# How many dissenters does it take to disorder a flock?

## TL;DR

This paper investigates how a small number of dissenters in a flock can disrupt collective motion, showing dissenters are more disruptive than static obstacles and modeling their effect as noise.

## Contribution

It introduces a modified active Brownian particle model with dissenters, demonstrating their significant impact on flocking behavior and developing a continuum description of their disruptive effect.

## Key findings

- Small dissenters disrupt flocking more effectively than static obstacles.
- Flock-disorder transition shows scale invariance and finite-size scaling.
- Dissenters act like noise, with strength depending on their persistence.

## Abstract

We consider the effect of introducing a small number of non-aligning agents in a well-formed flock. To this end, we modify a minimal model of active Brownian particles with purely repulsive (excluded volume) forces to introduce an alignment interaction that will be experienced by all the particles except for a small minority of "dissenters". We find that even a very small fraction of dissenters disrupts the flocking state. Strikingly, these motile dissenters are much more effective than an equal number of static obstacles in breaking up the flock. For the studied system sizes we obtain clear evidence of scale invariance at the flocking-disorder transition point and the system can be effectively described with a finite-size scaling formalism. We develop a continuum model for the system which reveals that dissenters act like annealed noise on aligners, with a noise strength that grows with the persistence of the dissenters' dynamics.