Effective descent morphisms for Banach modules
Bachuki Mesablishvili

TL;DR
This paper characterizes effective descent morphisms in the category of Banach modules as exactly those norm-decreasing algebra homomorphisms that are weak retracts, providing a precise criterion.
Contribution
It establishes a necessary and sufficient condition for effective descent morphisms in Banach modules, linking algebraic and categorical properties.
Findings
Effective descent morphisms are characterized as weak retracts.
Norm-decreasing homomorphisms are effective descent morphisms iff they are weak retracts.
Provides a categorical criterion for Banach algebra homomorphisms.
Abstract
It is proved that a norm-decreasing homomorphism of commutative Banach algebras is an effective descent morphism for Banach modules if and only if it is a weak retract.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsAdvanced Operator Algebra Research · Algebraic structures and combinatorial models · Advanced Topics in Algebra
Effective descent morphisms for Banach modules
Bachuki Mesablishvili
Abstract.
It is proved that a norm-decreasing homomorphism of commutative Banach algebras is an effective descent morphism for Banach modules if and only if it is a weak retract.
Key words and phrases:
Banach modules, weak retracts, effective descent morphisms
2010 Mathematics Subject Classification:
46H25, 46M15, 18D10
The work was partially supported by the Shota Rustaveli National Science Foundation Grants DI/18/5-113/13 and FR/189/5-113/14.
1. INTRODUCTION
The present note is a continuation of the previous works on the problem of describing effective descent morphisms in various monoidal categories [10], [11], [12], [13], [14] and aims to study the descent problem for the symmetric monoidal category of Banach spaces (with linear contractions as morphisms, and the projective tensor product). Recall that Grothendieck’s descent theory for modules in a symmetric monoidal category is the study of which morphisms of -monoids are effective descent morphisms for modules in the sense that the corresponding extension-of-scalars functor from the category of (left) A-modules to the category of (left) B-modules is comonadic. In this note we prove that effective descent morphisms for Banach modules are precisely those norm-decreasing homomorphisms of commutative Banach algebra which are weak retracts.
As background to the subject, we refer to S. MacLane [9] for generalities on category theory, to [3] and [15] for terminology and general results on Banach spaces and to G. Janelidze and W. Tholen [5], [6] and [7] for descent theory.
2. PRELIMINARIES
Suppose that is a fixed symmetric monoidal closed category with tensor product , unit object , and internal-hom . Recall ([9]) that a monoid A in (or -monoid) consists of an object of endowed with a multiplication and unit morphism such that the usual identity and associative conditions are satisfied. A monoid is called commutative if the multiplication map is unchanged when composed with the symmetry.
Recall further that, for any -monoid , a left -module is a pair , where is an object of and is a morphism in , called the action (or the -action) on , such that and . For a given -monoid , the left -modules are the objects of a category . A morphism is a morphism in such that . Analogously, one has the category of right A-modules.
If admits coequalizers, then each morphism of -monoids gives rise to two functors:
- •
the restriction–of–scalars functor where for any (left) B-module , is a (left) A-module via the action ;
- •
the extension–of–scalars functor where for any (left) A-module , is a (left) B-module via the action
[TABLE]
It is well-known that the restriction–of–scalars functor is right adjoint to the extension–of–scalars functor. is called an effective descent morphism (for modules) if the extension–of–scalars functor is comonadic.
We henceforth suppose that is a symmetric monoidal closed category with equalizers and coequalizers.
An inspection of the proof of [13, Theorem 3.7] shows that the theorem holds true also for morphisms of -monoids which are central in the sense that the diagram
[TABLE]
where is the symmetry of the monoidal category, commutes (see, [12]). Hence we can improve [13, Theorem 3.7] slightly as follows. (Recall that a regular injective object in a category is an object which has the extension property with respect to regular monomorphisms.)
2.1 THEOREM**.**
Let have a regular injective object such that the functor
[TABLE]
is comonadic, and let be a central morphism of monoids in . The following are equivalent:
- (i)
* is an effective descent morphism;*
- (ii)
* is a pure morphism in ; that is, for any -module , the morphism*
[TABLE]
is a regular monomorphism;
- (iii)
the morphism is a split epimorphism in ;
Note that, if satisfies any (and hence all) of the above equivalent conditions, then it is a monomorphism and the centrality then implies that A is commutative.
3. THE MAIN RESULT
Let denote either the field of real numbers or the field of complex numbers . Write for the category whose objects are Banach spaces over and whose morphisms are linear contractions. It is well-known (e.g, see [4], [16]) that is a symmetric monoidal category with tensor product of two Banach spaces being their projective tensor product (see [3]) and the unit for this tensor product being . Moreover, there is a bifunctor (the internal Hom) making the category into a symmetric closed monoidal category. For two Banach spaces and , is the Banach space whose elements are the bounded linear transformations quipped with the operator norm. In all small limits and all small colimits exist (e.g. [1]).
Recall (for example, from [4], [16]) that (commutative) unital Banach algebras are exactly (commutative) monoids in the symmetric monoidal category , and that, for any unital Banach algebra A, an object of is a (left) -module over A, that is, a Banach space together with -morphism
[TABLE]
such that Since the action is a morphism in , the map is bilinear and satisfies the condition The morphisms in are morphisms in which are A-linear.
If A is a unital Banach algebra and is a A-module, then the dual space of has the structure of a Banach A-module, where the action is given by
[TABLE]
Moreover, for any morphism in , the map is again a morphism in . And one says that is a weak retract if is a split epimorphism in .
The main result of this note is the following theorem.
3.1 THEOREM**.**
Let A be a commutative unital Banach algebra, and * a norm-decreasing central homomorphism of unital Banach algebras. Then the following conditions are equivalent:*
- (i)
* is an effective descent morphism for Banach modules; that is, the extension–of–scalars functor is comonadic;*
- (ii)
* is a –pure morphism in ; that is, for any Banach A-module ***, the morphism is an isometric inclusion;
- (iii)
* is a weak retract in .*
**Proof. ** Since the regular monomorphisms in are precisely the isometric inclusions (e.g. [1, 4.3.10.e]), is regular injective in by the Hahn-Banach Theorem. Moreover, the functor is monadic by [8]. Hence , seen as a functor , is comonadic. One now concludes the proof by applying Theorem 2.1. \sqcup$$\sqcap
Since any morphism of commutative unital -monoids is easily seen to be central, a corollary follows immediately:
3.2 COROLLARY**.**
Given a norm-decreasing homomorphism of commutative unital Banach algebras, the following conditions are equivalent:
- (i)
* is an effective descent morphism;*
- (ii)
* is a –pure morphism in ;*
- (iii)
* is a weak retract in .*
3.3 EXAMPLE**.**
Let be the Banach space of all sequences of scalars converging to zero with the supremum norm , the space of all sequences for which the norm is finite, and the space of all bounded sequences of scalars with the some supremum norm as . Then is isometrically isomorphic to and to (e.g., [15]). With these isometrical isomorphisms, the canonical isometric inclusion of into its double dual can be identified with the usual inclusion of spaces of sequences. Since both of and with element-wise algebra operations are commutative unital Banach algebras, it follows from Theorem 3.1 that the canonical inclusion of unital Banach algebras is an effective descent morphism.
We conclude the note by giving a result which shows how to construct an effective descent morphism for Banach modules from any commutative unital Banach algebra.
Let A be an arbitrary unital Banach algebra. Then the second dual of can be equipped with two Banach algebra products, called first and second Arens products, each of which makes it into a unital Banach algebra such that the canonical embedding is a homomorphism of unital Banach algebra (e.g., [15]). Since is always a weak retract in ([2]), and since for commutative A, is central with respect to either Arens product (see, e.g., [15, 3.1.14]()), Theorem 3.1 gives:
3.4 PROPOSITION**.**
Let A be any commutative Banach algebra. When is provided with either Arens product, is an effective descent morphism.
The reference list from the paper itself. Each links out to its DOI / PubMed record.
- 1[1] F. Borceux , Handbook of Categorical Algebra , vol. 1 , Encyclopedia of Mathematics and its Applications, 51. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1994).
- 2[2] F. Borceux and W. Pelletier, Descent theory for Banach modules, Categorical algebra and its applications (Louvain-La-Neuve, 1987), 36–54, Lecture Notes in Math., 1348 , Springer, Berlin (1988).
- 3[3] J. Cigler, V. Losert and P. Michor, Banach modules and functors on categories of Banach spaces, Lecture Notes in Pure and Applied Mathematics, Marcel Dekker, Inc., New York, 46 (1994)
- 4[4] K. H. Hofmann, The duality of compact semigroups and C ∗ − limit-from superscript 𝐶 C^{*}- bigebras, Springer Lect. Notes in Math. 129 (1970).
- 5[5] G. Janelidze and W. Tholen, Facets of Descent, I , Appl. Categ. Structures 2 (1994), 245–281.
- 6[6] G. Janelidze and W. Tholen, Facets of Descent, II , Appl. Categ. Structures 5 (1997), 229–248.
- 7[7] G. Janelidze and W. Tholen, Facets of Descent, III : Monadic Descent for Rings and Algebras, Appl. Categ. Structures 12 (2004), 461–477.
- 8[8] F. E. J., Linton, Applied functorial semantics. III. Characterizing Banach conjugate spaces. Proceedings of the Conference on Integration, Topology, and Geometry in Linear Spaces (Univ. North Carolina, Chapel Hill, N.C., 1979), pp. 227–240, Contemp. Math., 2 , Amer. Math. Soc., Providence, R.I., 1980.
