# Localisation of gamma-ray interaction points in thick monolithic CeBr3   and LaBr3:Ce scintillators

**Authors:** Alexei Ulyanov, Oran Morris, Oliver J. Roberts, Isaac Tobin, Lorraine, Hanlon, Sheila McBreen, David Murphy, Nick Nelms, Brian Shortt

arXiv: 1701.05548 · 2017-01-20

## TL;DR

This study compares the gamma-ray interaction point localization capabilities of different monolithic CeBr3 and LaBr3:Ce scintillators, demonstrating acceptable resolution in thick CeBr3 crystals for gamma-ray astronomy applications.

## Contribution

It introduces a neural network-based method for 3D position reconstruction in thick monolithic scintillators and evaluates their performance for gamma-ray detection.

## Key findings

- Thick CeBr3 crystal achieved ~5.4 mm x/y and 7.8 mm z resolution at 356 keV.
- LaBr3:Ce crystal showed worse position resolution due to optical interface issues.
- Energy resolution was 4.0% for LaBr3:Ce and 5.5% for CeBr3 at 662 keV.

## Abstract

Localisation of gamma-ray interaction points in monolithic scintillator crystals can simplify the design and improve the performance of a future Compton telescope for gamma-ray astronomy. In this paper we compare the position resolution of three monolithic scintillators: a 28x28x20 mm3 (length x breadth x thickness) LaBr3:Ce crystal, a 25x25x20 mm3 CeBr3 crystal and a 25x25x10 mm3 CeBr3 crystal. Each crystal was encapsulated and coupled to an array of 4x4 silicon photomultipliers through an optical window. The measurements were conducted using 81 keV and 356 keV gamma-rays from a collimated 133Ba source. The 3D position reconstruction of interaction points was performed using artificial neural networks trained with experimental data. Although the position resolution was significantly better for the thinner crystal, the 20 mm thick CeBr3 crystal showed an acceptable resolution of about 5.4 mm FWHM for the x and y coordinates, and 7.8 mm FWHM for the z-coordinate (crystal depth) at 356 keV. These values were obtained from the full position scans of the crystal sides. The position resolution of the LaBr3:Ce crystal was found to be considerably worse, presumably due to the highly diffusive optical in- terface between the crystal and the optical window of the enclosure. The energy resolution (FWHM) measured for 662 keV gamma-rays was 4.0% for LaBr3:Ce and 5.5% for CeBr3. The same crystals equipped with a PMT (Hamamatsu R6322-100) gave an energy resolution of 3.0% and 4.7%, respectively.

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1701.05548/full.md

## Figures

29 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1701.05548/full.md

## References

25 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1701.05548/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1701.05548