This paper investigates the algebraic structure of a semigroup of monotone injective partial selfmaps of the ordered set of natural number pairs with cofinite domains and images, revealing its decomposition, order relations, and quotient structures.
Contribution
It characterizes the semigroup's structure, describes its natural partial order, and establishes isomorphisms with semidirect products and free commutative monoids, extending understanding of such algebraic objects.
Findings
01
Semigroup is isomorphic to a semidirect product involving orientation-preserving maps and Z_2.
02
The natural partial order coincides with the order induced from the symmetric inverse monoid.
03
Quotients of the semigroup are isomorphic to free commutative monoids and their semidirect products.
Abstract
Let N⩽2 be the set N2 with the partial order defined as the product of usual order ≤ on the set of positive integers N. We study the semigroup PO∞(N⩽2) of monotone injective partial selfmaps of N⩽2 having cofinite domain and image. We describe the natural partial order on PO∞(N⩽2) and show that it coincides with the natural partial order which is induced from symmetric inverse monoid IN×N onto PO∞(N⩽2). We proved that the semigroup PO∞(N⩽2) is isomorphic to the semidirect product PO∞+(N⩽2)⋊Z2 of the monoid…
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
Topicssemigroups and automata theory · Geometric and Algebraic Topology · Rings, Modules, and Algebras
Full text
On the monoid of monotone injective partial selfmaps of N⩽2 with cofinite domains and images, II
Oleg Gutik and Inna Pozdniakova
Department of Mathematics, National University of Lviv, Universytetska 1, Lviv, 79000, Ukraine
Let N⩽2 be the set N2 with the partial order defined as the product of usual order ≤ on the set of positive integers N. We study the semigroup PO∞(N⩽2) of monotone injective partial selfmaps of N⩽2 having cofinite domain and image. We describe the natural partial order on the semigroup PO∞(N⩽2) and show that it coincides with the natural partial order which is induced from symmetric inverse monoid IN×N over the set N×N onto the semigroup PO∞(N⩽2). We proved that the semigroup PO∞(N⩽2) is isomorphic to the semidirect product PO∞+(N⩽2)⋊Z2 of the monoid PO∞+(N⩽2) of orientation-preserving monotone injective partial selfmaps of N⩽2 with cofinite domains and images by the cyclic group Z2 of the order two. Also we describe the congruence σ on the semigroup PO∞(N⩽2) which is generated by the natural order ≼ on the semigroup PO∞(N⩽2): ασβ if and only if α and β are comparable in (PO∞(N⩽2),≼). We prove that the quotient semigroup PO∞+(N⩽2)/σ is isomorphic to the free commutative monoid AMω over an infinite countable set and show that the quotient semigroup PO∞(N⩽2)/σ is isomorphic to the semidirect product of the free commutative monoid AMω by the group Z2.
Key words and phrases:
Semigroup of bijective partial transformations, natural partial order, semidirect product, minimum group congruence, free commutative monoid.
In this paper we shall denote the first infinite cardinal by ω and the cardinality of the set A by ∣A∣. We shall identify every set X with its cardinality ∣X∣. By Z2 we shall denote the cyclic group of order two. Also, for infinite subsets A and B of an infinite set X we shall write A⊆∗B if and only if there exists a finite subset A0 of A such that A∖A0⊆B.
An algebraic semigroup S is called inverse if for any element x∈S there exists a unique x−1∈S such that xx−1x=x and x−1xx−1=x−1. The element x−1 is called the inverse ofx∈S.
If S is a semigroup, then we shall denote the subset of idempotents in S by E(S). If S is an inverse semigroup, then E(S) is closed under multiplication and we shall refer to E(S) a band (or the band ofS). If the band E(S) is a non-empty subset of S, then the semigroup operation on S determines the following partial order ⩽ on E(S): e⩽f if and only if ef=fe=e. This order is called the natural partial order on E(S). A semilattice is a commutative semigroup of idempotents.
If α:X⇀Y is a partial map, then by domα and ranα we denote the domain and the range of α, respectively.
Let Iλ denote the set of all partial one-to-one transformations of an infinite set X of cardinality λ together with the following semigroup operation: x(αβ)=(xα)β if x∈dom(αβ)={y∈domα∣yα∈domβ}, for α,β∈Iλ. The semigroup Iλ is called the symmetric inverse semigroup over the set X (see [2, Section 1.9]). The symmetric inverse semigroup was introduced by Vagner [18] and it plays a major role in the theory of semigroups. An element α∈Iλ is called cofinite, if the sets λ∖domα and λ∖ranα are finite.
Let (X,⩽) be a partially ordered set (a poset). For an arbitrary x∈X we denote
[TABLE]
We shall say that a partial map α:X⇀X is monotone if x⩽y implies (x)α⩽(y)α for x,y∈domα.
Let N be the set of positive integers with the usual linear order ≤. On the Cartesian product N×N we define the product partial order, i.e.,
[TABLE]
Later the set N×N with so defined partial order will be denoted by N⩽2.
By PO∞(N⩽2) we denote the semigroup of injective partial monotone selfmaps of N⩽2 with cofinite domains and images. Obviously, PO∞(N⩽2) is a submonoid of the symmetric inverse semigroup Iω and PO∞(N⩽2) is a countable semigroup.
Furthermore, we shall denote the identity of the semigroup PO∞(N⩽2) by I and the group of units of
PO∞(N⩽2) by H(I).
For any positive integer n and an arbitrary α∈PO∞(N⩽2) we denote:
[TABLE]
and
[TABLE]
It well known that each partial injective cofinite selfmap f of λ induces a homeomorphism f∗:λ∗→λ∗ of the remainder λ∗=βλ∖λ of the Stone-Čech compactification of the discrete space λ. Moreover, under some set theoretic axioms (like PFA or OCA), each homeomorphism of ω∗ is induced by some partial injective cofinite selfmap of ω (see [12]–[17]). So, the inverse semigroup Iλcf of injective partial selfmaps of an infinite cardinal λ with
cofinite domains and images admits a natural homomorphism h:Iλcf→H(λ∗) to the homeomorphism group H(λ∗) of λ∗ and this homomorphism is surjective under certain set theoretic assumptions.
In the paper [9] algebraic properties of the semigroup
Iλcf are studied. It is showed that
Iλcf is a bisimple inverse semigroup
and that for every non-empty chain L in
E(Iλcf) there exists an inverse
subsemigroup S of Iλcf such that
S is isomorphic to the bicyclic semigroup and L⊆E(S),
the Green relations on Iλcf are described
and it is proved that every non-trivial congruence on
Iλcf is a group congruence. Also, the structure of the quotient semigroup Iλcf/σ is described, where σ is the least group congruence on Iλcf.
The semigroups I∞↗(N) and I∞↗(Z) of injective isotone partial selfmaps with cofinite domains and images of positive integers and integers are studied in [7] and [8], respectively. It was proved that the semigroups I∞↗(N) and I∞↗(Z) have similar properties to the bicyclic semigroup: they are bisimple and every non-trivial homomorphic image I∞↗(N) and I∞↗(Z) is a group, and moreover the semigroup I∞↗(N) has Z(+) as a maximal group image and I∞↗(Z) has Z(+)×Z(+), respectively.
In the paper [6] we studied the semigroup
IO∞(Zlexn) of monotone injective partial selfmaps of the set of Ln×lexZ having cofinite domain and image, where Ln×lexZ is the lexicographic product of n-elements chain and the set of integers with the usual linear order. In this paper we described
Green’s relations on IO∞(Zlexn),
showed that the semigroup IO∞(Zlexn) is
bisimple and established its projective congruences. Also, we proved that IO∞(Zlexn) is finitely generated, every automorphism of IO∞(Z) is inner and showed that in the case n⩾2 the semigroup IO∞(Zlexn) has non-inner automorphisms. In [6] we also proved that for every positive integer n the quotient semigroup
IO∞(Zlexn)/σ, where σ is a least group congruence on IO∞(Zlexn), is isomorphic to the direct power (Z(+))2n. The structure of the sublattice of congruences on IO∞(Zlexn) that are contained in the least group congruence is described in [4].
In the paper [5] we studied algebraic properties of the semigroup PO∞(N⩽2). We described properties of elements of the semigroup PO∞(N⩽2) as monotone partial bijection of N⩽2 and showed that the group of units of PO∞(N⩽2) is isomorphic to the cyclic group of order two. Also in [5] the subsemigroup of idempotents of PO∞(N⩽2) and the Green relations on PO∞(N⩽2) are described. In particular, here we proved that D=J in PO∞(N⩽2).
The present paper is a continuation of [5]. We describe the natural partial order ≼ on the semigroup PO∞(N⩽2) and show that it coincides with the natural partial order which is induced from symmetric inverse monoid IN×N over the set N×N onto the semigroup PO∞(N⩽2). We proved that the semigroup PO∞(N⩽2) is isomorphic to the semidirect product PO∞+(N⩽2)⋊Z2 of the monoid PO∞+(N⩽2) of orientation-preserving monotone injective partial selfmaps of N⩽2 with cofinite domains and images by the cyclic group Z2 of the order two. Also we describe the congruence σ on the semigroup PO∞(N⩽2), which is generated by the natural order ≼ on the semigroup PO∞(N⩽2): ασβ if and only if α and β are comparable in (PO∞(N⩽2),≼). We prove that the quotient semigroup PO∞+(N⩽2)/σ is isomorphic to the free commutative monoid AMω over an infinite countable set and show that quotient semigroup PO∞(N⩽2)/σ is isomorphic to the semidirect product of the free commutative monoid AMω by the group Z2.
The following proposition implies that the equations of the form a⋅x=b and x⋅c=d in the semigroup PO∞(N⩽2) have finitely many solutions. This property holds for the bicyclic monoid, many its generalizations and other semigroups (see corresponding results in [1, 3, 6, 7, 8, 9]).
Proposition 1**.**
For every α,β∈PO∞(N⩽2), both sets
[TABLE]
are finite. Consequently, every right translation and every left translation by an element of the semigroup PO∞(N⩽2) is a finite-to-one map.
Proof.
We consider the case of the equation α⋅χ=β. In the case of the equation χ⋅α=β the proof is similar.
The definition of the semigroup PO∞(N⩽2) and the equality α⋅χ=β imply that domβ⊆domα and ranχ⊆ranα. Since any element of the semigroup PO∞(N⩽2) has a cofinite domain and a cofinite image in N×N, we conclude that if an element χ0 satisfies the equality α⋅χ=β then for every other root χ of the equation α⋅χ=β there exist finitely many (i,j)∈(N×N)∖ranβ such that one of the following conditions holds:
(1)
(i,j)χ=(i,j)χ0;
(2)
(i,j)χ is determined and (i,j)χ0 is undetermined;
(3)
(i,j)χ0 is determined and (i,j)χ is undetermined.
This implies that the equation α⋅χ=β has finitely many solutions, which completes the proof of the proposition.
∎
Later we shall describe the natural partial order “≼” on the semigroup PO∞(N⩽2). For α,β∈PO∞(N⩽2) we put
For any semigroup S and its natural partial order ≼ the following conditions are equivalent:
(i)
a≼b;
(ii)
a=wb=bz, az=a for some w,z∈S1;
(iii)
a=xb=by, xa=ay=a for some x,y∈S1.
Proposition 3**.**
The relation ≼ is the natural partial order on the semigroup PO∞(N⩽2).
Proof.
Suppose that α=βε for some idempotent ε∈E(PO∞(N⩽2)). Then we have that
[TABLE]
Let ι:dom(βε)→dom(βε) be the identity map of the set dom(βε). Then ι∈E(PO∞(N⩽2)) and the definition of the semigroup PO∞(N⩽2) implies that dom(βε)=dom(ιβ), because ε is an idempotent of PO∞(N⩽2). This implies that (i,j)ιβ=(i,j)βε for each (i,j)∈dom(ιβ) and hence we get that α=βε=ιβ. Next we apply Proposition 2.
∎
Remark 4**.**
Proposition 3 implies that the natural partial order on the semigroup PO∞(N⩽2) coincides with the natural partial order which is induced from symmetric inverse monoid IN×N over the set N×N onto the semigroup PO∞(N⩽2).
We define a relation σ on the semigroup PO∞(N⩽2) in the following way:
[TABLE]
for α,β∈PO∞(N⩽2).
Proposition 5**.**
For α,β∈PO∞(N⩽2) the following conditions are equivalent:
(i)
ασβ;
(ii)
there exist ς,υ∈E(PO∞(N⩽2)) such that ας=βυ;
(iii)
there exist ς,υ∈E(PO∞(N⩽2)) such that ας=υβ;
(iv)
there exists ι∈E(PO∞(N⩽2)) such that ια=ιβ;
(v)
there exist ς,υ∈E(PO∞(N⩽2)) such that ςα=υβ.
Thus σ is a congruence on the semigroup PO∞(N⩽2).
Proof.
Implication (i)⇒(ii) is trivial.
(ii)⇒(i) If we have that ας=βυ for some ς,υ∈E(PO∞(N⩽2)) then ας(ςυ)=βυ(ςυ). Since PO∞(N⩽2) is a subsemigroup of the symmetric inverse monoid I∣N×N∣, the idempotents in the semigroup PO∞(N⩽2) commute and hence α(ςυ)=β(ςυ). This implies that ασβ.
(ii)⇒(iii) Suppose that ας=βυ for some ς,υ∈E(PO∞(N⩽2)). Let ι:dom(βυ)→dom(βυ) be the identity map of the set dom(βυ). Then ι∈E(PO∞(N⩽2)) and the definition of the semigroup PO∞(N⩽2) implies that dom(βυ)=dom(ιβ), because υ is an idempotent of PO∞(N⩽2). This implies that (i,j)ιβ=(i,j)βυ for each (i,j)∈dom(ιβ) and hence we get that ας=βυ=ιβ.
(iii)⇒(ii) Suppose that ας=υβ for some ς,υ∈E(PO∞(N⩽2)). Let ι:ran(υβ)→ran(υβ) be the identity map of the set ran(υβ). Then ι∈E(PO∞(N⩽2)) and the definition of the semigroup PO∞(N⩽2) implies that ran(υβ)=ran(βι), because υ is an idempotent of PO∞(N⩽2). Since all elements of the semigroup PO∞(N⩽2) are partial bijections of N×N we get that dom(υβ)=dom(βι). This implies that (i,j)βι=(i,j)υβ for each (i,j)∈dom(βι) and hence we get that ας=υβ=βι.
The proofs of equivalences (iii)⇔(iv) and (iv)⇔(v) are similar.
It is obvious that σ is a reflexive and symmetric relation on PO∞(N⩽2). Suppose that ασβ and βσγ in PO∞(N⩽2). Then there exist ς,υ∈E(PO∞(N⩽2)) such that ας=βς and βυ=γυ. This implies that αςυ=βςυ and βυς=γυς, and since the idempotents in PO∞(N⩽2) commute we get that αςυ=βςυ=βυς=γυς, and hence ασγ.
Suppose that ασβ for some α,β∈PO∞(N⩽2). Then by (iv) there exists ι∈E(PO∞(N⩽2)) such that ια=ιβ. This implies that ιαγ=ιβγ for each γ∈PO∞(N⩽2) and hence by item (iv) we get that (αγ)σ(βγ). The proof of the statement that (γα)σ(γβ) for each γ∈PO∞(N⩽2) is similar, and hence σ is a congruence on the semigroup PO∞(N⩽2).
∎
Corollary 6**.**
For α,β∈PO∞(N⩽2) the following condition are equivalent:
(i)
ασβ;
(ii)
αϖσβϖ;
(iii)
ϖασϖβ.
Proof.
(i)⇔(ii) If ασβ in PO∞(N⩽2) then by Proposition 5 there exists ι∈E(PO∞(N⩽2)) such that ια=ιβ. This implies that ιαϖ=ιβϖ and hence (αϖ)σ(βϖ). Conversely, if (αϖ)σ(βϖ) then by Proposition 5 we have that ναϖ=νβϖ for some ν∈E(PO∞(N⩽2)), and hence
να=ναϖϖ=νβϖϖ=νβ,
which implies that ασβ.
The proof of (i)⇔(ii) is similar.
∎
Also the definition of the congruence σ on the semigroup PO∞(N⩽2) implies the following simple property of σ-equivalent elements of PO∞(N⩽2):
Corollary 7**.**
Let α,β be elements of the semigroup PO∞(N⩽2) such that ασβ. Then the following assertions hold:
(i)
(Hdomα1)α⊆H1* if and only if (Hdomβ1)β⊆H1;*
(ii)
(Hdomα1)α⊆V1* if and only if (Hdomβ1)β⊆V1.*
We define
[TABLE]
Then Lemma 3 and Theorem 1 from [5] imply that PO∞+(N⩽2) is a subsemigroup of PO∞(N⩽2). The subsemigroup PO∞+(N⩽2) is called the monoid of orientation-preserving monotone injective partial selfmaps ofN⩽2 with cofinite domains and images. Moreover it is obvious that E(PO∞+(N⩽2)=E(PO∞(N⩽2)). Also, later by ≼ and σ we denote the corresponding induced relations of the relations ≼ and σ from the semigroup PO∞(N⩽2) onto its subsemigroup PO∞+(N⩽2).
The proofs of the following propositions are similar to those of Propositions 3 and 5, respectively.
Proposition 8**.**
The relation ≼ is the natural partial order on the semigroup PO∞+(N⩽2).
Proposition 9**.**
The relation σ is a congruence on the semigroup PO∞+(N⩽2).
By ϖ we denote the bijective transformation of N×N defined by the formula (i,j)ϖ=(j,i), for any (i,j)∈N×N. It is obvious that ϖ is an element of the semigroup PO∞(N⩽2) and ϖϖ=I.
Remark 10**.**
We observe that
(i)
α∈PO∞+(N⩽2) if and only if αϖ,ϖα∈PO∞(N⩽2)∖PO∞+(N⩽2);
(ii)
α∈PO∞+(N⩽2) if and only if ϖαϖ∈PO∞+(N⩽2).
We define a map h:PO∞(N⩽2)→PO∞(N⩽2) by the formula (α)h=ϖαϖ, for α∈PO∞(N⩽2).
Proposition 11**.**
The map h:PO∞(N⩽2)→PO∞(N⩽2) is an automorphism of the semigroup PO∞(N⩽2). Moreover its restriction h∣PO∞+(N⩽2):PO∞+(N⩽2)→PO∞+(N⩽2) is an automorphism of the subsemigroup PO∞+(N⩽2).
Proof.
First we show that h:PO∞(N⩽2)→PO∞(N⩽2) is a homomorphism. Fix arbitrary α,β∈PO∞(N⩽2). Then we have that
[TABLE]
and hence h:PO∞(N⩽2)→PO∞(N⩽2) is a homomorphism.
Fix an arbitrary α∈PO∞(N⩽2). Then the definition of h implies that
[TABLE]
and hence the map h:PO∞(N⩽2)→PO∞(N⩽2) is surjective. Suppose that (α)h=(β)h for some α,β∈PO∞(N⩽2). Then
[TABLE]
and hence the map h:PO∞(N⩽2)→PO∞(N⩽2) is injective. Thus the map h is an automorphism of the semigroup PO∞(N⩽2).
Now, Remark 10 implies that the restriction h∣PO∞+(N⩽2):PO∞+(N⩽2)→PO∞+(N⩽2) is an automorphism of the semigroup PO∞+(N⩽2), too.
∎
For the automorphism h:PO∞+(N⩽2)→PO∞+(N⩽2) of the semigroup PO∞+(N⩽2) we have that h2=IdPO∞+(N⩽2) is the identity automorphism of PO∞+(N⩽2). This implies that the element h generates the group which is isomorphic to the cyclic group of order two Z2. By Proposition 4 from [5] the group of units H(I) of the semigroup PO∞(N⩽2) is isomorphic to Z2. We define a map Q from H(I) into the group Aut(PO∞+(N⩽2)) of automorphisms of the semigroup PO∞+(N⩽2) in the following way (I)Q=IdPO∞+(N⩽2) and (ϖ)Q=h. It is obvious that so defined map Q:H(I)→Aut(PO∞+(N⩽2)) is an injective homomorphism.
Let S and T be semigroups and let H be a homomorphism from T into the semigroup of endomorphisms End(S) of S, H:t↦ht. Then the Cartesian product S×T with the following semigroup operation
[TABLE]
is called a semidirect product of the semigroup S by T and is denoted by S⋊HT. We remark that if 1T is the unit of the semigroup T then (1T)H=h1T is the identity homomorphism of S and in the case when T is a group then (t)H=ht is an automorphism of S for any t∈T.
Theorem 12**.**
The semigroup PO∞(N⩽2) is isomorphic to the semidirect product PO∞+(N⩽2)⋊QH(I) of the semigroup PO∞+(N⩽2) by the group H(I).
Proof.
We define a map I:PO∞+(N⩽2)⋊QH(I)→PO∞(N⩽2) by the formula (α,g)I=αg. Then for all α1,α2∈PO∞+(N⩽2) and g1,g2∈H(I) we have that
[TABLE]
because g2=I for any g∈H(I), and hence the map I:PO∞+(N⩽2)⋊QH(I)→PO∞(N⩽2) is a homomorphism.
By Lemma 3 from [5] for every α∈PO∞(N⩽2) there exist α+∈PO∞+(N⩽2) and gα∈H(I) such that α=α+gα. Indeed,
(a)
in the case when (Hdomα1)α⊆H1 we put α+=α and gα=I;
(b)
in the case when (Hdomα1)α⊆V1 we put α+=αω and gα=ω.
Let α+,β+∈PO∞+(N⩽2) and gα,gβ∈H(I) be such that α+gα=(α+,gα)I=(β+,gβ)I=β+gβ. Since (Hdomα+1)α+⊆H1 and (Hdomβ+1)β+⊆H1, Lemma 3 from [5] implies that gα=gβ. By Proposition 4 from [5] the group of units H(I) of the semigroup PO∞(N⩽2) is isomorphic to Z2 and hence α+=α+gα2=α+gαgβ=β+gβ2=β+. Therefore, we get that so defined map I:PO∞+(N⩽2)⋊QH(I)→PO∞(N⩽2) is an isomorphism.
∎
By Theorem 2(ii1) from [5] for every α∈PO∞+(N⩽2) there exists a smallest positive integer nα such that (i,j)α=(i,j) for each (i,j)∈domα∩↑(nα,nα).
Lemma 13**.**
For every α∈PO∞+(N⩽2) there exists αf∈PO∞+(N⩽2) such that the following assertions hold:
(i)
ασαf**;
(ii)
(i+1)αf[∗,j]−(i+1)=iαf[∗,j]−i* for arbitrary (i,j)∈domαf with j<nα, (i,j)\alpha_{\texttt{f}}=\big{(}i_{\alpha_{\texttt{f}}[*,j]},j_{\alpha_{\texttt{f}}[i,*]}\big{)} and (i+1,j)\alpha_{\texttt{f}}=\big{(}(i+1)_{\alpha_{\texttt{f}}[*,j]},j_{\alpha_{\texttt{f}}[i+1,*]}\big{)}, i.e., αf acts as a partial shift on the set Hj;*
(iii)
(j+1)αf[i,∗]−(j+1)=jαf[i,∗]−j* for arbitrary (i,j)∈domαf with i<nα, (i,j)\alpha_{\texttt{f}}=\big{(}i_{\alpha_{\texttt{f}}[*,j]},j_{\alpha_{\texttt{f}}[i,*]}\big{)} and (i,j+1)\alpha_{\texttt{f}}=\big{(}i_{\alpha_{\texttt{f}}[*,j+1]},(j+1)_{\alpha_{\texttt{f}}[i,*]}\big{)}, i.e., αf acts as a partial shift on the set Vi.*
Moreover, there exist smallest positive integers hα,vα⩽nα such that (i,j)αf=(i,j) for arbitrary (i,j)∈domαf with i⩾hα and (k,l)αf=(k,l) for arbitrary (k,l)∈domαf with l⩾vα.
Proof.
Fix an arbitrary element α of the semigroup PO∞+(N⩽2). Then by Theorem 1(1) from [5] we get that (Hdomαn)α⊆∗Hn and (Vdomαn)α⊆∗Vn for any positive integer n. Also, the definition of the semigroup
PO∞(N⩽2) and Theorem 2(ii1) of [5] imply that there exists a smallest positive integer nα such that (i,j)α=(i,j) for each (i,j)∈domα∩↑(nα,nα), and hence for arbitrary positive integers i,j<nα there exist smallest positive integers hαi and vαj such that the following conditions hold:
[TABLE]
and
[TABLE]
for all positive integers k⩾hαi and l⩾vαj.
We put
[TABLE]
The above arguments imply that
[TABLE]
[TABLE]
and
[TABLE]
for all positive integers k⩾hˉα and l⩾vˉα.
Next we put
[TABLE]
We define αf=α∣Dα, i.e.,
[TABLE]
Since αf=εααf=εαα for the identity partial map εα:N×N⇀N×N with domεα=ranεα=Dα, Proposition 5 implies that ασαf.
Then condition (1) and the definition of the positive integer hˉα imply that
[TABLE]
and by similar arguments and induction we have that (i+1)αf[∗,1]=(i,1)αf[∗,1]+1 for arbitrary i⩾hˉα+1. Next, if we apply condition (1) and induction for arbitrary j<nα then we get that (i+1)αf[∗,j]=(i)αf[∗,j]+1 for arbitrary i⩾hˉα+1. This implies assertion (ii).
The proof of item (iii) is similar to (ii).
The last statement of the lemma follows from the above arguments and Theorem 2(1) from [5].
∎
For every positive integer n we define partial maps γn:N×N⇀N×N and υn:N×N⇀N×N in the following way:
[TABLE]
and
[TABLE]
Simple verifications show that γn,υn∈PO∞+(N⩽2) for every positive integer n, and moreover the subsemigroups ⟨γk∣k∈N⟩ and ⟨υk∣k∈N⟩ of the semigroup PO∞+(N⩽2), generated by the sets {γk:k∈N} and {υk:k∈N}, respectively, are isomorphic to the free Abelian semigroup over an infinite countable set.
Lemma 14**.**
For every α∈PO∞+(N⩽2) there exist finitely many elements γk1,…,γki and υl1,…,υlj of the semigroup PO∞+(N⩽2), with k1<…<ki, l1<…<lj, such that
[TABLE]
for some positive integers p1,…,pi,q1,…,qj. Moreover if
[TABLE]
for some α,β∈PO∞+(N⩽2) then (α,β)∈/σ if and only if
[TABLE]
for any idempotent ι∈PO∞+(N⩽2).
Proof.
Fix an arbitrary element α of the semigroup PO∞+(N⩽2). Let αf be the element of PO∞+(N⩽2) defined in the proof of Lemma 13. By Theorem 3 from [5] and the second statement of Lemma 13 there exist smallest positive integers hα,vα⩽nα such that (i,j)αf=(i,j) for arbitrary (i,j)∈domαf with i⩾hα and (k,l)αf=(k,l) for arbitrary (k,l)∈domαf with l⩾vα.
for arbitrary \big{(}j,\widehat{h}_{\alpha}-1\big{)},\big{(}j+1,\widehat{h}_{\alpha}-1\big{)}\in\operatorname{dom}\alpha_{\!\texttt{f}}. Then we put phα−1=j−jαf[∗,hα−1]. Next, for s=2,…,hα−2 we define integers phα−s,…,p1 by induction,
[TABLE]
where \big{(}j,\widehat{h}_{\alpha}-s\big{)}\alpha_{\!\texttt{f}}=\big{(}j_{\alpha_{\!\texttt{f}}[*,\widehat{h}_{\alpha}-s]},\widehat{h}_{\alpha}-s\big{)}\leqslant(j,\widehat{h}_{\alpha}-s) for arbitrary \big{(}j,\widehat{h}_{\alpha}-s\big{)}\in\operatorname{dom}\alpha_{\!\texttt{f}}.
Similarly, by Lemma 13 and Theorem 1(1) of [5] we have that
[TABLE]
for arbitrary \big{(}\widehat{v}_{\alpha}-1,i\big{)},\big{(}\widehat{v}_{\alpha}-1,i+1\big{)}\in\operatorname{dom}\alpha_{\!\texttt{f}}. Then we put qvα−1=i−iαf[vα−1,∗]. Next, for t=2,…,vα−2 we define integers qvα−t,…,q1 by induction
[TABLE]
where \big{(}\widehat{v}_{\alpha}-t,i\big{)}\alpha_{\!\texttt{f}}=\big{(}\widehat{v}_{\alpha}-t,i_{\alpha_{\!\texttt{f}}[\widehat{v}_{\alpha}-t,*]}\big{)}\leqslant\big{(}\widehat{v}_{\alpha}-t,i\big{)} for arbitrary \big{(}\widehat{v}_{\alpha}-t,i\big{)}\in\operatorname{dom}\alpha_{\!\texttt{f}}.
For any α∈PO∞+(N⩽2) put εα:N×N be the identity partial map with domεα=ranεα=Dα, where the set Dα is defined by formula (3).
Simple verification shows that \varepsilon_{\alpha}\alpha=\varepsilon_{\alpha}\big{(}\gamma_{1}^{p_{1}}\ldots\gamma_{\widehat{h}_{\alpha}-1}^{p_{\widehat{h}_{\alpha}-1}}\upsilon_{1}^{q_{1}}\ldots\upsilon_{l_{j}}^{q_{\widehat{v}_{\alpha}-1}}\big{)} and hence
Since γm0=υm0=I for any positive integer m, without loss of generality we may assume that p1,…,pi,q1,…,qj are positive integers in formula (4).
Also, the last statement of the lemma follows from the definition of the congruence σ on the semigroup PO∞+(N⩽2).
∎
Lemma 15**.**
Let be \alpha\sigma\big{(}\gamma_{k_{1}}^{p_{1}}\ldots\gamma_{k_{i}}^{p_{i}}\upsilon_{l_{1}}^{q_{1}}\ldots\upsilon_{l_{j}}^{q_{j}}\big{)} for α∈PO∞+(N⩽2) and positive integers p1,…,pi, q1,…,qj, k1<…<ki, l1<…<lj. Then there exists an idempotent
εα∈PO∞+(N⩽2) such that
[TABLE]
Proof.
Put
[TABLE]
where hˉα and vˉα are the positive integers defined in the proof of Lemma 13. We define the identity partial map εα:N×N⇀N×N with domεα=ranεα=Mα, where
[TABLE]
Then εα≼εα where εα is the idempotent of the semigroup PO∞+(N⩽2) defined in the proof of Lemma 13. This implies that
[TABLE]
and the equlity
[TABLE]
follows from the definition of the idempotent εα∈PO∞+(N⩽2).
∎
The following theorem describes the quotient semigroup PO∞+(N⩽2)/σ.
Theorem 16**.**
The quotient semigroup PO∞+(N⩽2)/σ is isomorphic to the free commutative monoid AMω over an infinite countable set.
Proof.
Let X={ai:i∈N}∪{bj:j∈N} be a countable infinite set.
We define the map Hσ:PO∞+(N⩽2)→AMX in the following way:
(a)
if \alpha\sigma\big{(}\gamma_{k_{1}}^{p_{1}}\ldots\gamma_{k_{i}}^{p_{i}}\upsilon_{l_{1}}^{q_{1}}\ldots\upsilon_{l_{j}}^{q_{j}}\big{)} for some positive integers p1,…,pi, q1,…,qj, k1<…<ki, l1<…<lj, then
[TABLE]
(b)
(I)Hσ=e, where e is the unit of the free commutative monoid AMX.
Then Lemmas 14 and 15 imply that (α)Hσ=(β)Hσ if and only if ασβ in PO∞+(N⩽2) and hence the quotient semigroup PO∞+(N⩽2)/σ is isomorphic to the free commutative monoid AMX.
∎
The following corollary of Theorem 16 shows that the semigroup PO∞+(N⩽2) has infinitely many congruences similar as the free commutative monoid AMω over an infinite countable set.
Corollary 17**.**
Every countable (infinite or finite) commutative monoid is a homomorphic image of the semigroup PO∞+(N⩽2).
Its obvious that every non-unit element u of the free commutative monoid AMω over the infinite countable set {ai:i∈ω}∪{bj:j∈ω} can be represented in the form u=a1i1…akikb1j1…bljl, where i1,…,ik,j1,…,ll are positive integers. We define a map f:AMω→AMω by the formula
[TABLE]
for u=a1i1…akikb1j1…bljl∈AMω and (e)f=e, for unit element e of AMω.
Proposition 18**.**
The map f:AMω→AMω is an automorphism of the free commutative monoid AMω.
Proof.
First we show that f:AMω→AMω is a homomorphism. Fix arbitrary elements u,v∈AMω. Without loss of generality we may assume that
[TABLE]
for some non-negative integers p,i1,…,ip,j1,…,jp,s1,…,sp,t1,…,tp, where ai=bi=e for i=0.
Then we have that
[TABLE]
It is obvious that f:AMω→AMω is a bijective map
and hence f:AMω→AMω is an automorphism.
∎
The relationships between elements of the subsemigroup ⟨γk∣k∈N⟩ and of the subsemigroup ⟨υk∣k∈N⟩ in PO∞+(N⩽2) is described by the following proposition.
We observe that the cyclic group Z2 acts on the free commutative monoid AMω over the infinite countable set {ai:i∈ω}∪{bj:j∈ω} in the following way
[TABLE]
where the map f:AMω→AMω is defined by formula(5). By Proposition 18 the map f is an automorphism of the free commutative monoid AMω.
Proposition 19**.**
Let p1,…,pi, k1,…,ki be some positive integers such that k1<…<ki. Then the following assertions hold:
(i)
ϖγk1p1…γkipiϖ=υk1p1…υkipi;
(ii)
γk1p1…γkipiϖ=ϖυk1p1…υkipi;
(iii)
ϖγk1p1…γkipi=υk1p1…υkipiϖ;
(iv)
ϖυk1p1…υkipiϖ=γk1p1…γkipi.
Proof.
Assertion (i) follows from the definitions of the elements of the semigroups ⟨γk∣k∈N⟩ and ⟨υk∣k∈N⟩. Other assertions follow from (i) and the equality ϖϖ=I.
∎
Later we assume that Z2={0ˉ,1ˉ}.
The following theorem describes the quotient semigroup PO∞(N⩽2)/σ.
Theorem 20**.**
The semigroup PO∞(N⩽2)/σ is isomorphic to the semidirect product AMω⋊QZ2 of the free commutative monoid AMω over an infinite countable set by the cyclic group Z2.
Proof.
We define a map I:PO∞(N⩽2)/σ→AMω⋊QZ2:x↦(u,g) in the following way. Let Pσ:PO∞(N⩽2)→PO∞(N⩽2)/σ be the natural homomorphism generated by the congruence σ on the semigroup PO∞(N⩽2). Then for every x∈PO∞(N⩽2)/σ for any αx∈PO∞(N⩽2) such that (αx)Pσ=x only one of the following conditions holds:
(1)
(Hdomαx1)αx⊆H1;
(2)
(Hdomαx1)αx⊆V1.
We put
[TABLE]
for all αx∈PO∞(N⩽2) with (αx)Pσ=x. Then the definition of the congruence σ on the semigroup PO∞(N⩽2) and Corollary 7 imply that the map
I:PO∞(N⩽2)/σ→AMω×Z2 is well defined.
We observe that formula (6) implies that (xI)I=(e,0ˉ) for xI=(I)Pσ and (xϖ)I=(e,1ˉ) for xϖ=(ϖ)Pσ. Hence we have that
[TABLE]
and
[TABLE]
Also, since σ is congruence on PO∞(N⩽2), we get
[TABLE]
and
(i)
in the case when (Hdomαx1)αx⊆H1 for αx=γ1i1…γpipυ1j1…υpjp, for some non-negative integers p,i1,…,ip,j1,…,jp, where γ0=υ0=I, we get that (Hdom(ϖαx)1)ϖαx⊆V1,
in the case when (Hdomαx1)αx⊆V1 we get for αx=γ1i1…γpipυ1j1…υpjpϖ, for some non-negative integers p,i1,…,ip,j1,…,jp, where γ0=υ0=I, we get that (Hdom(ϖαxϖ)1)ϖαxϖ⊆H1,
Therefore we have showed that (xI)I is the identity element of PO∞(N⩽2)/σ and (xϖ)I⋅(xϖ)I=(xI)I.
Next we shall show that so defined map I is a homomorphism from PO∞(N⩽2)/σ into the semigroup AMω⋊QZ2. Fix arbitrary elements x and y of PO∞(N⩽2)/σ. We consider the following four possible cases:
(i)
(Hdomαx1)αx⊆H1 and (Hdomαy1)αy⊆H1 for any αx,αy∈PO∞(N⩽2) such that (αx)Pσ=x and (αy)Pσ=y;
(ii)
(Hdomαx1)αx⊆V1 and (Hdomαy1)αy⊆H1 for any αx,αy∈PO∞(N⩽2) such that (αx)Pσ=x and (αy)Pσ=y;
(iii)
(Hdomαx1)αx⊆H1 and (Hdomαy1)αy⊆V1 for any αx,αy∈PO∞(N⩽2) such that (αx)Pσ=x and (αy)Pσ=y;
(iv)
(Hdomαx1)αx⊆V1 and (Hdomαy1)αy⊆V1 for any αx,αy∈PO∞(N⩽2) such that (αx)Pσ=x and (αy)Pσ=y.
Assume that (i) hods. Then we have that αx,αy,αxαy∈PO∞+(N⩽2). Since σ is a congruence on the semigroup PO∞(N⩽2), we may choose an element αxy=αxαy∈PO∞+(N⩽2). Then (αxy)Pσ=xy Also, since Pσ:PO∞+(N⩽2)→PO∞(N⩽2)/σ is the natural homomorphism generated by the congruence σ on the semigroup PO∞(N⩽2) we get that
[TABLE]
If (ii) hods then by Propositions 1 and 3 from [5], αxϖ,αy,αxαyϖ∈PO∞+(N⩽2) and by Lemma 14 without loss of generality we may assume that
[TABLE]
for some non-negative integers p,i1,…,ip,j1,…,jp,s1,…,sp,t1,…,tp, where γ0=υ0=I. This and the fact that σ is a congruence on the semigroup PO∞(N⩽2), Proposition 19 imply that
[TABLE]
If (iii) hods then by Propositions 1 and 3 from [5], αx,αyϖ,αxαyϖ∈PO∞+(N⩽2) and by Lemma 14 without loss of generality we may assume that
[TABLE]
for some non-negative integers p,i1,…,ip,j1,…,jp,s1,…,sp,t1,…,tp, where γ0=υ0=I. Since σ is a congruence on the semigroup PO∞(N⩽2), this and Proposition 19 imply that
[TABLE]
Assume that (iv) hods. Then by Propositions 1 and 3 from [5] we have that αxϖ,αyϖ,αxαy, αxϖαyϖ∈PO∞+(N⩽2) and by Lemma 14 without loss of generality we may assume that
[TABLE]
for some non-negative integers p,i1,…,ip,j1,…,jp,s1,…,sp,t1,…,tp, where γ0=υ0=I. Since σ is a congruence on the semigroup PO∞(N⩽2), this and Proposition 19 imply that
[TABLE]
Thus the map I:PO∞(N⩽2)/σ→AMω⋊QZ2 is a homomorphism. Also, since (xI)I=(e,0ˉ), (xϖ)I=(e,1ˉ) and for any αx=γ1i1…γpipυ1j1…υpjp, where p,i1,…,ip,j1,…,jp are some positive integers, our above arguments imply that
[TABLE]
where x=(αx)Pσ and y=(αxϖ)Pσ. This implies that the homomorphism I is surjective.
Now suppose that (x)I=(y)I=(u,g) for some x,y∈PO∞(N⩽2)/σ. Then there exist αx,αy∈PO∞+(N⩽2) such that (αx)Pσ=x and (αy)Pσ=y in the case when g=0ˉ, and (αxϖ)Pσ=x and (αyϖ)Pσ=y in the case when g=1ˉ. If g=0ˉ then x,y∈PO∞+(N⩽2) and the condition αxσαy in PO∞+(N⩽2) implies the equality x=y. Similarly, if g=1ˉ then x,y∈PO∞(N⩽2)∖PO∞+(N⩽2) and the condition αxϖσαyϖ in PO∞+(N⩽2) implies the equality x=y.
Hence I:PO∞(N⩽2)/σ→AMω⋊QZ2 is an isomorphism.
∎
Acknowledgements
The authors acknowledge Taras Banakh and Alex Ravsky for their comments and suggestions.
Bibliography18
The reference list from the paper itself. Each links out to its DOI / PubMed record.
1[1] S. Bardyla and O. Gutik, On a semitopological polycyclic monoid , Algebra Discr. Math. 21 :2 (2016), 163–183.
2[2] A. H. Clifford and G. B. Preston, The Algebraic Theory of Semigroups , Vol. I., Amer. Math. Soc. Surveys 7, Providence, R.I., 1961; Vol. II., Amer. Math. Soc. Surveys 7, Providence, R.I., 1967.
3[3] C. Eberhart and J. Selden, On the closure of the bicyclic semigroup , Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 144 (1969), 115—126.
4[4] O. Gutik and I. Pozdniakova, Congruences on the monoid of monotone injective partial selfmaps of L n × lex ℤ subscript lex subscript 𝐿 𝑛 ℤ L_{n}\times_{\operatorname{lex}}\mathbb{Z} with co-finite domains and images , Math. Methods and Phys.-Mech. Fields 57 :2 (2014), 7–15.
5[5] O. Gutik and I. Pozdniakova, On the monoid of monotone injective partial selfmaps of ℕ ⩽ 2 subscript superscript ℕ 2 \mathbb{N}^{2}_{\leqslant} with cofinite domains and images , Visn. Lviv. Univ., Ser. Mekh.-Mat. 81 (2016), 101–116.
6[6] O. Gutik and I. Pozdnyakova, On monoids of monotone injective partial selfmaps of L n × lex ℤ subscript lex subscript 𝐿 𝑛 ℤ L_{n}\times_{\operatorname{lex}}\mathbb{Z} with co-finite domains and images , Algebra Discr. Math. 17 :2 (2014), 256–279.
7[7] O. Gutik and D. Repovš, Topological monoids of monotone, injective partial selfmaps of ℕ ℕ \mathbb{N} having cofinite domain and image , Stud. Sci. Math. Hungar. 48 :3 (2011), 342–353.
8[8] O. Gutik and D. Repovš, On monoids of injective partial selfmaps of integers with cofinite domains and images , Georgian Math. J. 19 :3 (2012), 511–532.