# Fundamental Plane of Black Hole Activity in Quiescent Regime

**Authors:** Fu-Guo Xie, Feng Yuan

arXiv: 1701.06143 · 2017-02-22

## TL;DR

This study confirms that quiescent AGNs follow a specific radio/X-ray luminosity relation consistent with theoretical predictions, emphasizing the importance of sample selection in understanding black hole activity.

## Contribution

The paper provides the largest quiescent AGN sample to date and demonstrates the fundamental plane relation in this regime, clarifying previous discrepancies caused by mixed samples.

## Key findings

- Quiescent AGNs follow a $\xi_{m X}	ext{≈}1.23$ relation.
- Sample composition affects the observed correlation index.
- Replacing luminosities with Eddington-scaled values offers a more physical analysis.

## Abstract

A correlation among the radio luminosity ($L_{\rm R}$), X-ray luminosity ($L_{\rm X}$), and black hole mass ($M_{\rm BH}$) in active galactic nuclei (AGNs) and black hole binaries is known to exist and is called the "Fundamental Plane" of black hole activity. Yuan & Cui (2005) predicts that the radio/X-ray correlation index, $\xi_{\rm X}$, changes from $\xi_{\rm X}\approx 0.6$ to $\xi_{\rm X}\approx 1.2-1.3$ when $L_{\rm X}/L_{\rm Edd}$ decreases below a critical value $\sim 10^{-6}$. While many works favor such a change, there are also several works claiming the opposite. In this paper, we gather from literature a largest quiescent AGN (defined as $L_{\rm X}/L_{\rm Edd} < 10^{-6}$) sample to date, consisting of $75$ sources. We find that these quiescent AGNs follow a $\xi_{\rm X}\approx 1.23$ radio/X-ray relationship, in excellent agreement with the Yuan \& Cui prediction. The reason for the discrepancy between the present result and some previous works is that their samples contain not only quiescent sources but also "normal" ones (i.e., $L_{\rm X}/L_{\rm Edd} > 10^{-6}$). In this case, the quiescent sources will mix up with those normal ones in $L_{\rm R}$ and $L_{\rm X}$. The value of $\xi_{\rm X}$ will then be between $0.6$ and $\sim1.3$, with the exact value being determined by the sample composition, i.e., the fraction of the quiescent and normal sources. Based on this result, we propose that a more physical way to study the Fundamental Plane is to replace $L_{\rm R}$ and $L_{\rm X}$ with $L_{\rm R}/L_{\rm Edd}$ and $L_{\rm X}/L_{\rm Edd}$, respectively.

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1701.06143/full.md

## Figures

14 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1701.06143/full.md

## References

114 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1701.06143/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1701.06143