# Destructive interference of direct and crossed Andreev pairing in a   system of two nanowires coupled via an s-wave superconductor

**Authors:** Christopher Reeg, Jelena Klinovaja, and Daniel Loss

arXiv: 1701.07107 · 2017-08-09

## TL;DR

This paper analytically and numerically investigates how direct and crossed Andreev pairings interfere destructively in a two-nanowire system coupled via an s-wave superconductor, significantly affecting the excitation gap and Majorana fermion support.

## Contribution

It provides an exact analytical solution for the excitation spectrum considering both pairing types and compares it with approximate methods, revealing the destructive interference effects.

## Key findings

- The excitation gap varies periodically with Fermi wavelength.
- Presence of both pairing types reduces the gap significantly.
- Exact diagonalization results differ from bulk Green's function approximations.

## Abstract

We consider a system of two one-dimensional nanowires coupled via an $s$-wave superconducting strip, a geometry that is capable of supporting Kramers pairs of Majorana fermions. By performing an exact analytical diagonalization of a tunneling Hamiltonian describing the proximity effect (via a Bogoliubov transformation), we show that the excitation gap of the system varies periodically on the scale of the Fermi wavelength in the limit where the interwire separation is shorter than the superconducting coherence length. Comparing with the excitation gaps in similar geometries containing only direct pairing, where one wire is decoupled from the superconductor, or only crossed Andreev pairing, where each nanowire is considered as a spin-polarized edge of a quantum Hall state, we find that the gap is always reduced, by orders of magnitude in certain cases, when both types of pairing are present. Our analytical results are further supported by numerical calculations on a tight-binding lattice. Finally, we show that treating the proximity effect by integrating out the superconductor using the bulk Green's function does not reproduce the results of our exact diagonalization.

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1701.07107/full.md

## Figures

8 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1701.07107/full.md

## References

57 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1701.07107/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1701.07107