# Dynamical dark energy in light of the latest observations

**Authors:** Gong-Bo Zhao, Marco Raveri, Levon Pogosian, Yuting Wang, Robert G., Crittenden, Will J. Handley, Will J. Percival, Florian Beutler, Jonathan, Brinkmann, Chia-Hsun Chuang, Antonio J. Cuesta, Daniel J. Eisenstein,, Francisco-Shu Kitaura, Kazuya Koyama, Benjamin L'Huillier, Robert C. Nichol,, Matthew M. Pieri, Sergio Rodriguez-Torres, Ashley J. Ross, Graziano Rossi,, Ariel G. S\'anchez, Arman Shafieloo, Jeremy L. Tinker, Rita Tojeiro, Jose A., Vazquez, Hanyu Zhang

arXiv: 1701.08165 · 2017-09-06

## TL;DR

This paper explores whether the tensions in cosmological data can be explained by a dynamical dark energy model, which fits current observations better than the standard cosmological constant, and predicts it could be decisively detected by future surveys.

## Contribution

The study demonstrates that a dynamical dark energy model can alleviate existing tensions in cosmological data and could be confirmed by upcoming observational surveys.

## Key findings

- Dynamical dark energy reduces dataset tensions significantly.
- Current data slightly favor dynamical dark energy over ΛCDM.
- Future surveys like DESI could decisively detect dynamical dark energy.

## Abstract

A flat Friedman-Roberson-Walker universe dominated by a cosmological constant ($\Lambda$) and cold dark matter (CDM) has been the working model preferred by cosmologists since the discovery of cosmic acceleration. However, tensions of various degrees of significance are known to be present among existing datasets within the $\Lambda$CDM framework. In particular, the Lyman-$\alpha$ forest measurement of the Baryon Acoustic Oscillations (BAO) by the Baryon Oscillation Spectroscopic Survey (BOSS) prefers a smaller value of the matter density fraction $\Omega_{\rm M}$ compared to the value preferred by cosmic microwave background (CMB). Also, the recently measured value of the Hubble constant, $H_0=73.24\pm1.74 \ {\rm km}\ {\rm s}^{-1} \ {\rm Mpc}^{-1}$, is $3.4\sigma$ higher than $66.93\pm0.62 \ {\rm km}\ {\rm s}^{-1} \ {\rm Mpc}^{-1}$ inferred from the Planck CMB data. In this work, we investigate if these tensions can be interpreted as evidence for a non-constant dynamical dark energy (DE). Using the Kullback-Leibler (KL) divergence to quantify the tension between datasets, we find that the tensions are relieved by an evolving DE, with the dynamical DE model preferred at a $3.5\sigma$ significance level based on the improvement in the fit alone. While, at present, the Bayesian evidence for the dynamical DE is insufficient to favour it over $\Lambda$CDM, we show that, if the current best fit DE happened to be the true model, it would be decisively detected by the upcoming DESI survey.

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1701.08165/full.md

## Figures

16 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1701.08165/full.md

## References

74 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1701.08165/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1701.08165