Totaro's Question on Zero-Cycles on Torsors
Reed Gordon-Sarney, Venapally Suresh

TL;DR
This paper investigates Totaro's question on the existence of closed étale points of certain degrees on torsors with zero-cycles, providing a counterexample that shows the answer is negative in general.
Contribution
The paper constructs a specific example demonstrating that a torsor with a zero-cycle of degree d need not have a closed étale point of degree dividing d, answering Totaro's question negatively.
Findings
Counterexample to Totaro's question
Zero-cycle existence does not imply étale point of dividing degree
Clarification of conditions under which the question holds
Abstract
Let be a smooth connected linear algebraic group and be a -torsor. Totaro asked: if admits a zero-cycle of degree , then does have a closed \'etale point of degree dividing ? While the literature contains affirmative answers in some special cases, we give an example to show that the answer is negative in general.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
\sectiondot
subsection
TOTARO’S QUESTION ON ZERO-CYCLES ON TORSORS
R. GORDON-SARNEY AND V. SURESH
(DEPARTMENT OF MATHEMATICS & COMPUTER SCIENCE
EMORY UNIVERSITY, ATLANTA, GA 30322 USA)
Abstract
Let be a smooth connected linear algebraic group and be a -torsor. Totaro asked: if admits a zero-cycle of degree , then does have a closed étale point of degree dividing ? While the literature contains affirmative answers in some special cases, we give an example to show that the answer is negative in general.
1 Introduction
One approach to understanding the rational points on a variety over a field is to study its group of zero-cycles, denoted . Every rational point on can be viewed as a zero-cycle of degree 1, where the degree homomorphism associates each closed point to the degree of its residue field . It is natural to ask about the converse: if a variety admits a zero-cycle of degree 1, does have a rational point?
The question was originally raised by Serre in the ‘60s in the case of principal homogeneous spaces (or torsors) under smooth connected linear algebraic groups over fields.
Serre’s Question. Let be a smooth connected linear algebraic group over a field . If a -torsor admits a zero-cycle of degree 1, does have a rational point?
The positive answer to Serre’s question for torsors under projective general linear groups is a classical theorem on central simple algebras. Springer’s theorem on quadratic forms answers the question in the affirmative for torsors under orthogonal groups [Spr52]. Bayer–Lenstra settled the question for torsors under unitary groups [BFL90]. Sansuc gave an affirmative answer to the question for torsors under any smooth connected linear algebraic group defined over a number field [San81]. Affirmative answers are known in many other special cases (cf. [Bha16], [Bla11a], [Bla11b]), though in general, Serre’s question is still open.
In the setting of general varieties, which are not necessarily torsors, the literature is rich with striking counterexamples. The classical Weil estimates show that any curve of genus over a finite field without a point nevertheless admits a zero-cycle of degree 1. Colliot-Thélène–Coray produced a conic bundle over the -adic projective line–a rational variety–admitting a zero-cycle of degree 1 but no rational points [CTC79]. Florence constructed an affine homogeneous space under a smooth connected linear algebraic group with finite stabilizers over or a local or global field with this same property [Flo04]. Parimala gave as a counterexample a projective homogeneous space under a smooth connected linear algebraic group over a -adic Laurent series field [Par05], settling a long-standing conjecture of Veĭsfeĭler in the negative [Veĭ69]. Motivated in part by the classical result on central simple algebras, Totaro posed the following generalization of Serre’s question in 2004:
Totaro’s Question ([Tot04]). Let be a smooth connected linear algebraic group over a field . If a -torsor admits a zero-cycle of degree , does have a closed étale point of degree dividing ?
Affirmative answers have been far rarer and far more specialized for Totaro’s question than for Serre’s question. In the paper where the question was originally posed, Totaro handled the cases of split simply connected groups of type , , and with a partial result on . Garibaldi–Hoffman extended Totaro’s results to all groups of type , reduced of type , and simply connected of type and [GH06]. Black–Parimala settled Totaro’s question in the affirmative for simply connected, semisimple groups of rank over fields of characteristic [BP14]. Recently, the first author gave an affirmative answer to Totaro’s question for algebraic tori of rank over arbitrary fields [GSb] and absolutely simple adjoint groups of classical types and over fields of characteristic [GSa].
In this paper, we construct examples to show that the answer to Totaro’s question is negative in general. In Section 2, we obtain the following (see 2.4, 2.6):
Theorem 1.1**.**
Let be a global field of characteristic not equal to 2 and a complete discretely valued field with residue field . Then for every integer , there exist a connected semisimple linear algebraic group of rank over and a -torsor such that admits a zero-cycle of degree but has no closed point of degree 1 or 2.
In the light of the first author’s work on tori of rank at most 2, the following consequence of the above result (see 2.5, 2.6) is interesting.
Theorem 1.2**.**
Let be a global field of characteristic not equal to 2 and a complete discretely valued field with residue field . Then for every integer , there exist a torus of rank over and a -torsor such that admits a zero-cycle of degree but has no closed point of degree 1 or 2.
By the result of Sansuc [San81], Serre’s question has an affirmative answer for groups over global and local fields. In Section 3, we prove the following (see 3.6, 3.7):
Theorem 1.3**.**
Let be a global field or a local field. Then there exist examples of semisimple groups and tori of rank 8 over which admit torsors with zero-cycles of degree but have no closed points of degree 1 or 2.
The groups in each example where Totaro’s question has a negative answer are not absolutely simple. In view of this, we ask the following question.
Question 1.4**.**
Let be field, let a smooth absolutely simple linear algebraic group over , and let be a -torsor. If admits a zero-cycle of degree , does admit a closed étale point of degree dividing ?
2 Examples of Rank Groups
In this section, for every odd prime , we give examples of rank semisimple groups and rank tori for which Totaro’s question has a negative answer. In general, the corestriction from a finite extension of a quaternion algebra may not be a quaternion algebra. We begin by constructing such algebras explicitly.
Lemma 2.1**.**
Let be a global field of characteristic and an odd prime. Let be a separable field extension of degree . Then there exist a quaternion division algebra over and such that
* is split,* 2. 2.
, and 3. 3.
* is division.*
Proof.
For a place of a global field , let denote the completion of at . Let and be two distinct places of which split in (cf. [Neu99, Ch.VII, Theorem 13.4]). Let be the division algebra over such that and are division and is split for all places of not equal to and (cf. [CF10, p. 196]). Let and be the places of lying over and , respectively. Let be parameters at and , respectively. Let be non-square units at and , respectively. Let be a place of with a field, and let be the unique extension of to . Since is odd, there exists with not a square in .
By weak approximation, let such that
is close to (resp. ) at (resp. ),
is close to (resp. ) at (resp. ),
is close to (resp. ) at (resp. , and
is close to at .
We now show that and have the required properties. By the choice of , is not a square in for all . In particular, is a split algebra (cf. [CF10, p. 131, Corollary 1]). Similarly, is a split algebra. Since is a split algebra for all not equal to and , is a split algebra (cf. [CF10, p. 187, Corollary 9.8]). Since is close to at and is a not a square in , is not a square in . By the choice of , is close to at , hence . Since is division, is division. Thus and have the required properties. ∎
Proposition 2.2**.**
Let be a global field of characteristic and an odd prime. Let be a separable field extension of . Let be a complete discretely valued field with residue field and the unramified extension of degree with residue field . Then there exists a quaternion division algebra over such that .
Proof.
Let be the ring of integers in . Let be a parameter. Let be an odd prime and a field extension of degree . Let be a quaternion division algebra over and be as in (2.1). Let be the quaternion algebra over with (cf. [Cip77]) and . Let be a unit in the ring of integers of which maps to . Since is a split algebra, is a split algebra (cf. [Cip77]). In particular, for some (cf. [GS06, Proposition 1.2.3]). Let . Then .
We now show that ind(cor. Since cor (cf. [GS06, Proposition 4.2.10]) with odd and cor (cf. [CF10, Section 4.7, Proposition 9.(iv) ]), we have cor. Since is unramified on , is unit in and is a division algebra, by ([FS95, Proposition 1(3) ]), we have
[TABLE]
∎
Proposition 2.3**.**
Let be a field and a finite separable extension of degree a prime. Let be a central simple algebra over whose index is coprime to . Then there exists an extension of degree coprime to such that is a split algebra.
Proof.
Since is a central simple algebra over , there exists a finite separable extension such that is a split algebra (cf. [GS06, Proposition 2.2.3 ]). Replacing by its Galois closure over , we assume that is Galois. Let be the -Sylow subgroup of the Galois group of and be the fixed field of . Then is coprime to and is a power of . Since , , and so is a power of . Since is a split algebra and ind is coprime to , is split (cf. [Pie82, Proposition 13.4.(vi)]). ∎
Theorem 2.4**.**
Let be a global field of characteristic and an odd prime. Let be a separable field extension of degree . Let be a complete discretely valued field with residue field and the unramified extension of degree with residue field . Let . Then there exists a -torsor such that admits a zero-cycle of degree 2 but has no closed point of degree 1 or 2.
Proof.
Let be a quaternion division algebra over as in (2.2). Since , classifies quaternion algebras over (cf. [GS06, Theorem 2.4.3 ]), Let be the -torsor given by the quaternion algebra . Let be an extension of degree 1 or 2. Suppose . Then is a split algebra (cf. [GS06, Theorem 2.4.3 and 5.2.1]). In particular, cor is trivial and hence ind(cor is at most 2, leading to a contradiction (2.1). Hence has no closed point of degree 1 or 2.
Since is split over a degree 2 extension of , has a closed point of degree . By (2.3), there exists a field extension of degree coprime to such that is a split algebra. Then . Since cor cor is split and cor has index 4, is divisible by 4. Since is coprime to , has a zero-cycle of degree . ∎
Theorem 2.5**.**
Let be a global field of characteristic and an odd prime. Let be a complete discretely valued field with residue field . Then there exist a torus over of rank and a -torsor over such that has a zero-cycle of degree 2 and has no closed point of degree 1 or 2.
Proof.
Let be a separable field extension of degree and the unramified extension of degree with residue field . Let be a quaternion division algebra over as in (2.2). Let be a degree two extension which splits . Let be the kernel of the morphism induced by the norm map and let . Then is a torus of rank (cf. [Vos98]). We have (cf. [GSb, Lemma 3.2.(a)]). Since is isomorphic to the subgroup of consisting of the classes of central simple algebras that split over , the quaternion division algebra defines a class in . Let be the -torsor corresponding to . Then as in (2.4), admits zero-cycle of degree 2 but has no closed point of degree 1 or 2. ∎
Remark 2.6*.*
(Colliot-Thélène)
Let be as in (2.4 or 2.5) with rank of equal to 3. Then by taking or , one gets examples of semisimple groups and tori of rank for every which admit torsors with zero-cycles of degree 2 but have no closed points of degree 1 or 2.
Remark 2.7*.*
Since (resp. ) has a discrete valuation with residue field a global field, one can descend the above examples over the completion of (resp. ) at to (resp. ). Thus we have examples of connected linear algebraic groups over (resp. over ) for which the question of Totaro has negative answer.
3 An Example over a -adic Field
In this section, we give an example of a smooth connected linear algebraic group over a -adic field for which the question of Totaro has a negative answer.
Lemma 3.1**.**
Let be a field and a prime not equal to char. For , the kernel of the natural homomorphism is generated by the class of .
Proof.
Let be a primitive root of unity in an extension of . Since is coprime to , the map is injective. Thus replacing by , we assume that . Then, by Kummer theory, the extension is a cyclic extension with Gal generated by given by for some coprime to . Let be such that for some . Then for some . Since is coprime to , there exists such that modulo . We have , hence . In particular, for some . ∎
Lemma 3.2**.**
Let be a field and a prime not equal to char. If is a finite extension of degree such that does not divide , then the order of the kernel of the natural homomorphism is at most .
Proof.
We prove the lemma by induction on . Suppose . Then is coprime to and hence the homomorphism is injective. Suppose that . Suppose there exists with . Let . By (3.1), the kernel of has order . Since , by the induction hypotheses, the kernel of the homomorphism has order at most . Thus the order of is at most . ∎
Lemma 3.3**.**
If is a -adic field, the order of is at least , where .
Proof.
Let be the number of elements in the residue field of . By ([Neu99, Proposition 5.7, p.140]), we have for some . Hence is isomorphic to a subgroup of . ∎
For a -adic field and , there are only finitely many extension of of degree (cf. [Lan94, Section 2.5, Proposition 14]), and there exists at least one extension of degree .
Lemma 3.4**.**
Let be a -adic field and be a finite extension containing all of the degree extensions of . Let be a central division algebra of degree over . Then for every prime , there exists an extension of degree coprime to and a degree extension such that is a split algebra.
Proof.
Let and a prime. For every , , write for some and coprime to . Let be a natural number coprime to such that for all , . Since is a -adic field, there exists an extension of degree . Write . Then each is an extension of of degree at most . For each , let be the kernel of the natural homomorphism . Let . Since , by ( 3.2), the order of is at most . Thus, the order of the product of all is at most . Since the order of is at least (cf. 3.3), there exists such that for all . In particular for all . Since is a -adic field and a central simple algebra of degree , is a split algebra (cf. [CF10, Section 6.1, Corollary 1]). Let . Then , hence is a split algebra. ∎
Theorem 3.5**.**
Let be a -adic field and be a finite extension containing all of the degree extensions of . Let be the linear algebraic group given by the Weil transfer of from to . Then every non-trivial principal homogeneous space of over admits a zero-cycle of degree but has no closed point of degree .
Proof.
Let be a principal homogeneous space of over with . Since classifies principal homogenous spaces of over (cf. [Ser, Section 1.5, Proposition 33]), corresponds to an element of . By [Ser, Section 1.5.b], we have . Since classifies central simple algebras of degree over (cf. [GS06, Theorem 2.4.3]), corresponds to central simple division algebra of degree over . Further, for any extension , if and only if is split (cf. [GS06, Theorems 2.4.3 and 5.2.1]). Let be a prime. By (3.4), there exists an extension of degree coprime to and a degree extension such that is a split algebra. In particular, . Let . Then . For every prime dividing , by 3.4, there exists an extension of degree coprime to and a degree extension such that is a split algebra. In particular, . Then the gcd of and for all dividing is . Thus admits a zero-cycle of degree . Let be a degree extension. Then, by the choice of , . Thus with . Since is a central division algebra of degree over , is division for all . Then is not split, hence . Thus there is no closed point of of degree . ∎
Example 3.6*.*
Let and . Then and contains every quadratic extension of . Let . Then the rank of is 8. By 3.5, every non-trivial -torsor admits a zero-cycle of degree 2 but has no closed point of degree 2. As in (2.5), we also get an example of torus over of rank 8 and a non-trivial -torsor that admits a zero-cycle of degree 2 but has no closed point of degree 1 or 2.
Example 3.7*.*
Let , , and . Let be the quaternion division algebra over . Let be close to and , and let . Then . Let be the -torsor associated to . Since has no closed point of degree 1 or 2 over (3.6), has no closed point of degree 1 or 2. Using Krasner’s lemma, we can show that has a zero-cycle of degree 2.
The reference list from the paper itself. Each links out to its DOI / PubMed record.
- 1[BFL 90] E. Bayer-Fluckiger and H. W. Lenstra, Jr. Forms in odd degree extensions and self-dual normal bases. Amer. J. Math. , 112(3):359–373, 1990.
- 2[Bha 16] N. Bhaskhar. On Serre’s injectivity question and norm principle. Comment. Math. Helv. , 91(1):145–161, 2016.
- 3[Bla 11a] J. Black. Implications of the Hasse principle for zero cycles of degree one on principal homogeneous spaces. Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. , 139(12):4163–4171, 2011.
- 4[Bla 11b] J. Black. Zero cycles of degree one on principal homogeneous spaces. J. Algebra , 334:232–246, 2011.
- 5[BP 14] J. Black and R. Parimala. Totaro’s question for simply connected groups of low rank. Pacific J. Math. , 269(2):257–267, 2014.
- 6[CF 10] Algebraic number theory . Proceedings of an instructional conference organized by the London Mathematical Society, Edited by J. W. S. Cassels and A. Fröhlich. London Mathematical Society, London, second edition, 2010.
- 7[Cip 77] M. Cipolla. Remarks on the lifting of algebras over Henselian pairs. Math. Z. , 152(3):253–257, 1977.
- 8[CTC 79] J.-L. Colliot-Thélène and D. Coray. L’équivalence rationnelle sur les points fermés des surfaces rationnelles fibrées en coniques. Compositio Math. , 39(3):301–332, 1979.
