# Quasar emission lines as probes of orientation: implications for disc   wind geometries and unification

**Authors:** James H. Matthews, Christian Knigge, Knox S. Long

arXiv: 1701.07037 · 2017-02-08

## TL;DR

This study uses SDSS quasar data to test geometric models of BAL outflows, finding that emission line equivalent widths do not support equatorial wind geometries and suggesting BAL quasars are viewed at intermediate inclinations.

## Contribution

The paper provides evidence against equatorial wind models and proposes that BAL quasars are observed at intermediate angles, challenging traditional unification models.

## Key findings

- BAL and non-BAL quasars have similar emission line EWs
- Equatorial geometries are disfavored by the data
- BAL quasars are likely viewed from intermediate inclinations

## Abstract

The incidence of broad absorption lines (BALs) in quasar samples is often interpreted in the context of a geometric unification model consisting of an accretion disc and an associated outflow. We use the the Sloan Digital Sky Survey (SDSS) quasar sample to test this model by examining the equivalent widths (EWs) of CIV 1550\AA, Mg II 2800\AA, [OIII] 5007\AA\ and C III] 1909\AA. We find that the emission line EW distributions in BAL and non-BAL quasars are remarkably similar -- a property that is inconsistent with scenarios in which a BAL outflow rises equatorially from a geometrically thin, optically thick accretion disc. We construct simple models to predict the distributions from various geometries; these models confirm the above finding and disfavour equatorial geometries. We show that obscuration, line anisotropy and general relativistic effects on the disc continuum are unlikely to hide an EW inclination dependence. We carefully examine the radio and polarisation properties of BAL quasars. Both suggest that they are most likely viewed (on average) from intermediate inclinations, between type 1 and type 2 AGN. We also find that the low-ionization BAL quasars in our sample are not confined to one region of `Eigenvector I' parameter space. Overall, our work leads to one of the following conclusions, or some combination thereof: (i) the continuum does not emit like a geometrically thin, optically thick disc; (ii) BAL quasars are viewed from similar angles to non-BAL quasars, i.e. low inclinations; (iii) geometric unification does not explain the fraction of BALs in quasar samples.

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1701.07037/full.md

## Figures

11 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1701.07037/full.md

## References

146 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1701.07037/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1701.07037