θ3 be the number of planes Πi′,i∈{3,4,...,q+1}, containing a tangent of Π2∩K through N1, but no tangent of Π1∩K through N1,
θ4 be the number of planes Πi′,i∈{3,4,...,q+1}, containing no one of the tangents of Π1∩K or Π2∩K through N1.
Then, as N1∈/Ci′ for ∣Πi′∩K∣≥q−2, we have
[TABLE]
Hence
[TABLE]
so
[TABLE]
Now we have
θ1+θ2≥∣Π1∩K∣−2≥q−4,
θ1+θ3≥∣Π2∩K∣−2≥q−4.
Hence
[TABLE]
So q2−2q+11>q2+(1−5)q+5, a contradiction.
Hence no plane Πi′ containing l′ intersects K in a m-arc, with m≤4,1≤i≤q+1. Consequently, for each plane Πi′ containing l′ we have ∣Πi′∩K∣≥q−2. Also, we know that the (q+2)-arc Ci′ extending Πi′∩K does not contain N1, with i=1,2,...,q+1.
(B.3) A final contradiction will be obtained by considering the possible intersections Πi′∩K,i=1,2,...,q+1. It is easy to see that at least q−6 planes Πi′ containing l′ intersect K in a m-arc having at least 3 tangents containing N1; these planes are the planes containing l′ passing through distinct tangents of Π1∩K and Π2∩K containing N1. For any such plane Πi′ the arc Πi′∩K is either a (q−1)-arc or a (q−2)-arc. Let
θ1′ be the number of planes Πi′, with Πi′=ll′, containing a tangent of Π1∩K through N1, a tangent of Π2∩K through N1, where Πi′∩K is a (q−1)-arc,
θ2′ be the number of planes Πi′, with Πi′=ll′, containing a tangent of Π1∩K through N1, a tangent of Π2∩K through N1, where Πi′∩K is a (q−2)-arc.
Let Ci′∩l′={P′,Ni′}, with l′∩K={P′} and Ci′ the (q+2)-arc extending Πi′∩K,i=1,2,...,q+1. Then Ni′=N1,i=1,2,...,q+1. We may assume that N1′=N2′. Assume, by way of contradiction, that N1′=N2′=Ni′, with i∈{3,4,...,q+1}. Then N1′ is on at least 3(q−3)+1 tangents of K. So
[TABLE]
Hence
[TABLE]
that is,
[TABLE]
clearly a contradiction. Hence we may assume that N1′=N2′,N3′=N4′,N1′=N3′,Ni′∈{N1′,N3′} for i=5,6,...,q+1. At least θ1′−4 of the arcs Π5′∩K,Π6′∩K,...,Πq+1′∩K are (q−1)-arcs, say Π5′∩K,Π6′∩K,...,Πθ1′′∩K are (q−1)-arcs. The number of tangents of Πi′∩K containing Nj′ , with j∈{1,3}, is either 1 or 3, with i=5,6,...,θ1′; if Nj′ is contained in one tangent of Πi′∩K, then Nu′ is contained in 3 tangents of Πi′∩K, with {j,u}={1,3} and i∈{5,6,...,θ1′}. So we may assume that at least (θ1′−4)/2 of the (q−1)-arcs Πi′∩K,i=5,6,...,θ1′, have 3 tangents containing N1′. Counting the tangents of K through N1′, we obtain at least
[TABLE]
tangents. As θ1′+θ2′≥q−6, this number of tangents is at least 1+q−6−6+2q−6=3q−17. Hence
[TABLE]
So
[TABLE]
or
[TABLE]
a contradiction for q>16.
If at least one of the arcs Π1′∩K,Π2′∩K is a m-arc with m>q−2, then
(44) becomes
[TABLE]
which is at least 3q−15. Hence k≤q2−2q+17. For q=16 this gives k≤241. But for q=16 the inequality k>q2+(1−5)q+5 yields k≥242, a contradiction.
Finally we assume that Π1′∩K and Π2′∩K are (q−2)-arcs. Then at least θ1′−2 of the arcs Πi′∩K, with i=5,6,...,q+1, are (q−1)-arcs, say Π5′∩K,Π6′∩K,...,Πθ1′+2′∩K. So at least (θ1′−2)/2 of the (q−1)-arcs Πi′∩K, with i=5,6,...,θ1′+2, have 3 tangents containing either N1′ or N3′. First, assume that this is the case for N3′. If at least one of the arcs Π3′∩K,Π4′∩K is a m-arc with m>q−2, then the number of tangents of K containing N3′ is at least
[TABLE]
which is at least 3q−13. Hence k≤q2−2q+15, and so q2+(1−5)q+5<q2−2q+15, that is, (3−5)q<10, a contradiction. Hence the arcs Π3′∩K and Π4′∩K are (q−2)-arcs. Then the number of tangents of K containing N3′ is at least
[TABLE]
which is at least 3q−13. This yields again a contradiction. Consequently at least (θ1′−2)/2 of the (q−1)-arcs Πi′∩K, with i=5,6,...,θ1′+2, have 3 tangents containing N1′. But then in (44) θ1′−4 may be replaced by θ1′−2, yielding at least 3q−15 tangents of K containing N1′. Hence k≤q2−2q+17, which is a final contradiction.
We conclude that each tangent l of K is contained in at least one plane intersecting K in at most four points.
(C) Assume, by way of contradiction, that there is a tangent l of K which is contained in at least two planes Π1,Π2 intersecting K in a m-arc, with m≤4.
Assume that l∩K={P} and that Π1∪Π2 contains 2q+δ tangents of K through P. We have −5≤δ≤1.
(C.1) Here we will show that 2q+δ is the total number of tangents of K containing P; as a corollary it will follow that k∈{q2−q+1,q2−q+2,q2−q+3}. Assume, by way of contradiction, that there is a tangent l′ of K containing P with l′⊂Π1∪Π2. If ∣ll′∩K∣≤4, then the number of tangents of K containing P is at least 2q+δ+q−3=3q+δ−3≥3q−8, so k≤q2+q+2−3q+8=q2−2q+10. Hence
[TABLE]
or (3−5)q<5, a contradiction. Now we consider all planes containing l′. By (B) at least one of these planes intersects K in a m-arc, with m≤4. If at least two planes containing l′ intersect K in at most 4 points, then P is contained in at least 2q−5+2(q−5)+1=4q−14 tangents of K. Hence k≤q2+q+2−4q+14=q2−3q+16, so
[TABLE]
that is, (4−5)q<11, clearly a contradiction. Consequently exactly one plane Π′ containing l′ intersects K in at most 4 points. Now we count the points of K in the planes containing l′. Let
θ1 be the number of planes , distinct from ll′ and Π′, containing l′, containing a tangent of K in Π1 and containing a tangent of K in Π2,
θ2 be the number of planes containing l′, distinct from Π′, containing a tangent of K in Π1 and containing no tangent of K in Π2,
θ3 be the number of planes containing l′, distinct from Π′, containing a tangent of K in Π2 and containing no tangent of K in Π1,
θ4 be the number of planes , distinct from Π′, containing l′ and containing no tangent of K in Π1 or Π2.
Then
[TABLE]
with
[TABLE]
So
[TABLE]
that is,
[TABLE]
hence
[TABLE]
Consequently
[TABLE]
or (3−5)q<6, a contradiction.
It follows that 2q+δ is the total number of tangents of K containing P and so k=q2+q+2−2q−δ=q2−q+2−δ. As k≤q2−q+3 by Theorem 2.1, we have −1≤δ≤1.
(C.2) Some further properties of K.
Let l′′ be any tangent of K not containing P and let K∩l′′={P′}. By (B) l′′ is contained in a plane Π′′ with ∣Π′′∩K∣≤4. There is a tangent n of K at P′ not contained in Π′′. The tangent n is contained in a plane ρ with ∣ρ∩K∣≤4. Let 2q+δ′ be the number of tangents of K at P′ in ρ∪Π′′. Then δ′≤δ and if ρ∩Π′′ is a tangent, then by the foregoing section we have δ′=δ. Assume, by way of contradiction, that ρ∩Π′′ is not a tangent of K and that δ′<δ. Then there is a tangent n′ of K at P′ not contained in ρ∪Π′′. The tangent n′ is contained in a plane ρ′ with ∣ρ′∩K∣≤4. If ρ∩ρ′ is a tangent of K, then the 2q+δ tangents of K at P′ are contained in ρ∪ρ′, a contradiction. So ρ∩ρ′ is not a tangent; similarly ρ′∩Π′′ is not a tangent. Hence the number of tangents of K at P′ is at least 3(q−2), so 2q+δ≥3q−6, hence δ≥q−6, a contradiction. We conclude that δ′=δ and that all tangents of K at P′ are contained in ρ∪Π′′.
Hence, given any point Q∈K there are two planes α1 and α2 containing all tangents of K at Q; also ∣α1∩K∣≤4 and ∣α2∩K∣≤4. These planes are uniquely defined by Q, and so is α1∩α2. By Section (A) the line α1∩α2 is a tangent of K at Q. Let Π be any plane containing Q, with Π∈{α1,α2}. Then Π∩K contains at most two tangents at Q, so ∣Π∩K∣≥q. It follows that K contains no (q−2)-arcs and no (q−1)-arcs.
Notice that ∣α1∩K∣+∣α2∩K∣+δ=3 and remind that −1≤δ≤1.
Let Π be a plane containing Q, with Π∈{α1,α2}. The arc Π∩Kcontains always at least one tangent of K at Q, except when δ=−1,k=q2−q+3,∣α1∩K∣=∣α2∩K∣=2. So if k∈{q2−q+1,q2−q+2} and if k=q2−q+3 with ∣α1∩K∣=∣α2∩K∣+2=3 or ∣α2∩K∣=∣α1∩K∣+2=3, then Π∩K is not a (q+2)-arc. If ∣α1∩K∣=∣α2∩K∣=2,k=q2−q+3, then there is excactly one plane Π containing Q for which Π∩K is a (q+2)-arc.
(C.3) k=q2−q+1
Then δ=1 and ∣Π1∩K∣=∣Π2∩K∣=1. Let U1,U2∈K, with U1=U2, and let ξ1,ξ2 be the planes containing U1 intersecting K in at most 4 points. If U2∈ξ1∪ξ2, then δ≤0, a contradiction. Hence U2∈ξ1∪ξ2. Consequently any plane containing the line U1U2 has more than 4 points in common with K.
Now we count the points of K in planes containing the line U1U2. Let θ1 be the number of planes containing U1U2 intersecting K in a q-arc, and let θ2 be the number of planes containing U1U2 intersecting K in a (q+1)-arc. Then
[TABLE]
So
[TABLE]
that is θ1=q and θ2=1.
Now we count the number of (q+1)-arcs on K, and obtain
[TABLE]
So q+1∣(q2−q+1)(q−1), so q+1∣6, a contradiction.
(C.4) k=q2−q+2
Then δ=0 and {∣Π1∩K∣,∣Π2∩K∣}={1,2}. Let Q be any point of K and let lQ be the tangent of K which is the intersection of the two planes α1 and α2 containing the 2q tangents of K at Q. Let (α1∪α2)∩K={Q,Q′}. Starting with Q′ and lQ′, we find the same pair {Q′,Q}. It follows that K is partitioned into pairs of type {Q,Q′}. Let L be the set of these (q2−q+2)/2 pairs.
Let {Q,Q′}∈L, let α1 and α2 be the planes containing the 2q tangents of K at Q, and assume that Q′∈α1. Then α1=lQlQ′. Let Π be a plane containing QQ′, distinct from α1. As Π contains a tangent of K at Q, we have ∣Π∩K∣≤q+1. Counting the points of K in the planes containing QQ′, we obtain ∣Π∩K∣=q+1. By an easy counting we see that the planes containing lQ, but distinct from α1 and α2, intersect K in (q+1)-arcs. This way there arise q−1(q+1)-arcs K1,K2,...,Kq−1, having kernels N1,N2,...,Nq−1 on lQ∖{Q}. Assume, by way of contradiction, that Ni=Nj,i=j and i,j∈{1,2,...,q−1}. Then Ni is on at least 2q+1 tangents of K, hence k≤q2−q+1, a contradiction. Let lQ∖{N1,N2,...,Nq−1}=NQ.
Assume, by way of contradiction, that lQ∩lQ′=NQ. Let lQ∩lQ′=Ni,i∈{1,2,...,q−1}, and let R∈Ki∖{Q}. Then lQ′R∩K is a (q+1)-arc with kernel Ni. Hence Ni is on at least q2+2 tangents, a contradiction. Consequently lQ∩lQ′=NQ; similarly, lQ∩lQ′=NQ′.
Assume, by way of contradiction, that lQ∩lS=∅, with Q=S and {Q,S}∈L. Let {Q,Q′} and {S,S′} be elements of L. Now we count the number of tangents of K containing lQ∩lS=M. The arc lQlS∩K is a (q+1)-arc with kernel M, so lQlS contains q+1 tangents of K through M; the arc lQS′∩K is a (q+1)-arc, and as the line MS′ of the plane lSS′ is a tangent of K, the point M is the kernel of lQS′∩K, so lQS′ contains q+1 tangents of K through M; similarly the plane lSQ′ contains q+1 tangents of K through M. Hence M is contained in more than 2q tangents of K, clearly a contradiction. It follows that if lQ∩lS=∅, with Q=S, then {Q,S}∈L.
Let {Q,S}∈L, with Q and S distinct points of K. Then lQ∩lS=∅. Now we count the points of K in the planes containing the line QS. Let θ1 be the number of planes which contain QS and intersect K in a q-arc, and let θ2 be the number of planes which contain QS and intersect K in a (q+1)-arc. Hence
[TABLE]
So θ1=q−1 and θ2=2. The 2 planes containing QS and intersecting K in a (q+1)-arc are the planes lQS and lSQ.
Let {Q,S}∈L and let lQ∩lS=N. Then N is kernel of no one of the q−1(q+1)-arcs defined by planes containing the tangent lQ and of no one of the q−1(q+1)-arcs defined by planes containing the tangent lS. So for any line n∈{lQ,lS} containing N we have ∣n∩K∣∈{0,2}. Let n∩K={U,U′}.
First, assume that {U,U′}∈L. Then ∣lUU′∩K∣=∣lU′U∩K∣=q+1. As ∣lQU∩K∣=∣lSU∩K∣=q+1, the planes lQU and lSU are the two planes containing UU′ and intersecting K in a (q+1)-arc. Hence {lQU,lSU}={lUU′,lU′U}. So we may assume that lQU=lUU′ and lSU=lU′U. Consequently lQ∩lU=∅ and lS∩lU′=∅, that is, {Q,U}∈L and {S,U′}∈L. Hence ∣lQlU∩K∣=∣lSlU′∩K∣=2, clearly a contradiction as Q,U,U′∈lQlU.
It follows that {U,U′}∈L. So for any pair {T,T′}∈L, with {T,T′}={Q,S}, we have N∈TT′. Let n′,n′′ be distinct lines containing N with n′=n=n′′ and n′,n′′∈{lQ,lS}. Assume also that n′∩K={V,V′} and n′′∩K={W,W′}. Then {V,V′}∈L and {W,W′}∈L. By the foregoing the lines VV′,WW′,QS contain N, clearly a contradiction.
(C.5) k=q2−q+3
Let P be any point of K and let lP be the tangent of K which is the intersection of the two planes Π1,Π2 containing the 2q−1 tangents of K at P. Two cases are considered.
(C.5.1) Π1∩K={P,P′,P′′},Π2∩K={P}
Then K contains no plane (q+2)-arcs containing P. Let l be a tangent of K at P, with l in Π1 and l=lP. We count the points of K in planes containing l. Let θ1 be the number of planes containing l and intersecting K in a (q+1)-arc, and let θ2 be the number of planes containing l and intersecting K in a q-arc. Then
[TABLE]
Hence θ1=0 and θ2=q. Let Π1,Π2,...,Πq be the planes containing l and intersecting K in a q-arc, let Πi∩K=Ki, let Ci be the (q+2)-arc extending Ki and let Ci∩l={P,Ni}, with i=1,2,...,q. Assume that for some i∈{1,2,...,q} we have Ni∈/P′P′′. The number of tangents of K containing Ni is at least
[TABLE]
a contradiction. Hence N1=N2=⋯=Nq=l∩P′P′′. Then the number of tangents of K containing N1 is at least
[TABLE]
again a contradiction.
(C.5.2) Π1∩K={P,P′},Π2∩K={P,P′′}
By (C.5.1), for each point Q∈K the two planes α1,α2 through Q intersecting K in at most four points, intersect K in exactly two points. If α1∩K={Q,Q′} and α2∩K={Q,Q′′}, then the plane QQ′Q′′ is the only plane on Q intersecting K in a (q+2)-arc. Hence the (q+2)-arcs on K partition K. So
[TABLE]
a contradiction.
Now the theorem is proved. ■
4. Corollaries
We are grateful to T. Szőnyi for bringing reference [12] to our attention which, in combination with Theorem 1.6, gives the following considerable improvement of the bound in Theorem 1.6; see also Remark 4.4.
Theorem 4.1**.**
[TABLE]
Proof. In [12] it is proved that there does not exist a complete k-cap in PG(3,q), q even, q≥64, for which
[TABLE]
where a is an integer which satisfies
[TABLE]
Putting a=3, the desired result immediately follows from Theorem 1.6. ■
Theorem 4.2**.**
(i)
m2(4,4)=41,
(ii)
m2(4,8)≤479,
(iii)
m2(4,q)<q3−q2+25q−8, q even, q>8.
Proof. For q=4, see [5]. Assume, by way of contradiction, that K is a k-cap of PG(4,8) with k>479, or a k-cap of PG(4,q), q even and q>8, with k>q3−q2+25q−8. At each of its points the cap K has t=q3+q2+q+2−k tangents. Hence we assume that t<107 for q=8 and t<2q2+(1−25)q+10 for q>8. We obtain a contradiction in several stages.
I K** contains no plane q-arc**
Similar to the reasoning in Section I in the proof of Theorem 6.27 in [9].
II There exists no solid δ such that q2+1>∣δ∩K∣>q2+(1−5)q+5
Suppose δ exists. Let δ∩K=K′. Then K′ can be completed to an ovoid O of δ, by Theorem 3.1. Let N∈O∖K′ and let N′∈K′. Consider the q+1 planes of δ through NN′. Since each of these planes meets O in a (q+1)-arc, each plane meets K′ in at most a q-arc. By I, there is no q-arc on K; so each plane meets K′ in at most a (q−1)-arc.
Assume, by way of contradiction, that none of these intersections is a (q−1)-arc. Therefore a count of the points on K′ gives
[TABLE]
whence
[TABLE]
so
[TABLE]
a contradiction.
So we may assume that for one of the planes δ through NN′, say Π, we have ∣Π∩K′∣=q−1. Now we consider all solids of PG(4,q) containing the plane Π. Let θ be the number of solids Π′ for which ∣Π′∩K∣>q2+(1−5)q+5, so q+1−θ is the number of solids Π′′ for which ∣Π′′∩K∣<q2+(1−5)q+5. We have θ≥1.
First, assume θ≥2. So there are at least two solids Π1′,Π2′ containing Π such that ∣Πi′∩K∣>q2+(1−5)q+5, with i=1,2. By Theorem 3.1 Πi′∩K can be completed to an ovoid Oi of Πi′,i=1,2. So Oi∩Π is a (q+1)-arc (Π∩K′)∪{Ni′,Ni′′},i=1,2. Since Π∩K′ can be contained in no more than three (q+1)-arcs, contained in a common (q+2)-arc, we have ∣{N1′,N1′′}∩{N2′,N2′′}∣≥1. Assume N1′=N2′. So the number of tangents of K containing N1′ is at least
[TABLE]
so
[TABLE]
a contradiction.
Finally, assume that θ=1. Counting the points of K in the q+1 solids, we obtain
[TABLE]
that is,
[TABLE]
Hence, for q>8,
[TABLE]
so
[TABLE]
a contradiction. For q=8, there arises 479<479, a contradiction.
III For a point N not in K, there do not exist planes Π1 and Π2 such that Π1∩Π2=N and such that Πi∩K is a (q+1)-arc with nucleus N for i=1,2
Similar to the reasoning in Section III in the proof of Theorem 6.27 in [9].
IV The tangents through any point Q off K lie in a solid
Similar to the reasoning in Section IV in the proof of Theorem 6.27 in [9].
V The final contradiction is obtained by counting the tangents of K
Similar to the reasoning in Section V in the proof of Theorem 6.27 in [9]. ■
Theorem 4.3**.**
For q even, q>2, n≥5,
(i)
m2(n,4)≤3118.4n−4+35**
(ii)
m2(n,8)≤478.8n−4−2(8n−5+⋯+8+1)+1,
(iii)
m2(n,q)<qn−1−qn−2+25qn−3−9qn−4−2(qn−5+⋯+q+1)+1, for q>8.
Proof This follows directly from Theorem 1.1, Theorem 4.2 and Theorem 6.14(ii) in [9]. ■
Remark 4.4**.**
The bound in Theorem 4.1 leads to considerable improvements of Theorem 4.2 and Theorem 4.3. We just mention these bounds, but the proofs are the theme of a subsequent paper*.
For q even, q≥2048,
[TABLE]
For q even, q≥2048, n≥5,
[TABLE]
5. Remark
The bound in the MAIN THEOREM is better than the bound of Chao, see [3]. In 2014 Cao and Ou, see [2], published the bound k<q2−2q+8 (q even and q≥128), which is better than ours. I did not follow some reasoning in their proof, so I sent two mails to one of the authors explaining why I think Section 1.3 of the proof is not correct. Unfortunately I never received an answer.
Bibliography13
The reference list from the paper itself. Each links out to its DOI / PubMed record.
1[1] R. C. Bose, Mathematicial theory of the symmetrical factorial design, S a n k h y a ¯ 𝑆 𝑎 𝑛 𝑘 ℎ 𝑦 ¯ 𝑎 Sankhy\bar{a} 8 (1947), 107 - 166.
2[2] J. M. Cao and L. Ou, Caps in 𝐏𝐆 ( n , q ) 𝐏𝐆 𝑛 𝑞 \mathbf{PG}(n,q) with q 𝑞 q even and n ≥ 3 𝑛 3 n\geq 3 , Discrete Math. 326 (2014), 61 - 65.
3[3] J. M. Chao, On the size of a cap in 𝐏𝐆 ( n , q ) 𝐏𝐆 𝑛 𝑞 \mathbf{PG}(n,q) with q 𝑞 q even and n ≥ 3 𝑛 3 n\geq 3 , Geom. Dedicata 74 (1999), 91 - 94.
4[4] A. A. Davydov and L. M. Tombak, Quasiperfect linear binary codes with distance 4 and complete caps in projective geometry, Problems Inform. Transmission 25 (1990), 265 - 275.
5[5] Y. Edel and J. Bierbrauer, 41 is the largest size of a cap in 𝐏𝐆 ( 4 , 4 ) 𝐏𝐆 4 4 \mathbf{PG}(4,4) , Des. Codes Cryptogr. 16 (1999), 151 - 160.
6[6] J. W. P. Hirschfeld, Finite Projective Spaces of Three Dimensions , Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1985, x + 316 pp.
7[7] J. W. P. Hirschfeld, Projective Geometries over Finite Fields , Second Edition, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1998, xiv + 555 pp.
8[8] J. W. P. Hirschfeld and J. A. Thas, Linear independence in finite spaces, Geom. Dedicata 23 (1987), 15 - 31.