# On the geometry of Bayesian inference

**Authors:** Miguel de Carvalho, Garritt L. Page, Bradley J. Barney

arXiv: 1701.08994 · 2018-05-24

## TL;DR

This paper introduces a geometric framework for Bayesian inference that quantifies agreement between priors, likelihoods, and posteriors, providing new tools for assessing compatibility and sensitivity in Bayesian analysis.

## Contribution

It presents a novel geometric interpretation of Bayesian inference, defining measures of compatibility and sensitivity based on inner products and correlation-like metrics.

## Key findings

- Introduces a geometric measure of compatibility similar to Pearson correlation.
- Provides estimators for geometric quantities from posterior simulations.
- Illustrates methods with real-world examples on drug usage, insect morphology, and cancer data.

## Abstract

We provide a geometric interpretation to Bayesian inference that allows us to introduce a natural measure of the level of agreement between priors, likelihoods, and posteriors. The starting point for the construction of our geometry is the simple observation that the marginal likelihood can be regarded as an inner product between the prior and the likelihood. A key concept in our geometry is that of compatibility, a measure which is based on the same construction principles as Pearson correlation, but which can be used to assess how much the prior agrees with the likelihood, to gauge the sensitivity of the posterior to the prior, and to quantify the coherency of the opinions of two experts. Estimators for all the quantities involved in our geometric setup are discussed, which can be directly computed from the posterior simulation output. Some examples are used to illustrate our methods, including data related to on-the-job drug usage, midge wing length, and prostate cancer.

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1701.08994/full.md

## Figures

27 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1701.08994/full.md

## References

40 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1701.08994/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1701.08994