What can be sampled locally?
Weiming Feng, Yuxin Sun, Yitong Yin

TL;DR
This paper explores distributed algorithms for sampling solutions from Gibbs distributions in local CSPs, introducing two Markov chain methods that achieve efficient parallel sampling under certain conditions.
Contribution
It presents two novel distributed Markov chain algorithms for sampling from Gibbs distributions, with one achieving near-optimal time bounds and the other providing bias-free parallel updates.
Findings
First algorithm achieves $O(\Delta \log n)$ time under Dobrushin's condition.
Second algorithm attains $O(\log n)$ time with stronger mixing conditions.
Proves a lower bound of $ ext{diam}$ for sampling independent sets in certain graphs.
Abstract
The local computation of Linial [FOCS'87] and Naor and Stockmeyer [STOC'93] concerns with the question of whether a locally definable distributed computing problem can be solved locally: for a given local CSP whether a CSP solution can be constructed by a distributed algorithm using local information. In this paper, we consider the problem of sampling a uniform CSP solution by distributed algorithms, and ask whether a locally definable joint distribution can be sampled from locally. More broadly, we consider sampling from Gibbs distributions induced by weighted local CSPs in the LOCAL model. We give two Markov chain based distributed algorithms which we believe to represent two fundamental approaches for sampling from Gibbs distributions via distributed algorithms. The first algorithm generically parallelizes the single-site sequential Markov chain by iteratively updating a random…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsMarkov Chains and Monte Carlo Methods · Complexity and Algorithms in Graphs · Bayesian Modeling and Causal Inference
