# Polynomial Wolff axioms and Kakeya-type estimates in $\mathbb{R}^4$

**Authors:** Larry Guth, Joshua Zahl

arXiv: 1701.07045 · 2019-04-23

## TL;DR

This paper introduces new bounds for collections of tubes in four-dimensional space satisfying polynomial Wolff axioms, leading to improved estimates on the Hausdorff dimension of Kakeya sets.

## Contribution

It establishes novel linear and trilinear bounds for tubes under polynomial Wolff axioms, advancing the understanding of Kakeya-type problems in 4.

## Key findings

- Proves volume lower bounds for tube unions under polynomial Wolff axioms.
- Derives maximal function estimates at dimension 3+1/40.
- Suggests that Kakeya sets likely satisfy polynomial Wolff axioms, implying improved dimension bounds.

## Abstract

We establish new linear and trilinear bounds for collections of tubes in $\mathbb{R}^4$ that satisfy the polynomial Wolff axioms. In brief, a collection of $\delta$-tubes satisfies the Wolff axioms if not too many tubes can be contained in the $\delta$-neighborhood of a plane. A collection of tubes satisfies the polynomial Wolff axioms if not too many tubes can be contained in the $\delta$-neighborhood of a low degree algebraic variety.   First, we prove that if a set of $\delta^{-3}$ tubes in $\mathbb{R}^4$ satisfies the polynomial Wolff axioms, then the union of the tubes must have volume at least $\delta^{1-1/40}$. We also prove a more technical statement which is analogous to a maximal function estimate at dimension $3+1/40$. Second, we prove that if a collection of $\delta^{-3}$ tubes in $\mathbb{R}^4$ satisfies the polynomial Wolff axioms, and if most triples of intersecting tubes point in three linearly independent directions, then the union of the tubes must have volume at least $\delta^{3/4}$. Again, we also prove a slightly more technical statement which is analogous to a maximal function estimate at dimension $3+1/4$.   We conjecture that every Kakeya set satisfies the polynomial Wolff axioms, but we are unable to prove this. If our conjecture is correct, it implies a Kakeya maximal function estimate at dimension $3+1/40$, and in particular this implies that every Kakeya set in $\mathbb{R}^4$ must have Hausdorff dimension at least $3+1/40$. This would be an improvement over the current best bound of 3, which was established by Wolff in 1995.

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1701.07045/full.md

## References

15 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1701.07045/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1701.07045