L^2-Betti numbers of rigid C*-tensor categories and discrete quantum groups
David Kyed, Sven Raum, Stefaan Vaes, Matthias Valvekens

TL;DR
This paper computes the $L^2$-Betti numbers for free $C^*$-tensor categories and discrete quantum groups, revealing invariance under monoidal equivalence and providing new calculations for quantum permutation and wreath product groups.
Contribution
It establishes the invariance of $L^2$-Betti numbers under monoidal equivalence and computes these invariants for several classes of quantum groups and tensor categories.
Findings
$L^2$-Betti numbers of dual quantum groups equal those of their representation categories
New computations of $L^2$-Betti numbers for quantum permutation groups
Upper bounds for the first $L^2$-Betti number based on generating sets
Abstract
We compute the -Betti numbers of the free -tensor categories, which are the representation categories of the universal unitary quantum groups . We show that the -Betti numbers of the dual of a compact quantum group are equal to the -Betti numbers of the representation category and thus, in particular, invariant under monoidal equivalence. As an application, we obtain several new computations of -Betti numbers for discrete quantum groups, including the quantum permutation groups and the free wreath product groups. Finally, we obtain upper bounds for the first -Betti number in terms of a generating set of a -tensor category.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
**-Betti numbers of rigid -tensor categories and
discrete quantum groups**
by David Kyed111Department of Mathematics and Computer Science, University of Southern Denmark, Odense (Denmark).
E-mail: [email protected]. DK is supported by the Villum foundation grant 7423., Sven Raum222EPFL SB SMA, Lausanne (Switzerland). E-mail: [email protected]., Stefaan Vaes333KU Leuven, Department of Mathematics, Leuven (Belgium). E-mails: [email protected] and [email protected]. Supported by European Research Council Consolidator Grant 614195, and by long term structural funding – Methusalem grant of the Flemish Government. and Matthias Valvekens3
Abstract
We compute the -Betti numbers of the free -tensor categories, which are the representation categories of the universal unitary quantum groups . We show that the -Betti numbers of the dual of a compact quantum group are equal to the -Betti numbers of the representation category and thus, in particular, invariant under monoidal equivalence. As an application, we obtain several new computations of -Betti numbers for discrete quantum groups, including the quantum permutation groups and the free wreath product groups. Finally, we obtain upper bounds for the first -Betti number in terms of a generating set of a -tensor category.
1 Introduction
The framework of rigid -tensor categories unifies a number of structures encoding various kinds of quantum symmetry, including standard invariants of Jones’ subfactors, representation categories of compact quantum groups, in particular of -deformations of compact simple Lie groups, and ordinary discrete groups. In several respects, rigid -tensor categories are quantum analogues of discrete groups.
Using this point of view, the unitary representation theory for rigid -tensor categories was introduced in [PV14]. This allowed to define typical geometric group theory properties like the Haagerup property and property (T) intrinsically for standard invariants of subfactors and for rigid -tensor categories. It was then proved in [PV14], using [Ara14, DFY13], that the Temperley-Lieb-Jones category has the Haagerup property, while has Kazhdan’s property (T). Equivalent formulations of the unitary representation theory of a rigid -tensor category were found in [NY15a, GJ15] and are introduced below.
In [PSV15], a comprehensive (co)homology theory for standard invariants of subfactors and rigid -tensor categories was introduced. Taking the appropriate Murray-von Neumann dimension for (co)homology with -coefficients, this provides a definition of -Betti numbers.
The first goal of this article is to compute the -Betti numbers for the representation category of a free unitary quantum group . Here, is the universal compact quantum group (in the sense of Woronowicz) generated by a single irreducible unitary representation. As a -tensor category, is the free rigid -tensor category generated by a single irreducible object . The irreducible objects of are then labeled by all words in and and can thus be identified with the free monoid . We prove that and that the other -Betti numbers vanish.
For compact quantum groups of Kac type (a unimodularity assumption that is equivalent with the traciality of the Haar state), the -Betti numbers of the dual discrete quantum group were defined in [Kye06]. The second main result of our paper is that these -Betti numbers only depend on the representation category of and are given by . This is surprising for two reasons. The -Betti numbers are well defined for all compact quantum groups, without unimodularity assumption. And secondly, taking arbitrary coefficients instead of -cohomology, there is no possible identification between the (co)homology of and . Indeed, by [CHT09, Theorem 3.2], homology with trivial coefficients distinguishes between the quantum groups , but does not distinguish between their representation categories by Corollary 6.2 below. As an application, we compute the -Betti numbers for several families of Kac type discrete quantum groups, including the duals of the quantum permutation groups , the hyperoctahedral series of [BV08] and the free wreath product groups of [Bic01].
One of the equivalent definitions in [PSV15] for the (co)homology of a rigid -tensor category is given by the Hochschild (co)homology of the associated tube algebra together with its counit as the augmentation. In [NY15b], it is proved that when is the representation category of a compact quantum group , then the tube algebra is strongly Morita equivalent with the Drinfeld double algebra of . This is one of the main tools in our paper. As a side result, applying this to , so that becomes the Temperley-Lieb-Jones category TLJ, we can transfer the resolution of [Bic12] to a length 3 resolution for the tube algebra of TLJ, see Theorem 6.1. This allows us in particular to compute the (co)homology of TLJ with trivial coefficients, giving in degree [math] and degree , and giving [math] in all other degrees. This completes the computation in [PSV15, Proposition 9.13], which went up to degree , and this was also obtained in an unpublished note of Y. Arano.
In the second part of this paper, we focus on the first -Betti number of a rigid -tensor category. For an infinite group generated by elements , it is well known that . The reason for this is that a -cocycle on is completely determined by the values it takes on the generators . In Section 7, we explain how to realize the first cohomology of a rigid -tensor category by a kind of derivations and prove that is indeed determined by its values on a generating set of irreducible objects. We then deduce an upper bound for and show in Section 8 that this upper bound is precisely reached for the universal (or free) category .
Acknowledgment. SV would like to thank the Isaac Newton Institute for Mathematical Sciences for support and hospitality during the programme Operator Algebras: Subfactors and their Applications when work on this paper was undertaken, supported by EPSRC Grant Number EP/K032208/1. SV also thanks Dimitri Shlyakhtenko for several helpful remarks.
2 Preliminaries
2.1 The tube algebra of a rigid -tensor category
Let be a rigid -tensor category, i.e. a -tensor category with irreducible unit object such that every object has a conjugate . In particular, this implies that every object in decomposes into finitely many irreducibles. The essential results on rigid -tensor categories, which we will use without further reference, are covered in [NT13, Chapter 2]. For , we denote the (necessarily finite-dimensional) Banach space of morphisms by .
The set of isomorphism classes of irreducible objects of will be denoted by . In what follows, we do not distinguish between irreducible objects and their respective isomorphism classes and we fix representatives for all isomorphism classes once and for all. Additionally, we always identify with when . The multiplicity of in when and is defined by
[TABLE]
For , we write whenever is isomorphic with a subobject of . When there is no danger of confusion, we denote the tensor product of and by .
The rigidity assumption says that every object admits a solution to the conjugate equations [NT13, § 2.2], i.e. an object and a pair of morphisms and satisfying the relations
[TABLE]
A standard solution for the conjugate equations for additionally satisfies
[TABLE]
for all . The adjoint object and the standard solutions for the conjugate equations are unique up to unitary equivalence. Throughout this article, we always fix standard solutions for all , and extend by naturality to arbitrary objects (see [NT13, Definition 2.2.14]). The positive real number defined by is referred to as the quantum dimension of .
These standard solutions also give rise to canonical tracial functionals on via
[TABLE]
Note that these traces are typically not normalized, since . It is sometimes convenient to work with the partial traces defined by
[TABLE]
for . These satisfy . For all , the categorical traces induce an inner product on , given by
[TABLE]
Throughout, the notation will refer to some choice of orthonormal basis of with respect to this inner product. Finally, the standard solutions of the conjugate equations induce the Frobenius reciprocity maps, which are the unitary isomorphisms given by
[TABLE]
where .
The tube algebra of a rigid -tensor category was first defined by Ocneanu in [Ocn93] for categories with finitely many irreducibles. For convenience, we recall some of the exposition from [PSV15]. The tube algebra is defined by the vector space direct sum
[TABLE]
For general and , a morphism also defines an element of via
[TABLE]
It should be noted that this map is generally not an embedding of into . One easily checks that is a -algebra for the following operations
[TABLE]
where , and where the map in (2.3) is used to view as an element of . We follow the notational convention from [PSV15] and explicitly denote the tube algebra operations by and , to avoid confusion with composition and adjunction of morphisms. It should be noted that is not unital, unless is finite.
For , the identity map on is an element of . So it can be considered as an element . As the notation suggests, is a self-adjoint idempotent in , and it is easy to see that when . The corner is a unital -algebra and the projections , , serve as local units for . In particular, for all purposes of homological algebra, we can work with as if it were a unital algebra.
The corner is canonically isomorphic to the fusion -algebra . This algebra is formed by taking the free vector space over , and defining multiplication by the fusion rules, i.e.
[TABLE]
The involution on is given by conjugation in .
The tube algebra comes with a faithful trace (see [PSV15, Proposition 3.10]). For with , this trace is given by
[TABLE]
In [PSV15], it is also shown that every involutive action of on a pre-Hilbert space is automatically by bounded operators. In particular, this allows us to define a von Neumann algebra by considering the faithful action of on by left multiplication, and then taking the bicommutant. Additionally, the trace uniquely extends to a faithful normal semifinite trace on .
For , we now have two inner products on , related by
[TABLE]
We will however always work with the inner product given by , because it is compatible with the inner product in (2.1), which is defined on all spaces of intertwiners and which makes the Frobenius reciprocity maps (2.2) unitary.
2.2 Representation theory for rigid -tensor categories
The unitary representation theory for rigid -tensor categories was introduced in [PV14] and several equivalent formulations were found in [NY15a, GJ15, PSV15]. Following [GJ15], a unitary representation of is given by a nondegenerate -representation of the tube algebra of . Following [NY15a], a unitary representation of is given by a unitary half braiding on an ind-object of , i.e. an object in the unitary Drinfeld center . Here, the category may be thought of as a completion of with infinite direct sums, giving rise to a (nonrigid) -tensor category. A unitary half braiding on an ind-object is a natural unitary isomorphism that satisfies the half braiding condition
[TABLE]
for all . The collection of unitary half braidings on is denoted by . We refer to [NY15a] for rigorous definitions and basic properties of these objects.
By [PSV15, Proposition 3.14], there is the following bijective correspondence between nondegenerate right Hilbert -modules and unitary half braidings . Given , one defines as the Hilbert space direct sum of the Hilbert spaces , . To turn into a right -module, we let act on a vector by
[TABLE]
In particular, we see that .
2.3 (Co)homology and -Betti numbers for rigid -tensor categories
(Co)homology for rigid -tensor categories was introduced in [PSV15]. One of the equivalent ways to describe this (co)homology theory is as Hochschild (co)homology for the tube algebra , see [PSV15, § 7.2]. Concretely, we equip with the augmentation (or counit)
[TABLE]
Since is a -homomorphism, we can view as an -module, which should be considered as the trivial representation of . Let be a nondegenerate right Hilbert -module. We denote the (algebraic) linear span of for by . Following [PSV15], the homology of with coefficients in is then defined by
[TABLE]
Similarly, the cohomology of with coefficients in is given by
[TABLE]
Note that, in the special case where , the left -module structure on induces a natural left -module structure on the (co)homology spaces. As in [PSV15], one then defines the -th -Betti number of as
[TABLE]
where is the Lück dimension with respect to the normal semifinite trace on .
We refer to [Lüc02, § 6.1], [KPV13, § A.4] and Remark 3.8 for the relevant definitions and properties of the dimension function on arbitrary -modules, associated with a von Neumann algebra equipped with a faithful normal semifinite trace . Note that the second equality in (2.5) is nontrivial and was proved in [PSV15, Proposition 6.4]. When is a discrete group, all these notions reduce to the familiar ones for groups.
3 A scaling formula for -Betti numbers
3.1 Index of a subcategory
Definition 3.1**.**
Let be a rigid -tensor category, and a full -tensor subcategory of . For an object , we define as the largest subobject of that belongs to . We denote the orthogonal projection of onto by . Fixing , we define the -orbit of as
[TABLE]
Note that in this definition, we can replace by without changing the orbit. By Frobenius reciprocity, the orbits form a partition of . If are representatives of -orbits, the index of is defined as
[TABLE]
If the set of orbits is infinite, we put .
In Lemma 3.2, we show that the index is well defined. In Proposition 3.12, we prove that equals the Jones index for an associated inclusion of von Neumann algebra completions of tube algebras. In Proposition 3.3, we prove the formula when . So, the above definition of is indeed natural.
When , the index defined above coincides with the global index of . When has only finitely many irreducible objects, we have , see Proposition 3.3.
Another extreme situation arises when
[TABLE]
is a subset of . In this case, the index simply counts the number of orbits. In particular, we recover the index for subgroups when are both groups considered as -tensor categories.
Lemma 3.2**.**
Let be a rigid -tensor category with full -tensor subcategory . Then, for with , we have that
[TABLE]
Proof.
For arbitrary , we have that
[TABLE]
by irreducibility of . Now suppose that satisfy the conditions of the lemma. Choose such that . For any isometry , we compute
[TABLE]
where we used that , as is easy to see by splitting into irreducible components. Multiplying by on the left, we find that
[TABLE]
We already proved that the left-hand side equals . So, the first equality in (3.3) follows. The second one is proven analogously. ∎
Proposition 3.3**.**
Let be a rigid -tensor category with full -tensor subcategories . Then,
[TABLE]
In particular, if is a rigid -tensor category with finitely many irreducible objects and if is a full -tensor subcategory, then , where and denote the global index of and .
Since a short proof for Proposition 3.3 can be given using the language of Markov inclusions, we postpone the proof until the end of Section 3.3.
In the concrete computations of -Betti numbers in this paper, we only need the particularly easy tensor subcategories that arise from a homomorphism to a finite group. More precisely, assume that we are given a group and a map satisfying the following two properties.
- (i)
For all with , we have . 2. (ii)
For all , we have .
Defining as those objects in that can be written as a direct sum of irreducible objects with , we obtain a full -tensor subcategory of index .
Note that , as defined in (3.2), always is a subset of . Actually, denoting by the set of orbits for the left (or right) action of on , we get that has a natural group structure and we can view as the largest group quotient of .
3.2 Markov inclusions of tracial von Neumann algebras
In [Pop92, Section 1.1.4], the concept of a -Markov inclusion of tracial von Neumann algebras was introduced. More generally, Popa defined in [Pop93, Section 1.2] the -Markov property for arbitrary inclusions of von Neumann algebras together with a faithful normal conditional expectation . Taking in the tracial setting the unique trace-preserving conditional expectation, both notions coincide.
In this paper, we need a slight variant of this concept for inclusions where both and are equipped with fixed faithful normal semifinite traces, denoted and , but the inclusion need not be trace-preserving. In particular, there is no canonical conditional expectation of onto .
Recall that an element is called right -bounded if there exists a such that for all . We denote by the associated bounded operator, which is right -linear and given by for all . A family of right -bounded vectors in is called a Pimsner-Popa basis for if
[TABLE]
Definition 3.4**.**
Let and be von Neumann algebras equipped with faithful normal semifinite traces. Assume that , but without assuming that this inclusion is trace-preserving. We say that the inclusion is -Markov for a given number if a Pimsner-Popa basis satisfies
[TABLE]
One checks that this definition does not depend on the choice of the Pimsner-Popa basis.
Definition 3.5**.**
Given a von Neumann algebra equipped with a faithful normal semifinite trace , we call an (algebraic) right -module locally finite if for every , there exists a projection with and .
Note that for every projection with , the right -module is locally finite, because for every , the right support projection of has finite trace.
For our computations, the following scaling formula is essential.
Proposition 3.6**.**
Let and be von Neumann algebras equipped with faithful normal semifinite traces. Assume that and that . The inclusion is -Markov if and only if for every locally finite -module .
We have for arbitrary -modules if and only if the inclusion is -Markov and the restriction of to is semifinite.
Proof.
Fix a Pimsner-Popa basis for , w.r.t. the traces , . Define the projection given by . Then,
[TABLE]
is a well-defined right -linear unitary operator. Whenever , the operator commutes with the right -action and so, we get a well-defined unital -homomorphism
[TABLE]
A direct computation gives that
[TABLE]
for all . So the inclusion is -Markov if and only if for every projection . Note that the left-hand side equals , while the right-hand side equals . So if the formula holds for all locally finite -modules, it holds in particular for for every projection with and we conclude that for every projection with . An arbitrary projection can be written as the limit of an increasing net of finite trace projections, so that the same formula holds for all projections and thus, is -Markov.
Conversely, assume that is -Markov. We prove that for every locally finite -module . Denote by the class of -modules that are isomorphic with for some and some projection having finite trace. We start by proving that for all .
Take a finite trace projection such that . We have
[TABLE]
Therefore,
[TABLE]
Conversely, since
[TABLE]
for all , and , we get for every finite subset the injective -module map
[TABLE]
Letting increase and taking , it follows that
[TABLE]
The left-hand side equals . In combination with the converse inequality above, we have proved that for every .
Next denote by the class of all -modules that arise as the quotient of an -module in . Let and let be an exact sequence of -modules, with . Since every finitely generated -submodule of an -module in again belongs to , we can write as the union of an increasing family of -submodules with for all . Since both and are continuous when taking increasing unions (see Remark 3.7), we get that . Since both and are additive with respect to short exact sequences (see Remark 3.7 as well), we conclude that
[TABLE]
Finally, every locally finite -module can be written as the union of an increasing family of -submodules in . So again using the continuity of the dimension function, we find that for all locally finite -modules .
Next assume that is -Markov and that the restriction of to is semifinite. We can then choose an increasing net of projections , converging to strongly, with and for all . Let be an arbitrary -module. By [KPV13, Lemmas A.15 and A.16], we have . For each , the -module is locally finite. Therefore, . Since , it follows that . Conversely, , so that
[TABLE]
Again using [KPV13, Lemmas A.15 and A.16], we have , so that the inequality follows.
Finally, assume that the restriction of to is not semifinite. We then find a nonzero projection such that for every nonzero element . Define the two-sided ideal consisting of all elements whose left (equivalently right) support projection has finite . Define and view as a right -module. Whenever is a projection with , we have that . By [KPV13, Definition A.14], we have that . On the other hand, the map is -linear and injective because . Therefore, . So, the dimension scaling formula fails in general when the restriction of to is no longer semifinite. ∎
Remark 3.7**.**
In the proof of Proposition 3.6, we made use of the following continuity and additivity property of the dimension function associated with a von Neumann algebra equipped with a faithful normal semifinite trace .
- (i)
Assume that is an -module and is an increasing net of -submodules with . Then, . 2. (ii)
Assume that is an exact sequence of -modules. Then, .
When is a tracial state, meaning that , these properties are proved in [Lüc02, Theorem 6.7(4)]. When is semifinite, we can take an increasing net of projections with for all and strongly. Define the tracial state on given by . Then [KPV13, Lemma A.16] says that for every -module , the net is increasing and converges to . Therefore, the continuity and additivity properties (i) and (ii) above are also valid for .
Remark 3.8**.**
Let be a von Neumann algebra equipped with a faithful normal semifinite trace. Proposition 3.6 shows that the dimension function has a subtle behavior. We therefore also want to clarify why [KPV13, Definition A.14], given by
[TABLE]
and making use of the dimension function for , coincides with [Pet12, Definition B.17], given by
[TABLE]
Whenever , we have . Denoting by the central support of , it follows from [KPV13, Lemma A.15] that
[TABLE]
Taking the supremum over all finite trace projections and all embeddings , it follows that the dimension in (3.5) is bounded above by the dimension in (3.4).
Conversely, can be computed as the supremum of where is a projection and . Defining given by , it follows that and for all . Then is -linear. We claim that remains injective. Indeed, if , then for all , also . So, for all and thus, . It follows that the dimension in (3.4) is bounded above by the dimension in (3.5).
3.3 The scaling formula
The goal of this section is to prove the following scaling formula for -Betti numbers under finite-index inclusions.
Theorem 3.9**.**
Let be a finite-index inclusion of rigid -tensor categories. Then
[TABLE]
for all .
For the rest of this section, fix a rigid -tensor category and a full -tensor subcategory . The tube algebra of naturally is a unital -subalgebra of a corner of the tube algebra of . In dimension computations, this causes a number of issues that can be avoided by considering the -subalgebra given by
[TABLE]
We still have a natural trace on and the inclusion is trace-preserving.
As a first lemma, we prove that the homology of can be computed as the Hochschild homology of with the counit augmentation .
Lemma 3.10**.**
Define the central projection in the multiplier algebra of given by . Note that naturally.
For every nondegenerate right Hilbert -module , there are natural isomorphisms
[TABLE]
We also have that
[TABLE]
Proof.
If and , then can only be nonzero if , by Frobenius reciprocity. Interchanging the roles of and , we conclude that is central in the multiplier algebra . Because , it follows that
[TABLE]
and similarly for the right bar resolution. Since the bar resolutions associated to and are equal, the respective and functors must also be the same. ∎
The following formula, generalizing [PSV15, Lemma 3.9], is crucial for us since we deduce from it that is a projective -module and also that in the finite-index case, the inclusion is -Markov in the sense of Definition 3.4.
Lemma 3.11**.**
For , we denote by the orthogonal projection of onto the closed linear span of all with and .
Then, for all and , we have that
[TABLE]
as operators on .
Proof.
Both the left- and the right-hand side of (3.7) vanish on if . So we fix and and prove that both sides of (3.7) agree on .
For every and , we have
[TABLE]
We claim that is the image in under the map in (2.3) of the element
[TABLE]
The claim follows because that image is given by
[TABLE]
because equals [math] when and equals when .
It then follows that is the image in of the element
[TABLE]
By Frobenius reciprocity,
[TABLE]
is an orthonormal basis of , and any orthonormal basis can be written in this form.
With this notation, we find that
[TABLE]
Combining (3.9) and (3.10), we thus obtain
[TABLE]
Choosing the orthonormal basis of by first decomposing , we see that only one of the is nonzero and conclude that
[TABLE]
Using Lemma 3.2, we get that
[TABLE]
This concludes the proof of the lemma. ∎
Proposition 3.12**.**
Let be a finite-index inclusion of rigid -tensor categories. Denote by the tube algebra of and define its subalgebra as in (3.6). Then is projective as a left -module and as a right -module. Moreover, the associated inclusion of von Neumann algebras is -Markov with in the sense of Definition 3.4.
Proof.
By symmetry, it suffices to prove that is a projective right -module.
For each , define the subspace spanned by all with and . Note that is a right -submodule. As in Lemma 3.11, denote by the orthogonal projection of onto . Note that .
Fix and define the projective right -module
[TABLE]
The maps
[TABLE]
are right -linear. By Lemma 3.11, we have that equals a multiple of the identity map on . It follows that is a projective right -module.
Taking the (direct) sum over all and over a set of representatives for the -orbits in , we conclude that also is projective as a right -module.
By Lemma 3.11, we have that
[TABLE]
is a Pimsner-Popa basis for the inclusion . Applying Lemma 3.11 in the case (and this literally is [PSV15, Lemma 3.9]), we get that
[TABLE]
So, is -Markov with . ∎
Proof of Theorem 3.9.
By Lemma 3.10, we have
[TABLE]
By Proposition 3.12, the left -module is projective. We can thus apply the base change formula for (see e.g. [Wei94, Proposition 3.2.9]) and obtain the isomorphism of left -modules
[TABLE]
The left counterpart of Proposition 3.12 provides an inverse for the natural right -linear map , which is thus bijective. We conclude that
[TABLE]
as left -modules.
By Proposition 3.12, the inclusion is -Markov with and trace preserving. Using Proposition 3.6, we conclude that
[TABLE]
∎
Using our results on Markov inclusions, we give the following short proof of Proposition 3.3.
Proof of Proposition 3.3.
Let be a rigid -tensor category with full -tensor subcategories . Note that if and only if has finitely many -orbits in the sense of Definition 3.1. Since has finitely many -orbits if and only if has finitely many -orbits and has finitely many -orbits, we may assume that the indices , and are all finite.
Define the -subalgebras and given by (3.6), associated with and , respectively. Note that . By Proposition 3.12, the inclusion is -Markov for . We claim that is -Markov. This does not literally follow from Proposition 3.12, but the proof is identical because, choosing representatives for the -orbits in , Lemma 3.11 implies that
[TABLE]
is a Pimsner-Popa basis for the inclusion .
Since , a repeated application of Proposition 3.6 gives
[TABLE]
So, the equality is proved.
When has only finitely many irreducible objects and is a full -tensor subcategory, we apply this formula to and obtain
[TABLE]
So, . ∎
4 -Betti numbers for discrete quantum groups
Following Woronowicz [Wor95], a compact quantum group is given by a unital -algebra , often suggestively denoted as , together with a unital -homomorphism to the minimal -tensor product satisfying
co-associativity: , and
the density conditions: and span dense subspaces of .
A compact quantum group admits a unique Haar state, i.e. a state on satisfying for all .
An -dimensional unitary representation of is a unitary element satisfying . The category of finite-dimensional unitary representations, denoted as , naturally is a rigid -tensor category. The coefficients of all finite-dimensional unitary representations of span a dense -subalgebra of , denoted as . We have , which provides the comultiplication of the Hopf -algebra .
The compact quantum group is said to be of Kac type if the Haar state is a trace. This is equivalent with the requirement that for every finite-dimensional unitary representation , the contragredient defined by is still unitary.
The counit of the Hopf -algebra is the homomorphism given by whenever and for all unitary representations of .
We denote by the Hilbert space completion of w.r.t. the Haar state . The von Neumann algebra generated by the left action of on is denoted as . The Haar state extends to a faithful normal state on , which is a trace in the Kac case.
Definition 4.1** ([Kye06, Definition 1.1]).**
Let be a compact quantum group of Kac type. The -Betti numbers of the dual discrete quantum group are defined as
[TABLE]
The main result of this section is the following.
Theorem 4.2**.**
Let be a compact quantum group of Kac type. Then for all .
The equality of -Betti numbers in Theorem 4.2 is surprising. There is no general identification of (co)homology of with (co)homology of . Indeed, by [CHT09, Theorem 3.2], homology with trivial coefficients distinguishes between the quantum groups , but does not distinguish between their representation categories by Corollary 6.2 below. Secondly, for the definition of the -Betti numbers of a discrete quantum group, the Kac assumption is essential, since we need a trace to measure dimensions. By Theorem 4.2, we now also have -Betti numbers for non Kac type discrete quantum groups.
Proof of Theorem 4.2.
Define the -algebra
[TABLE]
Drinfeld’s quantum double algebra of is the -algebra with underlying vector space and product determined as follows. We view in the usual way: the components of are given by for all and . We write instead of for all and . The product on is then determined by the following formula:
[TABLE]
for every unitary representation . The counit on is given by for all and .
Since is of Kac type, the Haar weight on is a trace and it is given by
[TABLE]
We denote by the von Neumann algebra completion of acting on . By [NY15b, Theorem 2.4], the tube algebra of is strongly Morita equivalent with the quantum double algebra defined in the previous paragraph. This strong Morita equivalence respects the counit and the traces on both algebras. Therefore,
[TABLE]
where equals the span of .
On the other hand,
[TABLE]
Since is a free left -module, the base change formula for again applies and gives the isomorphism of left -modules
[TABLE]
Since , we conclude that
[TABLE]
Denoting by the natural matrix units for , we see that the elements form a Pimsner-Popa basis for the (non trace-preserving) inclusion . It follows that this inclusion is -Markov. Since the left -module is locally finite (in the sense of Definition 3.5 and using the example given after Definition 3.5), using a bar resolution, one gets that also the left -module is locally finite. Proposition 3.6 then implies that
[TABLE]
and the theorem is proved. ∎
Given a compact quantum group , all Hopf -subalgebras of are of the form , where is a full -tensor subcategory. We say that is of finite index if is of finite index in the sense of Definition 3.1 and we define the index
[TABLE]
using Definition 3.1.
For special types of finite-index Hopf -subalgebras , the scaling formula between and was proved in [BKR16, Theorem D]. Combining Theorems 4.2 and 3.9, it holds in general.
Corollary 4.3**.**
Let be a compact quantum group of Kac type. Let be a finite-index Hopf -subalgebra. Then,
[TABLE]
Remark 4.4**.**
Of course, Corollary 4.3 can be proven directly, using the same methods as in the proof of Theorem 3.9. Choosing representatives for the right -orbits in , the appropriate multiples of form a Pimsner-Popa basis for the inclusion . As in the proof of Proposition 3.12, it follows that is a projective -module and that is a -Markov inclusion with .
5 Computing -Betti numbers of representation categories
For any invertible matrix , the free unitary quantum group is the universal -algebra with generators , , and relations making the matrices and unitary representations of , see [VDW96]. Here . We denote by the free unitary quantum group given by the identity matrix. The following is the main result of this section.
Theorem 5.1**.**
Let be an invertible matrix and the representation category of the free unitary quantum group . Then,
[TABLE]
For with , the free orthogonal quantum group is the universal -algebra with generators , , and relations such that is unitary and . We denote by the free orthogonal quantum group given by the identity matrix. Also note that \operatorname{SU}_{q}(2)=A_{o}\bigl{(}\begin{smallmatrix}0&-q\\ 1&0\end{smallmatrix}\bigr{)} for all .
Using Theorem 4.2 in combination with several results of [PSV15], we get the following computations of -Betti numbers of discrete quantum groups.
Theorem 5.2**.**
- (i)
(**[BKR16, Theorem A]** and **[KR16, Theorem A]**) For all , we have that is equal to if and equal to [math] if . 2. (ii)
(**[CHT09, Theorem 1.2]** and **[Ver09, Corollary 5.2]**) We have that for all and . 3. (iii)
Let be a finite-dimensional -algebra with its Markov trace. Assume that and let be the quantum automorphism group. Then, for all . In particular, all -Betti numbers vanish for the duals of the quantum symmetry groups with . 4. (iv)
Let be the free wreath product of a nontrivial Kac type compact quantum group and a quantum subgroup of that is acting ergodically on points, (see Remark 5.3 for definitions and comments). Then has the same -Betti numbers as the free product , namely
[TABLE] 5. (v)
In particular, for the duals of the hyperoctahedral quantum group , , and the series of quantum reflection groups , (see **[BV08]**), all -Betti numbers vanish, except , which is resp. equal to and .
Proof of Theorem 5.1.
By [BdRV05, Theorem 6.2], the rigid -tensor category only depends on the quantum dimension of the fundamental representation . We may therefore assume that . In [BNY15, Example 2.18, 3.6] and [BNY16, Proposition 1.2], it is shown that there are exact sequences of Hopf -algebras
[TABLE]
for the same compact quantum group . At the categorical level, this means that and the free product both contain the same index two subcategory (see also [BKR16, § 2]).
By the scaling formula in Theorem 3.9, this implies that and the free product have the same -Betti numbers. From the free product formula for -Betti numbers in [PSV15, Corollary 9.5] and the vanishing of the -Betti numbers of proved in [PSV15, Theorem 9.9], the theorem follows. ∎
Proof of Theorem 5.2.
Using Theorem 4.2, (i) follows from Theorem 5.1 and (ii) follows from [PSV15, Theorem 9.9]. The representation categories of the quantum automorphism groups are monoidally equivalent with the natural index full -tensor subcategory of . So (iii) follows from [PSV15, Theorem 9.9] and the scaling formula in Theorem 3.9.
To prove (iv), let be a free wreath product as in the formulation of the theorem. We use the notion of Morita equivalence of rigid -tensor categories, see [Müg01, Section 4] and also [PSV15, Definition 7.3]. By [TW16, Theorem B and Remark 7.6], is Morita equivalent in this sense with a free product -tensor category where is Morita equivalent with and is Morita equivalent with . To see this, one uses the observation in [PSV15, Proposition 9.8] that for the Jones tower of a finite index subfactor and for arbitrary intermediate subfactors
[TABLE]
with , the -tensor category of --bimodules generated by is Morita equivalent with the -tensor category of --bimodules generated by the original subfactor . Then, combining [PSV15, Proposition 7.4 and Corollary 9.5], we find that
[TABLE]
Since for all , and similarly with , statement (iv) is proved.
Finally, by [BV08, Theorem 3.4], the compact quantum groups can be viewed as the free wreath product and corresponds to the case . So (v) follows from (iv). ∎
Remark 5.3**.**
The free wreath products were introduced in [Bic01]. We recall the definition here. Denote by the fundamental representation of the quantum group acting on points, so that the action of on is given by the -homomorphism
[TABLE]
Then is defined as the universal -algebra generated by copies of , denoted by , , together with , and the relations saying that commutes with for all . The comultiplication on is defined by
[TABLE]
Now observe that it is essential to assume in Theorem 5.2.(iv) that the action of on is ergodic, in the same way as it is essential to make this hypothesis in [TW16, Theorem B]. Indeed, in the extreme case where is the trivial one element group, we find that is the -fold free product of , so that
[TABLE]
which is different from the value given by Theorem 5.2.(iv), namely .
Remark 5.4**.**
Let be a finite-dimensional -algebra with its Markov trace and assume that is a quantum subgroup of that is acting centrally ergodically on . Given any Kac type compact quantum group , [TW16, Definition 7.5 and Remark 7.6] provides an implicit definition of the free wreath product . The formula in Theorem 5.2.(iv) remains valid and gives the -Betti numbers of .
Remark 5.5**.**
The fusion -algebra of a rigid -tensor category has a natural trace and counit and these coincide with the restriction of the trace and the counit of the tube algebra to its corner . The GNS construction provides a von Neumann algebra completion of acting on and having a natural faithful normal tracial state . So also the fusion -algebra admits -Betti numbers defined by
[TABLE]
Answering a question posed by Dimitri Shlyakhtenko, we show below that the computation in Theorem 5.2.(iv) provides the first examples of rigid -tensor categories where . Note that it was already observed in [PSV15, Comments after Proposition 9.13] that for the Temperley-Lieb-Jones category , the -tensor category and the fusion -algebra have different homology with trivial coefficients.
The first -Betti number can be computed as follows. Write . A linear map is called a -cocycle if for all . A -cocycle is called inner if there exists a vector such that for all . Two -cocycles and are called cohomologous if is inner. The space of -cocycles is a left -module and when is infinite, the subspace of inner -cocycles has -dimension equal to . In that case, one has
[TABLE]
Let be any countable group and define . The fusion rules on were determined in [Lem13] and are given as follows. Denote by the unique nontrivial element and define as the set of reduced words
[TABLE]
that start and end with a letter from . Then can be identified with the set consisting of the trivial representation , the one-dimensional representation and a set of -dimensional representations for and . The fusion rules are given by
[TABLE]
Write . Given an arbitrary family of vectors in , one checks that there is a uniquely defined -cocycle satisfying and for all and . Moreover, this provides exactly the -cocycles that vanish on and . Every -cocycle is cohomologous to a -cocycle vanishing on , , and the inner -cocycles vanishing on , have -dimension . It follows that
[TABLE]
On the other hand, by Theorem 5.2.(iv), we have
[TABLE]
Taking , we find an example where , while . Taking , we find an example where is an amenable -tensor category, but yet . Although amenability can be expressed as a property of the fusion rules together with the counit (which provides the dimensions of the irreducible objects), amenability does not ensure that the fusion -algebra has vanishing -Betti numbers. In particular, the Cheeger-Gromov argument given in [PSV15, Theorem 8.8] does not work on the level of the fusion -algebra. In the above example, is Morita equivalent to the group . So also invariance of -Betti numbers under Morita equivalence does not work on the level of the fusion -algebra. All in all, this illustrates that it is not very natural to consider -Betti numbers for fusion algebras.
6 Projective resolution for the Temperley-Lieb-Jones category
Fix and realize the Temperley-Lieb-Jones category as the representation category . Denote by the tube algebra of together with its counit .
Although it was proved in [PSV15, Theorem 9.9] that for all , an easy projective resolution of was not given in [PSV15]. On the other hand, [Bic12, Theorem 5.1] provides a length 3 projective resolution for the counit of . In the case of , this projective resolution was already found in [CHT09, Theorem 1.1], but the proof of its exactness was very involved and ultimately relied on a long, computer-assisted Gröbner base calculation. The proof in [Bic12] is much simpler and moreover gives a resolution by so-called Yetter-Drinfeld modules. This means that it is actually a length 3 projective resolution for the quantum double algebra of . By [NY15b, Theorem 2.4], this quantum double algebra is strongly Morita equivalent with the tube algebra . The following is thus an immediate consequence of [Bic12, Theorem 5.1].
Theorem 6.1**.**
Label by the irreducible objects of and denote by the corresponding projections in .
Decomposing , the identity operator defines a unitary element . Denoting by the sign of , the sequence
[TABLE]
is a resolution of by projective left -modules.
As a consequence of Theorem 6.1, we immediately find the (co)homology of with trivial coefficients , which was only computed up to degree in [PSV15, Proposition 9.13]. The same result was found in an unpublished note of Y. Arano using different methods.
Corollary 6.2**.**
For , the homology and cohomology with trivial coefficients are given by when and are [math] when .
Remark 6.3**.**
It is straightforward to check that inside , we have and . Therefore, the composition of two consecutive arrows in Theorem 6.1 indeed gives the zero map. Using the diagrammatic representation of the tube algebra given in [GJ15, Section 5.2], there are natural vector space bases for and . It is then quite straightforward to check that the sequence in Theorem 6.1 is indeed exact.
Using the same bases, one also checks that the tensor product of this resolution with stays dimension exact. This then provides a slightly more elementary proof that for all , as was already proved in [PSV15, Theorem 9.9].
Remark 6.4**.**
Section 9.5 of [PSV15] provides a diagrammatic complex to compute the homology with trivial coefficients. In the particular case where is the Temperley-Lieb-Jones category with and , the space of -chains is given by the linear span of all configurations of nonintersecting circles embedded into the plane with points removed. Using Theorem 6.1, one computes that the -homology is spanned by the -cycle
[TABLE]
It is however less clear how to write effectively a generating -cocycle in this diagrammatic language. For instance, for every integer , indicating by the number of parallel strings, also
[TABLE]
and
[TABLE]
are -cycles and ad hoc computations show that in -homology, we have and . It would be interesting to have a geometric procedure to identify a given -cycle with a multiple of and to prove geometrically that homology vanishes in higher degrees.
7 Derivations on rigid -tensor categories
7.1 A Drinfeld type central element in the tube algebra
To describe the first cohomology of a rigid -tensor category by a space of derivations, a natural element in the center of the tube algebra (more precisely, in the center of its multiplier algebra) plays a crucial role. In the case where has only finitely many irreducible objects and hence, the tube algebra is a direct sum of matrix algebras, this Drinfeld type central element was introduced in [Izu99, Theorem 3.3]. When has infinitely many irreducible objects, the same definition applies and yields the following central unitary in the multiplier algebra defined by unitary elements .
Fix a rigid -tensor category . For every , denote by the element defined by the identity map in .
Proposition 7.1**.**
Fix . Then and . In other words, is unitary in . Moreover, for any and , the following relation holds:
[TABLE]
So, is a central unitary element in the multiplier algebra .
Proof.
By definition of the involution on , we have that
[TABLE]
Given this, one finds that
[TABLE]
Note that all terms with vanish. Hence, to conclude the computation, it suffices to note that is an orthonormal basis for . Similarly, one checks that .
Choose arbitrarily. Then
[TABLE]
On the other hand,
[TABLE]
From these identities, one readily deduces (7.1), by expanding (resp. ) in terms of the other orthonormal basis and using that the scalar products are given by the categorical traces. ∎
Note that (7.1), along with the fact that in particular implies that
[TABLE]
for and . As another corollary of (7.1), we find that belongs to the center of the von Neumann algebra .
7.2 Properties of -cocycles
Let be a rigid -tensor category with tube algebra . Fix a nondegenerate right Hilbert -module . As in [PSV15], define the bar complex for Hochschild (co)homology as follows. Denote by the linear span of the projections , . Then define
[TABLE]
with boundary maps where
[TABLE]
This is a resolution of the trivial right -module by projective right -modules. So is the -th cohomology of the dual complex
[TABLE]
The complex in (7.3) is isomorphic with the complex
[TABLE]
where . For , the coboundary maps of this complex are given by where
[TABLE]
The zeroth coboundary map of is given by
[TABLE]
In this picture, the 1-cocycles are precisely the maps that satisfy
[TABLE]
for all and . We associate a cocycle to every vector via (7.4). These are the inner -cocycles.
By analogy with the first -Betti number for groups, we want to express how a 1-cocycle is determined by its values on a generating set of objects of . So, we first need to specify how can actually be evaluated on objects .
By the correspondence theorem from [PSV15] discussed in Section 2.2, we may suppose that the right Hilbert -module arises from a unitary half braiding , where satisfies for all .
For every , we consider the vector subspace
[TABLE]
Note that each is a -bimodule. We can then define the natural bijection
[TABLE]
identifying with through the formulae
[TABLE]
for all and . Putting all together, we find a bijection
[TABLE]
identifying with the family .
Given a family of elements for all , we uniquely define for arbitrary objects by the formula
[TABLE]
Note that the naturality condition
[TABLE]
holds for all and all .
Definition 7.2**.**
Let be a rigid -tensor category. We say that a subset generates when every irreducible object in arises as a subobject of some tensor product of elements in .
The following proposition implies that a -cocycle is completely determined by its “values” for belonging to a generating set .
Proposition 7.3**.**
Consider a morphism with corresponding values , . Then is a 1-cocycle if and only if
[TABLE]
for all . In particular, any 1-cocycle satisfies and
[TABLE]
for all .
Proof.
Choose arbitrary morphisms and . The following identities can be verified by direct computation:
[TABLE]
By Frobenius reciprocity, for every fixed , the linear span of all with , , equals . So it follows that is a -cocycle if and only if (7.8) holds for all .
Finally, assume that is a -cocycle. By (7.8), we get that . The naturality property of the implies that for all . So,
[TABLE]
which yields one half of (7.9) after multiplying by on both sides. The other identity is proven similarly, by observing that . ∎
The following lemma shows that the constraint (7.9) on can be succinctly restated in terms of the special unitaries introduced in the previous section.
Lemma 7.4**.**
Fix and consider as in (7.6). Let with corresponding . Then satisfies the relation
[TABLE]
if and only if for all and .
Proof.
By definition of the -module structure on , for every and , we have
[TABLE]
where the final two equalities follow from the half braiding property and the naturality of , respectively. Writing as with , we then find that
[TABLE]
Since , we conclude that the equality for all and is equivalent with the equality
[TABLE]
Applying the transformation to the left- and the right-hand side, this equality becomes equivalent with (7.10). ∎
We can then formalize how a -cocycle is determined by its values on a generating set of a rigid -tensor category as follows.
Proposition 7.5**.**
Let be a rigid -tensor category with finite generating set . Denote by the tube algebra of and let be a nondegenerate right Hilbert -module. For every , define the subspace given by
[TABLE]
Define
[TABLE]
Then, the linear map
[TABLE]
is injective. In particular, if has infinitely many irreducible objects, we find the estimate
[TABLE]
where denotes the projection onto the kernel of .
Proof.
By Proposition 7.3 and Lemma 7.4, the map is well defined and injective. In the case where , the map is left -linear. Since , the proposition follows once we have proved that the space of inner -cocycles has -dimension equal to , assuming that has infinitely many irreducible objects.
In that case, by [PSV15, Corollary 9.2], meaning that the coboundary map
[TABLE]
is injective. The space of inner -cocycles is thus isomorphic with and so, has -dimension equal to . ∎
8 Derivations on
In this section, we again specialize to the case of free unitary quantum groups. Let . The methods of the previous section allow for a direct and explicit proof that . More generally, we determine the first cohomology of with arbitrary coefficients.
By [Ban97], the category is freely generated by the fundamental representation and the irreducible representations can be labeled by words in and . To avoid confusion between words and tensor products, we explicitly write to denote the tensor product of two representations. The tensor product decomposes as the sum of the trivial representation and the irreducible representation with label . Similarly, . Moreover, the standard solutions of the conjugate equations for , given by and generate all intertwiners between tensor products of and .
Proposition 8.1**.**
Let and , with tube algebra . Let be any nondegenerate right Hilbert -module. Using the notation of Proposition 7.5, we find an isomorphism
[TABLE]
Proof.
As explained in Section 2.2, we consider as the nondegenerate right Hilbert -module given by a unitary half braiding on some ind-object . A vector on the right-hand side of (8.1) then corresponds to an element in satisfying the conditions of Lemma 7.4, by Frobenius reciprocity. Fix such a morphism . We have to show that comes from a -cocycle , which we will construct as a family of morphisms satisfying the naturality condition (7.7). The identity (7.9) forces us to define by
[TABLE]
This is unambiguous because in . By Lemma 7.4, we also have that
[TABLE]
The cocycle identity (7.8) imposes the definition
[TABLE]
where . We also must set . Since every irreducible object in is a subobject of some tensor product of and , these relations fix for all . Concretely, if and is a co-isometry, where , we set
[TABLE]
Now, since appears in the decomposition of several different tensor products, it is not immediately clear why this is well defined. To this end, we will show that the naturality relation
[TABLE]
holds for all morphisms , with . This is where the freeness of comes into play. By [Ban97, Lemme 6], the intertwiner spaces between tensor products involving and are generated by maps of the form and , and their adjoints. Appealing to the naturality of in (8.2), it is therefore sufficient to verify that
[TABLE]
which follows from the two different expressions for , by retracing the computations made in the proof of Proposition 7.3. We conclude that there exists a unique producing the family of maps . This family satisfies the cocycle relation (7.8) by construction. Therefore is a 1-cocycle, as required. ∎
Combining Propositions 7.5 and 8.1, we get
[TABLE]
Calculating therefore boils down to computing the trace of . By von Neumann’s mean ergodic theorem, we have that
[TABLE]
In other words, to find the first -Betti number of , it is now sufficient to compute the traces for all , i.e. the sequence of moments of .
The following lemma translates this problem into a combinatorial one.
Lemma 8.2**.**
Let be an arbitrary rigid -tensor category with tube algebra . For and , define the rotation map
[TABLE]
Then for all , where is the unnormalized trace on the finite-dimensional matrix algebra of linear transformations of .
Proof.
Fix and observe that
[TABLE]
∎
Proposition 8.3**.**
Consider either for or for with . In both cases, denote by the fundamental representation and let be the nontrivial irreducible summand of or . Then, for all , we have
[TABLE]
So, and the spectral measure of with respect to the (unnormalized) trace on is given by , where denotes the normalized Lebesgue measure on the unit circle .
Proof.
We first deduce the result for from the case. Up to monoidal equivalence, we may assume that . Consider the group as a -tensor category with generator , and denote the fundamental representation of by . Write for the nontrivial irreducible summand of . We can embed into the free product as a full subcategory, by sending the fundamental representation to , see [Ban97, Théorème 1(iv)]. Under this identification, we have that , which implies that also . By mapping to instead, we similarly get that .
So it remains to prove the proposition for , where with and . If we choose such that
[TABLE]
then it follows from [BdRV05, Theorem 5.3] that is monoidally equivalent to . We still denote the fundamental representation by .
Note that, strictly speaking, the category depends on the sign of . However, since we only work in the subcategory generated by , all parity issues disappear. More precisely, if denotes the fundamental representation of , then the full -tensor subcategories generated by and are monoidally equivalent. To see this, denote the Hopf -subalgebra of generated by the matrix coefficients of by . It suffices to remark that in the same way as in [Ban98, Corollary 4.1], the adjoint coaction of on identifies with the quantum automorphism group of , where the state is given by
[TABLE]
In particular, the isomorphism class of does not depend on the sign of . By duality, the full -tensor subcategory of generated by is also independent of the sign of . We may therefore assume that without loss of generality. Since is unitary, it suffices to compute for all positive integers .
In summary, we have reduced the problem to a question about the Temperley-Lieb-Jones category , where (cf. [NT13, § 2.5]). This category admits a well-behaved diagram calculus, see e.g. [BS08]. In this view, morphisms from to are given by linear combinations of non-crossing pair partitions , which we will represent by diagrams of the following form:
[TABLE]
The composition of diagrams and , whenever meaningful, is defined by vertical concatenation, removing any loops that arise. The tensor product and adjoint operations are given by horizontal concatenation and reflection along the horizontal axis, respectively. We will denote the morphism in associated to the partition by . One then has that , and , where denotes the number of loops removed in the composition of and . Moreover, the family is a basis for .
In view of Lemma 8.2, we now specialize to non-crossing pair diagrams without upper points, i.e. morphisms in . The action of (as defined in Lemma 8.2) on intertwiners of the form for has an easy description in terms of the partition calculus discussed above:
[TABLE]
where is the permutation of given by
[TABLE]
In other words, permutes a basis of . In fact, behaves similarly with respect to a suitable basis of . Let be a co-isometry. We proceed to argue that the intertwiners form a basis of , where
[TABLE]
Indeed, it is clear that multiplication by yields a linear map from to . Moreover, it is easy to see that lies in the kernel of this map whenever . Hence, to finish the proof of the claim, it suffices to check that
[TABLE]
This fact is probably well known, but we give a short proof here for completeness. The number of elements of is known in the combinatorial literature as the -th Riordan number. As shown in [Ber97, § 3.2 (R2), § 5], the Riordan numbers can be expressed in terms of the Catalan numbers by means of the formula
[TABLE]
The left-hand side of (8.7) only depends on the fusion rules of the tensor powers of , so we can take to be the three-dimensional irreducible representation of for the purposes of this part of the computation. Making use of the Weyl integration formula for , see [Hal15, Example 11.33], we find that
[TABLE]
By the moment formula for the Wigner semicircle distribution, this is precisely (8.8).
Having shown that the intertwiners of the form form a basis of , we now demonstrate that acts on this basis by permutation. To this end, observe that . For , this yields
[TABLE]
where the last equality follows by substituting and noting that all terms involving vanish. In summary,
[TABLE]
for all . So permutes a basis of , as claimed. It follows that the trace of is exactly the number of fixed points of that lie in . When , this set is empty, but for all there is a unique such fixed point, given by the partition
[TABLE]
Since
[TABLE]
we conclude that . Clearly, the measure on in the formulation of the proposition has the same moments as and thus is the spectral measure of . ∎
Remark 8.4**.**
From the computation for , one might be tempted to conjecture that the trace of the spectral projection is always less than 1 for all in any -tensor category. However, this is not the case. Consider the category of finite-dimensional unitary representations of the alternating group . This category has four equivalence classes of irreducible objects, which we will denote by and . The trivial representation corresponds to , and are one-dimensional representations that can be thought of as “cube roots of ”, in that , and . The remaining representation is 3-dimensional, and satisfies
[TABLE]
Fix a partition of the identity into pairwise orthogonal projections
[TABLE]
such that the image of is isomorphic to . Using numerical methods, we found that
[TABLE]
In particular,
[TABLE]
The reference list from the paper itself. Each links out to its DOI / PubMed record.
- 1[Ara 14] Y. Arano, Unitary spherical representations of Drinfeld doubles , J. Reine Angew. Math., in press, ar Xiv:1410.6238 .
- 2[Ban 97] T. Banica, Le groupe quantique compact libre U(n) , Comm. Math. Phys. 190 (1997), 143–172.
- 3[Ban 98] T. Banica, Symmetries of a generic coaction , Math. Ann. 314 (1999), 763–780.
- 4[BS 08] T. Banica and R. Speicher, Liberation of orthogonal Lie groups , Adv. Math. 222 (2009), 1461–1501.
- 5[BV 08] T. Banica and R. Vergnioux, Fusion rules for quantum reflection groups , J. Noncommut. Geom. 3 (2009), 327–359.
- 6[Ber 97] F. R. Bernhart, Catalan, Motzkin, and Riordan numbers , Discrete Math. 204 (1999), 73–112.
- 7[Bic 01] J. Bichon, Free wreath product by the quantum permutation group , Algebr. Represent. Theory 7 (2004), 343–362.
- 8[Bic 12] J. Bichon, Hochschild homology of Hopf algebras and free Yetter-Drinfeld resolutions of the counit , Compos. Math. 149 (2013), 658–678.
