The $2_1^+ \to 3_1^+$ gamma width in $^{22}$Na and second class currents
S. Triambak, L. Phuthu, A. Garc\'ia, G.C. Harper, J.N. Orce, D.A., Short, S.P.R. Steininger, A. Diaz Varela, R. Dunlop, D.S. Jamieson, W.A., Richter, G.C. Ball, P.E. Garrett, C.E. Svensson, C. Wrede

TL;DR
This paper measures the gamma decay branch in $^{22}$Na and uses it to determine the weak magnetism form factor, revealing discrepancies with theoretical models and suggesting the presence of second class currents.
Contribution
First unambiguous measurement of the $2_1^+ o 3_1^+$ gamma branch in $^{22}$Na, enabling a new determination of the weak magnetism form factor.
Findings
The gamma branch in $^{22}$Na is 0.45(8)%
The weak magnetism form factor is |b/Ac_1| = 8.7(1.1)
Discrepancy between observed form factors and theoretical predictions
Abstract
A previous measurement of the directional coefficient in Na decay was used to extract recoil-order form factors. The data indicate the requirement of a significant induced-tensor matrix element for the decay.This conclusion largely relies on a Standard-Model-allowed weak magnetism form factor which was determined using an unpublished value of the analog branch in Na, with the further assumption that the transition is dominated by its isovector component. We obtain for the first time an unambiguous determination of the branch in Na to be . Using the Conserved Vector Current (CVC) hypothesis, our branch determines the weak magnetism form factor for Na decay to be . Together with the angular correlation coefficient, we obtain a large…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsMedical Imaging Techniques and Applications · Radiopharmaceutical Chemistry and Applications · Medical Imaging and Pathology Studies
