Circulant q-Butson Hadamard matrices
Trevor Hyde, Joseph Kraisler

TL;DR
This paper investigates the existence and construction of circulant q-Butson Hadamard matrices, providing new constraints on their dimensions and explicit examples, advancing understanding in combinatorial matrix theory.
Contribution
It establishes a strong algebraic number theory-based constraint on the dimension of circulant q-Butson Hadamard matrices when dimensions are prime powers and constructs explicit examples in all such dimensions.
Findings
Derived a dimension constraint for circulant q-Butson Hadamard matrices
Constructed explicit examples in all prime power dimensions
Connected results to the circulant Hadamard matrix conjecture
Abstract
If is a prime power, then a -dimensional \emph{-Butson Hadamard matrix} is a matrix with all entries th roots of unity such that . We use algebraic number theory to prove a strong constraint on the dimension of a circulant -Butson Hadamard matrix when and then explicitly construct a family of examples in all possible dimensions. These results relate to the long-standing circulant Hadamard matrix conjecture in combinatorics.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
Topicsgraph theory and CDMA systems · Mathematics and Applications · Coding theory and cryptography
Circulant -Butson Hadamard Matrices
Trevor Hyde
Dept. of Mathematics
University of Michigan
Ann Arbor, MI 48109-1043
and
Joseph Kraisler
Dept. of Mathematics
University of Michigan
Ann Arbor, MI 48109-1043
(Date: March 14th, 2017)
Abstract.
If is a prime power, then a -dimensional -Butson Hadamard matrix is a matrix with all entries th roots of unity such that . We use algebraic number theory to prove a strong constraint on the dimension of a circulant -Butson Hadamard matrix when and then explicitly construct a family of examples in all possible dimensions. These results relate to the long-standing circulant Hadamard matrix conjecture in combinatorics.
1. Introduction
For a prime power , a -Butson Hadamard matrix (-BH) of dimension is a matrix with all entries th roots of unity such that
[TABLE]
where is the conjugate transpose of . A matrix is said to be circulant if
[TABLE]
for some function defined modulo . In this paper we investigate circulant -BH matrices of dimension .
Theorem 1**.**
If is a prime power and , then there exists a circulant -Butson Hadamard matrix if and only if , with one exception when .
Our analysis of circulant -BH matrices led us to the useful notion of fibrous functions.
Definition 2**.**
Let and be a prime power,
- (1)
If is a finite set, we say a function is fibrous if the cardinality of the fiber depends only on . 2. (2)
We say a function is -fibrous if for each the function is fibrous.
When are both prime, -fibrous functions coincide with the concept of planar functions, which arise in the study of finite projective planes [2] and have applications in cryptography [6]. Circulant -BH matrices of dimension are equivalent to -fibrous functions .
Theorem 3**.**
Let be a prime power and a primitive th root of unity. There is a correspondence between circulant -Butson Hadamard matrices and -fibrous functions given by
[TABLE]
We restate our main result in the language of -fibrous functions.
Corollary 4**.**
If is a prime power, then there exist -fibrous functions if and only if with one exception when .
It would be interesting to know if -fibrous functions have applications to finite geometry or cryptography.
When , -BH matrices are called Hadamard matrices. Hadamard matrices are usually defined as matrices with all entries such that . Buston Hadamard matrices were introduced in [1] as a generalization of Hadamard matrices.
Circulant Hadamard matrices arise in the theory of difference sets, combinatorial designs, and synthetic geometry [7, Chap. 9]. There are arithmetic constraints on the possible dimension of a circulant Hadamard matrix. When the dimension is a power of two we have:
Theorem 5** (Turyn [9]).**
If is the dimension of a circulant Hadamard matrix, then or .
Turyn’s proof uses algebraic number theory, more specifically the fact that 2 is totally ramified in the th cyclotomic extension ; an elementary exposition may be found in Stanley [8]. Conjecturally this accounts for all circulant Hadamard matrices [7].
Conjecture 6**.**
There are no -dimensional circulant Hadamard matrices for .
Circulant -Butson Hadamard matrices provide a natural context within which to consider circulant Hadamard matrices. A better understanding of the former could lead to new insights on the latter. For example, our proof of Theorem 1 shows that the two possible dimensions for a circulant Hadamard matrix given by Turyn’s theorem belong to larger family of circulant -BH matrices with the omission of being a degenerate exception. Circulant -BH matrices have been studied in some specific dimensions [3], but overall seem poorly understood. We leave the existence of -BH matrices when the dimension is not a power of for future work.
Acknowledgements
The authors thank Padraig Cathain for pointers to the literature, in particular for bringing the work of de Launey [4] to our attention. We also thank Jeff Lagarias for helpful feedback on an earlier draft.
2. Main Results
We always let denote a prime power. First recall the definitions of -Butson Hadamard and circulant matrices.
Definition 7**.**
A -dimensional -Butson Hadamard matrix (-BH) is a matrix all of whose entries are th roots of unity satisfying
[TABLE]
*where is the conjugate transpose of .
A -dimensional circulant matrix is a matrix with coefficients in a ring such that
[TABLE]
for some function .
Example 8**.**
Hadamard matrices are the special case of -BH matrices with . The -Fourier matrix where is a primitive th root of unity is an example of a -BH matrix (which may also be interpreted as the character table of the cyclic group .) When and is a primitive 3rd root of unity this is the matrix:
[TABLE]
This example is not a circulant -BH matrix. The following is a circulant -BH matrix:
[TABLE]
The remainder of the paper is divided into two sections: first we prove constraints on the dimension of a circulant -BH matrix when is a power of ; next we introduce the concept of -fibrous functions and construct examples of circulant -BH matrices in all possible dimensions.
Constraints on dimension
Theorem 9 uses the ramification of the prime in the th cyclotomic extension to deduce strong constraints on the dimension of a -BH matrix.
Theorem 9**.**
If is a prime power and is a circulant -Butson Hadamard matrix of dimension , then .
Note that our indexing of has changed from the introduction; this choice was made to improve notation in our proof. We use this indexing for the rest of the paper.
Proof of Theorem 9.
Suppose is a circulant -Butson Hadamard matrix of dimension . From being -BH of dimension we have
[TABLE]
hence and each eigenvalue of has absolute value . On the other hand, since is circulant, it has eigenvalues
[TABLE]
for a primitive th root of unity with corresponding eigenvector
[TABLE]
These observations combine to give two ways of computing .
[TABLE]
The identity (2) is the essential interaction between the circulant and -BH conditions on . The prime is totally ramified in , hence there is a unique prime ideal over . Since all , it follows from (2) that as ideals of for some and for each . So either or is an element of . Say is the integral quotient. We noted for each , hence . The only integral elements of with absolute value 1 are roots of unity, hence for some , hence
[TABLE]
By (1) we have
[TABLE]
Each has a unique expression as where and . Let be a primitive th root of unity. Then
[TABLE]
Writing in the linear basis \big{\{}1,\zeta,\zeta^{2},\ldots,\zeta^{p^{m}-1}\big{\}} of we have
[TABLE]
where is a sum of complex numbers each with absolute value 1. Now (3) says for some and , thus
[TABLE]
Comparing coefficients we conclude that
[TABLE]
which is to say that is the sum of complex numbers each with absolute value 1, hence . On the other hand we have . Thus as desired. ∎
Remark*.*
The main impediment to extending this result from to a general integer is that we no longer have the total ramification of the primes dividing the determinant of . It may be possible to get some constraint in certain cases from a closer analysis of the eigenvalues and ramification, but we do not pursue this.
-Fibrous functions and construction of circulant -BH matrices
Recall the notion of fibrous functions from the introduction:
Definition 10**.**
Let and be a prime power,
- (1)
If is a finite set, we say is fibrous if the cardinality of the fibers depends only on . 2. (2)
We say a function is -fibrous if for each the function is fibrous.
Lemma 11 is a combinatorial reinterpretation of the cyclotomic polynomials .
Lemma 11**.**
Let be a prime and a primitive th root of unity.
- (1)
If with , then depends only on . 2. (2)
If is a finite set and is a function, then is fibrous iff
[TABLE]
Proof.
(1) Suppose for some . Then is a polynomial with degree such that . So there is some such that where
[TABLE]
is the th cyclotomic polynomial—the minimal polynomial of over . Since , it follows that . Let
[TABLE]
for some . Expanding we have
[TABLE]
Comparing coefficients yields
[TABLE]
which is to say, depends only .
(2) Suppose is fibrous. For each , let . Then
[TABLE]
Conversely, for each let . Then
[TABLE]
and (1) implies depends only on . Hence is fibrous. ∎
Theorem 12 establishes the equivalence between -BH matrices of dimension and -fibrous functions .
Theorem 12**.**
Let be a prime power. There is a correspondence between circulant -Butson Hadamard matrices of dimension and -fibrous functions given by
[TABLE]
Proof.
Suppose is -fibrous. Define the matrix by where is a primitive th root of unity. is plainly circulant and has all entries th roots of unity. It remains to show that , which is to say that the inner product of column and column is 0 for each and each . For each the function is fibrous. Then we compute
[TABLE]
where the last equality follows from Lemma 11 (2).
Conversely, suppose is a circulant -Butson Hadammard matrix. Then for some function . Since we have for each ,
[TABLE]
Lemma 11 (2) then implies is fibrous. Therefore is -fibrous. ∎
Lemma 13 checks that affine functions are fibrous. We use this in our proof of Theorem 14.
Lemma 13**.**
If is a prime power, then for all and arbitrary , the function is fibrous.
Proof.
Since ,
[TABLE]
Thus, by Lemma 11 (2) we conclude that is fibrous. ∎
Theorem 14**.**
If is a prime power, then there exists a circulant -Butson Hadamard matrix of dimension for each unless .
Our construction in the proof of Theorem 14 misses the family for each . Lemma 15 records a quick observation that circumvents this issue for , as our construction does give circulant -BH matrices of dimension .
Lemma 15**.**
If is a prime power and there exists a circulant -BH matrix of dimension , then there exists a circulant -BH matrix of dimension for all .
Proof.
Every th root of unity is also a th root of unity, hence we may view a circulant -BH matrix of dimension as a circulant -BH for all . ∎
Proof of Theorem 14.
Our strategy is to first construct a sequence of functions
[TABLE]
which are fibrous for each . If is the bijection , we define such that when . Hence is -fibrous and Theorem 12 implies the existence of a corresponding circulant -BH matrix of dimension .
Now for each define by
[TABLE]
where
[TABLE]
Observe that counts the integers in the interval congruent to (which only depends on .) Any interval of length contains precisely integers congruent to . For each , write with and , then
[TABLE]
We show that is fibrous when . If , then for each the function is affine hence fibrous by Lemma 13. So is fibrous. Now suppose for some . Using (5) we reduce (4) to
[TABLE]
where . Here we use our assumption . The definition of implies
[TABLE]
whence . Since it follows that , so is affine hence fibrous by Lemma 13.
Define by . For this to be well-defined, it suffices to check that with arbitrary . By (4),
[TABLE]
The argument leading to (6) gives
[TABLE]
Finally, unless . Lemma 15 implies that constructing an example for implies the existence of example for , hence we proceed under the assumption that either or and . The case is an exception as one can check explicitly that there are no 2-dimensional Hadamard matrices. Hence it follows that is well-defined. Let be the bijection . To finish the construction we suppose , show
[TABLE]
and then our proof that is fibrous for all implies is -fibrous. Theorem 12 translates this into the existence of a circulant -BH matrix of dimension . Now,
[TABLE]
∎
Remark*.*
Padraig Cathain brought the work of de Launey [4] to our attention after reading an initial draft. There one finds a construction of circulant -Butson Hadamard matrices of dimension for all prime powers which appears to be closely related to our construction in Theorem 14.
Example 16**.**
We provide two low dimensional examples to illustrate our construction. First we have an 8 dimensional circulant -BH matrix.
[TABLE]
Let be a primitive 3rd root of unity. The following is a 9 dimensional circulant -BH matrix.
[TABLE]
Corollary 17 is an immediate consequence of our main results by Theorem 12.
Corollary 17**.**
If is a prime power and , then there exists a -fibrous function iff , with the one exception of .
Closing remarks
Our analysis focused entirely on the existence of circulant -BH matrices with dimension a power of . The number theoretic method of Theorem 9 cannot be immediately adapted to the case where is not a power of , although as we noted earlier, it may be possible to get some constraint with a closer analysis of the eigenvalues of a circulant matrix and the ramification over the primes dividing in the th cyclotomic extension .
The family of examples constructed in Theorem 14 was found empirically. It would be interesting to know if the construction extends to any dimensions which are not powers of .
The reference list from the paper itself. Each links out to its DOI / PubMed record.
- 1[1] Butson, A.T. “Generalized Hadamard matrices” Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. , 13 (1962), pp. 894-898
- 2[2] Dembowski, Peter, and Thedore G. Ostrom. “Planes of order n 𝑛 n with collineation groups of order n 2 superscript 𝑛 2 n^{2} .” Mathematische Zeitschrift 103.3 (1968): 239-258.
- 3[3] Hiranandani, Gaurush, and Jean-Marc Schlenker. “Small circulant complex Hadamard matrices of Butson type.” European Journal of Combinatorics 51 (2016): 306-314.
- 4[4] de Launey, Warwick. “Circulant GH ( p 2 ; ℤ p ) GH superscript 𝑝 2 subscript ℤ 𝑝 {\rm GH}(p^{2};\mathbb{Z}_{p}) exist for all primes p 𝑝 p .” Graphs Combin. 8, no. 4, (1992): 317-321.
- 5[5] Leung, Ka Hin, and Bernhard Schmidt. “New restrictions on possible orders of circulant Hadamard matrices.” Designs, Codes and Cryptography 64.1 (2012): 143-151.
- 6[6] Nyberg, Kaisa, and Lars Ramkilde Knudsen. “Provable security against differential cryptanalysis.” Annual International Cryptology Conference . Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 1992.
- 7[7] Ryser, Herbert John. “Combinatorial mathematics.” Vol. 14. Washington, DC: Mathematical Association of America, 1963.
- 8[8] Stanley, Richard P. “Algebraic combinatorics.” Springer 20 (2013): 22.
