# On the size-Ramsey number of cycles

## TL;DR

This paper investigates the size-Ramsey number of cycles, providing new upper bounds and an alternative proof that avoids the regularity lemma, with explicit constants for two-color cases.

## Contribution

It offers new upper bounds for the size-Ramsey numbers of cycles and presents an alternative proof method that does not rely on the regularity lemma.

## Key findings

- Size-Ramsey number of cycles is linear in cycle length.
- Explicit upper bounds for two-color size-Ramsey numbers of cycles.
- An alternative proof approach avoiding the regularity lemma.

## Abstract

For given graphs $G_1,\ldots,G_k$, the size-Ramsey number $\hat{R}(G_1,\ldots,G_k)$ is the smallest integer $m$ for which there exists a graph $H$ on $m$ edges such that in every $k$-edge coloring of $H$ with colors $1,\ldots,k$, $ H $ contains a monochromatic copy of $G_i$ of color $i$ for some $1\leq i\leq k$. We denote $\hat{R}(G_1,\ldots,G_k)$ by $\hat{R}_{k}(G)$ when $G_1=\cdots=G_k=G$. Haxell, Kohayakawa and \L{}uczak showed that the size Ramsey number of a cycle $C_n$ is linear in $n$ i.e. $\hat{R}_{k}(C_{n})\leq c_k n$ for some constant $c_k$. Their proof, is based on the regularity lemma of Szemer\'{e}di and so no specific constant $c_k$ is known. In this paper, we give various upper bounds for the size-Ramsey numbers of cycles. We give an alternative proof of $\hat{R}_{k}(C_{n})\leq c_k n$, avoiding the use of the regularity lemma. For two colours, we show that for sufficiently large $n$ we have $\hat{R}(C_{n},C_{n}) \leq 10^6\times cn,$ where $c=843$ if $n$ is even and $c=113482$ otherwise.