An ultraproduct method via left reversible semigroups to study Bruck's generalized conjecture
Fouad Naderi

TL;DR
This paper introduces an ultraproduct-inspired method to analyze fixed points of left reversible semigroups acting on Banach spaces, leading to a new fixed point theorem for nearly uniformly convex spaces.
Contribution
It develops a novel ultraproduct-like approach for fixed point analysis and proves a Bruck-type theorem for nearly uniformly convex Banach spaces.
Findings
Nearly uniformly convex Banach spaces have the weak fixed point property for left reversible semigroups.
The method extends fixed point results to broader classes of Banach spaces.
Provides a new tool for studying fixed points in semigroup actions.
Abstract
We use a method similar to ultraproducts to study the common fixed point of a left reversible semitopological semigroup acting on a Banach space. As an application, we prove a Bruck-type theorem for nearly uniformly convex Banach spaces to the effect that such spaces have weak fixed point property for left reversible semigroups.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsNonlinear Differential Equations Analysis · Optimization and Variational Analysis · Advanced Banach Space Theory
An ultraproduct method via left reversible semigroups to study Bruck’s generalized conjecture
Fouad Naderi
Department of Mathematical and Statistical Sciences, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, T6G 2G1, Canada.
Abstract.
We use a method similar to ultraproducts to study the common fixed point of a left reversible semitopological semigroup acting on a Banach space. As an application, we prove a Bruck-type theorem for nearly uniformly convex Banach spaces to the effect that such spaces have weak fixed point property for left reversible semigroups.
Key words and phrases:
Nearly uniformly convex Banach space, Non-expansive mapping, Scattered C*-algebra, Weak fixed point property.
2010 Mathematics Subject Classification:
46L05; 47H10
1. Introduction
Let be a subset of a Banach space . A self mapping on is said to be non-expansive if for all . We say that has the weak fixed point property (weak fpp) if for every weakly compact convex non-empty subset of , any non-expansive self mapping on has a fixed point.
Let be a semi-topological semigroup, i.e., is a semigroup with a Hausdorff topology such that for each , the mappings and from into are continuous. is called left reversible if any two closed right ideals of have non-void intersection.
An action of on a subset of a topological space is a mapping from into such that for . The action is separately continuous if it is continuous in each variable when the other is kept fixed. We say that has a common fixed point in if there exists a point in such that for all . When is a normed space, the action of on is non-expansive if for all and . There are also other types of action for a semi-topological semigroup (see [1] and [5]).
We say that a Banach space has the weak fpp for left reversible semigroups if for every weakly compact convex non-empty subset of , any non-expansively separately continuous action of a semi-topological semigroup on has a fixed point.
One of the celebrated results in fixed point theory is due to Bruck [2]. He has shown that if a Banach space has weak fpp, then it has weak fpp for abelian semigroups. Now, we call the following statement Bruck’s Generalized Conjecture (BGC):
(BGC) If a Banach space has weak fpp, then it has weak fpp for any left reversible semi-topological semigroup .
In [6], it has been shown that BGC is true for the preduals of von Neumann algebras. The main results of the current work is to show BGC is also true for nearly uniformly convex Banach spaces.
2. Weak fixed point property of Bruck type
A Banach space is called nearly uniformly convex (NUC), if for each there exists a such that for every sequence in the closed unit ball of with the distance is strictly less than where denotes the convex hull of the sequence.
When is a left reversible semigroup, we make it to a directed set by declaring: if and only if . Thus, we can use as an index set for nets and speak about limit and limit-supremum with respect to this net. Also, note that when acts on a weakly compact subset of Banach space , each acts non-expansively on and sometimes we use the notation instead of ; even, we may use to denote the composition .
Let , and . Put and endow it with the quotient norm . One can embed and its subsets into by using constant classes. For example, for let denotes the equivalence class containing the constant net . So, is a subset of . Also, we define ; and note that, . The process of embedding preserves the properties of being closed and convex for subsets of . If each is non-expansive on , then the mega mapping defined by is also non-expansive. Another piece of notation, when is a sequence in , then is a sequence in .
Definition 2.1**.**
(a) Let be a non-empty subset of a Banach space and be a bounded net in . For each define
[TABLE]
[TABLE]
The set (the number ) will be called the asymptotic center (asymptotic radius) of in . These are the generalizations of Chebyshev center and radius and are due to Edelstein[4]. The asymptotic center is always non-empty for weakly compact set .
(b) When viewed in , these notions are seen as:
[TABLE]
[TABLE]
.
The proof of the following theorem uses some ideas from [3] and [7].
Theorem 2.2**.**
Let be a bounded closed convex non-empty subset of a Banach space , and let be a left reversible semigroup acting non-expansively and separately continuous on . Suppose there exists a such that for each net in and each net in we have . Then, has a common fixed point in .
Proof. Let . Put and . Let . Since the action is non-expansive we see that and . Put and . By induction, we get a sequence such that , , , and . As in the proof of [3, Theorem 3.17] and [7, Theorem 5.3], there exists a such that the sequence converges to in . Note that the use of instead of in those theorems for the part we need, cause no problem since the convergence occurs in . So, the limit of is regardless of the indexing s. Let be arbitrary and consider the elements and the constant element which are indexed by s. Since the action is non-expansive we get the . Hence the sequence converges to in . But, , so by the first part of the current proof, is a another sequence like with the same limit. That is, by the same discussion, must have the limit . Hence, . Therefore, , which is the desired result.
Corollary 2.3**.**
Let be a weakly compact convex non-empty subset of a nearly uniformly convex Banach space , and let be a left reversible semigroup acting non-expansively and separately continuous on . Then, has a common fixed point in .
Proof. The set is closed and bounded. Also, nearly uniformly convex Banach spaces satisfy the inequality in Theorem 2.2. So, the result follows.
The reference list from the paper itself. Each links out to its DOI / PubMed record.
- 1[1] M. Amini, A. R. Medghalchi and F. Naderi, Pointwise eventually non-expansive action of semi-topological semigroups and fixed points, J. Math. Anal. Appl., 437 (2016), 1176-1183.
- 2[2] R. E. Bruck Jr., A common fixed point theorem for a commuting family of non-expansive mappings, Pacific J. Math. 53 (1974), 59-71.
- 3[3] T. Butsan, S. Dhompongsa and W. Takahashi, A fixed point theorem for pointwise eventually non-expansive mappings in nearly uniformly convex Banach spaces, Nonlinear Anal. 74 (2011), 1694-1701.
- 4[4] M. Edelstein, The construction of asymptotic center with a fixed point property, Bull. Amer. Math. Soc. 78 (1972), 206-208.
- 5[5] R. D. Holmes and A. T. Lau, Asymptotically non-expansive actions of topological semigroups and fixed points, Bull. London. Math. Soc., 3 (1971), 343-347.
- 6[6] F. Naderi, C*-algebraic approach to fixed point theory generalizes Baggett’s theorem to groups with discrete reduced duals, submitted.
- 7[7] A. Wisnicki and J. Wosko, Banach ultrapowers and multivalued non-expansive mappings, J. Math. Anal. Appl. 326 (2007), 845-857.
