# Quantum entanglement, sum of squares, and the log rank conjecture

**Authors:** Boaz Barak, Pravesh Kothari, David Steurer

arXiv: 1701.06321 · 2017-07-11

## TL;DR

This paper presents a faster algorithm for the Best Separable State problem in quantum information, leveraging sum-of-squares hierarchy to improve over brute-force methods and connect to rank bounds in communication complexity.

## Contribution

It introduces the first subexponential-time algorithm for the BSS problem using sum-of-squares hierarchy, improving upon previous exponential-time approaches.

## Key findings

- Achieves $	ilde{O}(rac{	ext{poly}(n)}{	ext{poly}(rac{1}{	ext{epsilon}})})$ runtime for BSS problem.
- Connects quantum separability testing to rank bounds in communication complexity.
- Demonstrates the effectiveness of sum-of-squares hierarchy in quantum property testing.

## Abstract

For every $\epsilon>0$, we give an $\exp(\tilde{O}(\sqrt{n}/\epsilon^2))$-time algorithm for the $1$ vs $1-\epsilon$ \emph{Best Separable State (BSS)} problem of distinguishing, given an $n^2\times n^2$ matrix $\mathcal{M}$ corresponding to a quantum measurement, between the case that there is a separable (i.e., non-entangled) state $\rho$ that $\mathcal{M}$ accepts with probability $1$, and the case that every separable state is accepted with probability at most $1-\epsilon$. Equivalently, our algorithm takes the description of a subspace $\mathcal{W} \subseteq \mathbb{F}^{n^2}$ (where $\mathbb{F}$ can be either the real or complex field) and distinguishes between the case that $\mathcal{W}$ contains a rank one matrix, and the case that every rank one matrix is at least $\epsilon$ far (in $\ell_2$ distance) from $\mathcal{W}$.   To the best of our knowledge, this is the first improvement over the brute-force $\exp(n)$-time algorithm for this problem. Our algorithm is based on the \emph{sum-of-squares} hierarchy and its analysis is inspired by Lovett's proof (STOC '14, JACM '16) that the communication complexity of every rank-$n$ Boolean matrix is bounded by $\tilde{O}(\sqrt{n})$.

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1701.06321/full.md

## References

27 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1701.06321/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1701.06321