Impact of leptoquarks in semileptonic B decays
Suchismita Sahoo, Rukmani Mohanta, Anjan K. Giri

TL;DR
This paper investigates how vector leptoquarks could explain recent anomalies in semileptonic B meson decays, constraining their couplings with existing data and exploring their potential to simultaneously address multiple observed discrepancies.
Contribution
It provides a comprehensive analysis of vector leptoquark effects on B decay anomalies, constrains their parameters with current data, and assesses their ability to explain multiple anomalies simultaneously.
Findings
Leptoquark couplings are constrained by B decay data.
Predicted branching ratios align with observed anomalies.
Potential for simultaneous explanation of R_D(*) and R_K anomalies.
Abstract
We study the impact of vector leptoquarks on the recent anomalies in semileptonic meson decays such as and etc. We constrain the leptoquark couplings by using the existing data on the branching ratios of and processes, where . We estimate the branching ratios of processes using the constrained leptoquark parameter space. We also investigate the possibility of simultaneous explanation of , anomalies in this model.
| Deacy process | Leptoquark Couplings | Real part | Imaginary Part |
|---|---|---|---|
| Observables | SM Predictions | Values in LQ Model |
|---|---|---|
| Br | ||
| Br | ||
| Br | ||
| Br | ||
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsParticle physics theoretical and experimental studies · Computational Physics and Python Applications
Impact of leptoquarks in semileptonic decays
School of Physics, University of Hyderabad,
Hyderabad-500046, India
E-mail The authors would like to thank Science and Engineering Research Board (SERB), Government of India for financial support through grant No. SB/S2/HEP-017/2013.
Rukmani Mohanta
School of Physics, University of Hyderabad,
Hyderabad-500046, India
Anjan K. Giri
Physics Department, IIT Hyderabad,
Kandi - 502285, India
Abstract:
We study the impact of vector leptoquarks on the recent anomalies in semileptonic meson decays such as and etc. We constrain the leptoquark couplings by using the existing data on the branching ratios of and processes, where . We estimate the branching ratios of processes using the constrained leptoquark parameter space. We also investigate the possibility of simultaneous explanation of , anomalies in this model.
1 Introduction
Recently both BaBar [1] and Belle [2] experiments have measured the ratio of branching fractions of over decays, where , and the present average experimental result [3] is
[TABLE]
which has deviation from its standard model (SM) prediction [4]. Besides, both the factories and LHCb [5] have reported discrepancy [3] in the measurement of
[TABLE]
from its SM result [6]. Analogously another interesting observable is the lepton nonuniversality (LNU) parameter in process, which has recently been measured at LHCb, with value [7],
[TABLE]
and corresponds to a deviation from its SM value [8] in the dilepton invariant mass squared bin .
In this paper, we would like to investigate the semileptonic decay processes, mediated by the FCNC transitions in the vector leptoquark (LQ) model. We compute the branching ratios of modes in this model. The simultaneous study of the lepton non-universality parameters and is the main objective of this work. LQs are color triplet hypothetical bosonic particles which allow quarks and leptons to interact simultaneously and carry both baryon and lepton numbers. LQs can have spin 0 (scalar) or spin 1 (vector) and are encountered in various extensions of the SM, such as technicolor model, GUT theories, Pati-Salam models and the quark and lepton composite model.
The outline of the paper is follows. In section 2, we discuss the effective Hamiltonians involving and transitions in the SM. We also present the new physics contribution due to the vector LQ exchange. The constraint on LQ parameter space by using the experimental limit on the branching ratios of the and decays and the numerical analysis for processes are presented in section 3. Section 4 contains the conclusion.
2 Effective Hamiltonian and the new physics contribution from vector leptoquark exchange
In the SM, the effective Hamiltonian describing the processes mediated by the transition is given by [9]
[TABLE]
where is the Fermi constant, is the CKM matrix element and are the chiral quark fields with as the projection operators. The Wilson coefficient is zero in the SM and can only be generated by the new physics model.
The effective Hamiltonian for process in the SM is given by
[TABLE]
where ’s are the six dimensional operators and ’s are the corresponding Wilson coefficients.
Models with vector LQs can modify the SM effective Hamiltonian (4, 5) due to the additional contributions arising from the LQs exchange and will give measurable deviations from the predictions of the SM in the beauty sector. Here we consider vector LQ multiplet which is invariant under the SM gauge group and does not allow proton decay. The interaction Lagrangian for LQ with the SM fermions is given by [9]
[TABLE]
where is the left handed quark (lepton) doublets, are the LQ couplings and represents the Pauli matrices. After performing the Fierz transformation and comparing with (4), we obtain an additional Wilson coefficient as
[TABLE]
Similarly the comparison of Eqn. (6) after Fierz transformation, with the SM effective Hamiltonian (5), one can obtain new Wilson coefficients
[TABLE]
3 Constraint on leptoquark couplings and numerical analysis
After knowing the new physics contribution to the SM, we now proceed to constrain the new parameter space by using the experimental limit on the branching ratios of and processes. Including LQ model, the branching ratio of process is given by
[TABLE]
Now comparing the theoretical value of branching ratio with the range of the experimental data, the constraint on the real and imaginary part of the LQ couplings are given in Table 1.
The branching ratio of process in the LQ model is given by
[TABLE]
where and can be found in [10]. The allowed region of corresponding LQ couplings which are compatible with the range of the experimental result in low are given in Table 1.
Now using the constrained LQ couplings from Table 1 and Eqns. (7, 8), we compute the bound on new Wilson coefficients , . In Table II, we present the predicted values of branching ratios of processes in both the SM and LQ model. In Fig. 1, we show the variation of LNU parameters, (left panel) and (right panel). The plots for (left panel) and (right panel) parameters in low region are shown in Fig. 2. The corresponding numerical values of LNU parameters are given in Table 2.
4 Conclusion
In this work we have studied the rare semileptonic decays and the lepton nonuniversalty parameters such as and in the vector LQ model. The LQ parameter space is constrained by using the branching ratios of rare and decay processes. We computed the branching ratios and lepton nonuniversality in processes in the vector LQ model. The anomaly in observable is also studied. We found that the observed anomalies can be accommodated in this model.
The reference list from the paper itself. Each links out to its DOI / PubMed record.
- 1[1] Ba Bar Collaboration, J. Lees et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 109 , 101802 (2012); Ba Bar Collaboration, J. Lees et al., Phys. Rev. D 88 , 072012 (2013).
- 2[2] Belle Collaboration, M. Huschle et al., Phys. Rev. D 92 , 072014 (2015); Belle Collaboration, A. Abdesselam et al., [ar Xiv:1603.06711].
- 3[3] Heavy Flavour Averaging Group, http://www.slac.stanford.edu/xorg/hfag/semi/winter 16/ winter 16_dtaunu.html.
- 4[4] H. Na et al., Phys. Rev. D 92 , 054410 (2015).
- 5[5] R. Aaij et al. [LH Cb Collaboration], Phys. Rev. Lett. 115 , 111803 (2015) Addendum: Phys. Rev. Lett. 115 , 159901 (2015).
- 6[6] S. Fajfer, J. F. Kamenik, and I. Nisandzic, Phys. Rev. D 85 , 094025 (2012).
- 7[7] R. Aaij et al., [LH Cb Collaboration], Phys. Rev. Lett. 113 , 151601 (2014).
- 8[8] C. Bobeth, G. Hiller, G. Piranishvili, JHEP 12 , 040 (2007).
