Magnetic phase diagram of Eu$_2$CuSi$_3$ derived from thermal expansion and magnetostriction studies
Liran Wang, Lars Wallbaum, Changhyun Koo, Chongde D. Cao, Wolfgang, L\"oser, R\"udiger Klingeler

TL;DR
This study maps the magnetic phase diagram of Eu$_2$CuSi$_3$ using thermal expansion and magnetostriction, revealing strong magneto-structural coupling, anisotropic magnetic interactions, and ferromagnetic correlations above the Curie temperature.
Contribution
It provides the first detailed thermal and magnetostriction analysis of Eu$_2$CuSi$_3$, highlighting anisotropic magnetic coupling and complex magnetic phases.
Findings
Identified ferromagnetic transition at 34 K with strong magneto-structural coupling.
Revealed anisotropic thermal expansion between c-axis and ab-plane.
Constructed magnetic phase diagram showing evolution of magnetic order up to 15 T.
Abstract
Precise thermal expansion and magnetostriction studies of the intermetallic compound EuCuSi in the temperature range between 5 and 300 K are presented. A clear sign of magnetic second order phase transition at the ferromagnetic Curie temperature = 34 K indicates strong magneto-structural coupling. Uniaxial thermal expansion data show a large anisotropy between the magnetic easy -axis and the hexagonal -plane, which is associated with a strongly anisotropic magnetic coupling. A spin-reorientation regime as well as a non-uniform energy scale are indicated by Gr\"uneisen analysis of the data at low temperatures. Anomalous contributions to the thermal expansion imply ferromagnetic correlations far above in zero magnetic field. The magnetic phase diagram is constructed, showing the evolution of short- and long-range magnetic order in magnetic fields up to 15 T. The…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsMagnetic and transport properties of perovskites and related materials · Magnetic Properties of Alloys · Rare-earth and actinide compounds
Magnetic phase diagram of Eu2CuSi3 derived from thermal expansion and magnetostriction studies
L. Wang
Kirchhoff Institute of Physics, Heidelberg University, INF 227, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
L. Wallbaum
Kirchhoff Institute of Physics, Heidelberg University, INF 227, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
C. Koo
Kirchhoff Institute of Physics, Heidelberg University, INF 227, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
C. D. Cao
Department of Applied Physics, Northwestern Polytechnical University, Xi’an 710072, P.R. China
W. Löser
Leibniz Institute for Solid State and Materials Research IFW Dresden, Helmholtzstr. 20, 01069 Dresden, Germany
R. Klingeler
Kirchhoff Institute of Physics, Heidelberg University, INF 227, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
Center for Advanced Materials, Heidelberg University, INF 225, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
Abstract
Precise thermal expansion and magnetostriction studies of the intermetallic compound Eu2CuSi3 in the temperature range between 5 and 300 K are presented. A clear sign of magnetic second order phase transition at the ferromagnetic Curie temperature = 34 K indicates strong magneto-structural coupling. Uniaxial thermal expansion data show a large anisotropy between the magnetic easy -axis and the hexagonal -plane, which is associated with a strongly anisotropic magnetic coupling. A spin-reorientation regime as well as a non-uniform energy scale are indicated by Grüneisen analysis of the data at low temperatures. Anomalous contributions to the thermal expansion imply ferromagnetic correlations far above in zero magnetic field. The magnetic phase diagram is constructed, showing the evolution of short- and long-range magnetic order in magnetic fields up to 15 T. The anisotropic magnetic field effect yields anomalous magnetostrictive effects up to about 200 K.
I Introduction
Ternary intermetallic compounds Ln2CuSi3 (Ln = rare earth) are of considerable interest because of their diverse types of magnetic ordering and associated complex interplay of structural, orbital, electronic, and magnetic degrees of freedom. Hwang et al. (1996); Tien et al. (1997); Tien and Luo (1998); Nakamoto et al. (2000); Li et al. (2003, 2009); Majumdar et al. (1999); Cao et al. (2008, 2010); Zhang et al. (2017) Most of the known members of this class crystallize in a hexagonal AlB2-type structure (space group P6/mmm) with random distribution of Cu and Si atoms on the B positions. Raman (1967) One exception is Er2CuSi3, crystallizing in a tetragonal ThSi2-type structure. Raman (1967) The great diversity of magnetic ground states originates from correlations of the localized -electrons of the rare-earth elements, which are coupled by the conduction electrons according to the Ruderman-Kittel-Kasuya-Yosida theory. Some compounds exhibit unusual transport properties, namely large negative magnetoresistance has been found in Eu2CuSi3 above the Curie temperatureMajumdar et al. (1999); Cao et al. (2010), even up to K, and a typical Kondo behavior has been found in Ce2CuSi3 Hwang et al. (1996); Nakamoto et al. (2000). Unusual mass enhancement of Ce2CuSi3 Hwang et al. (1996) and Pr2CuSi3 Tien et al. (1997) has been unveiled by studies on the electronic specific heat. Weak spin glass behavior coexisting with long range ferromagnetic order is observed in Pr2CuSi3 and Nd2CuSi3. Tien et al. (1997); Li et al. (2009) However, due to particular challenges in single crystal growth Cao et al. (2011), anisotropic properties have been reported so far only for Ce2CuSi3 Nakamoto et al. (2000) and Eu2CuSi3 Cao et al. (2010) while all other experimental data rest on polycrystalline samples.
Due to its half-filled shell in the 4 electronic configuration, Eu2CuSi3 has a particular role among the lanthanides-based series of ternary intermetallics. The Eu2+-ions in Eu2CuSi3 do not follow the lanthanide contraction rule. Majumdar et al. (1999); Cao et al. (2010) Instead, unit cell volume and lattice parameters in Eu2CuSi3 are abnormally enlarged, similar to what is observed in the more frequently studied family R2PdSi3. Mallik et al. (1998) Ferromagnetic order in Eu2CuSi3 evolves at = 34 K. Above , magnetization data show a magnetic moment of , i.e., a stable valence of 2+ of Eu-ions. The anisotropy of the electron spin resonance signal of divalent Eu2+-ions proves appreciable short-range ferromagnetic correlations up to K, i.e., far above . Cao et al. (2010) Below , there is a sizeable magnetic anisotropy with the crystallographic -axis being the easy magnetic axis. In the temperature regime around 10 to 20 K the magnetic anisotropy gradually vanishes most probably due to a spin reorientation. It may be expected that, similar to other intermetallic materials (e.g., HoNi2B2C Schneider et al. (2007), TbxGd1-xAl2 del Moral et al. (1986), Mo5+ySi3−yBx Zhao et al. (2004)), that magnetic anomalies are tightly coupled with lattice changes. However, no investigations of magneto-structural effects are known for Eu2CuSi3 or any other member of this class of materials. Therefore, the investigation of thermal expansion and magnetostriction on a Eu2CuSi3 single crystal will elucidate the interrelation of structural, magnetic, and electron degrees of freedom. In the present work, we investigate in detail of the uniaxial lattice distortions induced by the magnetic transition as well as the influence of external magnetic fields. A detailed magnetic phase diagram of Eu2CuSi3 focusing on the low temperature range up to 70 K is derived from the data.
II Experimental
Eu2CuSi3 single crystals have been grown by the traveling-solvent floating-zone method as described in Ref. Cao et al., 2011. The relative length changes along the crystallographic - and -directions were studied (as the - and -axes are crystallographically equivalent) on a cuboidal shaped crystal which dimensions are 1.831 mm (), 3.408 mm (), and 1.792 mm (). The measurements were done by means of a three-terminal capacitance dilatometer. Wang et al. (2009) For investigating the effect of magnetic fields, the length changes and the thermal expansion coefficients were studied in magnetic fields up to 15 T applied along the axis , respectively. In addition, the field induced length changes were measured at temperatures from 5 K to 200 K in magnetic fields up to 15 T and the magnetostriction coefficients were derived.
III Thermal expansion and Grüneisen scaling
The temperature dependence of the uniaxial length changes in Eu2CuSi3 shows that magnetic order is associated with pronounced magnetoelastic effects (Fig. 1b) both along and in the -plane. Accordingly, the volume significantly shrinks upon evolution of magnetic order and the volume thermal expansion coefficient displays a peak (Fig. 1a). Qualitatively, this implies positive hydrostatic pressure dependence d/d. In addition, there is a broad shoulder in at around 15 K and the region of anomalous volume changes extends well above . According to Ref. Gratz and Lindbaum, 1994, the electronic () and phononic () contributions to the thermal expansion coefficient can be described by
[TABLE]
with and being constants and being the Debye function. The red solid lines in Fig. 1 show the results of the fitting procedure to the experimental data well above . For the fitting of both the volume and the uniaxial expansion data, the same Debye temperature K independently obtained from analysing the specific heat of La2CuSi3 (data from Ref. Hwang et al., 1996) is used here to ensure the consistency of the procedure. 111Note, that our analysis of of La2CuSi3 applying the Debye function up to 50 K yield a different value for as compared to the -law fitting used in Ref. Hwang et al., 1996. The obtained K was renormalised in order to account for the different masses. Quantitatively, the differences between the estimated non-magnetic lengths changes and the actual experimental data at K amounts to . The temperature range of this divergence is clearly visible in which signals anomalous contributions to the volume changes up to 75 K. As will be shown below, the anomalous length changes are strongly suppressed by external magnetic fields which suggests its magnetic nature. Short-range ferromagnetic correlations have been indeed detected in Eu2CuSi3 by electron spin resonance below K. Cao et al. (2010) We conclude that the observed anomalous length changes are associated to ferromagnetic short range magnetic correlations.
The uniaxial length changes in Eu2CuSi3 along the - and the -axis, respectively, show pronounced anisotropy which is reflected by the fact that, well above the anomalies at K, is about three times larger than (Fig. 1b). As in , in both directions the onset of long range magnetic order is associated with clear anomalies. Interestingly, in both directions long range magnetic order is associated with shrinking of the respective lattice parameters and , i.e., positive uniaxial pressure dependence of . In , there is a peak at followed by a broad hump centered around 15 K. In contrast, the anomalous contributions are much broader in and there is only a rather jump-like anomaly at . Upon further cooling, no additional hump can be identified. The structural changes are further illustrated by the distortion parameter and its derivative shown in Fig. 2. The data confirm that the ferromagnetic phase transition at is associated with a kink in the distortion parameter and a large regime of structural fluctuations up to about 75 K. Upon cooling towards , smoothly increases in a Curie-Weiss-like manner, i.e., as , with K. Note, that this description of the derivative of the parameter does not reflect the high-temperature mean-field approximation but only phenomenologically describes the behavior upon approaching . Just below , is temperature independent, i.e., decreases linearly. A large hump of centered at 12 K is observed in the temperature regime below about 25 K. These distortions appear in the temperature regime where magnetic anisotropy starts to decrease through a spin reorientation process which finally yields vanishing anisotropy below K. Cao et al. (2010) To be specific, upon cooling magnetic moments rotate from the easy magnetic -axis towards , thereby lifting the magnetic anisotropy. One may attribute the low temperature humps of the specific heatCao et al. (2010) and of as the thermodynamic signatures of this spin-reorientation towards the -plane.
In order to discuss the anomalous length changes in more detail, Fig. 3 presents the low temperature thermal expansion and the specific heat Hwang et al. (1996). Again, the data have been corrected for the phononic and electronic contributions obtained from analysing of of La2CuSi3, yielding the magnetic contributions ’ and ’. Hwang et al. (1996); Cao et al. (2010) Different ordinate scales have been used to highlight the similarities and differences in the temperature dependencies. The data show that, at temperatures , the magnetic specific heat resembles quite well the volume thermal expansion coefficient ’ while scaling fails at (Fig. 3a). At temperatures , our data exclude similar temperature dependencies of ’ and .
In the presence of one dominant energy scale of the respective ordering phenomenon, the scaling between and ’ is described by the Grüneisen relation
[TABLE]
Applying Eq. 3 to the data in Fig. 3a yields the hydrostatic pressure dependence /GPa for the temperature range where scales to ’. Assuming being proportional to , this yields K/GPa.
In contrast to the volume effect, there is no general Grüneisen scaling below if the uniaxial pressure effects are considered. However, still fairly scales to both ’ and ’ in the reduced temperature regime 25 K (see Fig. 3b). Here, the analysis yields /GPa and /GPa or K/GPa and K/GPa, respectively. For both ’ and ’, simple Grüneisen scaling can be excluded for 25 K.
In general, one may identify three temperature regions with different behavior as indicated in Fig. 3: (1) At , the anomalous volume changes as well as the uniaxial length changes do not obey Grüneisen scaling. (2) Upon evolution of long range magnetic order at , there is a rather temperature independent hydrostatic pressure dependence of down to 5 K. For the uniaxial pressure dependencies, this regime is restricted to . (3) Below , where the distortion parameter signals spin reorientation, the uniaxial pressure dependencies for pressure applied along the - and -axis, respectively, strongly differ.
IV Effect of external magnetic fields
Figures 4 and 5 show the effect of external magnetic fields on the uniaxial length changes. Magnetic fields up to 15 T affect the lengths changes well above indicating structural changes up to K for and K for . While the -axis shrinks in external magnetic field in the entire temperature range up to 200 K, the -axis displays a heterogeneous response and anomalous magnetostriction is restricted to K. Upon application of T, the -axis overall shrinks above K while it strongly increases below. As will be discussed in more detail below, there is a sign change of the magnetostriction coefficient at K.
The field effect on the anomaly at = 34 K is most visible if the thermal expansion coefficients in Fig. 5 are considered. Both and show a broadening of the anomaly at in external magnetic field. The ferromagnetic nature of the phase transition is reflected by the strong shift of anomalous length changes to higher temperatures and the sharp anomalies observed at are not observed in finite magnetic field. In magnetic fields T, no clear anomaly can be observed anymore. Even in finite fields T, the -like peak in which is the most distinct signature of the phase transition smears out and converts into a jump-like feature. We hence consider the middle of this jump being a relevant signature for the evolution of ferromagnetic correlations. Together with all other features extracted from the data as described in the following, it is used to construct the magnetic phase diagram in Fig. 8. In contrast to the anomaly at , the low-temperature hump indicative of spin-reorientation from the -axis into the -plane is suppressed in external magnetic fields. This is straightforwardly attributed to the fact that the spin reorientation towards is hindered by . We define this spin-reorientation regime using the concave kink in the curve, and the convex kink is used to define the crossover to isotropic magnetic behavior, marked by the black arrows in Fig. 5a. For fields larger than 10 T, becomes negative at low temperature and the features signaling spin-reorientation are not observed in the temperature regime under study. In the -plane, the effects of magnetic fields on are quite different. The anomaly at is smeared out as well, but a clear maximum remains observable even in fields up to T where a kink is seen in at K.
These differences associated with the actual direction of the magnetic field with respect to the crystallographic axes are also seen in the linear magnetostriction coefficients and displayed in Fig. 7. In the -plane, is negative at all fields and temperatures under study. At K, there are two anomalies as indicated by arrows in Fig. 7b. One of which is associated with a peak at T and the other with a kink at T. The position of the peak does not change upon heating up to 15 K, appears at a slightly reduced field at K and disappears above . A very similar behavior with however opposite sign is found in which shows a peak maximum at low field. Above , the minimum in converts into a kink where the slope of changes. This kinks becomes more and more broad upon heating. Correspondingly, there is a minimum in above which is shifted to higher fields upon heating. At K, there is still a broad anomaly centered around T. Both features observed above display the same vs. behavior (see Fig. 8) so that we conclude a common nature. In contrast, the above mentioned kink in is restricted . The nonuniform response of the length changes for are displayed by the magnetostriction coefficients obtained at 100 K. Associated with the minimum discussed above, magnetostriction is negative at low fields and positive at high magnetic fields.
V Discussion and conclusions
The onset of long range magnetic order yields shrinking of the sample both along the - and the -direction. Eu2CuSi3 displays stable valence of Eu2+ below room temperature. Its 4 electronic configuration implies no orbital momentum and the Steven’s factors vanish so that magnetic anisotropy and magnetoelastic effects induced by spin-orbit coupling is negligible. In the half-filled shell, crystal field effects can be excluded either. We also note, that the observed anomalous length changes are not associated with unstable Eu valence. Neumann et al. (1985) The strong magnetoelastic effect might result from either dipole-dipole interaction or anisotropic magnetic coupling. Above , both and imply the presence of anomalous length changes at elevated temperatures up to 80 K, i.e., far above the Curie temperature. We attribute these anomalous length changes to the presence of ferromagnetic correlations. In this temperature regime, the evolution of short range ferromagnetic order is associated with a structural distortion, i.e., finite distortion parameter . Recent ESR data suggest that the effective internal field in the short-range-correlated region is parallel to the -axis. (Cao et al., 2010) Noteworthy, Grüneisen scaling does not apply in this temperature regime. Due to the fact that the Grüneisen parameter obtained in the long-range ordered phase does not describe the relation between ’ and at , one has to conclude the different nature of short range and long range magnetic order. In particular, the failure of simple Grüneisen scaling at K suggests competing ordering phenomena in this temperature regime.
This is corroborated by the observed anisotropic field dependencies at high temperatures. In general, both magnetic fields and stabilize the ferromagnetic correlations and there is a pronounced magnetic field dependence. Upon application of magnetic fields , the sharp thermodynamic signature of long-range magnetic order at disappears and strongly smears out already in small magnetic field. Although this is a typical behaviour for ferromagnets where no true magnetic phase transition appears in finite magnetic field, we note that our data do not unambiguously prove long range order at T. The data for do not clarify this issue either, as the jump-like feature in disappears in magnetic field. However, in contrast to the case , the maximum in is not significantly affected as indicated by the vertical dashed line in Fig. 8. The phase boundary evidenced by the magnetostriction data at T might hence either indicate melting of (true) long-range order or the stabilisation of a competing ordered phase. A spin-flop nature of this phase boundary can be excluded because it is observed in both field directions as well as above and within the spin-reoriented phase. The origin of the feature at around 4.5 T and is unknown. The fact that and the associated onset temperature are suppressed by support the scenario that, at , reorientation of the magnetic moments from towards the -plane appears. For , the data do not allow to extract .
Despite the easy -axis nature of long range order in Eu2CuSi3, magnetic fields do stabilize the short range magnetic order less than . This observation supports our conclusion that the nature of short range order differs from the magnetically ordered state. Our observation of magnetostrictive effects even at 200 K straightforwardly connects to the anomalous magnetoresistance in Eu2CuSi3. Majumdar et al. (1999); Cao et al. (2010) Upon application of T, negative magnetoresistive has been observed up to about 80 K for and about 130 K for . Cao et al. (2010) On the one hand, structural changes proven by our high-precision dilatometry data presented here naturally explain associated changes of the electric transport properties. Quantitatively, the larger magnetoresistance for observed in the experiment can be explained by the anisotropic effect of magnetic field on the structure, i.e., stronger magnetostrictive effects for .
In summary, we have studied the thermodynamic properties and their field dependence of intermetallic single crystalline Eu2CuSi3. At the ferromagnetic ordering temperature, strong magnetostrictive coupling yields a pronounced -like anomaly in the thermal expansion coefficient. The distortion parameter signals short-range order far above . A spin-reorientation regime as well as a non-uniform energy scale are indicated by Grüneisen analysis of the data at low temperatures. The magnetic field effect both on the long-range order, the spin-reorientation, and the short-range order is highly anisotropic and yields anomalous magnetostrictive effects up to about 200 K.
Acknowledgements.
RK gratefully acknowledges fellowship of the Marsilius Kolleg Heidelberg. CDC acknowledges financial support by the National Natural Science Foundation of China Grant No. 51471135, the National Key Research and Development Program of China under contract No. 2016YFB1100101, and Shaanxi International Cooperation Program.
The reference list from the paper itself. Each links out to its DOI / PubMed record.
- 1Hwang et al. (1996) J. S. Hwang, K. Lin, and C. Tien, Solid State Communications 100 , 169 (1996), ISSN 0038-1098, URL http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0038109896003808 .
- 2Tien et al. (1997) C. Tien, L. Luo, and J. S. Hwang, Phys. Rev. B 56 , 11710 (1997), URL http://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/Phys Rev B.56.11710 .
- 3Tien and Luo (1998) C. Tien and L. Luo, Solid State Communications 107 , 295 (1998), ISSN 0038-1098, URL http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S 0038109898002270 .
- 4Nakamoto et al. (2000) G. Nakamoto, Y. Shibai, M. Kurisu, and Y. Andoh, Physica B: Condensed Matter 281-282 , 76 (2000), ISSN 0921-4526, URL http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S 0921452699010868 .
- 5Li et al. (2003) D. Li, Y. Shiokawa, S. Nimori, Y. Haga, E. Yamamoto, T. Matsuda, and Y. Onuki, Physica B: Condensed Matter 329-333, Part 2 , 506 (2003), ISSN 0921-4526, proceedings of the 23rd International Conference on Low Temperature Physics, URL http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S 0921452602021750 .
- 6Li et al. (2009) D. Li, X. Zhao, and S. Nimori, Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter 21 , 026006 (2009), URL http://stacks.iop.org/0953-8984/21/i=2/a=026006 .
- 7Majumdar et al. (1999) S. Majumdar, R. Mallik, E. V. Sampathkumaran, K. Rupprecht, and G. Wortmann, Phys. Rev. B 60 , 6770 (1999), URL http://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/Phys Rev B.60.6770 .
- 8Cao et al. (2008) C. D. Cao, R. Klingeler, N. Leps, H. Vinzelberg, V. Kataev, F. Muranyi, N. Tristan, A. Teresiak, S. Zhou, W. Löser, et al., Phys. Rev. B 78 , 064409 (2008), URL http://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/Phys Rev B.78.064409 .
