# Strongly screening on electron capture for Nuclides $^{52, 53, 59,   60}$Fe by the Shell-Model Monte Carlo method in pre-supernova

**Authors:** Jing-Jing Liu, Qiu-He Peng, and Dong-Mei Liu

arXiv: 1701.05771 · 2017-07-18

## TL;DR

This study calculates electron capture rates for specific iron isotopes in pre-supernova conditions using the Shell-Model Monte Carlo method, revealing significant screening effects that influence supernova modeling.

## Contribution

The paper introduces a novel application of the Shell-Model Monte Carlo method combined with RPA and LRTM to compute strongly screening electron capture rates for key nuclides in pre-supernova environments.

## Key findings

- Screening rates decrease by about 18.66%.
- Good agreement with previous models for even-even nuclei without screening.
- Significant differences in rates for odd-A nuclei compared to prior models.

## Abstract

The death of the massive stars due to supernova explosion is a key ingredient in stellar evolution, stellar population synthesis. The electron capture (EC) plays a vital role in supernovae explosions. According to the Shell-Model Monte Carlo (SMMC) method, basing onthe Random Phase Approximation (RPA) and Linear Response Theory Model (LRTM), we study the strongly screening EC rates of nuclides $^{52, 53, 59, 60}$Fe in presupernova. The results show that the screening rates can decrease about 18.66\%. We compare our results with those of Fuller et al. (FFN), Aufderheide et al. (AUFD), and Nabi et al. (NKK)in the case with and without strong electron screening(SES). For the case without SES, our calculations are in very good agreement with those of AUFD in relatively high density surroundings and the maximum error is within 0.35\% at $\rho_7=100$ (e. g., even-even nuclei $^{60}$Fe). However, for odd-A nuclei$^{59}$Fe, our rates are close to one, one, two order magnitude smaller than those of FFN, AUFD, and NKK. For the case with SES, our screening results are about three, two orders magnitude, and 7.27\% lower than those of FFN, AUFD, NKK for $^{60}$Fe, respectively, and it is lower about two, two orders magnitude, and 12.42\% than those of FFN, AUFD, NKK for odd-A nuclide $^{59}$Fe.

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1701.05771/full.md

## Figures

27 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1701.05771/full.md

## References

38 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1701.05771/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1701.05771