Handwritten Recognition Using SVM, KNN and Neural Network
Norhidayu Abdul Hamid, Nilam Nur Amir Sjarif

TL;DR
This paper compares the effectiveness of SVM, KNN, and Neural Network classifiers for handwritten recognition across various input sources like paper and touchscreens.
Contribution
It evaluates and contrasts three different classification methods for handwritten recognition, providing insights into their relative performance.
Findings
Neural Network outperforms SVM and KNN in accuracy.
KNN is faster but less accurate.
SVM offers a balance between speed and accuracy.
Abstract
Handwritten recognition (HWR) is the ability of a computer to receive and interpret intelligible handwritten input from source such as paper documents, photographs, touch-screens and other devices. In this paper we will using three (3) classification t o re cognize the handwritten which is SVM, KNN and Neural Network.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsHandwritten Text Recognition Techniques
MethodsSupport Vector Machine
