# Stability of fundamental couplings: a global analysis

**Authors:** C. J. A. P. Martins, A. M. M. Pinho

arXiv: 1701.08724 · 2017-01-31

## TL;DR

This paper performs a comprehensive analysis of astrophysical measurements of fundamental constants, assessing their stability over time and space, and finds slight statistical hints of variation and a possible spatial dipole, though with some inconsistencies.

## Contribution

It updates and combines a large set of measurements of fundamental constants to test their stability and spatial variation, highlighting potential systematics and the need for future precise observations.

## Key findings

- Slight preference for variations of constants at up to two sigma
- Inconsistencies between different data subsets suggest hidden systematics
- Evidence for a spatial dipole in alpha at 2.3 sigma

## Abstract

Astrophysical tests of the stability of fundamental couplings are becoming an increasingly important probe of new physics. Motivated by the recent availability of new and stronger constraints we update previous works testing the consistency of measurements of the fine-structure constant $\alpha$ and the proton-to-electron mass ratio $\mu=m_p/m_e$ (mostly obtained in the optical/ultraviolet) with combined measurements of $\alpha$, $\mu$ and the proton gyromagnetic ratio $g_p$ (mostly in the radio band). We carry out a global analysis of all available data, including the 293 archival measurements of {\it Webb et al.} and 66 more recent dedicated measurements, and constraining both time and spatial variations. While nominally the full datasets show a slight statistical preference for variations of $\alpha$ and $\mu$ (at up to two standard deviations), we also find several inconsistencies between different sub-sets, likely due to hidden systematics and implying that these statistical preferences need to be taken with caution. The statistical evidence for a spatial dipole in the values of $\alpha$ is found at the 2.3 sigma level. Forthcoming studies with facilities such as ALMA and ESPRESSO should clarify these issues.

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1701.08724/full.md

## Figures

38 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1701.08724/full.md

## References

61 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1701.08724/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1701.08724