# Radial anisotropy in omega Cen limiting the room for an intermediate-mass black hole

## TL;DR

This study shows that radial anisotropy in omega Cen can explain its core kinematics, reducing the need to invoke an intermediate-mass black hole, thus impacting IMBH detection methods.

## Contribution

The paper demonstrates that radially-biased pressure anisotropy can account for observed kinematic signatures in omega Cen, challenging previous IMBH claims.

## Key findings

- Radial anisotropy models fit observed kinematics without IMBH.
- Anisotropy explains velocity dispersion profiles.
- No evidence for IMBH in omega Cen based on anisotropy analysis.

## Abstract

Finding an intermediate-mass black hole (IMBH) in a globular cluster (or proving its absence) would provide valuable insights into our understanding of galaxy formation and evolution. However, it is challenging to identify a unique signature of an IMBH that cannot be accounted for by other processes. Observational claims of IMBH detection are indeed often based on analyses of the kinematics of stars in the cluster core, the most common signature being a rise in the velocity dispersion profile towards the centre of the system. Unfortunately, this IMBH signal is degenerate with the presence of radially-biased pressure anisotropy in the globular cluster. To explore the role of anisotropy in shaping the observational kinematics of clusters, we analyse the case of omega Cen by comparing the observed profiles to those calculated from the family of LIMEPY models, that account for the presence of anisotropy in the system in a physically motivated way. The best-fit radially anisotropic models reproduce the observational profiles well, and describe the central kinematics as derived from Hubble Space Telescope proper motions without the need for an IMBH.