The Rational Sectional Category of Certain Universal Fibrations
Gregory Lupton, Samuel Bruce Smith

TL;DR
This paper proves that for a broad class of spaces satisfying Halperin's conjecture, the rationalized sectional category of their universal fibrations is exactly one, advancing understanding in algebraic topology.
Contribution
It establishes that the sectional category of universal fibrations with certain spaces as fibers equals one after rationalization, confirming a specific case of a conjecture.
Findings
Sectional category equals one after rationalization for these fibrations.
Supports Halperin's conjecture in the context of universal fibrations.
Advances the understanding of the structure of universal fibrations in rational homotopy theory.
Abstract
We prove that the sectional category of the universal fibration with fibre X, for X any space that satisfies a well-known conjecture of Halperin, equals one after rationalization.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
The Rational Sectional Category of Certain Universal Fibrations
Gregory Lupton
Department of Mathematics, Cleveland State University, Cleveland OH 44115
and
Samuel Bruce Smith
Department of Mathematics, Saint Joseph’s University, Philadelphia, PA 19131
Abstract.
We prove that the sectional category of the universal fibration with fibre , for any space that satisfies a well-known conjecture of Halperin, equals one after rationalization.
Key words and phrases:
sectional category, rational homotopy theory, universal fibration, Halperin conjecture, Lusternik-Schnirelmann category
2000 Mathematics Subject Classification:
Primary: 55P62; Secondary: 55M30, 55R15, 55R70
This work was partially supported by a grant from the Simons Foundation (#209575 to Gregory Lupton).
1. Main Result
We begin with a concise résumé of the ingredients, then a statement, of our main result. Notations used and assertions made here are described in greater detail below. Sectional category () is a numerical invariant of a fibration that extends the notion of LS category () of a space to fibrations. We normalize these invariants: when fibration has a section. Sectional category plays a role in several interesting applications (e.g. see [1, §9.3] and [4]).
Fibrations with fibre a fixed space are classified by a universal fibration with fibre [17, 2, 14]. For fibrations of simply connected spaces, this universal fibration may be identified, up to homotopy, as the map on Dold-Lashof classifying spaces that is induced by an inclusion of connected monoids of self-equivalences [3, 9].
A fibration with simply connected admits a rationalization that, homotopically, represents a simplification of . Then the rational sectional category () of fibration is defined by setting
Now we have general inequalities , with the rational LS category of the classifying space, which is often infinite (see [6, 7]). So it is natural to ask whether may be finite.
Our main result is the following:
Theorem 1.1**.**
Let be any -space that satisfies Conjecture 1 below. Then , where denotes the universal fibration with fibre .
An -space is any (non-trivial) space with and both finite-dimensional and . Examples of -spaces for which Conjecture 1 is satisfied include even-dimensional spheres, complex projective spaces, homogeneous spaces with , and finite products of any of these spaces.
2. Introduction
We continue with a fuller description of the ingredients just indicated. We assume all spaces are simply connected CW complexes of finite type. Let be a fibration. For , set if is the minimal number of open sets in a cover of such that admits a section over each . Set if is the minimal number of open sets in a cover of such that each inclusion is nulhomotopic. The inequalities and for the pull-back of by a map are both proved directly (see, e.g. Proposition 9.14 and Exercise 9.3 of [1], which reference also contains many facts concerning and ). Generally speaking, both and are delicate invariants, and difficult to compute. It is quite surprising, therefore, that we are able to obtain a global result such as Theorem 1.1. This is especially so considering that the universal fibration is a rich construction that involves large and complex spaces whose general structure is not well understood.
Because is universal, , when finite, is an upper bound for the sectional category of every fibration with fibre . From properties of rationalization, we have . This inequality follows using an alternate characterization of that we indicate at the start of the next section—involving the so-called fibrewise join construction. We also have , with the inequality following as before, applied to the rationalized fibration . For simply connected , we have , where denotes the rational LS category. By the naturality of rationalization with respect to pull-backs, we obtain for any fibration with fibre .
Stanley has given a complete calculation of the rational sectional category of spherical fibrations [16]. His results for the even-dimensional sphere imply (in our normalized notation) that . Here, we extend Stanley’s result from to any -space that satisfies Halperin’s Conjecture in rational homotopy theory. We discuss this class of spaces now.
As above, an -space is an elliptic space— and are both finite-dimensional—with evenly-graded rational cohomology: Halperin has conjectured the following generalization of classical results on the rational cohomology of homogeneous spaces.
Conjecture 1** (Halperin).**
Let be an -space and any fibration of simply connected spaces with fibre . Then the rational Serre spectral sequence for collapses at the -term.
The conjecture is equivalent to the assertion that for an -space where is the graded Lie algebra of degree-lowering derivations of the algebra [18, 15]. The conjecture follows easily from this version for and, more generally, for any space with rational cohomology a truncated polynomial algebra. Meier proved the conjecture for flag-manifolds with a maximal torus, and other homogeneous spaces [15, Th.B]. Shiga and Tezuka extended Meier’s result to the general case of homogeneous spaces of equal rank pairs [17]. Halperin’s Conjecture has also been confirmed for the cases in which has or fewer generators [12]. Markl has shown that the class of spaces for which Conjecture 1 holds is closed under fibrations, not just products [13]. Our main result, Theorem 1.1, applies in all these cases. We refer the reader to [5, p.516] for a discussion and other references.
Meier made the following connection between Halperin’s Conjecture and the rational homotopy of the universal fibration [15, Th.A]
Theorem 2.1** (Meier).**
Let be an -space. Then satisfies Halperin’s Conjecture if and only if is rationally equivalent to a product of even-dimensional Eilenberg-Mac Lane Spaces. ∎
Meier’s Theorem implies that for an -space that satisfies Halperin’s Conjecture. In fact, this is the case for any elliptic space [6]. We will use Theorem 2.1 to deduce Theorem 1.1 in Section 3 as a consequence of Proposition 3.2 a technical result concerning sections of rational fibrations.
3. Rational Sectional Category of a Fibrewise Join
We recall a special case of a characterization of in terms of the fibrewise join construction. Given with fibre , the fibrewise join is a fibre sequence:
\textstyle{X\ast X\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces}$$\textstyle{E\ast E\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces}$$\scriptstyle{p\ast p}$$\textstyle{B.} As is well-known, we may identify the (ordinary) join as The following is a special case of a result of Svarc (see [11, Prop.8.1]):
Proposition 3.1**.**
Let be a fibration. Then if and only if has a section. ∎
Our main result is that the fibrewise join of the universal fibration
[TABLE]
has a section after rationalization when is an -space that satisfies Halperin’s Conjecture. We make use of the correspondence between fibre sequences of rational spaces and relative Sullivan models. Although we will recall some basic facts about minimal models, our proofs assume a working familiarity with them. Our reference for rational homotopy is [5].
Let be a fibre sequence. The relative Sullivan model for is a sequence
[TABLE]
of DG algebras, with and the Sullivan minimal models for and , respectively [5, Prop.15.5]. The differential satisfies
[TABLE]
The inclusion is a model for . Applying spatial realization, we obtain that admits a section if and only if has a left-inverse . That is, admits a section if and only if there is a DG algebra map with . We prove:
Proposition 3.2**.**
Let be a fibre sequence. Suppose
- (1)
* has the rational homotopy type of a product of even-dimensional Eilenberg-Mac Lane spaces, and*
- (2)
* has the rational homotopy type of a wedge of at least two odd-dimensional spheres.*
Then the rationalization of admits a section.
Proof.
In the following, we make use of the identification V^{n}\cong\mathrm{Hom}\big{(}\pi_{n}(X),{\mathbb{Q}}\big{)}, where is the minimal model of , and also the identification between Samelson products in the rational homotopy Lie algebra and the quadratic part of the differential in , for any space . See [5, Th.15.11, Th.21.6] for details. Hypothesis (1) implies that the minimal model for has trivial differential, with We deduce two consequences of (2) for the minimal model of the fibre, . First we see that (a wedge of odd-dimensional spheres has no non-zero rational homotopy in even degrees). Write with whenever and each odd. Then, for degree reasons, we have . The rational homotopy Lie algebra is free as graded Lie algebra. Translated to Sullivan models, we deduce, in particular, that there is some for , such that .
The relative Sullivan model for is of the form:
[TABLE]
Given a subspace , let denote the ideal generated by in Our goal is to prove that is a -stable ideal of We may then define a DG algebra map by and to obtain the desired section.
We use induction on to show that, for any , we have . First, we show that . For suppose that , for some polynomial . Since , we see that for some . Then, with chosen as above, we have , for some . Notice that there cannot be a term from in , since is oddly graded and is of even degree, and also because is of minimal degree in . Furthermore, since is the only term from appearing in , is the only such term appearing in . Since , we have
[TABLE]
and it follows that (also that ).
Now suppose that we have for all and for some . Then is a -stable ideal of . We may take the quotient by this ideal yielding the graded algebra
[TABLE]
Since is -stable, induces a differential on the quotient. Let denote the projection which is a map of DG algebras.
Next observe that is a -stable sub-algebra of . Write for the induced differential and for the projection. We claim that is the minimal model for a wedge of odd-dimensional spheres. For observe that is surjective on generators. Applying the Mapping Theorem [5, Th.29.5], we deduce that
[TABLE]
Our claim follows (recall that , hence , is concentrated in odd degrees).
Now consider the commutative diagram of relative Sullivan models:
[TABLE]
The bottom sequence of this diagram corresponds to a fibre sequence with the original base, say . We have argued above that the fibre , with minimal model , is a wedge of odd-dimensional spheres. We can now apply the first part of the argument above, to deduce that . But this implies that . By induction, we conclude that is -stable. ∎
Examples 3.3**.**
We allustrate that Proposition 3.2 is a sharp result, at least if we consider rational fibrations with fibre a wedge of spheres and base a product of Eilenberg-Mac Lane spaces.
(a) We must have only even-dimensional Eilenberg-Mac Lane spaces in the base. For consider obtained by converting the inclusion to a fibration. Here, the fibre is rationally a wedge of odd-dimensional spheres. We can see that does not admit a section, however, since is not injective.
(b) We must have a wedge of at least two odd-dimensional spheres in the fibre. For example, the path-loop fibration does not have a section. In fact, since the total space here is contractible we have . Recall that we have
(c) We cannot allow even-dimensional spheres in the fibre. For suppose is a wedge of spheres and set . By pinching off , then including the sphere as the bottom cell of an Eilenberg-Mac Lane space, we obtain a fibre sequence with fibre a wedge of spheres (of both odd and even dimensions). This fibration cannot admit a section, as is not injective in cohomology.
We next observe that the universal fibration for a nontrivial elliptic space does not admit a section. To prove this, we use the Gottlieb group [8]. Recall that where is the evaluation map.
Proposition 3.4**.**
Let be a nontrivial elliptic space, such as any -space. Then
Proof.
First note that we have for any elliptic space . This is because, in the minimal model for , there is an (odd) integer such that and for . Then it follows from the identification of the Gottlieb group in minimal model terms, discussed in [5, §29d], that we have . Next, by [8, §4], corresponds to the image of , the linking homomorphism in the long exact sequence of the universal fibration. Thus implies that does not induce a surjection on rational homotopy groups and so cannot admit a section. ∎
We apply the preceding to prove our main result:
Proof of Theorem 1.1.
Let be a nontrivial -space. By Proposition 3.4, we have We prove
The fibrewise join of the universal fibration, has base and fibre . By Theorem 2.1, if satisfies Halperin’s Conjecture then is rationally a product of even-dimensional Eilenberg-Mac Lane spaces. Regarding the fibre, note that, since is evenly graded, is oddly graded. By [10, Th.1.5], has the rational homotopy type of a wedge of odd-dimensional spheres. If has dimension at least , then is rationally a wedge of at least two odd-dimensional spheres. Applying Proposition 3.2, we conclude the rationalization of has a section and we conlcude by Proposition 3.1.
When has dimension then and we can invoke Stanley’s result [16, Lem.3.1]. Alternately, we may observe that the fibrewise join has fibre and base It follows easily from degree considerations that is fibre-homotopically trivial and so, in particular, has a section. ∎
Theorem 1.1 reduces the computation of for fibrations with fibre satisfying Halperin’s Conjecture to the question of the existence of a section. Stanley expressed the obstruction to a section in cohomological terms when [16, Th.3.3]. We follow his approach to obtain the following example.
Example 3.5**.**
Write for the set of fibrations modulo rational fibre-homotopy equivalence. We assume The identity follows from [15, Pro.2.6(iii)]. By universality,
[TABLE]
We associate the rational fibre-homotopy equivalence class of with an explicit -tuple defined as follows. The relative Sullivan model for is an inclusion with . As for we have
[TABLE]
for some The basis change will depress the polynomial and we may assume .
Given a section write for . Comparing coefficients of in the equation we see that is a solution to The converse follows similarly and we obtain:
[TABLE]
We conclude with a question arising from our work. Meier [15] and others have given various equivalent versions of Halperin’s Conjecture. It would be interesting to have an equivalent version of the conjecture phrased in terms of the sectional category of the universal fibration. We pose the following:
Question 3.6**.**
Let be an -space. Does imply satisfies Halperin’s Conjecture?
The reference list from the paper itself. Each links out to its DOI / PubMed record.
- 1[1] Octav Cornea, Gregory Lupton, John Oprea, and Daniel Tanré, Lusternik-Schnirelmann category , Mathematical Surveys and Monographs, vol. 103, American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, 2003. MR 1990857
- 2[2] Albrecht Dold, Halbexakte Homotopiefunktoren , Lecture Notes in Mathematics, vol. 12, Springer-Verlag, Berlin-New York, 1966. MR 0198464 (33 #6622)
- 3[3] Albrecht Dold and Richard Lashof, Principal quasi-fibrations and fibre homotopy equivalence of bundles. , Illinois J. Math. 3 (1959), 285–305. MR 0101521 (21 #331)
- 4[4] M. Farber, Topological complexity of motion planning , Discrete Comput. Geom. 29 (2003), no. 2, 211–221.
- 5[5] Yves Félix, Stephen Halperin, and Jean-Claude Thomas, Rational homotopy theory , Graduate Texts in Mathematics, vol. 205, Springer-Verlag, New York, 2001. MR 1802847 (2002 d:55014)
- 6[6] J.-B. Gatsinzi, LS-category of classifying spaces , Bull. Belg. Math. Soc. Simon Stevin 2 (1995), no. 2, 121–126. MR 1332389 (96b:55010)
- 7[7] by same author, LS-category of classifying spaces. II , Bull. Belg. Math. Soc. Simon Stevin 3 (1996), no. 2, 243–248. MR 1389618 (97d:55022)
- 8[8] Daniel Henry Gottlieb, Evaluation subgroups of homotopy groups , Amer. J. Math. 91 (1969), 729–756. MR 0275424
