# Suppression vs enhancement of heavy quarkonia in pA collisions

**Authors:** B. Z. Kopeliovich, Ivan Schmidt, M. Siddikov

arXiv: 1701.07134 · 2017-06-14

## TL;DR

This paper models heavy quarkonia production in pA collisions using the dipole approach, revealing that nonzero heavy quark separation dominates nuclear effects and explaining experimental suppression patterns across energies.

## Contribution

It introduces a dominant higher twist correction based on heavy quark separation and proposes a new mechanism for charmonium enhancement, aligning with experimental data.

## Key findings

- Nonzero heavy quark separation is the main source of nuclear effects.
- Nuclear suppression remains stable from RHIC to LHC energies.
- The dipole model explains the suppression of $	ext{psi}(2S)$ relative to J/psi.

## Abstract

We describe production of heavy quarkonia in pA collisions within the dipole approach, assuming dominance of the perturbative color-singlet mechanism (CSM) in the $p_T$-integrated cross section. Although accounting for a nonzero heavy $Q$-$\bar Q$ separation is a higher twist correction, usually neglected, we found it to be the dominant source of nuclear effects, significantly exceeding the effects of leading twist gluon shadowing and energy loss. Moreover, this contribution turns out to be the most reliably predicted, relying on the precise measurements of the dipole cross section at HERA. The nuclear suppression of quarkonia has been anticipated to become stronger with energy, because the dipole cross section steeply rises. However, the measured nuclear effects remain essentially unchanged within the energy range from RHIC to the LHC. A novel production mechanism is proposed, which enhances the charmonium yield. Nuclear effects for the production of $J/\psi$, $\psi(2S)$, $\Upsilon(1S)$ and $\Upsilon(2S)$ are calculated, in agreement with data from RHIC and LHC. The dipole description offers a unique explanation for the observed significant nuclear suppression of $\psi(2S)$ to $J/\psi$ ratio, related to the nontrivial features of the $\psi(2S)$ wave function.

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1701.07134/full.md

## Figures

22 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1701.07134/full.md

## References

90 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1701.07134/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1701.07134