# COTS software in science operations, is it worth it?

**Authors:** William O'Mullane, Nana Bach, Jose Hernandez, Alexander, Hutton, Rosario Messineo

arXiv: 1701.06484 · 2017-01-24

## TL;DR

This paper evaluates the effectiveness and decision-making process behind using Commercial Off-The-Shelf (COTS) software in scientific systems, highlighting considerations and assessing whether these choices are justified.

## Contribution

It provides a case-based analysis of COTS software selection in scientific operations, offering insights into decision criteria and effectiveness.

## Key findings

- COTS software can be cost-effective and efficient for scientific systems.
- Decision processes for COTS selection vary based on project needs.
- Assessing effectiveness of COTS use remains challenging.

## Abstract

Often, perhaps not often enough, we choose Common Off the Shelf (COTS) software for integration in our systems. These range from repositories to databases and tools we use on a daily basis. It is very hard to assess the effectiveness of these choices. While none of us would consider a project specific word processing solution when LaTeX (or even Word) many will consider writing their own data management systems. We will look at some of the COTS we have used and attempt to explain how we came to the decision and if it was worth it.

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1701.06484/full.md

## Figures

1 figure with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1701.06484/full.md

## References

3 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1701.06484/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1701.06484