An Example in Complete Intersections and an Erratum
Satya Mandal

TL;DR
This paper discusses the Complete Intersection conjecture, highlights recent counterexamples to a claimed proof, and clarifies inconsistencies in the literature related to ideals in polynomial rings over fields.
Contribution
It provides clarification on the inconsistencies in the literature regarding the Complete Intersection conjecture and discusses recent counterexamples to a claimed proof.
Findings
Counterexamples to the stronger claim about the conjecture
Inconsistencies in the literature on the conjecture
Discussion on the implications of these counterexamples
Abstract
This is essentially an erratum, with some example to indicate inconsistencies. Suppose is a polynomial ring over a field . The Complete Intersection conjecture states that, for any ideal in , , where denotes the minimal number of generators. When is an infinite field, with , a proof of this conjecture was claimed recently, which was a consequence of a stronger claim. A counter example of this stronger claim surfaced recently. This note discusses such examples and attempts to provide some clarity to the inconsistencies in the literature.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsAlgebraic Geometry and Number Theory · Commutative Algebra and Its Applications · Polynomial and algebraic computation
