# Temporal resolution of a pre-maximum halt in a Classical Nova: V5589 Sgr observed with STEREO HI-1B

## TL;DR

This study captures the detailed rise phase of a classical nova, V5589 Sgr, revealing a pre-maximum halt with unprecedented temporal resolution, and compares observations with models to infer properties of the nova system.

## Contribution

First high-cadence observations of a pre-maximum halt in a classical nova, providing new insights into the rise phase and system parameters.

## Key findings

- Resolved the pre-maximum halt for the first time.
- Estimated the nova's decline time as very fast (2.1-3.9 days).
- Predicted mass loss onset 12 hours before optical maximum.

## Abstract

Classical novae show a rapid rise in optical brightness over a few hours. Until recently the rise phase, particularly the phenomenon of a pre-maximum halt, was observed sporadically. Solar observation satellites observing Coronal Mass Ejections enable us to observe the pre-maximum phase in unprecedented temporal resolution. We present observations of V5589 Sgr with STEREO HI-1B at a cadence of 40 min, the highest to date. We temporally resolve a pre-maximum halt for the first time, with two examples each rising over 40 min then declining within 80 min. Comparison with a grid of outburst models suggests this double peak, and the overall rise timescale, are consistent with a white dwarf mass, central temperature and accretion rate close to 1.0 solar mass, 5x10^7 K and 10^-10 solar masses per year respectively. The modelling formally predicts mass loss onset at JD 2456038.2391+/-0.0139, 12 hrs before optical maximum. The model assumes a main-sequence donor. Observational evidence is for a subgiant companion; meaning the accretion rate is under-estimated. Post-maximum we see erratic variations commonly associated with much slower novae. Estimating the decline rate difficult, but we place the time to decline two magnitudes as 2.1 < t_2(days) < 3.9 making V5589 Sgr a "very fast" nova. The brightest point defines "day 0" as JD 2456038.8224+/-0.0139, although at this high cadence the meaning of the observed maximum becomes difficult to define. We suggest that such erratic variability normally goes undetected in faster novae due to the low cadence of typical observations; implying erratic behaviour is not necessarily related to the rate of decline.