The Cabello Nonlocal Argument is Stronger Control than the Hardy Nonlocal Argument for Detecting Post-Quantum Correlations
Ali Ahanj

TL;DR
This paper compares the strength of Cabello and Hardy nonlocal arguments in detecting post-quantum correlations, finding that CNA provides stronger control than HNA under various physical principles.
Contribution
It demonstrates that the Cabello nonlocal argument is more effective than Hardy's in identifying post-quantum no-signalling correlations across multiple principles.
Findings
CNA exhibits a larger gap between quantum mechanics and the principles than HNA.
CNA is a stronger control for detecting post-quantum correlations.
The study considers all possibilities of local randomness.
Abstract
In this paper, we study the Hardy nonlocal argument (HNA) and the Cabello nonlocal argument (CNA) under the Information Causality, Macroscopic Locality and Local Orthogonality principles in the context of Local Randomness. We see that, in the context of all the possibilities of local randomness, the gap between the quantum mechanics and the above principles, in the Cabello's nonlocality argument is larger than the Hardy's case. Therefore the CNA is stronger control than the HNA for detecting post-quantum nosignalling correlations.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsQuantum Mechanics and Applications · Quantum Information and Cryptography · Quantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture
